This might help http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table
We certainly have a GPT partition of 15Tb but I know it can go much larger.
Phil.
Manish Kathuria wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does CentOS 5.4 support large ( > 2 TB) external storage devices using
> GPT (GUID Partition Tables), while the
Manish Kathuria wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Phil. I had seen that site before and I wanted to know the
> status on the current CentOS kernels. Are you running CentOS 5.x and
> using LVM for this partition or have you formatted it as ext3
> filesystem directly ?
>
> --
> Manish
> ___
On 22/09/10 11:39 AM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
> I have zoneminder 1.24.4 running under 5.5. The docs/support sucks. There is
> one comment you need to add to ./configure to get it to compile. It took me
> months to figure it out and find it on the zoneminder website.
>
> The best version was 1.23.3 b
On 22/09/10 2:39 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> We gave up on zoneminder and moved to motion, easy to build RPM's and
>> configure.
>>
>> http://www.lavrsen.dk/twiki/bin/view/Motion/WebHome
> Looks nice, I'll sub to that list but quick last question: After a read of
> the docs, I
> get the idea
- Original Message -
>
>> Did you consider opennms - and if so was there a reason for not using
>> it? It has some integration for provisioning, but I'm not exactly sure
>> how it works and the latest release made some changes.
>
> its on the list of things I want to get to one day, not
- Original Message -
> changed the timezone by copying the correct file to /etc/localtime,
> however something keeps changing it back. I'm not sure if this is a yum
> update or what. Without installing the graphical tools, how can I
> update the timezone in such a way that the /etc/l
Hi We use AoE disks for some of our systems. Currently, a 15.65Tb filesystem
we have is full, I then extended the LVM by a further 4Tb but resize4fs could
not handle a filesystem over 16Tb (CentOS 5.5). I then reduced the lvm by the
same amount, and attempted to create a new LV, but get this er
OK I believe I've resolved it. I knew I was in test mode, but wasn't
expecting those messages. Running the command out of test mode just works.
Should have tried that earlier, never mind I'll know next time.
Phil.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@ce
On 29/07/10 9:55 PM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to reorganise our IP management and I'd like to implement a slave
> DHCP server. Right now we assign IP addresses based on the
> ethernetadress of a client 1:1.
>
> The tutorial here [1] is simple and looks like the thing I
I gave up with the repo method and ended up building it from source. It
worked out a lot easier.
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 at 02:35 Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 18/07/2017 à 17:42, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit :
> > I'm reading through various HOWTOs and tutorials, and it seems like I'm
> > stuck very early
Hi,
If I run timemaster from systemd it fails with:-
Aug 02 06:07:41 machinename timemaster[19230]: [1494069.352] process 19231
started: /usr/sbin/chronyd -u chrony -n -f /var/run/timemaster/chrony.conf
Aug 02 06:07:41 machinename timemaster[19230]: [1494069.352] process 19232
started: /usr/sbin/
Prior to upgrading to CentOS 7.4 everything was fine, after upgrade I'm
seeing
/etc/keepalived# keepalived -f /etc/keepalived/keepalived.conf --dont-fork
--log-console --log-detail --dump-conf -m -v
Starting VRRP child process, pid=17224
Registering Kernel netlink reflector
Registering Kernel net
Hi,
If I disable ipv6 via the kernel command line, ipv6.disable=1, then
systemd-networkd fails to bring up any interfaces.
Removing the option and networking works as expected.
Phil.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/ma
Hi Clint,
systemd-networkd doesn't use those files at all.
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 at 13:55 Clint Dilks wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Phil Manuel wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > If I disable ipv6 via the kernel command line, ipv6.disable=1, then
> > sys
trying to turn off ipv6
> for a single nic as as outlined at
> https://coreos.com/os/docs/latest/network-config-with-networkd.html ?
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Phil Manuel wrote:
>
> > Hi Clint,
> >
> > systemd-networkd doesn't use tho
Sometimes we build kernels that need the minimal amount of functionality
that we can get away with, the environment this system is in an environment
that does not use, and won't use IPv6 for some time.
systemd-networkd has some nice features for setting link speed, renaming
interfaces etc, and so
You can get the Linux driver from
http://www.realtek.com/downloads/downloadsView.aspx?Langid=1&PNid=5&PFid=5&Level=5&Conn=4&DownTypeID=3&GetDown=false#RTL8111B/RTL8168B/RTL8111/RTL8168%3Cbr%3ERTL8111C/RTL8111CP/RTL8111D%28L%29%3Cbr%3ERTL8168C/RTL8111DP
if you can't find it under C7
Regards
On Fr
> On 13 Jul 2016, at 4:07 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> On 7/12/2016 10:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I'll mention it to my manager. However, much more important is finding
>> something that will tell me*which* drive in a RAID just failed so I can
>> replace it
>
> thats something thats
Hi,
I think it's related to either
TimeoutStopSec=0
TimeoutStartSec=0
You might want to check out these options for your service definition.
Phil.
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 at 03:21 Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:06:59PM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> >
> > Try this
> >
> ht
Hi,
I have a test system that booted fine using "Legacy Bios” mode and using the
following Kickstart snippet configured the disks correctly:-
# Clear the Master Boot Record
zerombr
# Partition clearing information
clearpart --all --initlabel
# Disk partitioning information
part raid.01 --fstype=
On Sun, 21 Aug 2016 at 12:51 Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 08/19/2016 11:35 PM, Phil Manuel wrote:
> > The install fails under UEFi due to the fact the partitions are not
> cleared, and it doesn’t have any space to continue. Is there an extra step
> I need to do to remove the orig
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 at 02:18 Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 08/21/2016 11:56 PM, Phil Manuel wrote:
> > part /boot/efi --fstype="efi" --size=200 --ondisk=sda
> > And I have tried the latter with location as mbr still fails
> > What am I missing ?
>
>
> I very
on=partition
--boot-drive=sda1
Still fails.
Thanks
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 at 02:07 Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 08/22/2016 11:31 PM, Phil Manuel wrote:
> > Should I need to change anything to this ?
>
>
> As far as I know, you shouldn't. If installation still fails, you'
> On 28 Aug 2016, at 10:04 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Gordon Messmer
> mailto:gordon.mess...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> On 08/25/2016 11:35 PM, Phil Manuel wrote:
>>>
>>> The relevant kickstart section is:-
>>>
&
Hi
I have a disk which two of the partitions are part of a RAID1 setup. I'm
trying to rename the the second raided partition
mdadm -E /dev/sdc4
/dev/sdc4:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.2
Feature Map : 0x1
Array UUID : 83d7657b:ebfddcb7:36b0fa14:d29a350c
Name :
Hi,
This page
http://www.pkje.net/meander/2014/07/27/centos-6-5-on-supermicro-hft-server/
detailed
how to add modules for C6, I imagine the process to be similar for C7
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 at 00:02 Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane,
JXVS wrote:
> > From: Locane [loc...@gmail.com]
> >
Latency over PCIe is an issue with the new Ryzen chips/motherboards, the
PCIe layout is different
https://community.amd.com/thread/214078
On Thu, 18 May 2017 at 08:55 Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 17/05/17 04:34, Eugene Poole wrote:
> > OK, AMD has announced it's new line of server and desktop pro
Hi,
At the time of testing support for the Ryzen CPU was added in February of
this year. This kernel was used for testing.and we usually build them as
rpm's.
Regards
Phil
On Thu, 18 May 2017 at 22:24 Eugene Poole wrote:
> I read somewhere that the PCIe issue is indicative of some other
> hard
28 matches
Mail list logo
