On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 20:17 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Alice Wonder said:
> > I need a low profile PCI-E card that allows for up to 2 M.2 SSD
> > drives that is known to work with the stock kernel in CentOS 7.
> >
> > Can anyone recommend one?
>
> I can't recommend a specific
> I must admit that I skipped through the first and second stages - I
> never found creating init scripts a joy and instead opted to write my
> own scripts that I launched via inittab. As such, I welcomed the
> simplicity systemd's service files without fuss.
>
> So, at which stage are you in
> I just read through this thread, and I must say I'm a bit worried, to
> the point that I'm asking myself: is CentOS still as reliable as it was?
Yes.
> This is not a rhetorical question, but a real one. On my Slackware
> servers, I'm hosting a few dozen websites, various platforms for schools
>
> Years uptime, wow! What do you do when security update for kernel or glibc
> is released? These come as often as once every 45 days in my observation.
>
They're non-exposed hosts doing very specific things - think internal
network with an air-gap to the internet.
P.
>We've been using pxeboot to pull up a menu, to build or rebuild
> machines for years. We have this new server, and it fails. Times out.
> What's happening is that it tries in this order
> .../pxelinux.cfg/b8945908-d6a6-41a9-611d-74a6ab80b83d
> .../pxelinux.cfg/01-88-99-aa-bb-cc-
> > > .../pxelinux.cfg/b8945908-d6a6-41a9-611d-74a6ab80b83d
> > > .../pxelinux.cfg/01-88-99-aa-bb-cc-dd
> > > .../pxelinux.cfg/C0A8025B
> > > .../pxelinux.cfg/C0A8025
> > > .../pxelinux.cfg/C0A802
> > > .../pxelinux.cfg/C0A80
> > > .../pxelinux.cfg/C0A8
> > > .../pxelinux.cfg
Not wishing to extend this thread further, but ...
> There are conspiracy theories out there that the NSA is involved with
> bringing systemd to Linux so they can have easy access to *"unknown"*
> bugs - aka backdoors - to all Linux installations using systemd *[1]*.
They're conspiracy theori
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 06:53 -0400, ken wrote:
> On 04/15/2017 04:46 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > Not wishing to extend this thread further, but ...
> >
> > > There are conspiracy theories out there that the NSA is involved with
> > > bringing systemd to Linu
> Indeed. I think the assertion "OSS is somehow safer because of community
> audit" is a logical fallacy. How would one go about "auditing" in the first
> place?
There are tools to audit source code for problems - OSS is safer
*because* the source is available and can be audited.
> Even if the
>
> Think about what that would take in terms of man hours to accomplish
> moving from EL6 to 7. And moving from 5 to 6 was not much better.
> This is just too expensive to repeat every three years.
So why do it? There is absolutely nothing wrong with sticking with EL6
for a long time, certain
On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 12:23 -0400, Larry Martell wrote:
> I am trying to find out what version of CentOS is running at a
> customer site, but I do not have remote access and there is no one
> there to run anything for me. But I do have a dmesg output and I see
> this:
>
> Linux version 3.10.0-327.
On Sat, 2017-04-29 at 08:50 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> about 4 years ago, I tried to install CentOS 6 on a Supermicro server
> with SCSI drives using a LSI raid system. I could never figure out or
> find a way to make the installation disc of Centos 6 identify the SCSI
> drive
On Sat, 2017-04-29 at 15:43 +, Beartooth wrote:
> My wife bought a new Thinkpad, on which we had the shop install
> CentOS 7 (I *think* it's 7.3.) Alas!, I didn't think to specify NOT Gnome,
> in thunder. So of course I got it.
>
> I've tried several times to force myself to acc
>
> kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#5 stuck for 67s! [khungtaskd]
> kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7 stuck for 67s! [khugepaged]
>
> These messages started appearing today around 7 AM, which is when
> users started reporting the slowdown. They are still occurring
> periodically and the system is
On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 13:06 +0200, vychytraly . wrote:
> And I got these errors: can't link /lib64/libSsl.so>10 to libssl.so.10 and
> can't create temporary cache file /etc/ld.so.cache~: Permission denied
sudo ldconfig
And if the error persists check that there's nothing wrong with your
filesyste
301 - 315 of 315 matches
Mail list logo
