[CentOS] ksplice within CentOS

Hello guys, I saw that a few days back there was a talk about encorporating the ksplice toolchain into CentOS and creating rebootless upgrades to the CentOS kernel. I'm really interested in helping for that. Where/how we can start work ? Best regards, Marian Marinov signature.asc Descri

Re: [CentOS] sshd: Authentication Failures: 137 Time(s)

> Rainer > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Best regards, Marian Marinov signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___

Re: [CentOS] sshd: Authentication Failures: 137 Time(s)

18:58 Jason Brown wrote: > You could also try using tcpwrappers along with iptables. > > On 04/04/2011 06:34 AM, Marian Marinov wrote: > > On Monday 04 April 2011 12:18:43 Rainer Traut wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> to prevent scripted dictionary atta

Re: [CentOS] sshd: Authentication Failures: 137 Time(s)

d login attempts I can > assume that the perpetrator is at least a little more skilled than usual > and possibly take additional action. > > Cheers, > Dave > > > > > ___________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > htt

Re: [CentOS] sshd: Authentication Failures: 137 Time(s)

ber increased and reached 60-65% of the original number. Introducing a Hawk helped us a lot. Tools like Hawk and fail2ban are quite useful, actually only thinks like that have good impact on the bruteforce attempts. Regards, Marian Marinov signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sig

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

aid6 Arrays with 30TB. We have tested XFS and its write performance was really dissapointing. So we looked at Ext4. It is really good for our workloads, but it lacks the ability to grow over 16TB. So we crated two partitions on the raid with ext4. The RAID rebuild time is around 2 days, max 3

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

On Tuesday 12 April 2011 15:34:21 Torres, Giovanni (NIH/NINDS) [C] wrote: > On Apr 12, 2011, at 3:23 AM, Matthew Feinberg wrote: > > ext4 does not seem to be fully baked in 5.6 yet. parted 1.8 does not > support creating ext4 (strange) > > The CentOS homepage states that ext4 is now a fully suppo

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

On Tuesday 12 April 2011 15:56:54 rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote: > > On Tuesday 12 April 2011 15:34:21 Torres, Giovanni (NIH/NINDS) [C] wrote: > >> On Apr 12, 2011, at 3:23 AM, Matthew Feinberg wrote: > >> > >> ext4 does not seem to be fully baked in 5.6 yet. parted 1.8 does not > >> support creati

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

On Tuesday 12 April 2011 16:20:22 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Marian Marinov wrote: > >> I'm managing machines with 30TB of storage for more then two years. And > >> with good reporting and reacti

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

On Tuesday 12 April 2011 16:48:14 Markus Falb wrote: > On 12.4.2011 15:02, Marian Marinov wrote: > > On Tuesday 12 April 2011 15:56:54 > > rainer-rnrd0m5o0maboiyizis...@public.gmane.org wrote: > > > > Yes... but with such RAID10 solution you get only half of the disk

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

On Tuesday 12 April 2011 17:36:39 John Jasen wrote: > On 04/12/2011 10:21 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Alain Péan > > > > > wrote: > > > I would chime in with a dis-commendation for XFS. At my previous > employer, two case

Re: [CentOS] /etc/bashrc help!

On Tuesday 19 April 2011 20:18:38 Roland Roland wrote: > Dear all, > > i've appended the below to /etc/bashrc it works like a charm with ssh > connections though SFTP sessions fail since the below is being sent to > the intiator. > any way of limiting the below to none sftp sessions? or any othe

Re: [CentOS] /etc/bashrc help!

On Wednesday 20 April 2011 00:26:04 Marian Marinov wrote: > On Tuesday 19 April 2011 20:18:38 Roland Roland wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > i've appended the below to /etc/bashrc it works like a charm with ssh > > connections though SFTP sessions fail since th

Re: [CentOS] Finding wich files a writen to

e/hackman/f2.tst) Pid: 14229 Position change: 12 blocks FD: 3(/home/hackman/f1.tst) The argument to the script is the sleep between the two checks. I have tested the script on a few production servers... It works as a charm :) Thank you for the good question... now I have one good

Re: [CentOS] Finding wich files a writen to

o be useful, such a feature must be simple to use, > lightweight with little overhead and flexible. It should be easy to > add new watches and painless to receive notification of events. If you go the inotify route, do keep in mind that you need to mon

Re: [CentOS] Promo Store is now open

Hi guys, Three things, 1st I would like to sponsor some stickers. Karan, you can reach me on Jabber if you want. 2nd I would also like to offer free hosting for the promo site. 3rd I can offer a storage area for delivery of TShirts, but it is in Bulgaria(Eastern Europe). Regards, Marian s

Re: [CentOS] Modify Parameters at system boot

About the options... at least with kernel 2.6.18.0194.el5 the right option is: options ipt_hashsize 131072 Also keep in mind that you have to remove the '=' sign from modprobe.conf Marian -- Best regards, Marian Marinov signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed mes

Re: [CentOS] Apache in chroot reporting every client is 16.0.0.0

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- B

Re: [CentOS] allowing users to write to a web content area

On Monday 16 May 2011 06:19:49 David Mehler wrote: > Hello, > I've got apache running on a centos 5.6 machine. All of my users have > a umask of 077 set in /etc/bashrc. I'm now wanting to give several of > them permission to write to a web area so they can place content > visible to the web server.

Re: [CentOS] Passing password to script for rpmsign of list of .rpm files

ex.php/2011/05/06/sign-multiple-rpms-with-on > > e-command > > Thanks. I am bit behind visiting sites. I have found expect script for > this but this is much more elegant. > > Many thanks to KB also for solution. > You should also check this: http://blogs.23.nu/till

Re: [CentOS] FTP Migration

On Tuesday 24 May 2011 05:24:07 listmail wrote: > Hi All, > > Please feel free to correct any misconceptions in my premises as I get to > my question. I have about 6 ftp services running on a CentOS system that > is going down for service, and I want to move the ftp services to a VM on > another n

Re: [CentOS] local repo

On Saturday 28 May 2011 06:03:19 Steven Crothers wrote: > You'll have to edit your repos in the %post section of your ks. The > repos are provided by centos-release iirc. > > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > When I am installing I use kickstart and have a l

Re: [CentOS] BIND9 - automatic zone definition replication to slave

On Tuesday 31 May 2011 11:41:47 Lars Hecking wrote: > Martin Šťastný writes: > > Hello, > > > > I have simple question - is there a way to automatically replicate zone > > definition (not zone itself - this is easy) to slave server using BIND9? > > Is it BIND built-in or are there prebuilt scripts

Re: [CentOS] Using umask

to > > cover this and/or my experience is lacking. > > Either have a group that you're both a member of and have a SGID bit set on > the relevent directories using that gruop, or look at ACLs. > > jh Or you can simply start using mod_suphp or suexec for running your

Re: [CentOS] ext4 in CentOS 5.6?

ith them at the moment is 16TB. You can recompile the tools and remove this limitation if that is a problem for you. Regards, Marian Marinov signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] ext4 in CentOS 5.6?

On Thursday 23 June 2011 22:31:28 PJ wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Marian Marinov wrote: > > On Thursday 23 June 2011 19:16:37 PJ wrote: > >> I'm sure many are running ext4 FS's in production, but just want to be > >> re-assured that there are

Re: [CentOS] ext4 in CentOS 5.6?

On Thursday 23 June 2011 22:41:50 PJ wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM, PJ wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Marian Marinov wrote: > >> On Thursday 23 June 2011 19:16:37 PJ wrote: > >>> I'm sure many are running ext4 FS's in production, b

Re: [CentOS] ext4 in CentOS 5.6?

On Friday 24 June 2011 04:34:20 Smithies, Russell wrote: > We have a single 27TB partition (35 x 1TB drives as RAID5+0 in an HP > MDS600), just formatted it xfs and had no problems with it so far. It's > used as scratch space so not too concerned about performance. > > --Russell > I have compare

Re: [CentOS] iptables port forwarding

On Sunday 26 June 2011 12:53:07 muiz wrote: > Dear all, > I would like to forward a port to an internet server, but failed. can you > help me? Server: eth0: 192.168.1.250, Port: 8080 TCP, CentOS 5.6 > Remote server: IP: a.b.c.d Port: 8181 > > > Forward path: client1(192.168.1.10) -> 192.16

Re: [CentOS] iptables port forwarding

ckets to 1.250 so a.b.c.d will return the answares to the right source. Marian > > > 2011-06-26 23:38:58，"Marian Marinov" wrote： > > >On Sunday 26 June 2011 12:53:07 muiz wrote: > >> Dear all, > >> > >> I would like to forward a port to a

Re: [CentOS] iptables port forwarding

m tcp -p tcp -d a.b.c.d --dport > 8080 -j ACCEPT > > > And more rules I add is : > /sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -d a.b.c.d -p tcp --dport 8080 -j > MASQUERADE > > > Then it works! But if I don't use system-config-firewall GUI tools, then > how? > >

Re: [CentOS] iptables port forwarding

-to a.b.c.d:8181 /sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT -s > 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 --to 192.168.1.250 echo 1 > > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_fowardThen it's not to work! You have to have some other iptables rules that block the traffic since this has to work. Marian > At 20

Re: [CentOS] Mail Question

On Monday 27 June 2011 21:25:42 Bo Lynch wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Im having a issue that I just cant seem to figure out. We currently are > running an email server Centos 5.6 Postfix/Dovecot with a squirrelmail > frontend. I was setting up a testbed to do a migration to SoGo using > LDAP/MYSQL

Re: [CentOS] tripwire alternative

m/host-based-intrusion-detection-samhain The tool is quite usefull but sometimes heavy on the central machine, once you go over 100 nodes. -- Best regards, Marian Marinov signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Ce

Re: [CentOS] managing a rack full of centos servers

On Thursday 21 July 2011 18:36:17 Devin Reade wrote: > --On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 11:02:42 PM -0700 RC > > wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:07:06 -0600 Devin Reade wrote: > >> It should be considered as complementing the automated config > >> management tools like cfengine et al, not as a re

Re: [CentOS] lots of small files in a folder on Linux centos

y a temporary solution that should serve only as a proof that this is the problem and it needs to be fixed. Try to explain that this hack is not an actual solution. -- Best regards, Marian Marinov signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Are file system mounts costly?

g time to execute. Best regards, Marian Marinov signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos