On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Fred Moyer wrote:
> Looks like d...@httpd is aware of the issue and will be
> releasing a fix. Haven't tried 5.3 centos but this sounds
> like they shipped a version of apache that caused this.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/d...@httpd.apache.org/msg44177.html
>
Hello, it s
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
> Boris Epstein wrote:
> >
> > I found an even simplier solution - disabled SELinux. I've got a
> > firewall and that is plenty.
> >
>
> Wow, not sure I'd place all my faith in a firewall.
>
> There is an SELinux tutorial on the Wiki that explicitly covers
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 12:30, Mark Hedges wrote:
> >>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux
> >> Is this why DBD::SQLite broke under mod_perl recently in
> >> CentOS?
> >
> &
I signed up for the list,
I thought it was ignored but it looks like it didn't post:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Mark Hedges wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Fred Moyer wrote:
> > Looks like d...@httpd is aware of the issue and will be
> > releasing a fix. Haven't tried 5.3 c
> You can report problems on the CentOS bug tracker at:
> http://bugs.centos.org/
Umm, as I said, I couldn't sign up to file a bug report.
Nope, still broken.
APPLICATION ERROR #2800
Invalid form security token. Did you submit the form
twice by accident?
> If the problem is reproducibl
> Yeah it doesn't make sense to me why it's an advantage for
> RedHat to selectively backport patches instead of keeping
> up what the developers believe is a stable API for all
> callers. It's the same corporate cargo cult they were in
> when they made the mod_perl1 "compatibility" interface for
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
