tem Admin - Follow me - I follow you
http://solosysad.blogspot.com/
Latest Entry: Bacula - Building from source
--
Mister IT Guru At Gmx Dot Com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 13/01/2011 13:20, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
>> At the risk of sounding like an newbie, is is possible to build the RPMS
>> for all architectures on the same box at the same time? I would really
>> like to automate this, so
On 13/01/2011 13:33, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
>> I have an x86_64 box running Xen, so a paravirtualised guest has just
>> been ordered for building a Mock Environment. I'm going to have to run
>> to Google to learn
On 14/01/2011 15:11, Robert Spangler wrote:
> On Friday 14 January 2011 05:45, Mister IT Guru wrote:
>
>> On 13/01/2011 21:45, Daniel Heitmann wrote:
>> > On 13.01.2011, at 22:34, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>> >> You should probably give RH a call
n child?
--
The Solo System Admin - Follow me - I follow you
http://solosysad.blogspot.com/
Latest Entry: Bacula - Building from source
--
Mister IT Guru At Gmx Dot Com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 14/01/2011 16:14, Cia Watson wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:11:20 -0500
> Robert Spangler wrote:
>
>> On Friday 14 January 2011 05:45, Mister IT Guru wrote:
>>
>>> I assumed that this would be the case! Made me realise how much
>>> faith I have in
there are different kernel versions out there. Even kernel versions that
are the same between distros, may have been compiled with different options.
--
The Solo System Admin - Follow me - I follow you
http://solosysad.blogspot.com/
Latest Entry: Ba
s, but as usual, someone beat me to it :)
> John
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
The Solo System Admin - Follow me - I follow you
http://solosysad.blogspot.com/
Latest Ent
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 10:31 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> > On 04/01/11 6:54 PM, Digimer wrote:
> >
> >> I would not fault someone for "moving on", but I would when said person
> >> does so in a manner that only leads to unhelpful drama.
> >
> > yeah, seri
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 18:03 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Monday 04 April 2011 12:25:06 Mister IT Guru wrote:
> > The one thing I would love to be able to contribute my time to is
> > helping test new code, and get it out the door so guys on the street can
> > test it out
ges that are contained within are available to everyone...
already. Whatever feature you could possibly ask for, you can go an get
yourself.
If you are the type of person that likes bleeding edge on your server,
then maybe CentOS is not for you. Fedora, and Ubuntu may suit you
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 21:38 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 05:41 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> > I haven't tried it, but in theory you could take a clonezilla image of
> > the physical machine and restore it to a KVM disk image: Just create the
> > initial virtual dri
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:33 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 04/06/2011 07:54 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> > How can a company dedicate a few man-hours per week to help CentOS?
> > I mean this in a more official way, rather than just a person dropping
> > by at the -devel list.
>
> Thats
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 08:58 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Keith Keller
> wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > We've seen quite a few references on the list to "100% binary
> > compatibility with upstream". What I am curious about is, how precisely
> > is this determined? All t
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 14:47 -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Dvorkin, Asya wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks Keith, good question, that should have been on my list of
> >>> "Questions to ask about CentOS building process", and thanks to Akemi
> >>> for a quick answer :)
> >>
>
Dear List,
I've taken a look at the TODO page http://wiki.centos.org/ToDo and I've
picked something at random to ask a question about and see if we can get
it done!
"Add page for Hosting control panels - we seem to get a lot of people
asking about them"
I spotted this quote - What exactly does t
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 10:31 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 04/09/2011 10:26 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
> > Dear List,
> >
> > I've taken a look at the TODO page http://wiki.centos.org/ToDo and I've
> > picked something at random to ask a question ab
Due to recent list traffic, it seems that we need to have a new todo
list! I propose the following
1) Nuke current todo page
2) Create new todo page
3) Clear out ancient todo items
a) Get rid of the items that are no longer relevant
b) Reword those that are
4) Update Wiki
a
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 13:32 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 09/04/11 11:36, Mister IT Guru wrote:
> > Due to recent list traffic, it seems that we need to have a new todo
> > list! I propose the following
> >
> > 1) Nuke current todo page
> > 2) Create new todo p
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 08:52 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Saturday, April 09, 2011 05:32:34 AM Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > I just wanted to make sure that people realise that while the process on
> > that page will get you to where one needs to be, the scripts etc are not
> > what we use in the cen
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 09:39 -0700, Chuck Munro wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Just a short note to add my vote for a HUGE round of applause to the
> CentOS team for their untiring efforts in getting releases out the door.
> I've just upgraded several servers to 5.6 and it all "just works".
This is o
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 22:23 -0400, Peter A wrote:
> On Monday, April 11, 2011 10:12:15 PM Antaryami Khuda wrote:
> > I see um twitter dag's want to start his own RHEL rebuild.
> >
> > Dag how much monies you do need?
> >
> > I make contribution of 5.000 rupee if other join.
> >
> > Ant
> This is
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 19:53 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 04/15/11 7:40 PM, Michel Donais wrote:
> >>> Will it be the same from 5.6 to 6.0 or a full install will be better.
> >> Full installs are always recommended between major versions.
> >
> > Thank's all for the advise; but is there any easy
e I'll
come to the list for that one!)
--
The Solo System Admin - Follow me - I follow you
http://solosysad.blogspot.com/
Latest Entry - Smooth Sailing with CentOS
--
Mister IT Guru At Gmx Dot Com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
htt
On 13/01/2011 10:39, mahmoud mansy wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Mister IT Guru <mailto:misteritg...@gmx.com>> wrote:
At the risk of sounding like an newbie, is is possible to build
the RPMS
for all architectures on the same box at the same time? I would really
On 13/01/2011 12:12, JohnS wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 10:25 +0000, Mister IT Guru wrote:
>> At the risk of sounding like an newbie, is is possible to build the RPMS
>> for all architectures on the same box at the same time?
> That would be dependent upon your build environme
On 13/01/2011 12:26, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
>> At the risk of sounding like an newbie, is is possible to build the RPMS
>> for all architectures on the same box at the same time? I would really
>> like to automate thi
On 13/01/2011 12:54, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
>> On 13/01/2011 12:26, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Mister IT Guru
>>> wrote:
>>>> At the risk of sounding like an n
28 matches
Mail list logo
