On Friday, January 28, 2011 07:51:53 pm Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Any idea for remote encrypted backup system? files must be encrypted
> on local side ? duplicity? any better ideas?
I use duplicity and like it.
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message par
entOS-5. yum
search/provides on the system itself is the way to go.
# yum provides libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
...
compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-138.i386 : Compatibility 2.96-RH standard C++
: libraries
Repo: base
Matched from:
Other : libstdc++-lib
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:28:56 pm Hal Davison wrote:
> On 2/3/2011 12:57 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> > On 02/03/11 9:43 AM, Hal Davison wrote:
...
> >> Attempting to run a database, PROGRESS,
> >>
> >> give the error:
> >> error wile loading shared libraries:
> >> libstdc++libc6.2.2.s
On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 03:49:51 pm Johnny H wrote:
> Dear Centos users,
> I am not sure if this the correct place to post but it seems sensible.
> I have an 8 node cluster which I want to install/configure Centos. As
> I am not a sys-admin, can anyone advise me on what I should do?
First th
On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 04:52:27 pm Johnny H wrote:
> Dear all,
> Thank you very much for your answers; am a little overwhelmed as I did
> not expect so many so fast. I will take a look at your suggestions and
> sites.
>
> The cluster is medium performance for something called bioinformatics
On Friday, March 04, 2011 10:18:53 am sync wrote:
> Hi , all :
>
>
> Sometimes my server network connection on Linux goes down with short
> message in syslog saying: "[localhost kernel] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0:
> transmit timed out" (or similar).
>
> By the way , I installed the CentOS 5.4 x86_64
On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 05:06:21 pm Riccardo Veraldi wrote:
> excuse me, could you be more helpful ?
> Actually I am not able to get any security update from CentOS 5.5 repo.
> Is there something I must change in the repo files ?
The kernel you're expecting is not an update for 5.5 but a part
On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 05:45:22 pm Mark Foster wrote:
> Hello, I was wondering why there haven't seemed to be any security
> updates for centos-5 since Jan 6. Per
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html there are a ton of
> outstanding issues.
> Thanks.
See the on-going threa
re anything else that could help me make a
> discrimination between this two?
> (these will be used in twin servers for a small (up to 24 nodes)
> parallel cluster)
> Thanks!
> Adrian
--
-= Peter Kjellström
-= National Supercomputer C
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 06:04:15 pm Lars Hecking wrote:
> Which version of the ixgbe driver is included in 5.6? I went through all
> the RHEL5 release notes, but they only ever state that the driver was
> updated, not which devices was added.
>
> This device is not supported up to CentOS 5.
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 07:07:59 pm Lars Hecking wrote:
> > This does not mean it's not supported it's just not in the pci-id
> > database.
> >
> > You could try to update just the pci-db with:
> > # update-pciids
>
> Cool!
>
> 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599EB 10 Gig
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 04:54:01 AM Ross Walker wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
...
> > As matter of interest, what hardware do you use? i.e. what CPU's, size
> > of RAM and RAID cards do you use on this size system?
> >
> > Everyone always recommends to use smaller
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 03:10:33 PM Lars Hecking wrote:
> > OTOH, gparted doesn't see my software raid array either. Gparted it
> > rather practical for regular plain vanilla partitions, but for more
> > advanced stuff and filesystems, fdisk is probably better.
>
> For filersystems > 2TB, you'
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 02:56:54 PM rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
...
> > Steve,
> > I'm managing machines with 30TB of storage for more then two years. And
> > with
> > good reporting and reaction we have never had to run fsck.
>
> That's not the issue.
> The issue is rebuild-time.
> The longe
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 09:29:29 AM Matthew Feinberg wrote:
> Thank you everyone for the advice and great information. From what I am
> gathering XFS is the way to go.
>
> A couple more questions.
> What partitioning utility is suggested? parted and fdisk do not seem to
> be doing the job.
M
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 04:13:19 PM Steve Brooks wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 03:10:33 PM Lars Hecking wrote:
> >>> OTOH, gparted doesn't see my software raid array either. Gparted it
> >>> rath
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 04:15:10 PM Sorin Srbu wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> >Behalf Of Peter Kjellström
> >Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 3:31 PM
> >To: centos@centos.org
>
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 04:54:34 PM Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:37:15 AM Christopher Chan wrote:
> > I used XFS extensively when I was running mail server farms for
> > the mail queue filesystem and I only remember one or two incidents when
> > the filesystem was marked r
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 05:26:41 PM Ross Walker wrote:
> 2011/4/14 Peter Kjellström :
...
> > While I do concede the obvious point regarding rebuild time (raid6 takes
> > from long to very long to rebuild) I'd like to point out:
> >
> > * If you do the mat
On Tuesday, April 19, 2011 02:07:04 AM Ron Blizzard wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote:
> > There is a known issue with one of the security updates on that
> > version of glibc.
> >
> > That said, it's still *highly* recommended that you update. There are
> > four CVEs c
On Monday, April 18, 2011 09:26:56 PM Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am getting:
>
> kernel panic unable to mount root fs on unknown block (0,0)
>
> This is just a normal box that I have use many a time to test install.
> Basic one disk SATA 160G. Been using it for at least a year.
>
> Is this that glibc
On Tuesday, April 19, 2011 03:56:41 PM Jerry Geis wrote:
> ok - so I am getting the kernel panic in my (kickstart PXE invironment).
> I have used this environment since cents 5.2
> The PXE starts up 5.6 gets installed that all works fine.
> then after it reboots I get the kernel panic cant mount ro
On Tuesday, April 19, 2011 05:06:49 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ron Blizzard wrote:
> > 2011/4/19 Peter Kjellström :
> >> On Tuesday, April 19, 2011 02:07:04 AM Ron Blizzard wrote:
> >>> For clarification, this bug is only known to be affecting Evolution
On Tuesday, April 19, 2011 05:26:18 PM Jerry Geis wrote:
> Jerry Geis wrote:
> > ok - so I am getting the kernel panic in my (kickstart PXE invironment).
> > I have used this environment since cents 5.2
> > The PXE starts up 5.6 gets installed that all works fine.
> > then after it reboots I get th
On Tuesday, April 19, 2011 05:45:15 PM Jerry Geis wrote:
> Ok - after further looking - I have found this in /root/install.log
>
> error: nash-5.1.19.6-68.el5_61: Header V3 DSA signature BAD, key ID
> e8562897
>
> I am using a local repo for installations:
Seems the installer fetched a broken pk
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:32:08 AM Eric Doutreleau wrote:
> yes indeed
> i look through the sources and the path is hardcoded
> it s really strange some packages for centos are built but obviously
> don't work.
You may want to take this up with the centalt people since it seems to be a
prob
On Saturday, May 07, 2011 09:35:48 PM Ali Ahsan wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have xeon server with 16 Gb Ram and no Swap memory.I am running
> cassandra server on two node in cluster.When there is high load on
> server kswapd0 kicks inn and take 100% cpu and make machine very slow
> and we need to restar
On Mon, 11 May 2020 12:40:15 +
Gestió Servidors wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My server is running kernel 3.10.0-1062.12.1 in a CentOS Linux
> release 7.7.1908. Since some weeks ago, server is restarting after
> XFS errors. Logs in /var/crash reported this information: [...]
...
> [443804.295922] blk_
On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:24:35 +0530
Harsh chopra wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am using Centos 7.8.2003 kernel 3.10
> . I was trying to build and install the latest linux stable kernel
> i.e. 5.7, I successfully did the process but accidentally messed it
> up by copying the .config file again in 5.7 ke
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:21:12 +0530
Sachchidanand Upadhyay via CentOS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While checking with df -h, it's showing the used space is 94% on
> root (/). If checked with du -sh, it's not showing the used space.
>
> # df -h
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> devtmpfs 7.8G
On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 21:46:19 +0800
Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> Subject: [Sharing] CentOS 8.2 (2004) Linux Server is Compatible with
> Dell PowerEdge R640 1U Server
This server should be fully ok to run RHEL8 and CentOS8. What exactly
goes wrong?
https://access.redhat.com/ecosyste
On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:59:42 +0800
Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> There are no issues so far.
Hahaha, I read _in_Compatible :-D
...generally nobody reports a server compatible.
/Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 14:46:30 +0100
Patrick Bégou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm deploying a CentOS8 (not stream 😁) cluster and I have a question
> about MTU on the interfaces. I have a connectX6 Mellanox interface
> where I need IBoIP setup.
> I've setup this interface via nmcli and set the MTU to 65520 w
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 23:33:56 +
lejeczek via CentOS wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> Hoping some net experts my stumble upon this message, I have
> an IPoIB direct host to host connection and:
...
> > $ iperf3 -c 10.5.5.97
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
> [ 5] 0.00-1
On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 01:48:13 PM Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 12:20 PM, John Doe wrote:
> > Guess this new ctrl does not use the cciss module anymore.
>
> If it's like a P410i like what I have it uses the hpsa driver.
HP is moving from the old cciss driver to the new hpsa driver. O
On Friday, January 27, 2012 04:40:09 PM Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have found a lot of discussions concerning the LSI Logic scsi driver.
>
> E.g.:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/26/335
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16547
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-list/2007-A
On Sunday 26 February 2012 19.59.07 Tomas Vondra wrote:
...
> i.e. about 200 MB of free memory, but apache fails because of segfaults
> when forking a child process:
>
> [16:49:51 2012] [error] (12)Cannot allocate memory: fork: Unable to
> fork new process
> [16:51:17
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 06.07.03 John Doe wrote:
> From: Volker Poplawski
>
> > The required xhci_hcd kernel module is not part of the 260 modules in
> > the initrd for some reason. Sony Memory-Stick is included, if you happen
> > to have one of these...
> > I was able to rebuild the initrd
On Sunday 04 March 2012 21.15.03 fred smith wrote:
> I'm trying to find out from which repo I got xiphos and its matching
> sword libraries from, and somehow am not finding it. hints, anyone?
>
> thanks!
On CentOS-6 you can use yumdb to get real data (saved explicitly when a pkg is
installed):
On Wednesday 07 March 2012 11.17.15 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Got a bunch of servers from Penguin. Supermicro m/b's H8QG6. We put a 3tb
> drive in for additional workspace for the users, and some of them won't
> read, others will go for weeks, then spit out DRDY errors. lshw shows the
> controller
On Friday 09 March 2012 08.44.53 Sorin Srbu wrote:
...
> What are some of the cases it would be practical/best to have it off?
>
> I know there might be some negative performance issues with certain
> applications, but would you notice it in day-to-day use?
Negative performance due to HT comes in
On Friday 29 October 2010 11:42:38 przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have CentOS ftp server (vsftpd) which has a lot of users who are writing
> and reading a lot of small files from/into its own accounts (and other
> servers - using samba client - are reading these files and putting them
>
On Wednesday 01 December 2010 20:12:18 Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hello listmates,
>
> As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with
> Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details:
>
> http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224
>
> So now my ques
On Thursday 02 December 2010 12:22:38 Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Thursday, December 02, 2010 06:53 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> > For completeness (since many previous posts have touched on this), we
> > don't use jumbo frames since we have no problem reaching wirespeed
On Thursday 02 December 2010 18:24:12 Alice Anderson wrote:
> I want to use systemtap on a 5.3 system but cannot find supporting
> kernel-PAE-debuginfo or kernel-debuginfo-common packages. Am I being a
> noob, or do these not exist for the PAE kernel?
Sometimes a specific package is missing but
On Friday 03 December 2010 13:55:28 Keith Roberts wrote:
> There was a similar thread about which is the best FS for
> Centos.
>
> I'm using ext3, and wondered if XFS would be more 'data
> safe' than ext3.
'data safe' is certainly not something easy to define. Short answer: no XFS is
not better
On Friday 03 December 2010 21:13:37 Keith Roberts wrote:
...
> Having made regular backups to the hard drive, I then as I
> feel is appropriate, make CD/DVD backups from the backup
> drive.
Just be careful with CD/DVDs since data quality and persistence over time is
questionable.
/Peter
> I've
On Thursday, December 16, 2010 11:45:36 pm Sean wrote:
> Hello Producers
>
> "Longevity of Support" is an attractive drawcard for CentOS if it means
> the exact opposite of Fedora's "short support cycle" that does not
> provide updating of infrastructural libraries for very long, libraries
> which
On Friday, December 17, 2010 08:44:46 am Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> actual Intel Ethernet cards PCI-E
> - Are normal recognized by Centos 5.5 Live CD
> - Not recognized by 5.2
> Because of vmware, I will use 5.2
It's not recommended to run CentOS-5.2 (many serious secu
On Friday, December 17, 2010 04:55:58 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 12/17/10 8:18 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> > Longevity (things continue to work without breakage for a long time):
> > This kind of implies "don't keep stuff continously updated to recent
> >
On Tuesday, December 21, 2010 09:57:52 pm Kevin C wrote:
> Yes,
Well "works for you" may be more correct then. Hard to call it "stable"
especially in the context of an enterprise dist when it's officially a
"technology preview".
/Peter
> We use it for 4 months on our backup server, we no issue
> isn't this entirely a problem caused by MBR?
No, this is a different matter.
> An (U)EFI-machine should be able to handle FS-sizes beyond these limits
> without any hassles. Can anyone confirm this?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
On Monday, January 10, 2011 08:50:18 pm Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
...
> [snip]
>
> > 01:00.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation Unknown device 0194 (rev 03)
>
> [snip]
>
> So no driver installed.. There's a link I found:
"Unknown device" from lspci does
. For example some raid controllers really prefer
noop.
Lastly, you didn't tell us if you're on i386-pae or x86_64 which may make a
big difference.
/Peter
> On 05/09/2011 06:01 PM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> > On Saturday, May 07, 2011 09:35:48 PM Ali Ahsan wrote:
> >>
On Thursday, June 02, 2011 08:34:26 PM Drew wrote:
> Have you also unmounted the filesystem on LogVol00?
There is no need to unmount the filesystem when increasing the size of the
underlying lv. In fact you can even grow the filesystem inside the lv
afterwards without unmounting it (resize2fs).
On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 09:00:48 PM mcclnx mcc wrote:
> We have DELL server with MD1000 Disk array in it. O.S. is CENTOS 5.5.
> Recently every time MD1000 "patrol read" start I will get "media error"
> messages on /var/log/message file.
>
> I use MD1000 "slow initialize" to initialize "bad d
On Thursday, July 07, 2011 03:57:04 PM Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> > On 07/06/11 5:40 PM, John J. Boyer wrote:
> >> When I first installed my CentOS system the machine had only 1 GB.
> >> the swap memory was set to 2 GB Now the machine has 4 GB but swap is
> >> sti
On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 04:54:21 AM Rogelio wrote:
> The free DHCP solution, ISC, seems to be having scaling issues (i.e.
> handling only about 200 DHCPDISCOVER and 20 DHCPRENEW requests), and I
> was wondering if anyone had any open source suggestions of solutions
> that could scale much bette
On Thursday, July 21, 2011 05:26:47 PM Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to build a redundant duo of firewalls/routers/gateways and I'm
> thinking about not putting any disks in them and instead using a usb-stick
> raid-1 as storage.
> Has anyone any experience with this? Since the ma
On Friday, August 05, 2011 04:28:20 PM Lars Hecking wrote:
> Lars Hecking writes:
> > > There are more than one NIC-model with 82599EB and evidently not all
> > > work with
> > >
> > > the CentOS driver. What we're using successfully is X520-DA2:
> > > Intel Corporation 82599EB 10-Gigabit Network
On Friday, August 05, 2011 05:25:13 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/5/2011 9:46 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> > Our X520 are still stable except for one recent problem, 2.6.18-238.9.1
> > -> 2.6.18-238.12.1 broke it quite bad. With 238.12.1 our servers start
> > dropping all
On Monday, August 22, 2011 12:10:07 PM Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a server which is really difficult to restart because
> of usage requirements
> and the fact that it's in a co-lo rack so miles away. I've added a
> couple of drives which
> I'd like to bring up and add to LVM bu
On Monday, August 22, 2011 01:36:11 PM Lisandro Grullon wrote:
> Dear List,
> I have been getting system crash, syslog is reporting the following in
> stdout...please advise.
Sure, please don't use "reply" when starting a new thread.
> Message from syslogd@saturn at Aug 21 03:38:08 ...
> kernel:
On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 12:11:51 PM Peter Kjellström wrote:
> On Friday, August 05, 2011 05:25:13 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> > On 8/5/2011 9:46 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> > > Our X520 are still stable except for one recent problem, 2.6.18-238.9.1
> > > -> 2.6.
On Thursday, August 25, 2011 09:17:39 PM John R Pierce wrote:
> On 08/25/11 12:09 PM, Mike VanHorn wrote:
> > I'm confused as to how to install updates for CentOS 5.6 without
> > upgrading to 6.0. When I do a "yum check-updates", the new *-release
> > packages for 6.0 are listed, so I don't think I
On Monday, August 29, 2011 12:12:03 PM ken wrote:
> On 08/28/2011 11:37 PM Always Learning wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 22:33 -0400, ken wrote:
> >> On 08/28/2011 09:17 PM Always Learning wrote:
...
> >> Well, since I've got two or three other machines I'm either upgrading or
> >> installing li
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 02:56:35 PM Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Hi everyone! :-)
>
> I just installed CentOS 6 on one of my desktop machines, and yum now
> tells me that some of my favorite apps are not present in any of the
> repositories I configured. To name a few: ktorrent, kile, krusader,
>
On Thursday, September 01, 2011 03:21:25 AM Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
> Good Evening All,
>
> I have a question regarding CentOS 6 server partitioning. Now I know
> there are a lot of different ways to partition the system and different
> opinions depending on the use of the server. I currently have
On Friday, September 09, 2011 12:54:51 AM Paras pradhan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a host which is connected to SAN via single Fibre channel HBA
> (qlogic). I have several LUNS assigned to this (sdc, sdd). I added
> another single port HBA to this host. I can now see two world wide
> names.
>
> Now
On Saturday, September 10, 2011 08:40:47 PM ken wrote:
> Where do I find a gnumeric rpm? I must not have enough repos listed.
> (I recently had to rebuild my system pretty much from scratch. :( )
EPEL is a widely used repo that carries gnumeric.
/Peter
signature.asc
Description: This is a dig
On Monday, September 12, 2011 06:00:32 PM Jon Detert wrote:
> i'm a newbie at building rpms. I made a few rpms years ago, but can't now
> make one on Centos 5.
>
> In /usr/local/rpmbuild, there are 5 subdirs: BUILD RPMS SOURCES SPECS
> SRPMS tmp
It's not a good idea to build rpms as root (u
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 11:20:57 AM John Doe wrote:
> From: Peter Kjellström
>
> > It's not a good idea to build rpms as root (unless in a throw-away vm).
> > Build as user or even better using mock.
>
> Am I missing something or building an rpm as a non-ro
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:22:46 -0600
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Red Hat's Security policy for Production 3 Phase of the Life Cycle for
> EL5 is that they will only release "Critical impact Security
> Advisories (RHSAs) and selected Urgent Priority Bug Fix Advisories
> (RHBAs) may be released as they be
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:41:58 +0200
Eero Volotinen wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202858
>
> affects also on centos?
Bugs in internal, non-released, rh packages don't really affect centos,
no.
/Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
Cent
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:48:14 +1200
Peter wrote:
> On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote:
> > Hi CentOS developers - I’ve been happily using CentOS for several
> > years now, so thanks for all the good work. In the last week,
> > however, I noticed that while the items in RHSA-2015:1443 ha
On Monday 25 February 2013 14:24:28 Gelen James wrote:
> 'rpm -V' can be misleading, if taking into account of prelink on
> Redhat/Centos Boxes which is running through cron by default. I've shown
> the steps on reverse the effect of prelink at the comments sections at
> link https://isc.sans.edu/d
821.ko
a1a9819138bada0a1a7d9c21c6458510 perf_event_blocker_35861.ko
05f0bfd3030db4d4f4deb0fdc71b7fa3 perf_event_blocker.stp
/Peter
--
-= Peter Kjellström
-= National Supercomputer Centre
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
C
On Monday 01 July 2013 20:21:41 natxo asenjo wrote:
> On 06/26/2013 10:29 PM, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote:
> > You need a license from HP to access your hard disks... Stupid, but
> > real...
>
> wow, just, wow. If this is true I will advise against buying any HP
> server kit whenever we need to buy n
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:15:11 -0500
Joakim Ziegler wrote:
...
> So, if I use iozone -a to test write speeds on the raw device, I get
> results in the 500-800MB/sec range, depending on write sizes, which
> is about what I'd expect.
>
> However, when I have an ext4 filesystem on this device, mounte
As it says, probably hardware problem (most often memory related).
I agree with Ilyas that you should query the management processor but
would like to add that the vendor specific log usually contains better
data than the IPMI standard SEL. Like for example the IML on HP/iLO.
/Peter K
On Mon, 13
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:22:04 -0400
Lamar Owen wrote:
...
> Now, I'm going to sound like a broken record here. If you absolutely
> positively must stay at a point release for whatever reason (and
> there are valid reasons for this), then you don't need to be running
> CentOS; it is simply not sup
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:33:27 -0500
Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am seeing this in dmesg on Dell Poweredge 860
>
>
> INFO: task tail:17872 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
It's a generic "something might be wrong" alert issued since (in this
case) a tail process blocked (on I/O) for more than 120s. I
On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:53:05 +0100
Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
...
> df shows 9.4 GB free, 198GB used.
>
> If I do "du -sch * | sort -h -r" on /, I just have close to 3.5GB
> used
Next thing to check is stuff hiding under mount points. That is for
example the /tmp directory on th
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 19:22:20 -0400
mark wrote:
> On 07/12/17 12:09, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 07/12/2017 07:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
...
> > NM tends to log fairly verbose information. It sounds like you've
> > looked at the network traffic. Have you looked at the logs on the
> > affe
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:01:07 -0400
Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 06:02:15PM +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > >
> > > The physicists and mathematicians who count there need high
> > > durations.
> >
> > Yes. I too run HPC clusters and I have had uptimes of over 1000
> > days -
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 18:46:14 +0100
lejeczek wrote:
> do we know if 7.4 is good for new AMD cpus?
> More specifically for virtualization. Historically there
> were some issues and things like AMD's IOMMU & similar were
> not exactly perfectly supported by HW vendors, UEFI/bios <=>
> kernel.
An
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:54:04 -0400
mark wrote:
> Hi, folks,
>
> So, I want to rebuild my "ancient" HP netbook, from the ancient
> ubuntu netbook remix. Is there an *ARM* .iso, or net install
> somewhere? I'm not finding it, googling. Lots of Raspberry Pi, but
Centos has two ARM efforts
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 17:07:31 + (UTC)
Chris Olson wrote:
> We have been fortunate to hang onto one of our summer interns
> for part time work on weekends during the current school year.
> One of the intern's jobs is to load documents and data which
> are then processed. The documents are .txt
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 17:02:08 +0100
hw wrote:
> Jonathan Billings writes:
>
> > On Oct 28, 2017, at 23:15, hw wrote:
> >>
> >> Jonathan Billings writes:
> >>
> On Oct 27, 2017, at 10:21, hw wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have the home directory of a user on an nfs serve
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:37:30 +0100
Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Spamassassin has been working nicely on my main server running CentOS
> 7 and Postfix. SELinux is activated (Enforcing).
>
> Since the most recent update (don't know if it's related to it though)
> I'm getting the following SELi
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 04:03:48 -0600
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 01/18/2018 03:41 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
> >
> >> Look at:
> >>
> >> https://t.co/6fT61xgtGH
> >>
> >> Get the latest microcode.dat file from here:
> >>
> >> https://t.co/zPwagbeJFY
> >>
> >> See how to update the microcode from the li
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 11:13:57 +
isdtor wrote:
> Does anyone know if Red Hat are working on backporting improved
> mitigation techniques and features from newer, 4.14.14+ kernels?
>
> $ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/*
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/meltdown:Mitigati
On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:02:59 +0800
Genghuang Wang wrote:
> Hello, CentOS team and everyone who cares about CentOS,
>
> Huawei release an Euler OS, which is an distribution based on CentOS.
> http://developer.huawei.com/ict/en/site-euleros/euleros-introduction
>
> According to CentOS's statement
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:31:20 +0800
Genghuang Wang wrote:
> Hello, Peter, thanks for your reply
>
> 1. Huawei DOES change the distribution EULA, if type in the following
> command: vi /usr/share/eula/eula.en_US
> you can see it changed to "HUAWEI EulerOS-2.0"
> which is a copyright one, let alone
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 17:27:51 +0800
Genghuang Wang wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have found the Docker images for the above-mentioned Euler OS.
>
> https://github.com/euleros/euleros-docker-images/blob/master/2.2/EulerOS-2.2.tar.xz
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Docker_(software)
>
> However, after ope
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 15:15:59 -0500
Jerry Geis wrote:
> I have two systems both running CentOS 7.4
>
> one shows pid_max as 32768
> the other shows pid_max as 49152
>
> Why might that be ? I would have thought they would be the same. I
> have not changed them.
I think that max is calculated as
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 13:07:12 +0100
hw wrote:
...
> So what do you really gain from selinux, and is that worthwhile all
> the trouble and the hours spent to fix the problems it creates? What
> about the impact on performance?
The main feature is that lots of software is indeed confined (even
tho
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:26:27 +0200
Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
...
> > > The src.rpm for that kernel is probably available somewhere.
> >
> > I'm fairly certain you cannot download the SRPM for EUS kernels.
> > You might if you're a Red Hat customer paying for that product (but
> > don't take my word
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:12:30 -0500
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On 06/14/18 10:00, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:26:27 +0200
> > Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> > ...
> >>>> The src.rpm for that kernel is probably available somewhere.
>
On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 12:59:09 +
James Pearson wrote:
> James Pearson wrote:
> >
> > I'm attempting to port an existing xinetd service from CentOS 6 to
> > something equivalent with systemd for CentOS 7
> >
> > The existing xinetd config uses the attributes 'only_from' to limit
> > connections
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
