Dne 14.12.2010 00:20, Warren Young napsal(a):
> Nothing is truly intuitive
> in computing. ("The only intuitive interface is the nipple.")
As a father of two kids, I can testify that even the nipple is hardly
intuitive. Every kid (and mom) needs to learn how to use it. Just to
clear one myth.
B
Dne 10.1.2011 00:35, derleader __ napsal(a):
> Red hat yum downloads packages from RHN
> Centos yum downloads packages from the fastest mirror?
>
> There is difference in configuration.
yum can use plugins and in this case RHEL yum uses rhnplugin for
communicating with RHN/Satellite. Yum itself (
On 2008-11-29, 02:18 GMT, MHR wrote:
> Does anyone here have a good working knowledge of the command line
> interface to Bugzilla?
>
> If so, please contact me off-list as this is OT here, but my inquiry
> on the bugzilla list met with silence
It is OT, but I cannot resist to make a small plug
On 2008-11-29, 20:23 GMT, Vandaman wrote:
> yumlist or yumex are not as good as rpmfind, as i don't run
> yumex/GUI on any server.
He, didn't say yumlist, but yum list (and you can add yum search
to the mix).
Matěj
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cent
On 2008-12-03, 00:41 GMT, Christopher Chan wrote:
> This is not a matter of preferring Ubuntu. It is one of NO
> CHOICE. I know next to nothing about Debian/Ubuntu
> configuration files nor am I familiar with dpkg or apt as I am
> with rpm and yum. You think I want to move over for fun?
I am c
On 2008-12-04, 00:42 GMT, Christopher Chan wrote:
> What would you pick? Learn a few new commands/configuration
> files or have to prep up a new desktop rollout every six
> months?
12 -- Fedora 8 is still pretty good and only now you would have
to switch to F10. Actually, I know about many peop
On 2008-12-04, 17:50 GMT, R P Herrold wrote:
> Almost all (I cannot think of any exceptions, but there may be)
> of the core centos team do not run off-topic threads on either
> the fedora or RHEL lists; May we have the same courtesy?
sorry, I will do better next time,
On 2008-12-05, 13:22 GMT, William L. Maltby wrote:
> Got second cup of coffee downed and went to see if the bug was
> known here
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific\
> &order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&content=plugin
>
> Didn't see a match. If someone can confi
On 2008-12-05, 23:48 GMT, William L. Maltby wrote:
>> I was able to _start_ a comparison process, not completed yet.
What is the output of the command
mozilla-plugin-config -l
? And if you have flash-plugin in ~/.mozilla then many bad things
will happen to you. Remove it and install the one fr
On 2008-12-17, 08:37 GMT, NiftyClusters T Mitchell wrote:
> It is possible that dedicated Cisco hardware solutions will
> scale better.
Your mileage may vary, but I have terrible experience with Linux
Cisco VPN clients, so I would strongly suggest OpenVPN. Of
course, I don't know anything about
On 2008-12-21, 22:38 GMT, William L. Maltby wrote:
> Note that I changed "vesa" to "vga" since the card mentions
> only vga.
Forget about VGA, it is really obsolete now -- all graphic cards
you are likely to encounter in the wild are VESA-compatible,
which is what you want.
Matěj
On 2008-12-22, 00:11 GMT, William L. Maltby wrote:
> He had tried vesa in a parameter to system-config-display, as
> suggested by Alan, and it hadn't worked. So I figured try
> something that _ought_ to work on stuff even 10 years old (or
> older) and go from there.
OK, if *that* didn't work, t
On 2008-12-22, 17:38 GMT, William L. Maltby wrote:
> Well, having faith that things really _are_ working, one of his
> messages in the log file about insufficient memory reminded me
> that many laptops and less-expensive desktops have shared
> memory. I've suggested that he check BIOS for variou
On 2008-12-22, 17:58 GMT, William L. Maltby wrote:
> Other folks chimed in at various points, so you might want to
> take a gander at those too.
I think I saw couple of these in our bugzilla now and I wonder
whether it is the same. Try to run
gnome-default-applications-properties and take a loo
On 2008-12-22, 23:49 GMT, William L. Maltby wrote:
> I presume this completes the triage process? Now, who reports
I hope this bug is publicly visible
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471193
otherwise just yes, IMHO (and it is not official statement by RH
Gecko developers) whole busin
On 2008-12-23, 12:15 GMT, James Bensley wrote:
> find . -exec grep -q "$1" '{}' \; -print >> ./found_files
I think you can have only one action (either -exec or -print),
but not sure about it. Anyway, my first instinct when things are
getting to be more complicated is to use while cycle, like th
On 2008-12-23, 18:05 GMT, Vandaman wrote:
> If you are having problems with 5.2 then address these problems
> immediately without waiting for 5.3. How do you address them? File bugs
> or ask questions relating to your existing problem but 5.3 beta is unable
> to solve them automagically for you.
On 2008-12-24, 14:00 GMT, Alain PORTAL wrote:
> More info in the updated bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D477708#c5
Thanks Alain, this looks really pretty bad. Bug updated and
maintainer asked to take a look at it.
Matěj
___
CentOS
On 2008-12-24, 01:22 GMT, MHR wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> On 2008-12-23, 12:15 GMT, James Bensley wrote:
>>> find . -exec grep -q "$1" '{}' \; -print >> ./found_files
>>
>> I think you can have only one a
On 2008-12-30, 15:32 GMT, Tony Placilla wrote:
> The root answer is that if he wants to use ZFS (which is
> a *good* choice) he should use some flavor of Solaris
I would just add that RHEL 5.3 (and thus CentOS 5.3) when it
happens, will have ext4fs as a technology preview, which may
fulfill OT
20 matches
Mail list logo
