On 11/12/2007 17:18, Steve Campbell wrote:
I'm just beginning to consider using the Clustering available with
CentOS. We are going to spec out some new hardware, and after reading
most of the Clustering manuals, I have a small question about MySQL.
I would like to run High Availability MySQL,
On 12/12/2007 05:50, Jason Pyeron wrote:
I am running a server inside of VMWare, and the clock gains ~30 seconds
every 1000 seconds or 1.03X.
I need to keep the drift under the magic 1000 limit that ntpd kills its
self, but despite setting maxpoll really low I get:
Dec 11 23:58:14 host ntpd[490
On 14/12/2007 13:27, Centos wrote:
Hello
I have downloaded Centos 5.1 several times, but I am getting
md5checksum error.
also none of the websites on North America had DVD version.
it is listed but I couldn't download it.
any one else have the same problem.
md5sum -c CentOS-5.1-x86_64-bin-D
On 08/01/2008 15:15, Brian Mathis wrote:
From: Jack Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 8, 2008 3:17 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Hello All,
Consider a CentOS-5.1 Xen server (2.6.18-53.1.4.el5xen) hosting two
domains running CentOS-5.1 (2.6.18-53.1.4.el5). One domain has a fairly
accurate clock,
On 29/01/2008 13:35, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Tom Brown wrote:
I have a couple C5 systems I want to back up. My plan is to, one
way or another, back them up to a C5 machine in my office. I have
samba installed on the systems to back up, the machines are mounted
on the sys
On 01/02/2008 01:53, Jerry Geis wrote:
Hi all,
I used to use centos 4.5 on an AMD 4800+ with 2GIG ram.
Now I use centos 5.1 on AMD 6400+ with 4GIG RAM.
The system responsiveness is different between the two.
I noticed that centos 5.1 seems to be swapping programs out
of memory at times resultin
On 06/02/2008 17:26, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
If I have a production mailserver and a series of Linux servers that
all develop mail from logging etc, it seems slightly redundant to have
so many smtp servers installed on each of those boxes simply
forwarding mail as I choose to not have local d
On 13/02/2008 05:24, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
But I really have a hunch that it is just a lot of I/O wait time due to
either metadata maintenance and checkpointing and/or I/O failures, which
have very long timeouts before failure is recognized and *then*
alternate block assignment and mapping is d
NetApp's WAFL with A-SIS (advanced single instance storage) does
this. From a quick google:
http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/originalContent/
0,289142,sid5_gci1255018,00.html says:
... calculates a 16-bit checksum for each block of data it stores.
For data deduplication, the hashes are p
9 matches
Mail list logo
