Re: [CentOS] subscription of Cent - OS newletter

2015-01-04 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 04/01/15 01:16 AM, Bijesh Maskey wrote: >> >> Dear Sir/ Ma'am >> i would like to suscribe to the cenos newletter its update and patches >> release thanks regards >> b > > > If you visit this page: > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo > >

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-01-30 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: > > There is some complaining going on on the Fedora testing list, > not sure where else one can protest. > The thread starts here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2015-January/124827.html ___

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-02 Thread PatrickD Garvey
OK, folks. You're doing a great job of describing the current milieu with a rough description of some best practices. Now how about some specific sources you personally used to learn your craft that we can use likewise? PatrickD ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-02 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 18:34 -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > >> OK, folks. You're doing a great job of describing the current milieu >> with a rough description of some best practices. >> >> N

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-02 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2015-02-03, Always Learning wrote: >> >> Perhaps a topic for the Centos Wiki entitled Basic Security on Your New >> Machine ? > > As long as someone qualified is writing and reviewing this wiki page. > > --keith I thought the Open Source b

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-02 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: > On 3 February 2015 at 13:34, PatrickD Garvey > wrote: >> Now how about some specific sources you personally used to learn your >> craft that we can use likewise? > > So many places it makes my brain hurt just th

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-03 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 20:26 -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >> >> The CentOS wiki pages found by a title page search are: >> http://wiki.centos.org/HelpOnConfiguration/SecurityPolicy >> http://wiki.cent

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-03 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Valeri Galtsev > wrote: >> Perhaps the Simplified Linux Server Special Interest Group http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SLS could benefit from contributions from each of you?

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-03 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 11:21 -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > >> I would love to review the improvements you may make to any page of the wiki. > > Post the URL of your page. > http://wiki.c

Re: [CentOS] lost at 'repository' entry installing centos7

2015-02-06 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Ted Miller wrote: > On 02/05/2015 01:03 PM, g wrote: >> >> >> On 02/02/2015 02:15 PM, Tim wrote: >>> >>> Am 1. Februar 2015 21:30:52 MEZ, schrieb g : greetings. while attempting to install c7, i got lost at 'repository' entry. i cancele

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 07:06:11PM +, Always Learning wrote: >> The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the PDF >> shows every page appears to be readable. 11 pages devoted to BASH. >> Information on other in

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:12 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/9/2015 11:06 AM, Always Learning wrote: >> >> The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the PDF >> shows every page appears to be readable. 11 pages devoted to BASH. >> Information on other interesting topics too.

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Valeri Galtsev > wrote: >> > >> Still, there are many knowledgeable people on the list, they may give >> different recommendation, which will create some pool of choices. I asked >> John and Jonathan, I'd like t

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: > On 10 February 2015 at 10:08, Kahlil Hodgson > wrote: >> I think you can simply submit a bug report under fedora documentation. > > Via bugzilla: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora%20Documentation >

Re: [CentOS] Recommendations for good CentOS 7 documentation

2015-02-09 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Le 09/02/2015 23:01, Eero Volotinen a écrit : >> >> How about redhat documentation? > > > Yes, it's OK too. I didn't ask about all the existing documentation out > there. I was just curious about any specific recommendations you can make, > good

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-02-09 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: > On 10 February 2015 at 10:15, PatrickD Garvey > wrote: >> Please allow me to make sure I am perceiving this correctly, >> reports of errors found in RedHat documentation are to be reported >> against the Fedora Do

Re: [CentOS] Securing SSH wiki article outdated

2015-02-13 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 02/13/2015 05:41 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > This is also why the Orange Book and its Rainbow kin exist (Orange Book = > 5200.28-STD, aka DoD Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria). > Should anyone care to learn from the Rainbow Books

Re: [CentOS] C5 BASH IF

2015-02-14 Thread PatrickD Garvey
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Nichols > wrote: >> >>> But it is not 'just' expansions. You need to know the full order of >>> operations with all the steps - word splitting, quote removal, i/o >>> redirection, groupings, etc., so