Re: [CentOS] drbd on CentOS 5

On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:14 -0500, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > Is the centosplus kernel still needed for drbd support? I noticed that > if I do a 'yum update kmod-drbd', yum gives me an error because it wants > to install the "normal" CentOS kernel, but can't

[CentOS] drbd on CentOS 5

though. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.9-61.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 15:12:04 up 21 days, 13:43, 1 user, load average: 0.72, 0.85, 0.94 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] saslauth in postfix 2.2 on CentOS 4

x that the sasl auth should be passed to dovecot? I know how to do this in CentOS 5 since it has postfix 2.3, and that version has support for dovecot authentication. So far, I haven't been able to figure out how to do the same thing in CentOS 4 and postfix 2.2. Any tips? Regards, Ranbir --

Re: [CentOS] saslauth in postfix 2.2 on CentOS 4

g, and it doesn't look like I'll be able to use dovecot for the sasl auth. I would have to upgrade postfix and dovecot on this CentOS 4 box to an unsupported version. Damn. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.9-61.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 09:28:51 up 5 days, 7:58, 1 user

Re: [CentOS] drbd on CentOS 5

swer, Fabian. Much appreciated. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.9-61.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 13:28:34 up 15 days, 11:56, 1 user, load average: 0.44, 0.47, 0.42 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Do we have any Zimbra users on the list?

em know that you are. If you would > pay for Official support, let them know that too. I'm thinking about deploying Zimbra for a customer, and perhaps even for myself. But, I haven't figured out if I want to use Zimbra or Scalix. I haven't spent much time investigating, though.

[CentOS] virt-install in CentOS 5

http://10.19.75.200/mirror/fedora/linux/releases/8/images/xen/vmlinuz : it's actually here: http://10.19.75.200/mirror/fedora/linux/releases/8/Fedora/i386/os/images/xen/ I've used the above syntax to install CentOS 5 domUs on the same host without any problems. What gives? Regards, Ranbir --

[CentOS] php-pear-SOAP

w/php-pear-SOAP.html I should be able to just install the Fedora 6 package, but I'd rather use one built on CentOS 5. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 17:15:43 up 14 days, 5:20, 0 users, load average: 0

Re: [CentOS] How to get status of notebook lid?

Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 21:08:42 up 10 days, 50 min, 2 users, load average: 0.58, 0.34, 0.20 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Rebuild Fedora Core 6 cmake rpm on CentOS 5

Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.20-1.2962.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 11:47:54 up 1 day, 5:47, 3 users, load average: 0.09, 0.06, 0.04 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: Rebuild Fedora Core 6 cmake rpm on CentOS 5

po, or do I have create it myself? Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.20-1.2962.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 13:11:05 up 1 day, 7:10, 3 users, load average: 0.16, 0.12, 0.09 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/

[CentOS] can't login to remote cvs server

st. I'm missing something critical, obviously. Does anyone have any ideas about what I'm doing wrong? Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.20-1.2962.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 14:55:33 up 10 days, 8:53, 4 users, load average: 0.58, 0.44, 0.26

Re: [CentOS] can't login to remote cvs server

On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 15:05 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > I'm stumped. I can't figure out why cvs keeps saying the repository > doesn't exist. I'm missing something critical, obviously. > > Does anyone have any ideas about what I'm doing wrong? I fi

[CentOS] nedi rpms for centos 5

Hi Everyone, I'm looking for rpms of nedi for centos 5. Does anyone know of a repo that has them? Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.2-42.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 12:58:56 up 11 days, 11:24, 1 user, load average: 0.88, 0.92,

[CentOS] 2 nics, 2 networks, 2 switches

fcfg-eth0 and ifcfg-eth1), but it didn't work. I'm over looking something. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.2-42.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 11:40:26 up 14 days, 10:05, 4 users, load average: 0.57, 0.20, 0.08 ___ Ce

Re: [CentOS] 2 nics, 2 networks, 2 switches

A's internet/DMZ router. Yes, B's gateway has routes to the rest of 10.x.x.x, and more. Leaving the default gateway as network A's should be okay. I'll have to try this. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.2-42.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 17:20:35 up 19 days, 1

Re: [CentOS] 2 nics, 2 networks, 2 switches

s because services running on the box need to access devices on network B, and that's only possible from within network B itself. So, is that enough detail? I'm not sure if I've cleared things up or just made more of a mess. Thanks for any help. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbi

Re: [CentOS] 2 nics, 2 networks, 2 switches

figuring two NICs for two separate networks. I thought it would have been a relatively common procedure, and therefore fairly well documented. Anyone know of half decent sites that discuss how to implement what I'm trying to do? Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.2-42

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)

control channel /dev/initctl What the hell is going on? Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.20-1.2944.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 01:01:07 up 8 days, 15:49, 4 users, load average: 0.65, 0.56, 0.55 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http

[CentOS] logwatch reports not benig emailed

mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t" but, it hasn't helped. Does anyone have any ideas? I must be missing something obvious. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.20-1.2944.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 12:14:54 up 16 days, 3:01, 3 us

Re: [CentOS] logwatch reports not benig emailed

On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 12:22 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > I can send mail on the command line, and I get it at my email address, > delivered to the internal mail server: great! But, every night when > logwatch runs, the damned reports never make it to my mailbox. What's >

Re: [CentOS] logwatch reports not benig emailed

On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 08:00 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > No ideas what's going on? This happening on every single CentOS 5 > server I've installed (6 so far). Oh my gosh. Well, I figured out the problem: crontabs and vixie-cron weren't installed. On all the CentOS

Re: [CentOS] KVM host question about host firewall

in a host based firewall...yet, anyway. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 15:39:12 up 9 days, 21:23, 3 users, load average: 0.03, 0.07, 0.02 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Migrating standalone systems to KVM

nezilla in the VM and restore from the images. That's an excellent idea! I didn't consider it when I was trying to figure out how to migrate a physical CentOS 5 server to a KVM. I will try this just for shits and giggles. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.32.26-175.f

Re: [CentOS] Printers, aka an old time sysadmin

Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 21:15:40 up 1 day, 19:55, 2 users, load average: 0.02, 0.02, 0.05 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] virDomainSetMaxMemory error

- I changed the memory parameters to be what I wanted, saved, and quit # virsh define guest.xml Done. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 21:41:35 up 4 days, 20:21, 2 users, load average: 0.08, 0.21, 0.16

Re: [CentOS] Re: fastrack channel?

getting 5 hours a night, most of the time (instead of the 8 I really need). Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 21:01:58 up 14 days, 43 min, 1 user, load average: 1.04, 0.96, 0.91 ___ CentOS mailing list

[CentOS] Postfix+MySQL - how to create DB

7;d much rather know if there is an official source for this, though. So far I haven't found it. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 22:25:36 up 9 days, 16:23, 2 users, load average: 0.29, 0.27, 0.27 ___ Ce

Re: [CentOS] clustered mail server?

just about always the best option. Having said that, I'm going to stick with RoundCube. If SquirrelMail ever gets a total interface overhaul, I'll most likely go back to it. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 21:30:46 up 31 days, 15:26, 2

[CentOS] Will CentOS 6's upstream be based on Fedora 10?

machine. I haven't decided yet if I want to move up to Fedora 10 or CentOS 6. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 10:30:46 up 20 days, 11:40, 1 user, load average: 0.77, 0.79, 0.72 ___ CentOS mailing l

RE: [CentOS] Will CentOS 6's upstream be based on Fedora 10?

Evolution has been much more stable. Go figure. FYI: I use CentOS 5 for all my server stuff, and even for desktop machines. But, I just don't want it as my main desktop distribution. :) Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 11:04:42 up 20 days, 12:14, 1 use

Re: [CentOS] Will CentOS 6's upstream be based on Fedora 10?

On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 07:41 -0700, nate wrote: > Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > The subject says it all. I'm asking because I've found Fedora 9 to be > > It will be based on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. CentOS is based on RHEL, RHEL i

Re: [CentOS] Will CentOS 6's upstream be based on Fedora 10?

OS as my main desktop for work and home. :) Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 16:47:03 up 20 days, 17:56, 1 user, load average: 0.20, 0.42, 0.72 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] rsyslog expression based filters

logs are coming in because I've setup property based filters that all work just fine. I can take this to the rsyslog list if need be. I wanted to try here first. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Re: [CentOS] rsyslog expression based filters

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:59 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > Hello All, > > Does the rsyslog version in CentOS 5 support expression based filters? > I'm asking because a filter I believe should be working, isn't and I > cannot figure out why. I think this is the l

[CentOS] mock rebuild of rsyslog dies

ne know why librelp-devel wouldn't be found? Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 15:22:34 up 2 days, 16:33, 4 users, load average: 1.11, 1.06, 0.67 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cent

Re: [CentOS] mock rebuild of rsyslog dies

On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 15:23 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > Does anyone know why librelp-devel wouldn't be found? Well, shit, I figured it out. librelp-devel is in epel, not in the CentOS repos. So, after adding the epel repo to the mock config for centos-5-x86_64 and centos-5-i

Re: [CentOS] recent rsyslog package available for CentOS?

hat's not a disaster. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 09:52:40 up 9 days, 19:26, 5 users, load average: 1.61, 1.35, 1.23 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/

Re: [CentOS] recent rsyslog package available for CentOS?

h mock. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 10:16:18 up 1 day, 16:47, 4 users, load average: 1.37, 1.16, 1.22 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] good small registrar?

e. But, if you really want to stay away, try Gandi - www.gandi.net I use gandi.net for my .com domains. Me likey! Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 10:36:40 up 1 day, 17:07, 4 users, load ave

[CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

ernel). Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 17:55:54 up 5 days, 9:22, 5 users, load average: 1.13, 0.47, 0.28 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 18:06 -0400, Kwan Lowe wrote: > I don't think kvm is available upstream until 5.4. I figured that out about 5 minutes after sending the email. Just great. Anyone know when 5.4 is hitting? Thanks for the reply! Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2

Re: [CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

tions: 1. How stable is it? 2. Any idea if moving from this testing version to the eventual official release in CentOS 5.4 will present any problems? (I suspect not) Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 21:49:02 up 5 days, 13:15, 4 users

Re: [CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

128.1.14). So, I'll give the version packaged up by Farkas a try. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 11:27:48 up 6 days, 2:54, 4 users, load average: 1.40, 1.28, 1.29 ___ CentOS maili

Re: [CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

> we use it for and seems to be finally stable: > kmod-kvm-2.6.30.1-2.el5 > qemu-*-0.10.5-2.el5 I don't see a libvirt package. Should I just use the one from the extras repo? Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 12:24:46

Re: [CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 18:56 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: > see around (it's there since 06.28): > http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/x86_64/virt/RPMS/libvirt-0.6.4-2.el5.x86_64.rpm Wow, I'm blind. Thanks. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.

Re: [CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

repos keep replacing it, even though I've excluded the package. I've tried cleaning the yum cache and a few other trouble shooting steps, all to no avail. I'll have to install libvirt locally. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU

Re: [CentOS] kvm in Centos 5.3

endencies are resolving properly. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 23:53:03 up 12 days, 15:19, 3 users, load average: 0.34, 0.27, 0.18 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://l

[CentOS] KVM - missing dependency

0.7.0-5.el5.x86_64 (lfarkas) I can't find that package anywhere in that repo. So, where do I get it from? BTW, I would have asked this on the CentOS virt list, but that list is really quiet. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 21:1

Re: [CentOS] KVM - missing dependency

On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 21:17 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > I can't find that package anywhere in that repo. So, where do I get it > from? Forget I asked: I'll just grab it from the CentOS base repo. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.x

[CentOS] pulse audio for CentOS 5

Hi All, Does anyone know of a repo packaging a recent pulse audio release as RPMs for CentOS 5? Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 11:26:10 up 8 days, 12:22, 5 users, load average: 1.09, 0.35, 0.18

[CentOS] How to install kvm?

installing the older kernel my only option? BTW, I'd post this on the virt-list, but I have a hard time getting answers on that list. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 14:44:30 up 8 days, 15:41, 5 users, load average: 0.56, 0.22,

Re: [CentOS] How to install kvm?

ld it. I did it several times, it is not that hard and you get the > most recent version. Fair enough, but the kmod-kvm rpms in the extras repo are for ancient kernels. There hasn't been a new package since Oct. 2008. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc

Re: [CentOS] [OT] RHEVM List

evice instead of > bonding bridged nics? That's what I do on our various CentOS 5 and RHEL 5 based KVM clusters (I use CentOS/RHEL Cluster Suite for the storage and KVM clustering bits). Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.32.23-170.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 07:08:09 up

Re: [CentOS] OT - Monitoring tool

On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 05:32 -0400, Jim Wildman wrote: > Have not tried it, but I snipped this for future use. > > FAN Fully Automated Nagios (based on CentOS) > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/fannagioscd Oh wow - I haven't heard of this project. It looks sweeet. The CentOS 5 + nagios + s

Re: [CentOS] Re: question about software Raid 1

On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 21:01 +0200, Kay Diederichs wrote: > Fact is that with CentOS-5 kernels (but not with CentOS-4, as this > functionality became available in kernel 2.6.17) you could (or rather > _should_ regularly) > echo check > /sys/block/mdX/md/sync_action > to check agreement between

Re: [CentOS] Re: question about software Raid 1

On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 12:09 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote: > cat /proc/mdstat gives progress > > cat /sys/block/md0/md/sync_action gives current mode Of course! I guess when I ran the check on md0, it finished before I had the opportunity to watch the progress, so I wasn't sure what to check. Also,

Re: [CentOS] freenx 7.3?

On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 16:38 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Has anyone built a freenx 7.3 for Centos 5? I'd like to be able to use > the session shadow mode on some machines. Oh neat! When did this get added to freenx? I've been wanted to test that out for a long time. Regards, Ranbir _

Re: [CentOS] Kerberos for squid auth

joining the AD to test AD auth. That is, you want to be sure your "linux" side is configured properly to get a kerberos ticket in the first place. If you're able to get one, you should be to join the domain. HTH, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.7-53.fc9.x86_64 x86_

Re: [CentOS] Kerberos for squid auth

> to AD... If you need any tips/help, let me know. I have lots of CentOS servers and a couple of Fedora and Ubuntu laptops authenticating to AD at work, and they all work flawlessly. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.7-53.fc9.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 10:17:32 up 6 days, 14:4

Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]

know his stuff! Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 21:12:14 up 2 days, 22:59, 4 users, load average: 0.22, 0.21, 0.29 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]

hopefully be useful to you, too. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 17:50:59 up 5 days, 19:38, 3 users, load average: 2.08, 1.78, 0.98 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]

later this week. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 17:54:53 up 5 days, 19:41, 3 users, load average: 1.20, 1.70, 1.14 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]

hough I don't know what. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 17:57:09 up 5 days, 19:44, 3 users, load average: 0.21, 1.13, 1.00 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]

hen the user logs in. What's the difference between kerberos auth and winbind auth? Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 19:32:30 up 5 days, 21:19, 3 users, load average: 0.30, 0.24, 0.21

Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]

rds before. Anyway, thanks for pointing out the Firefox settings. I doubt I would have remembered they were there. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 14:04:07 up 6 days, 15:51, 4 users, load average: 0.92, 1.02, 0.69 __

Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]

On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 14:07 -0500, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 20:36 -0500, Ross Walker wrote: > > In Firefox go to your about:config page and scroll down to: > > > > network.negotiate-auth.delegation-uris > > > > and > >

Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]

cussing what I've mentioned here. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 14:58:02 up 6 days, 16:45, 4 users, load average: 1.32, 1.27, 1.21 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] jboss application server rpm

egards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 15:26:31 up 7 days, 14:53, 5 users, load average: 0.79, 0.32, 0.16 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] jboss application server rpm

gt; > > The only exception to this approach might be if part of your > > file- system are read-only because you booted the box via PXE. > > > > You could make a RPM pretty easy for it. I was kind of hoping not having to go down that route...you know, laziness and all. :)

[CentOS] freeradius version

he freeradius server is going to be critical. So, should I rebuild the F10 rpm, or should I just stick with the version in CentOS 5? Based on what I'm reading, moving to a newer release would be wise. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/L

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 08:44 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > What about branching Fedora freeradius for EPEL? I guess I can I make a package request there (I already checked - they don't have it). Are people really deploying freeradius-1.1.3?? -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.19-

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

am will backport, if need be. I suppose my real concern is if our soon-to-arrive network gear requires features included only in the 2.0 and up releases. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 12:00:42 up 19 days, 11:26, 4 users, load ave

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

he ideal way to do it. I assume there's a particular way packages need to be built for inclusion into centosplus. Where be the info? :) Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 12:13:53 up 19 days, 11:40, 4 users,

Re: [CentOS] help on kerberos5

gt;ticket_lifetime = 36000 >renew_lifetime = 36000 > forwardable = true >krb4_convert = false > } kinit should work after making the changes above. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 14:06:36 up 19 da

Re: [CentOS] freeradius version

ed to continually > monitor updates and releases unless there's a security issue. I'd be doing it for the community, not just myself. It would help everyone out. Besides, what comes around, goes around. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 x86_

Re: [CentOS] error when join my Centos machine to win2003 ADS server

eper problem (e.g. network issue), or simply that you've specified the wrong server to use for checking passwords against. BTW, I still don't know why you have two "kdc" entries in your krb5.conf file. You only need one. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 23:09:16 up 4 days, 2:19, 2 users, load average: 0.17, 0.26, 0.21 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

untu server. Debian, sure (though I'm a Red Hat and Red Hat based guy), but Ubuntu? Forget it! I hope you find it as stable and reliable as CentOS. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 06:47:45 up 23:59, 1 user, load a

[CentOS] CentOS 6 x86_64 DVD doesn't boot

"EF" part. Does anyone know what's going on? I've never seen this problem before. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 09:21:53 up 10:20, 2 users, load average: 1.20, 1.47, 1.34 _

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 x86_64 DVD doesn't boot

work *NOT* a CDRW drive? > Sometimes CD-ROM drives do not like reading rewriteable media. The drive in my little server is a DVD/CD burner, too. So, that's not the problem. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 x86_64 DVD doesn't boot

ows the drive or the machine? The burner I'm using is a built in laptop drive. :/ However, I have used it to burn LinuxMCE DVD images, and those have always booted on my new machine without issue. I think it's something specific to CentOS 6 and the particular hardware I'm usin

Re: [CentOS] Burning DVDs (was: CentOS 6 x86_64 DVD doesn't boot)

in Fedora 15 to burn the DVD image. I changed the speed to 1x, but K3B reported the burn speed as 2.4x - I guess it couldn't go any lower. The newly burnt image didn't boot either. The error was the same. So sad. :( Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x

Re: [CentOS] Burning DVDs (was: CentOS 6 x86_64 DVD doesn't boot)

On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 05:57 +0200, Udo Siewert wrote: > A shot in the dark: my DVD image burned by K3B won't also boot. Using > Brasero and all was fine. Not reproducable, but worth the attempt. I used Brasero: failed to boot. Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.32.26-175.

Re: [CentOS] Burning DVDs (was: CentOS 6 x86_64 DVD doesn't boot)

On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 22:17 -0600, Devin Reade wrote: > My successful burns (although not tried with CentOS 6 yet) have been > using growisofs directly: > > growisofs -speed=1 -dvd-compat -Z /dev/dvd=image.iso Tried this: failed to boot. Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Lin

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 x86_64 DVD doesn't boot

> if the problem follows the drive or the machine? I used a different burner in a different PC running Fedora 15: failed to boot. Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 09:36:17 up 9:25, 1 user, load average: 0.19

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 x86_64 DVD doesn't boot

On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 09:32 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > ETCDisolinux: Found something at drive = EF > No DEFAULT or UI configuration directive found! > boot: > > The same disc works fine in my 4 year old HP laptop, and when installing > CentOS 6 as a KVM. I've

Re: [CentOS] Burning DVDs (was: CentOS 6 x86_64 DVD doesn't boot)

d. See if it boot then? I already tried that: it won't boot. :( Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 12:12:23 up 12:01, 1 user, load average: 0.44, 0.10, 0.03 ___ CentOS mailing list CentO

Re: [CentOS] Burning DVDs

olve the CentOS problem. I'll still try it. It's worth a shot. Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 12:15:29 up 12:04, 1 user, load average: 0.29, 0.16, 0.06 ___ CentOS mailing list Cent

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 x86_64 DVD doesn't boot [SOLVED]

ise isolinux in CentOS 6 and in Fedora 15 behave differently. Thanks to everyone that tried to help out. I appreciate everyone's efforts. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 12:18:37 up 12:07, 1

Re: [CentOS] Multiple FreeNX servers and SSH ports

On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 15:54 +0100, Niki Kovacs wrote: > I'd like to handle the two PCs from the medical office remotely with > FreeNX. I figured that the best way to distinguish them would be to > assign a different port for SSH to each of them, and then redirect each > of the ports respectively

Re: [CentOS] Networking setup/help

On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 09:31 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > If you are starting from scratch and don't know your way around the > linux system, why not use one of the 'appliance' style distributions > like ClearOS (fairly new) or SMEserver (older but still works)? These > are based on CentOS code

[CentOS] Satellite 6

Hi Everyone, Since Satellite 6 is an amalgam of other F/OSS projects and is no longer solely based on Spacewalk, is a new upstream project for Satellite 6 going to be created? BEtter yet, is a new upstream project already available? Ranbir -- Kanwar R.S. Sandhu _

Re: [CentOS] Satellite 6

On 2015-07-22 13:34, Thomas Eriksson wrote: The upstream project is called Katello, http://www.katello.org/ It has nothing to do with Spacewalk as far as I can tell. Katello is just one piece. Satellite 6 also integrates Candlepin, Puppet and more. What I'm wondering is if the entire set of so

Re: [CentOS] Satellite 6

On 2015-07-22 14:53, Thomas Eriksson wrote: The Katello project is the whole thing. During installation it pulls in Foreman, Candlepin, Pulp, Puppet and more. Really? I couldn't tell based on the Katello project site. Thanks for the info. I'm going to give Katello a spin at home. -- Kanwar R.

[CentOS] Oracle java RPM

Hi Everyone, Years ago the recommended way to install Sun's java was to install from the tar.gz file because the RPM they supplied did some bad things (clobbered other files or something...can't remember the details). Is this still the case with Oracle's java RPM, or is it now safe to install? Ra

Re: [CentOS] Oracle java RPM

On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 16:16 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > jailed in a docker is safe to install, Cool, but it doesn't really answer my question. :P -- Kanwar R.S. Sandhu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailm

[CentOS] CentOS 7.1.1503 + Dovecot + IPA

Hi Everyone, I'm running an IPA server on CentOS 7 successfully and now I want to change my Dovecot setup to use GSSAPI for IMAP authentication instead of a flat "userdb" file. I've already joined the Dovecot box to the IPA domain - ssh and ipa policies and all that are working properly. I read a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.1.1503 + Dovecot + IPA

On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 13:53 -0700, Alice Wonder wrote: > You could try rebuilding this src.rpm - > > http://awel.domblogger.net/7/libre/src/repoview/dovecot.html > > That's what I use for Dovecot on CentOS 7 but I build it against > LibreSSL so you probably don't want my binary RPM but the src.r

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.1.1503 + Dovecot + IPA

On 2015-09-09 14:21, Mike wrote: Yep, I have it working. It's been almost 6 months since I set it up so don't recall many details other than it was NOT trivial :). Have only used alpine and thunderbird clients, both work fine. I wonder if that means Evolution is broken. In any case, could you t

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.1.1503 + Dovecot + IPA

On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:01 -0700, Mike wrote: > < !include auth-system.conf.ext This helped. I enabled pam for passdb and now my GSSAPI auth works, but I don't understand why. I also had to enable "allow_all_users=yes" otherwise the messages weren't delivered. I'm going to have to take this to

  1   2   >