[CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-02 Thread Linux Advocate
Guys, apache cpus usage is hitting 100% sometimes ( to such an extent that its very noticeable) on a box with just 8 users or so. i m getting this when i run 'top'. The worrying thing is seeing the work 'atack' under command PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-02 Thread Linux Advocate
sorry typos amended Guys, apache's cpu usage is hitting 100% sometimes ( to such an extent that its very noticeable) on a box ( 2gb ram) with just 8 users or so. This newver happended before. i m getting this when i run 'top'. The worrying thing is seeing the word 'atack' under c

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-02 Thread Linux Advocate
> > > some google foo shows this is a WINDOWS exploit not a linux one. > > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/analyzing-apache-logs-174552/ > ___ yes, william, i saw those links when i googledi too did no think it related to

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-02 Thread Linux Advocate
reply below - Original Message > From: John R. Dennison > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 11:43:46 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 08:23:16PM -0700, Linux Advocate

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-03 Thread Linux Advocate
My replies below i m just so down in the dumps nowaaah - Original Message > From: Neil Aggarwal > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 1:38:05 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell > > The original poster stated

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-03 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message > From: Anne Wilson > On Wednesday 03 June 2009 06:09:37 John R. Dennison wrote: > > He's running an apache instance on cent5. He has processes he > > can not readily identify running under apache named "atack"; > > where does "windows" co

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-03 Thread Linux Advocate
> > as an aside? did he say if he even looked on the net for anything related to > this?? i tried googling for 'centos apache atack" but did not get anything substantial. i tried locating a binary file called ' atack' but got nothing. ___

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-03 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message > From: John R. Dennison > > I stand by my previous advice - the box is compromised, can not > be trusted, and as a responsible admin he should be working on > re-installing it, evaluating what web-apps he had running that > led to this in the firs

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-03 Thread Linux Advocate
BRUCE U ARE A F*** GENIUS MAN ! u were right brothanx for spending the time on this man more info below ! - Original Message > From: bruce > To: linuxhous...@yahoo.com > Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 9:53:24 PM > Subject: RE: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache

Re: [CentOS] setrubleshootd dominating

2009-06-12 Thread Linux Advocate
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Frank M. Ramaekers > wrote: > > Anyone have any idea as to why setroubleshootd would be dominating the > > system: > > > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND > > 2371 root 25 0 1884m 1.8g 4100 R 100.2 44.7 680:06.40 > > se

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
Matt, great idea I FOUND SOMETHING... pls see below... >From: Matt >To: CentOS mailing list >Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2009 4:40:57 AM >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell >PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM

Re: [CentOS] setrubleshootd dominating

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
replies below... - Original Message > From: Ralph Angenendt > To: centos@centos.org > Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 2:46:40 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] setrubleshootd dominating > > Linux Advocate wrote: > > > > > strace -p And see what it is doing?

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message > From: bruce > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2009 3:20:24 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell > > and if you don't figure out what caused the issue... working on it bro :) one of the pointers here w

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message > From: William L. Maltby > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2009 12:56:22 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell > > > On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 09:33 -0700, Linux Advocate wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
replies below... - Original Message > From: Filipe Brandenburger > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 9:58:51 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell > > I suggest you start by looking at Apache's logs, Filipe, good idea.

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
john, replies below... > Linux Advocate wrote: > > DID THIS GUY ACTUALLY SAVE A FILE ON MY HARD DISK??? > > AA??? > > > > Was this why rkhunter popped out with this warning? > > > > * Filesystem checks &g

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-16 Thread Linux Advocate
> cmdshell.php) > > ? The horde framework was installed from the centos repo.!!! > > > I don't think the horde set on CentOS is very current. I just used the tarball > from the horde website, and I keep it current. ok. its just that with centos being a redhat clone and so on. all the rpm

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....[SOLVED]

2009-06-18 Thread Linux Advocate
thanx guys. Lets close this thread. bye. - Original Message > From: Scott Silva > To: centos@centos.org > Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 2:36:27 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell > > on 6-16-2009 10:26 PM Linux Advocat

Re: [CentOS] ssh security

2009-06-19 Thread Linux Advocate
> > [Normal log stuff from dictionary attack deleted...] > > This is common, and, presuming you have good passwords or only > accept authorized_keys, not a real problem other than large log > files. > > Look at fail2ban for a method that will automatically add > iptables blocks when this occurs

Re: [CentOS] Program to ban sniffers

2009-06-20 Thread Linux Advocate
> > That program would then, upon receiving a 'sniff' or 'user' would then add > that ip to the deny hosts lists..for either a long or short time. > > Using this would seem like a win as you can easily grab someone before they > can get somewhere one hopes. > Also, by opening up a few other

Re: [CentOS] server is always getting hacked

2009-06-28 Thread Linux Advocate
get ; 1. fail2ban - it blocks failed login ips etc 2. get shorewall or any iptables front end and restrict ips to the ranges u need ( or even specific ips) 3. run ssh on a nonstandard port 4. good, long password these steps will go a long way and will get u started. - Original Message -

Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster

2009-06-28 Thread Linux Advocate
taling abt piranha... i understand that its LVS + webfrontend and is suitable fro webpages and so on. What do we need to make it as a LAMP cluster, i.e with a mysql HA backend as well. So-> HA of [ LoadBalancer + Apache + MySQL} Any ideas guys? From: fmb fmb

Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster

2009-06-28 Thread Linux Advocate
: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Linux Advocate Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 11:18 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster taling abt piranha... i understand that its LVS + webfrontend and is suitable fro webpages and so on

Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster

2009-06-29 Thread Linux Advocate
ww.JAMMConsulting.com >100% uptime for your e-commerce site! Stay fully >operational >even with a db server failure. Ask me about the GRed >database. > > > ____ From: centos-boun...@centos.org >> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On B

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-29 Thread Linux Advocate
same here. i really must thank dag wiers and gang for all the good work. But If epel and rpmforge can work together , that's great. - Original Message > From: Ron Loftin > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:13:33 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linu

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-29 Thread Linux Advocate
beranger...@yahoo.com... , u have a problem with dag...and now it looks like u have a problem with linus torvalds himself u talk abt the need for cooperation,etc but you apparently dont get that 'you have to give respect to get respect' & 'give cooperation to get cooperation' relax br

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
Niki, could u tell me howto build frm SRPM? i am not good at this area and would like to learn this. - Original Message > From: Niki Kovacs > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 5:11:54 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag > > David Hrbác a écrit

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
david, could u tell me how to build frm SRPMS. i m not good in this area and would like to improve. - Original Message > From: David Hrbác( > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 5:52:37 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag > > Niki Kovacs napsal(a

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
> > Rather than dumping *even more work* on the core CentOS project (who are > already clearly struggling to provide even the core distro at present), > why doesn't everyone do as Dag suggested, and adopt a handful of > packages and help maintain them at rpmforge for the benefit of everyone.

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
great. thanx. - Original Message > From: Robert Heller >could u tell me howto build frm SRPM? i am not good at this area and > would like to learn this. > > Simple form (should work with most packages): > > # rpmbuild --rebuild package-version-release.srpm > > 'man rpmbuild' for m

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 14:18, Linux Advocatewrote: > > could u tell me howto build frm SRPM? i am not good at this area and would > like to learn this. > > This article in the Wiki should get you going... > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM > > HTH, > Filipe thanx. _

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
can dag & karanbir sort of sum up this thread as to how list members can work together on improving all the additional non-redhat-originated packages from rpmforge,etc. As for radu-cristian, relax bro. As for others (myself included), lets all chill out. this thread should not evolve into p

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-07-03 Thread Linux Advocate
> > enough is enough already. > > can some centos admin please discipline, ban and/or get rid of Radu-Cristian > FOTESCU aka beranger...@yahoo.ca > > please? > > not only has he physically threatened a contributor, his language & behavior > are more than inappropriate for such a profess

[CentOS] Yum - which repo did a package come from

2009-08-03 Thread Linux Advocate
guys, i have installed mailscanner, spamassassin, etc on my machine. This was done sometime ago. Some of these rpms i got not frm centos repos. What command ( or yum command ) can i use to find out which repo did this installled package come from. yum info packagename just says; repo : ins

Re: [CentOS] Yum - which repo did a package come from

2009-08-04 Thread Linux Advocate
Frank, > On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:33:52 -0700 (PDT) > Linux Advocate wrote: > > > What command ( or yum command ) can i use to find out which repo did this > installled package come from. > > rpm -qi packagename > > # rpm -qi spamassass

Re: [CentOS] Yum - which repo did a package come from

2009-08-04 Thread Linux Advocate
> > > What command ( or yum command ) can i use to find out which repo did this > installled package come from. > > rpm -qi packagename # rpm -qi mailscanner Name: mailscanner Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 4.74.13 Vendor:

[CentOS] RPMs for vispan , spamstat, phplistadmin

2009-08-04 Thread Linux Advocate
Guys, i have heard of vispan, phplistadmin, spamstat from the mailscanner manual and would like to experiment with them. 1. Any thoughts on them? ( i am trying to avoid mailwatch bcos i think vispan is better fit for reporting) 2. I have googled for their centos rpms but no luck? Any ideas whe

Re: [CentOS] Yum - which repo did a package come from

2009-08-04 Thread Linux Advocate
> > Yes, I have found this is a limitation of yum. It would be nice if the > information about the source repository could be stored somewhere. > > If these were installed after the initial OS installation, and you haven't > done a yum clean, you might be able to glean some info from the cache

Re: [CentOS] firewall question

2009-08-06 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message > From: William L. Maltby > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2009 4:15:40 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewall question > > On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 17:39 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > > > > > Or IPcop? > > > > > > BTW, Scott and other IPCop users

Re: [CentOS] RPMs for vispan , spamstat, phplistadmin

2009-08-08 Thread Linux Advocate
> Guys, > > i have heard of vispan, phplistadmin, spamstat from the mailscanner manual > and > would like to experiment with them. > > 1. Any thoughts on them? ( i am trying to avoid mailwatch bcos i think vispan > is > better fit for reporting) > 2. I have googled for their centos rpms b

[CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-22 Thread Linux Advocate
guys, i have the yum plugin -> fastest mirror . But not even once i have seen it selecting repos which are near my region such as japan or australia ( where i get the best speeds). Something is wrong. It seems stuck with these 3 sites ; Determining fastest mirrors * ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de :

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-22 Thread Linux Advocate
i have tried yum clean all , yum clean metadata - Original Message > From: Linux Advocate > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 8:56:37 PM > Subject: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region > > guys, i h

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-22 Thread Linux Advocate
> Hi Linux Advocate, > > I have found this a problem for the Australian servers I manage as > well. I suggest you manually test the speed of some local mirrors then > manually specify a mirror rather than relying on the fastest mirror > plugin. > > If your ISP mirr

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-23 Thread Linux Advocate
> > inetnum: 60.48.0.0 - 60.54.255.255 > netname: XDSLSTREAMYX > descr:Telekom Malaysia Berhad > descr:Network Strategy > descr:Wisma Telekom > descr:Jalan Pantai Baru > descr:50672 Kuala Lumpur > country: MY > > . > > A couple differe

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-23 Thread Linux Advocate
> John R Pierce wrote: > > fwiw, it appears "linux advocate" is sending his email from a Malaysia > > IP per the email headres... > > > > $ whois 60.50.xxx.yyy > > [Querying whois.apnic.net] > > [whois.apnic.net] > > % [whois.apn

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-24 Thread Linux Advocate
> > > #mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=os > > baseurl=ftp://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ > > gpgcheck=1 > > gpgkey=ftp://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 > > > > Regards, > > Oliver > > I h

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-24 Thread Linux Advocate
> > If you take a look in /etc/yum.repos.d/ you will see a number of > files. There should be example baseurl lines in the repo files which > will be commented out by default. Here's an example of how I use this > to manually use my local ISPs mirror for the base repo: > > [base] > name=Ce

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-24 Thread Linux Advocate
> > > > > > my repos are configured to use mirrorlist. how do i add mirrors > > manually? > > > > If you take a look in /etc/yum.repos.d/ you will see a number of > files. There should be example baseurl lines in the repo files which > will be commented out by default. Here's an example of

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-24 Thread Linux Advocate
> #mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=os > >> baseurl=ftp://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ > >> gpgcheck=1 > >> gpgkey=ftp://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 > >> > >> Regards, > >> Oliver > > > >

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-24 Thread Linux Advocate
> > I maintain the RPM that is used as part of CentOS Extras and that we use > on the CentOS servers in question. > > I did some major work on the app that CentOS uses for mirrorlists and > isolists over the weekend. Especially in the AP region, as we have > picked up some mirrors there recentl

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-25 Thread Linux Advocate
my region > > Linux Advocate wrote: > > johny, thanx for the link. > > > > i think 'my' should point to jp, cn, tw, au,sg. the setup u have there is > > > ;) > > > > do all ISP's in .MY use the same peering/trunking or do

Re: [CentOS] What repo did this rpm come from? rpm-VVa failures on new install

2009-09-20 Thread Linux Advocate
> > Vendor: Fedora Project > > If (Vendor == Fedora Project) then repo is epel > if (Vendor == Centos) then repo is Centos > if (Vendor == Dag Apt Repository) repo is rpmforge > > useful info. thanx. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.or

Re: [CentOS] realtime backup

2009-02-18 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message > From: John Doe > To: CentOS mailing list > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 5:40:48 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] realtime backup > > > From: CentOS List > > I had a cfml application running on mysql database. Can some suggest a > > realtime backup solution via

Re: [CentOS] Mail from domain problem

2009-02-23 Thread Linux Advocate
in /etc/postfix/main.cf , set myorigin=$mydomain and not as $myhostname. From: Xia Guowen To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 2:07:38 PM Subject: [CentOS] Mail from domain problem Hi, I installed a CentOS 4.7 server, the system

[CentOS] centos 5.2 - latest rpms for mailcanner , clamav and spamassassin

2009-02-27 Thread Linux Advocate
Guys, What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Repo order - priority plugins

2009-02-27 Thread Linux Advocate
Guys, what is the best way of arranging the repos with regards to their priority? Any ideas, especially for all non base ones? /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo - priority = 1, 2 /etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-extras.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-misc

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 - latest rpms for mailcanner , clamav and spamassassin

2009-02-27 Thread Linux Advocate
from the rpmforge repo? - Original Message > From: Ned Slider > > Linux Advocate wrote: > > Guys, > > > > What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin? > > > > RPMforge has clamav and spamassassin, but not mailscanner. > >

Re: [CentOS] Repo order - priority plugins

2009-02-27 Thread Linux Advocate
replies below... > On 2/27/09, Linux Advocate wrote: > > Guys, what is the best way of arranging the repos with regards to their > > priority? Any ideas, especially for all non base ones? > > > > /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo - priority = 1, 2 > >

Re: [CentOS] Repo order - priority plugins

2009-02-27 Thread Linux Advocate
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > > On 2/27/09, Linux Advocate wrote: > >> Guys, what is the best way of arranging the repos with regards to their > >> priority? Any ideas, especially for all non base ones? > >> > >> /et

Re: [CentOS] HylaFax and Com Ports

2009-02-27 Thread Linux Advocate
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > I need to setup HylaFax which leads to my first question, anyone > > got an opinion on whether or not to use HylaFax or HylaFax+? > > We use Hylafax together with Avantfax and are very pleased with the > results. I cannot speak to HylaFax+

Re: [CentOS] Repo order - priority plugins

2009-02-27 Thread Linux Advocate
Thanx kal, and to all who replied. i have understood the issue better. > > > /etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo > > > > /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo > > > > /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-extras.repo > > /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-misc.repo > > > > /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmforge.repo > > you can put rpmforge at 10 and

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 - latest rpms for mailcanner , clamav and spamassassin

2009-02-28 Thread Linux Advocate
> Craig White wrote on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:46:47 -0700: > > > you can get clam* and newer spamassassin rpms from rpmforge > > I suggest rolling your own SA. It's as simple as downloading the tarball > and rebuilding it with the included spec file. It's a simple one-line > command and docume

[CentOS] mailscanner installation - centos 5.2 - rpmforge + vanderkooij rpms

2009-02-28 Thread Linux Advocate
Guys, i have just installed ( after reading the docs on the mailscanner site and centos lists ) Mailscanner, and was wondering a.) How do i test my installation? is there some sample spam/ virus messages that can be used to test. b.) MailScanner -V shows; b.1) LibClamAV Warning: **

Re: [CentOS] trying to install 5.2 on a laptop

2009-03-01 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message > From: Michael Klinosky > > The X wiki suggested that I try adding this to /etc/X11/xorg.conf: > Section "ServerFlags" > Option "AllowMouseOpenFail" "1" > EndSection > > Using "cat xorg.conf", I seeSection "InputDevice" , which refers > to the S

Re: [CentOS] mailscanner installation - centos 5.2 - rpmforge + vanderkooij rpms

2009-03-01 Thread Linux Advocate
thanx. - Original Message > From: "tdu...@sc.rr.com" > To: CentOS mailing list > Cc: Linux Advocate > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 11:38:35 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] mailscanner installation - centos 5.2 - rpmforge + > vanderkooij rpms > >

Re: [CentOS] Fail2Ban

2009-03-01 Thread Linux Advocate
> > > Actually, it is a rather OS dependent package and the rules for CentOS > are difficult to write. That really doesn't belong on the fail2ban list > either. i have a basic fail2ban with tcp-wrappers & /etc/hosts.deny combo working. i couldnt get the iptables thing working properly.

Re: [CentOS] Fail2Ban

2009-03-03 Thread Linux Advocate
thanx john - Original Message > From: John Lundin > > john, could u share your rules for the dovecot attempts?t > > > Since no one else has stepped up... here's dovecot and vsftpd. > > These worked for me, ymmv. Centos 5 with rpmforge. Folded, failregex > should be a single line w

Re: [CentOS] Cannot get CentOS to install

2009-03-10 Thread Linux Advocate
> > The hardware is P4 2.8 CPU, 512 MB RAM, 120GB 3ware IDE/PATA RAID HD, > ATI Video, CDRW CD, Dual Nic, Floppy and IDE/PATA Tape drive. > if you could install centos 3 on this hardware, then centos 5.x should work...any error messages from the console? ___

Re: [CentOS] How to add ClamAV to Postfix?

2009-03-23 Thread Linux Advocate
> > > > Is there some standard way of adding AV to Postfix? > > clearly the best way is to add a wrapper program like amavisd-new or > MailScanner which handles spamassassin and which ever combination of > anti-virus programs you use. > > The postfix list and primary author, Wietse will te

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-23 Thread Linux Advocate
but what I worry about is members of the core > CentOS team burning out and quitting... that would be much worse for > CentOS than a few weeks delay here and there. For me it is important for > the core team to know that they can take the time off they need for real > life events without feeli

Re: [CentOS] OT: Torrent software choice

2009-04-02 Thread Linux Advocate
> > For a GUI, ktorrent scratches my itch. Persists indefinitely -- across > power failures, reboots, etc.; provides many stats. > From rpmforge: ktorrent-2.2.1-1.el5.rf > For a curses solution, I like bittorrent-curses from the > bittorrent-4.4.0-1.el5.rf package -- also from rpmforge.

Re: [CentOS] OT: Torrent software choice

2009-04-04 Thread Linux Advocate
> Linux Advocate wrote: > > is there a cli option? > > > Yes, there is. /usr/bin/bittorrent-console is provided as part of the > bittorrent package, available from http://bittorrent.com/ thanx, i will get it