han 20 KB/sec) for reconstruction.
no other errors or anything.
Thanks
Nathan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
e 231, in currentStep
self.gotoNext()
File "/usr/lib/anaconda/text.py", line 593, in run
(step, instance) = anaconda.dispatch.currentStep()
File "/usr/bin/anaconda", line 1115, in <module>
anaconda.intf.run
skipx
rootpw
firewall --disabled
authconfig --enableshadow --enablemd5
%packages
redhat-lsb
rubygems
puppet
%end
Thanks.
Nathan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I have a CentOS 5.1 dom0 running on a machine with two cores and 4gb
of memory. It runs three 4.6 domUs and one 5.1 domU. Just out of the
blue the other night all the 4.6 domUs crashed, but the dom0 stayed up.
I ran xm console (domU-name) and got the Oops information below. I
didn't get anythi
diagnose.
Today I installed the grml distribution and it worked with no issues, it uses
a base kernel of 2.6.28. so there is nothing wrong with the hardware but centos
still does not want to install on this motherboard.
Anyone have any ideas?
Nathan
9 active sync /dev/sdl1
Anyone got any ideas?
Nathan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> On Dec 1, 2014, at 14:48, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
>> We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs
>> familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for
>> the box before we ship it, then w
> On Jan 2, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
> I’m not interested in the reverse case, where an old server could not take
> over from a newer one, because there’s no good reason to manage the upgrade
> that way. You drop the new one in as a backup, take the old one offline,
> upgrade
> On Jan 15, 2015, at 12:36, Mateusz Guz wrote:
> according to this :
>
> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/28144/after-yum-update-is-it-a-good-idea-to-restart-the-server
>
> i should reboot my server after updating packages i.e: kernel, glibc, libc.
> Maybe it's a silly question, but I
We also saw some problems with recent Dell machines with “SpeedStep” or
whatever Intel calls their power/speed management these days.
One developer measured a very significant increase in speed after completely
disabling support for it in his kernel on multiple Linux variants.
I don’t have the
Sorry, meant to chop the reply off of that previous post after I typed it.
Argh… accidental top-posting. Icky!
:-)
Nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Jul 10, 2015, at 10:47, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Trying to prevent this from happening again, I've decided to replace the
> drive that's in predictive failure. The array has a hot spare. I tried to
> remove, using hpacucli, it refuses "operation not permitted", and there
> doesn't *seem* to
> On Jul 28, 2015, at 11:27, Warren Young wrote:
>
> On Jul 25, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Bob Marcan wrote:
>>
>> 1FuckingPrettyRose
>> "Sorry, you must use no fewer than 20 total characters."
>> 1FuckingPrettyRoseShovedUpYourAssIfYouDon'tGiveMeAccessRightFuckingNow!
>> "Sorry, you cannot use punctu
> On Jul 28, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
> The Apple ID password rules are a fair bit stronger than the libpwquality
> rules we’ve been discussing here, and have been so for some time:
>
> https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201303
>
> Given that recent OS X releases want to use yo
> On Jul 28, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
> On Jul 28, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Nathan Duehr wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 28, 2015, at 11:27, Warren Young wrote:
>>>
>>> So no, your local password quality policy is not purely your own concern.
&g
> On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:48, Peter wrote:
>
> On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote:
>> Hi CentOS developers - I’ve been happily using CentOS for several
>> years now, so thanks for all the good work. In the last week,
>> however, I noticed that while the items in RHSA-2015:1443 has shown
>
> On Jul 29, 2015, at 18:20, Nathan Duehr wrote:
>
>> On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:48, Peter wrote:
>>
>> On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote:
>>> Hi CentOS developers - I’ve been happily using CentOS for several
>>> years now, so th
> On Jul 30, 2015, at 03:37, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> Of course it makes sense. Those security updates are not released in a
> vacuum, and all the things they are built on/against also need to be
> released and installed for them to work.
>
> The source code for the ssecurity updates you are t
> On Jul 30, 2015, at 12:20, Warren Young wrote:
>
> Meanwhile over here in CentOS land, you still see SSH password guessers
> banging on every public IP that responds to port 22. Why? Because it still
> occasionally works. Increase the password strength minima, and this class of
> worm, t
> On Jul 30, 2015, at 20:09, Always Learning wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 11:45 -0600, Nathan Duehr wrote:
>
>> Honestly I don’t know how you guys do it…
>
> By not using Windoze ?
>
I meant the time… the time… involved… so much time…
:-)
--
> On Feb 2, 2016, at 17:57, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Suppose I executed the command
>
> rm -rf /
There was also this article recently that pointed out that if the box boots via
UEFI, you may brick the machine, depending on setup.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_ite
On Jan 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>
> Does anyone know if there is a repo that has openscad for CentOS?
>
> rpmfind.net doesn't turn up anything.
>
> The openscad wiki page says, "As of 2013, prebuilt OpenSCAD packages are
> available on many recent Linux and BSD distribution
On Feb 14, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> "No need to worry. They are only hints, and named uses them to get the
> current list of root name servers at startup. Even if they are 15 years
> out of date it will still work, because the root name servers do not
> change very often."
On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Nelson Green wrote:
> I can change things around so that tcp is used instead of RELP, and everything
> works that way. The problem is specific to using RELP in the normal background
> mode. I also tested the above RELP configuration on two Debian Wheezy boxes,
> each
On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Nelson Green wrote:
>
> Yep, that was it. Thanks for setting me straight.
>
> And apologies for the top-posting reply previously. I pasted the reply and
> just
> wasn't paying attention. My mother raised me better than that.
No problem, was just a hunch... happe
On Feb 25, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Tilman Schmidt
wrote:
> Am 25.02.2013 15:56, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>>> Then there is the actual update. I learned long ago NOT to run yum over
>>> an SSH connection, as WHEN that connection breaks in the middle of an
>>> update, yo
On Mar 19, 2013, at 9:32 AM, Woehrle Hartmut SBB CFF FFS (Extern)
wrote:
> Hello Mailing List
>
> I got a severe network error message at a HP DL360 Server.
> The kernel log says:
If that's a DL360 G7 server, make sure you've applied all of the latest
firmware patches from HP on it. The G7
It won't help you on troubleshooting which RAM module is bad, but dmidecode may
be helpful in figuring out how many slots/sticks you have and what's populated
and not populated.
Typically if the lights are not on on that display, the RAM is tossing ECC
errors or similar, but not fully failing.
On May 6, 2013, at 1:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Interesting. I need to look at them further.
>
> HOWEVER: I saw something there about unpacking an .exe... and googled
> that, and found someone talking about doing that... which led me to
> cabextract, and, sure 'nough, I now have what was in
On Jun 26, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Marcelo Roccasalva
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 2:52 AM, ☼ Francis
> wrote:
>>
>> Este é Inglês lista utilize palavras em inglês
>>
>>
>> 2013/6/26 Sergio Alex
>>
>>> Gostaria de instalar o Centos 6.4 em um dl380e g8 com uma smart array
>>> b320i, na insta
On Jul 1, 2013, at 12:20 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 7/1/2013 10:57 AM, Nathan Duehr wrote:
>>> DRM'ed server hardware. Pure evil.
>>
>> why is that evil? why should you pay for features you're not using?
>
> You nee
On Jul 1, 2013, at 12:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 01.07.2013 20:30, schrieb Nathan Duehr:
>> The significant problem we ran into was someone at an upstream vendor orders
>> HP stuff via
>> individual part numbers in a specific configuration for us, s
On Jan 8, 2014, at 3:13 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: John R Pierce
>
>> On 1/7/2014 10:39 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
>>> I am trying to install CentOS5 on a new HP DL360e G8 with B120i disk
>>> controller. It appears that a proprietary HP driver is needed for it.
>>
>> fwiw, centos 6.recent s
On Feb 20, 2014, at 3:16 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> That was *exactly* what I needed. Boy, is that interface user hostile.
> Finally got it to tell me the drive'd failed.
>
> Now, if we've got a spare 2.5" drive (I have grave doubts)
I've got a bunch of time in with these, and I'll wa
On Feb 3, 2014, at 1:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> 1) We run, and have been running for *years*, inexpensive USB cameras
> plugged into rackmount servers
>running the motion package on CentOS. Every few subreleases, some
> problem crops up in what I
>*think* is the video dr
On Mar 11, 2014, at 6:09 AM, mark wrote:
>> So if he "wants to be out of the business", why is he having you spec the
>> solution?
>>
>> Call a security company and tell them what you want, and they'll send the
>> bill and they'll be "in the business"... LOL!
>>
>> Sorry, just thought your bo
Running across some curious stuff with ulimit on CentOS 5.10.
We have a non CentOS packaged version of Asterisk (using their packages) that
we start at boot time with a typical RC script.
Recently it started whining that it couldn't open enough file handles.
As we dug further into this, it appe
On Apr 26, 2014, at 10:37 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:33:27AM -0400, Evan Rowley wrote:
>> Is anyone frustrated by Network Manager? I wish CentOS just used the basic
>> configuration files like the ones on BSD-style OSes. Those are so simple in
>> comparison.
>
> se
On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:44 AM, James Pearson wrote:
> Nathan Duehr wrote:
>>
>> Attempting to force the ulimit up inside the RC script has no effect, since
>> the package is running
>> as a non-root user. It fails to raise the limit.
>
> init.d scripts run
On Apr 25, 2014, at 4:46 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 24.04.2014 um 19:44 schrieb James Pearson :
>> Nathan Duehr wrote:
>>>
>>> Attempting to force the ulimit up inside the RC script has no effect, since
>>> the package is running
>>> as
On Apr 28, 2014, at 6:40 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 04:20:25PM -0600, Nathan Duehr wrote:
>> Seems like the brokenness is the behavior of init ignoring
>> /etc/security/limits.conf, to my way of thinking anyway.
>
> Umm, no. That's
On May 1, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>>
>> oh, left out, on terminal->appearance, also set character encoding to UTF-8
>>
>
> Tah-ah! That fixed it! That's what I've been overlooking all this time.
> Thanks much!
So
On May 1, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 05/01/2014 10:56 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> I feel for you then. I guess we have been lucky in the 6 or 7 hardware
>> platforms we have used that the nics ( minimum 3, usually 4 or more )
>> have always stayed the same names in the same order.
On May 5, 2014, at 1:06 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Hey, you puttin' down zmodem, man? The only one that picked up, if you
> lost the connection, from where it was, rather than starting new? Only
> rsync is that good
>
> The nerve of some people, puttin' down perfectly good software
>
On May 5, 2014, at 1:14 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 12:44:01PM -0600, Nathan Duehr wrote:
>> Not processes started that change to a non-root user from a root/init/rc
>> script. No session. At least not from what I was seeing in 5.10.
>> Inten
On Aug 20, 2014, at 9:06, James B. Byrne wrote:
> This mornings activity log shows this:
>
> . . .
> From 23.102.132.99 - 2 packets to tcp(3389)
> From 23.102.133.164 - 1 packet to tcp(3389)
> From 23.102.134.239 - 2 packets to tcp(3389)
> From 23.102.136.210 - 3 packets to tcp(3389)
>
Hi, everyone.
tldr: How in the heck do I force CentOS7 to boot to a low/conservative GDM
resolution?
Hoping someone can lend a hand getting CentOS7 to sync to my Panasonic
Vierra 42' TV. It worked fine in CentOS6.5 but since installing I boot to a
GDM background with no login prompt. I can SSH i
I agree! ;)
But I'm only getting the splash screen with the etched '7' and no login
prompt or top bar. I've been all over /var/log and I don't see anything
which resembles an error. I even did a "yum groupinstall 'GNOME Desktop'"
to make sure I had absolutely everything GDM-related.
__
I think… we were just threatened by the list owner.
;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)
--
Nate Duehr
denverpi...@me.com
On Oct 9, 2014, at 17:06, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The recent anti-social content on the list including threats and
> support of harassmen
> On Oct 22, 2014, at 15:15, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>
> As you can probably guess by now I am working my way down through my
> outstanding issue list trying to get as many deferred items closed out as I
> can before the next security storm hits.
They stopped? :-)
--
Nate Duehr
denverpi...@me
> Things break and need maintenance. If your services can't tolerate
> that, you need more redundancy. As for the OS updates (which are
> only one of the many things that can break...), they are 'pretty well'
> vetted by upstream so breakage is rare and your odds are better
> installing them tha
>
> True, but pretty much everything was written wrong to begin with, back
> in the day when everyone thought bad guys just shouldn't be allowed to
> use the network. And the fixes are trickling in bit by bit.
Been hearing that “back in the day” excuse since Novell / IPX was big. Wash,
rinse,
Honestly, something that big I put a NAS variant on it like OpenMediaVault,
and CentOS and other distros in virtuals for jobs.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 3:58 PM Kenneth Porter
wrote:
> I was just given a Dell R720xd with 160 GB memory and 12x 900 GB drives
> that I plan to deploy as my home mail/f
if it
is a missing module still)
--
Nathan Coulson
System Administrator for Bravenet Web Services
www.bravenet.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 2019-10-15 12:12 p.m., Nathan Coulson wrote:
I was working on a haproxy transparent proxy setup that we had working
on Centos 7 (iptables), but running into issues getting tproxy working
with NFTables on Centos 8.
From https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/tproxy.txt,
It
On 2019-10-15 12:46 p.m., Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 10/15/19 9:16 PM, Nathan Coulson wrote:
On 2019-10-15 12:12 p.m., Nathan Coulson wrote:
I was working on a haproxy transparent proxy setup that we had working
on Centos 7 (iptables), but running into issues getting tproxy working
with
> Thanks, James, that did the trick. So now I have set up two desktops,
> one a vanilla xterm and the other specifically for this purpose, runs
> my script in a gnome-terminal and it appears to be working properly,
> no funky pop-ups or anything. Thanks again for your help!
Glad you got it working
On Oct 4, 2012, at 2:50 PM, Miranda Hawarden-Ogata
wrote:
> Not sure if I answered your question or not :)
Yep, you did. I thought you were helping folks who were always sitting at a
physical machine console.
Disregard all after "Good afternoon"! GRIN... the comment didn't apply to
remote
On 2022-11-08 15:49, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/8/22 13:12, Simon Matter wrote:
Is anyone else experiencing trouble with
kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64?
I'm seeing a kernel panics in the kvm module on one of our VM hosts
with
it.
I did notice a new libvirt update as well, but it see
There is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143438 which I ran
into on AlmaLinux 8, (which impacts Xeon 55xx processors, but seems to
work on Xeon 56xx and newer).
Just a user who ran into it (nothing to do with the fix), and I upgraded
the server to a Xeon 56XX processor to resolve
60 matches
Mail list logo
