Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

Amos Shapira wrote: > 2009/1/22 Ian Forde : > >> same network as the Linux hosts, that should take care of the sweet spot >> of the AV argument. (Though if you're connected to a site via VPN or >> private link that has Windows boxes, that may be a different story.) > > Rightso. You reminded me -

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.3 released

Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Tim Verhoeven wrote: >> But I'm wondering where we need to put it ? I was thinking in either >> the general CentOS FAQ or in the CentOS 5 FAQ ? Anyone can think of a >> better place ? > > I don't think people will find that when it's put in the FAQ, especially > if work is

Re: [CentOS] Completeley disabling SELinux?

Kevin Thorpe wrote: > Hi all, > I've set SELinux to disabled using the security and firewall > widget but I'm still getting a lot of messages in Logwatch > > NULL security context for user, but SELinux in permissive mode, continuing () > > So it looks like SELinux is still operati

Re: [CentOS] Problem compiling cairo-dock under CentOS 5.2

William L. Maltby wrote: > On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 23:14 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote: >> > >> To partially answer my own question, it appears that g_timeout_add_seconds >> was >> introduced in glib2 library, starting from version 2.14, while my current >> CentOS installation has version 2.12.3-

Re: [CentOS] postfix startup issue - CentOS 5.2

Tom Brown wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to get postfix going on a friends VPS however after > installing on startup i see this > > > # uname -i > Linux 2.6.18-028stab059.6 #1 SMP Fri Nov 14 14:01:22 MSK 2008 i686 i686 > i386 GNU/Linux > That's not a CentOS kernel. > # cat /etc/redhat-relea

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade to 5.3?

Barry Brimer wrote: >> I'm not that up on CentOS so I'd be curious to know if it is possible >> to upgrade CentOS 5.2 to 5.3 without reinstalling? Perhaps via Yum? Or >> can you get update RPMs? > > Once CentOS 5.3 is released, you can just type "yum upgrade" and you will > be upgraded from CentO

Re: [CentOS] unsubscribe

cent osserver wrote: > > Wow - so you are an ICT director? > Amazing that you could be a dickhead in SO MANY WAYS in ONE EMAIL! > > #1 - sending HTML email to a List that doesn't allow it > > #2 - Sending an unsubscribe message to an email address that > doesn't do anything with them when the i

Re: [CentOS] New user

kmadananteshwar.vb...@gmail.com wrote: > Hey everybody! > I am a new linux user who's just migrated to linux from windows vista and I > also happen to be a desktop user and I've been using linux for hardly a week > and so it would be very helpful if you guys could give me a few links and/or > a

Re: [CentOS] sound problem

Paolo Supino wrote: > Hi > > I have CentOS 5.2 installed on a computer (the same one that I just posted > a message on: Intel DG33BU motherboard) and for even though audio is > reported to be found and working Linux just doesn't play anything through > the speakers. The computer dual boots Linux

Re: [CentOS] sound problem

Paolo Supino wrote: > Hi > > I can't wait until CentOS 5.3 is released :-( The bigger issue is that I > also have windows xp running as a guest inside a vmware server (version 2) > and since vmware doesn't discover the audio devices properlly (because linux > claims to not have them), there's no

Re: [CentOS] new user - with questions

Michael Klinosky wrote: > Hello. > I've been using Fedora since about the FC6 era, for home use. I don't > like the 6 month upgrade (or re-install) concept, and I don't need the > latest & greatest versions of apps. So, CentOS sounds enticing. > A lot of desktop users come to CentOS for exactly t

Re: [CentOS] xulrunner dependancy problem

listmail wrote: > Hi, > > Is anyone else noticing a problem updating Firefox and its dependencies? > > It appears that xulrunner-devel 1.9.0.6-1.el5 wants xulrunner 1.9.0.5-1.el5, > but "this is not available". Following is the output from Yum when I attempt > to update Firefox on CentOS 5.2 X86_

Re: [CentOS] Easiest way to get samba up and working for Windows users?

Noob Centos Admin wrote: > > So far I've tried the following which all don't quite work. > > 1. CentOS's samba configuration tool > - added users never show up on the share configuration so the only shares it > could create was for public access. > The samba configuration tool (system-config-sa

Re: [CentOS] Easiest way to get samba up and working for Window users?

Noob Centos Admin wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Ned Slider wrote: > > >> The samba configuration tool (system-config-samba) is finally fixed in >> 5.3 (due out soon) and will now correctly show added samba users :-) >> > > Honestly, I'm so gla

Re: [CentOS] iptables rules to limit attack

chloe K wrote: > Hi all > > ks there iptables rules to limit attack? > > Thank you > There are examples using the recent and limit modules on the Wiki (Securing SSH page): http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/SecuringSSH#head-a296ec93e31637aa349538be07b37f67d836688a It should be e

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 - latest rpms for mailcanner , clamav and spamassassin

Linux Advocate wrote: > Guys, > > What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin? > RPMforge has clamav and spamassassin, but not mailscanner. Mailscanner has RPMs available on their site. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http:/

Re: [CentOS] Postfix smtp_recipient_restrictions causing mail to fail

Logan Moore wrote: > Logan Moore wrote: Can anybody see where I've gone wrong. I can't fathom why this would block all incoming emails from the web. smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_invalid_h

Re: [CentOS] pop3 attack

James Pifer wrote: >> The masquerading options are for a different purpose. >> I'm glad you got it sorted out. > > > Although I'm able to send mail to most people without a problem using > smarthost, I still have a few that bounce back with errors like: > Your message was rejected by mail.lance.c

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - different context on subdirectories

Marcus Moeller wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created a directory /srv with the following SELinux context: > > system_u:object_r:var_t > > Now I want to create a subdirectory within /srv which should get a > different context. So I tried to set e.g.: > > semanage fcontext -a -t samba_share_t /srv

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - different context on subdirectories

Ned Slider wrote: > Marcus Moeller wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have created a directory /srv with the following SELinux context: >> >> system_u:object_r:var_t >> >> Now I want to create a subdirectory within /srv which should get a >> differe

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - different context on subdirectories

Marcus Moeller wrote: > Dear Ned. > >> You may also need to manually change the context first: >> >> chcon -v --type=samba_share_t /srv/samba > > chcon did the trick. > > Thanks a lot > Marcus semanage will make the changes persistent through a complete filesystem relabel (chcon will persist t

Re: [CentOS] How to add ClamAV to Postfix?

Xn Nooby wrote: > I sent this email to the Rehdat list, but I thought the Centos users > might be more inclined to have the command-line solution I am looking > for, so I thought I would post it here too: > > I would like to add anti-virus to my email server. Currently I have > Postfix, Dovecot, P

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade

Thomas Dukes wrote: > Hello, > > Just did yum update. There were numerous packages to be updated. I get > this is the newest release of Centos. > > The update bombed stating I need nss-3.12.2.0-2.el5. I did a rpm -q nss and > nss-3.12.2.0-4.el5 is install in Cento 5.2. > > What's up with that

Re: [CentOS] Where's v5.3 source RPMs?

David Hrbáč wrote: > Ralph Angenendt napsal(a): >> Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating >> their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the >> SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors. >> >> Regards, > > Ralph, > I don´t like this solution. When

Re: [CentOS] Centos Forum is down??

rock wrote: > Hi, > > I have joined the Centos forum a few days ago and still do not have my > activation email. > > My user name and email address is in there but I cannot do anything > until I activate. > I have left a message with the webmaster and I have requested a lost > password, but

Re: [CentOS] Centos Forum is down??

Ned Slider wrote: > rock wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have joined the Centos forum a few days ago and still do not have my >> activation email. >> >> My user name and email address is in there but I cannot do anything >> until I activate. >>

Re: [CentOS] Centos Forum is down??

rock wrote: > Ned Slider wrote: >> OK, looks like I found you and have activated your account. Would you >> please now try to log in. >> >> Thanks. >> > > Thank you Ned!! > > Did that and all is A okay now. > > oz :-) > Great :-)

Re: [CentOS] Clamd and Amavis

Anne Wilson wrote: > I'm trying to get amavis to play using clamd and tried to follow this: > > # ### http://www.clamav.net/ > ['ClamAV-clamd', >\&ask_daemon, ["CONTSCAN {}\n", "/var/run/clamav/clamd"], >qr/\bOK$/, qr/\bFOUND$/, >qr/^.*?: (?!Infected Archive)(.*) FOUND$/ ], > # # NOTE

Re: [CentOS] Clamd and Amavis

Anne Wilson wrote: > On Monday 13 April 2009 12:31:15 Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> Anne Wilson wrote on Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:00:40 +0100: >>> I came unstuck with the instruction regarding the LocalSocket. If I >>> change that in clamd.conf to $MYHOME/amavisd.sock or $MYHOME/clamd the >>> clamd service wo

Re: [CentOS] Clamd and Amavis

Anne Wilson wrote: > For heavens' sake! Both, please, if the issue is now resolved, take the bickering off list if you feel the need to continue. Some of us have to pay for our bandwidth and I don't really want to pay to continue reading this. Thanks.

Re: [CentOS] E-Mail Serving Options

dnk wrote: > > > > > On 27-Apr-09, at 8:41 AM, Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> What are my e-mail serving options? I need to host POP, IMAP and SMTP. >> I must admit that non-windows e-mail hosting has always been a chore >> for me. I remember QMail and QPopper IIRC. >> >> -

Re: [CentOS] Defaults of CentOS Install not working with SELinux

Dan Roberts wrote: > Ok, but how? > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Hardening

Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle > wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> What tips does everyone have on hardening a CenOS Server that is >> running web, e-mail, ssh, ftp, mysql, coldfusion and will be >> processing payments from www? > > NSA hardening gui

Re: [CentOS] Postfix Questions

Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote: > Hi All, > > I am working on setting up Postfix and I have a few questions: > > 1. mynetworks = Do I put my public static IP here? So I am hosting at > another provider on my own dedicated hardware. Do I put that machines > IP or the IP of my apartment where

Re: [CentOS] how to find out dependencies

Jerry Geis wrote: > At install I had Gnome and Not KDE. > > doing rpm -qa | grep qt results in > qt-3.3.6-23.el5 > qt4-4.2.1-1 > > How can I find out what package loaded the qt4 and qt? > Easy way... 'yum erase qt4' and see what deps yum would like to remove. For example: # yum erase qt4 Load

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6/CentOS

On 11/05/11 19:01, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 5/11/2011 12:32 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: >> Hello Steve, >> >> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: >>> On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: >>>I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0. >>> >>>

Re: [CentOS] issue with fail2ban letting IP's through

On 16/05/11 19:16, David Mehler wrote: > Hello, > I'm using fail2ban to block bots in conjunction with existing iptables > rules. Here's a few rules from my iptables configuration: > > # > # Set up a temporary pass rule so we don't lock ourselves out when > #doing remote ssh > iptables -P INPUT ACC

Re: [CentOS] securing sshd with selinux

On 17/05/11 14:00, Hajo Locke wrote: > Hello List, > > dont have experience with selinux, but i want to know if it would be a > practicable way to secure sshd with selinux. sshd runs unconfined, at least on el5: $ ps Zax | grep sshd system_u:system_r:unconfined_t:SystemLow-SystemHigh 2918 ? Ss

Re: [CentOS] Creating a Centos endorsed 3rd part repo

On 20/05/11 13:31, Keith Roberts wrote: > Hi all. > > I'd like to put together a small repo for Centos packages > that I build on my machine, and make them available for > other Centos users. > > Are there any guidlines for creating an officially endorsed > Centos 3rd party repo please? > > Kind Re

Re: [CentOS] Creating a Centos endorsed 3rd part repo

On 20/05/11 15:57, Keith Roberts wrote: > On Fri, 20 May 2011, Bowie Bailey wrote: > >> To: centos@centos.org >> From: Bowie Bailey >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Creating a Centos endorsed 3rd part repo >> >> On 5/20/2011 10:15 AM, John Hodrien wrote: >>> On Fri, 20 May 2011, Keith Roberts wrote: >>> >>

Re: [CentOS] Shared object packaging in rpm

On 25/06/11 02:15, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I whipped up a quick spec to package Zenoss' wmi client and noticed it > creates a > libasync_wmi_lib.so.0 and libasync_wmi_lib.so.0.0.1 that their python script > would > otherwise copy during its install routine (obviously I wrote a native rpm > sec

Re: [CentOS] Shared object packaging in rpm

On 25/06/11 10:04, Ned Slider wrote: > On 25/06/11 02:15, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> I whipped up a quick spec to package Zenoss' wmi client and noticed it >> creates a >> libasync_wmi_lib.so.0 and libasync_wmi_lib.so.0.0.1 that their python script >> would >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 supported hardware

On 05/07/11 10:09, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Mark Weaver wrote: >> On 7/4/2011 10:41 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:30:08PM -0400, Mark Weaver wrote: Has anyone seen a supported hardware list on CentOS 6? I've been looking around for the last few days; even loo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 supported hardware

On 06/07/11 13:32, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 06:19:58 PM Ned Slider wrote: >> On 05/07/11 10:09, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >>> Broadcom has license restrictions so even ElRepo guys wont create rpms, >>> but there is howto, even for CentOS 5: >&g

Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor

On 09/07/11 19:09, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Digimer wrote: >> I think there is a business case to be made for CentOS, from the point >> of view of Red Hat. My experience has been that a lot of >> people/companies start out on CentOS. After a while, those that succeed >> and do well eventually w

Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor

On 09/07/11 19:35, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Ned Slider wrote: >> On 09/07/11 19:09, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >>> My view is that problem arose when Oracle came into picture. They are >>> aggressively steeling Red Hat customers using Rad Hat EL source. >>&g

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED]--Re: centos 6 (what else? :) :)

On 11/07/11 03:28, fred smith wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:01:14PM -0400, fred smith wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> My thanks to the Centos team for continuing to slave away on C6 >> even with all the distractions!!! >> >> Just did a test install on my eeepc 901 (on an external drive, til I'm >> co

Re: [CentOS] EL4 and spamassassin info

On 12/07/11 15:56, R - elists wrote: > > greetings, > > have been google foo for week or so. > > used to be super easy to upgrade spamassassin on CentOS dist. > > just grab the tarball and put in right spot and > > rpmbuild -tb spamassassin-3.somethingsomething.tar.gz > > then rpm or yum install an

Re: [CentOS] Effecting CentOS change

On 13/07/11 21:46, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 7/13/2011 3:17 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: >> CentOS has a clear mission. It's the first paragraph on the centos.org >> home page: >> >> CentOS is an Enterprise-class Linux Distribution derived from >> sources freely provided to the public by a pro

Re: [CentOS] nouveau driver one centos 6

On 21/07/11 13:08, Jerry Geis wrote: > I "wish" to not load the or even install the nouveau driver by default. > I want to use the NVIDIA binary driver. > > I have tried a number of things: > > 1) in my kickstart package section add the line: > -xorg-x11-drv-nouveau > > This did not work - it was s

Re: [CentOS] Updated Kernel sensors modules

On 25/07/11 17:04, Dejan wrote: > Last week I upgraded my box to CentOS 6 and I'm very impressed so far with it. > > The only small issue so far is that it doesn't seem to recognize the > new Sandy Bridge Core i5 CPU that I have and you can't monitor its > temperature. > > I recompiled the latest c

Re: [CentOS] Intel HD graphics & CentOS 6: Error inserting i915

On 30/07/11 14:40, Timo Neuvonen wrote: > I installed CentOS 6 to Acer 7750 laptop, which has Intel Sandybridge CPU > ( i5-2410M) with integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000. > > By default X won't use intel driver for graphics, but vesa instead, which > limits the resolution to 1024x768. I tried to for

Re: [CentOS] perl-Nagios-Plugin-0.35-1.el5.rf.noarch from rpmforge: dependency problem

On 31/07/11 18:51, Dirk wrote: > Hi folks, > > I hope this is the right mailing list to ask since on the repoforge > website there is no list or contact information. > > I have a problem with updating the perl-Nagios-Plugin package. I have > installed perl-Nagios-Plugin-0.33-1.el6.rf.noarch, and ru

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 driver support

On 01/08/11 03:05, Nguyen Vu Hung (VNC) wrote: > Hello all, > > This is the laptop I own: > HP Pavilion dv6t Quad Edition > Spec: Intel Core i7-2630QM 2.0GHz, 6GB RAM, 750GB HDD, VGA ATI Radeon HD > 6490M > > You can also check the spec here: > http://www.amazon.com/HP-Pavilion-dv6t-dv6tqe-Laptop/d

Re: [CentOS] RedHat to CentOS packages

On 01/08/11 17:10, Gabriel Tabares wrote: > Dear all, > > We're trying to use Nessus to monitor our system and we're having a hard > time mapping the package versions from RedHat to CentOS in order to be > able to report against CVE (vulnerability reports). > > After some research, we think that th

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, Postfix Dovecot

On 03/08/11 17:28, John Hinton wrote: > I only have one Postfix server running at the moment and have some > questions. On that install, I did Amavisd-new with ClamAV, SpamAssassin, > Postfix and Dovecot. > > I know this is a bit off topic, but I'm really hoping for performance > guidance. > > Is t

Re: [CentOS] OT?

On 09/08/11 05:33, Dave Stevens wrote: > I have a CentOS server with postfix running. A pop user's account was > compromised and a lot of spam started being sent. My upstream ISP's > mail program started refusing to talk to me because of the very high > rate of mail, error 451. I disabled the compr

Re: [CentOS] rsync CR upgrade

On 23/08/11 12:35, Michael Simpson wrote: > Hello > > Is anyone else having problems on 5.6 using the new rsync from the CR repo > I have only managed to get rsync (called from the cli) working again > after downgrading it to the previous 2.x release as the newer version > was just spitting out the

Re: [CentOS] Apache warns Web server admins of DoS attack tool

On 29/08/11 21:11, Les Mikesell wrote: > > Clicking on the first one of those gave me a 'you do not have > permission to access this forum' error, which might mean someone > removed it after the rss entry was picked up, but still not a great > user experience. > Yes, that was spam and was removed

Re: [CentOS] selinux & iptables

On 30/08/11 20:08, Michael D. Berger wrote: > In setting up my new CentOS 6 laptop, I replaced > /etc/sysconfig/iptables with my own, very restrictive > version. I then tried to restart the iptables daemon, > but it reported that my new iptables was unreadable. > On a guess, I disabled selinux, an

Re: [CentOS] Error installing latest CentOS kernel from %post section of kickstart

On 31/08/11 17:12, Alfred von Campe wrote: > I'm running the command "yum -y update" from a script called from the the > post section of my kickstart config file, and I get the following error: > > Installing : kernel-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.i686 > 185/378 > grubby fatal

Re: [CentOS] Centos VPS Kernel 2.6.35.4 & 'string-less' IP tables

On 01/09/11 00:28, Always Learning wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:11 -0700, Craig White wrote: >> More to the point, he disables SELinux and then spends hours trying to >> improve security. > > Tell the world the ENTIRE story. > > Disabled it because things would not run. Said publicly in the

Re: [CentOS] hfsplus.ko

On 01/09/11 21:27, Jerry Geis wrote: >Hey on Centos 5 hfsplus.ko is part of the Kernel: > > kernel-2.6.18-238.12.1.el5.x86_64 : The Linux kernel (the core of the > Linux operating system) > Repo: installed > Matched from: > Filename: /lib/modules/2.6.18-238.12.1.el5/kernel/fs/hfsplu

Re: [CentOS] hfsplus.ko

On 01/09/11 22:05, Jerry Geis wrote: >I'm not all that excited about using another repo. > > I changed the makefile to: > obj-m += hfsplus.o > > > I extracted the source for 2.6.32.46 and found the fs/hfsplus directory. > The above files are present. I changed the makefile to the above. > >

Re: [CentOS] dealing with spoofing

On 01/09/11 22:10, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:43 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: > >> I get TONS of spam with legitimate DKIM signatures... > > How is that possible ? > Because spammers know how to sign their email with DKIM signatures too, same as spammers can set an SPF recor

Re: [CentOS] New wireless controller

On 02/09/11 04:54, Emmett Culley wrote: > I just installed an Asus PCE-n13 wireless card into one of my CentOS 5.6 > systems. It uses the RaLink 2680 chip set and I was able to get the driver > loaded using modprobe rt2x00pci.ko. I saw no error and now see that the > module is loaded along wit

Re: [CentOS] New wireless controller

On 02/09/11 18:33, Emmett Culley wrote: > Yup, looks like I am trying to load the wrong driver. I assumed that if the > driver loaded it found the hardware. > > [root@bus ~]# for BUSID in $(/sbin/lspci | awk '{ IGNORECASE=1 } /net/ { > print $1 }'); do /sbin/lspci -s $BUSID -m; /sbin/lspci -s $

Re: [CentOS] hfsplus.ko

On 06/09/11 16:34, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Friday, September 02, 2011 12:48:47 AM Ned Slider wrote: >> You should also consider filing a bug report upstream and make a case >> for hfsplus inclusion in the RHEL6 kernel. It's not unheard of for Red >> Hat to turn mod

Re: [CentOS] centos product specification

On 09/16/2011 01:00 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 13:45 +0200, Janez Kosmrlj wrote: > >> The page http://www.centos.org/product.html has product specifications >> for all centos releases except for centos6. Is there a reason why or >> did the site maintainers just forget abou

Re: [CentOS] centos product specification

On 09/17/2011 03:23 AM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 02:54 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: >> On 09/16/2011 01:00 PM, Always Learning wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 13:45 +0200, Janez Kosmrlj wrote: >>> >>>> The page http://www

Re: [CentOS] centos product specification

On 09/17/2011 03:44 AM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 03:32 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: > >> As I said above, this isn't something people can volunteer for - only >> a very select few have the appropriate privileges to perform the task. >> There are

Re: [CentOS] missing package openmotif in i386

On 25/09/11 10:16, Christian Athon wrote: > I can only find openmotif22 in centos 5 i386. x86_64 has a openmotif. A > mistake I assume? > > Christian. Yes, it's a known issue: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5101 Until the devs get around to fixing this, you can copy the missing i386 packag

Re: [CentOS] good centos/rhel source for latest spamassassin?

Eero Volotinen wrote: > Is there any good rpm source for latest spamassassin for centos/rhel ? > > Currently using from dag's, but is is a bit old version nowdays. > You could try Warren's RHEL5 builds here: http://wtogami.livejournal.com/33674.html http://people.redhat.com/wtogami/temp/spamass

Re: [CentOS] how to monitor,or be notified of email blacklisting ?

Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know how I can monitor our server's for blacklisting? We > run a large amount of shared hosting & reseller hosting servers and > from time to time one of the IP's will get blacklisted. I'm looking > for a way to be notified if any of our IP's get blackliste

Re: [CentOS] dkms

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:56 PM, wrote: >> ls -l `find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko` >>> How 'bout find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko -ls? >>> 309659070 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 Mar 18 09:48 >>> /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.2.1.el5/weak-updates/nvid

Re: [CentOS] bruteforce protection howto

Larry Vaden wrote: > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Vadkan Jozsef > wrote: >> What's the best method to ban that ip [what is bruteforcig a server] >> what was logged on the logger? >> I need to ban the ip on the router pc. > > but you may have

Re: [CentOS] Multiple FreeNX servers and SSH ports

Niki Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I've setup a small LAN of two desktops running CentOS 5 in a medical > office. Both are connected to the Internet via a small modem/router. > > Recently I played around with FreeNX on my own desktop, and I'd like to > install it on these two computers. On my PC, I j

Re: [CentOS] Multiple FreeNX servers and SSH ports

Les Mikesell wrote: > Niki Kovacs wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've setup a small LAN of two desktops running CentOS 5 in a medical >> office. Both are connected to the Internet via a small modem/router. >> >> Recently I played around with FreeNX on my own desktop, and I'd like to >> install it on these t

Re: [CentOS] Looking for experiences with filesystem choices....

Tom Bishop wrote: > Lots of opinions out there and I have read and read, so I have a home server > that I have finally setup with a hot swap hdd cage and what I am planning on > doing is copying my data drive every other day and rotating them offsite, > haven't figured out how often though. So I d

Re: [CentOS] Configure Webcam in centos 5.4

Krishna Chandra Prajapati wrote: > Hi list, > > I looking for a solution about how to configure webcam in centos 5.4 What > are the webcam packages available in centos. > > Any help is highly appreciated. > > Regards, > Krishna > The Wiki has a webcams page: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalR

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.5 released

Stephen Harris wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:24:20PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: >> And yes, CentOS team does know about this, and is working on CentOS 5.5. >> Please be patient :) > > Is it ready yet? > > *grins, ducks and runs* > > (patient? me?) > Stay up to date on progress here:

Re: [CentOS] wifi

Davy Leon wrote: > Hi folks > > I'm trying to use a Netgear WG111-2 USB-wifi adapter on a Centos 5.3 Box. > Someone has done it? It seems not to be supported by the kernel. > > Thanks > > David > It should work. However, I'd strongly suggest updating from 5.3 as many improvements to the wir

Re: [CentOS] wifi

Ned Slider wrote: > > I've not actually used the device, only plugged it in, so you'd need to > configure it from here or just let NetworkManager handle the device. > I just fired the device up to test and it works fine out of the box with NetworkManager connecting

Re: [CentOS] pkcs11-helper-devel is needed

cahit Eyigünlü wrote: > how could i install pkcs11 on 64 cent os 5.4 :S it always asking me for > pkcs11-helper but i've already installing > > > [r...@vpn VpnSetup]# rpmbuild -tb openvpn-2.1.1.tar.gz > Anything wrong with: yum install openvpn rpmforge has packages: http://wiki.centos.org/A

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.x and Fedora

Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: > why dont you download the source and compile it, its really easy. > Source installs are not encouraged: http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/SourceInstalls ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.o

Re: [CentOS] Apparent BIND problem doing RBL lookups for Postfix

sys Admin wrote: > What happens if you change your resolv.conf to google's dns ? > > Changing dns to public services such as google or OpenDNS is not going to help as DNSBLs like Spamhaus will have blocked access by these services. Otherwise it would be simple to avoid paying for (business) a

Re: [CentOS] Apparent BIND problem doing RBL lookups for Postfix

Larry Vaden wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Ned Slider wrote: >> Changing dns to public services such as google or OpenDNS is not going >> to help as DNSBLs like Spamhaus will have blocked access by these >> services. Otherwise it would be simple to avoid paying for

Re: [CentOS] X Servers xorg.conf file changing.

Don Krause wrote: > Twice now over the past year, I've had something edit the /etc/X11/xorg.conf > file without user intervention. > > The machine in question is a 3 headed X-Terminal that displays the > accelerator control system application for a medical proton accelerator, and > operated by

Re: [CentOS] cve-2010-0436 patch for CentOS 5.4

Olaf Mueller wrote: > Hello, > > I am using a self compiled kde-3.5.10 from ftp.kde.org as a desktop > system under CentOS 5.4. Does anybody knows where to get a > cve-2010-0436 patch (kdebase, kdm) for kde-3.5.10? > Thanks! > Maybe use the same patch Red Hat have backported into the distro pack

Re: [CentOS] selinux

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> Does anyone know? Are we, with CentOS, that far behind with something >>> like this, which isn't even a port, but a policy? >> I dunno about CentOS but on Fedora I just look at the message in the >> log file (/var/log/messages IIRC) and it gives me a command to execute >

Re: [CentOS] centOS vs "the upstream vendor"

Kevin Kempter wrote: > Hi All; > > I have a laptop running the "workstation" version of Linux from RedHat. I've > enabled the EPEL and rpmfusion repos plus I'm subscribed to the following > channels: > * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 5 for 64-bit x86_64) > * Red Hat Network Tools

Re: [CentOS] mail server best practices question

Coert wrote: > Hello all, > > About a year ago I set up a mail server on CentOS using this howto: > http://wanderingbarque.com/howtos/mailserver/mailserver.html > I managed to add amavisd-new with clamav and spamassassin. > It runs very well, but it runs on CentOS 5.2, and if I try to upgrade, >

Re: [CentOS] mail server best practices question

Rob Kampen wrote: > Ned Slider wrote: >> Coert wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> About a year ago I set up a mail server on CentOS using this howto: >>> http://wanderingbarque.com/howtos/mailserver/mailserver.html >>> I managed to ad

Re: [CentOS] Update successful. Thanks.

Robert wrote: > > Only disappointment so far is that lm_sensors still doesn't grok the AMD > K-10 thermal sensors - a situation I grumble about even as I file it in > the "beggars can't be choosers" folder. > That's because your kernel does not have a k10temp driver - it was only introduce

Re: [CentOS] centos release 5.5 issue

Philip Manuel wrote: > Hi > > One of our developers has come across an issue with the new release. He > provided this piece of code to show the problem:- > > > Anyone else seen this or found a bug with these function definitions ? > Yes, confirmed. You should file a bug. _

Re: [CentOS] Calendar server software suggestions

On 05/26/2010 10:07 AM, sync wrote: > Hello,guys: > > I've seen several suggestions for alternatives to exchange for mail, > which I will be trying. > My question is, does anyone know of any good open source shared calendar > systems? > Take a look at Zafara: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Feature

Re: [CentOS] Amavisd-new from rpmforge and Courier

Bowie Bailey wrote: > Does anyone know if the amavisd-new package in rpmforge has the Courier > patch installed? > I can't see any indication that it does... http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/amavisd-new/amavisd-new.spec ___ CentOS mailing list C

Re: [CentOS] question on CPU

On 05/27/2010 01:47 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > I have centos 5.4 on an HP laptop, as below the /proc/cpuinfo shows Dual > core, > however, there is only 1 processor listed in /proc/cpuinfo. > > Is the OS only using a single core? > > jerry > What's the status of ACPI? Is it enabled in the bios? Is t

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 & gspca

On 06/11/2010 10:38 PM, JohnS wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:10 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Kernel. gspcs is a module, used by the motion daemon. > > > Quick Search found this for el5. You could get the src rpm and rebuild > it for all machines. Or test a binary out first with one.

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 & gspca

On 14/06/10 18:58, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >> The standalone gspca code is old and deprecated. It's now maintained as >> part of the Video4Linux v4l-dvb tree here: >> >> http://linuxtv.org/ > > Thanks. However, that's not an overly friendly site for non-project > developers - don't see any curre

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >