Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

2017-04-10 Thread Pete Orrall
running SystemD for a while now honestly I don't mind it. While the language used (units, targets) is confusing and documentation could be better, there are some things I like about it more than SysVInit. -- Pete Orrall p...@cs1x.com www.peteorrall.com "If there

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

2017-04-11 Thread Pete Orrall
SystemD but Fedora/RHEL has changed the way they handle some things. NICs, for instance, are no longer named after the device number (eth0, eth1, eth2, etc.) but after the *driver* name. Yes, it's a change but it also makes sense. IIRC this is how FreeBSD handles NIC names. -- Pete Orrall

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

2017-04-11 Thread Pete Orrall
orking_Guide/ch-Consistent_Network_Device_Naming.html#sec-Naming_Schemes_Hierarchy Thanks for the clarification, John. I will check this out. -- Pete Orrall p...@cs1x.com www.peteorrall.com "If there isn't a way, I'll make one." ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@

Re: [CentOS] Pulseaudio

2017-04-17 Thread Pete Orrall
t; This is C7 latest and greatest. > Any ideas??? Hi Adrian, Could you provide more information? What are you trying to do? Is this a new system? What software and hardware are you using? Thanks and I look forward to hearing from you. -- Pete Orrall p...@cs1x.com www.peteorrall.com "If