Hi,
Just wondering if anyone else was trying to get Centos 5.2 onto an EeePC
1000H?
My EeePC came with XP, and I planned to put Centos on it in a dual-boot
config. I've been struggling with this for a few evenings now, with some
success (the wired ethernet is atl1e (gigabit rather than 10/100) -
In my efforts to get the sound hardware working, I eventually decided to
try the latest vanilla kernel (2.6.27-rc6). I had a bit of a battle to
get it to work (it kept detecting the SATA disk as standard IDE, so
blocking the SATA drivers, and making the system run like a dog: I
finally fixed this b
On what topic specifically do you need advice?
On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 11:24 +0800, Martin Zhou wrote:
> * Hi, I am Martin, coming from the east of china, is a novice for
> Linux. Kindly give me your advice. Thanks.
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
On Sat, 2016-01-23 at 20:27 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:05:02 -0500
> Mark LaPierre wrote:
>
> > The main reason I'm still using, nearly obsolete, CentOS 6 is because I
> > don't want to have to deal with Gnome 3.
>
> Install Mate on Centos 7 and you never have to touch Gnome
On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 12:01 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> Well, there is Linux distribution which is systemd-free. And that
> distribution I predict will live for decently long time. It is "Devuan" -
> a fork of Debian, stripped off systemd and friends... well, I should have
> said: composed witho
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 08:05 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Peter Duffy said:
> > The thing which always gets me about systemd is not the thing itself,
> > but the way it was rolled out. When I first installed Red Hat 7, if a
> > window had appeared telling
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:53 +, Richard Mann wrote:
> >
> > Complaining on the CentOS list is probably not that productive, though.
> >
>
> +1. To be constructive, the criticism would need to be done ELSEWHERE. On
> this list, it is just whining.
It's not complaining. It's discussion.
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 11:57 +, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Peter Duffy wrote:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/systemd#Why_Debian_should_default_to_systemd
>
Might be more convincing if they stuck to reasoned argument, rather than
propaganda.
The only web editor out of which I've ever got any mileage at all was
bluegriffon - but the only time I've tried it was about 5 years ago, when it
was both fully free and quite unstable (it was undergoing a lot of development
work.) It's not fully free now, and it remains to be seen how stable
9 matches
Mail list logo
