On Dec 6, 2007 5:40 PM, Andrew Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To upgrade the kernel to CentOS 5.1 (to take advantage of support for
> Dell wireless card bcm43xx), should I update everything or just type
> 'yum update kernel', or what?
It's OK to just update the kernel, however, why not update
On Dec 6, 2007 11:22 PM, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can take it further (if you have more than one site/port to
> connect to) - install a proxy on the remote machine (e.g. "squid" or
> maybe apache's mod_proxy) and forward a tunnel to it as you describe
> then setup localhost:
On Dec 7, 2007 11:30 AM, Charles E Campbell Jr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>- If you didn't install vim-enhanced, I suggest getting the vim
> source, preferably applying the patches, and compiling it yourself:
Why? There would be nothing that we could do to support anything
compiled form sou
On Dec 7, 2007 3:48 AM, David Hrbáč <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And you can extend Karanbir's way by using kickstart, where you can
> remove far more packages. Some hints: bluez*, up2date, wireless-tools,
> wvdial, pcmcia-cs, etc. It all depends on the needs.
> David Hrbáč
This question comes up
On Dec 7, 2007 1:04 PM, Bob Tomkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To "best preserve" RAID1 mirroring protections of OS, Data, etc
>
> *AND*
>
> optimize performance, how should I setup RAID for the "new" configurations?
The entire system I would install on HW RAID, and use LVM for
flexibility
On Dec 7, 2007 2:33 PM, Bob Tomkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I correct in my understanding that each DomU contains an instance of
> OS/kernel + app binaries in it's own virtual volume/file space, but that
> *data* (effectively, *any* dynamic content) is written by the DomU processes
> to/fr
On Dec 9, 2007 7:39 PM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is running 2.6.23.9 as I wanted to use kvm-amd.
There is no way that we can support this, since you are running a
kernel that was not supplied with the distribution. The current
kernel for CentOS 5.1 is 2.6.18-53.1.4.
You may
On Dec 10, 2007 11:11 AM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a local mirror of CentOS5 base and updates. Now with 5 having
> become 5.1 and in case I just want to keep on updating (at the moment) is
> it enough that I update the mirror of updates or do I also need an update
> of the b
On Dec 10, 2007 8:08 AM, David Hláčik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was thinking that CentOS 5.1 has allready a kernel patched , but as it
> seems NOT. Or am i wrong?
If upstream has not patched it, CentOS would not have either. It
appears from the Red Hat Bugzilla entry that this is a likely
c
On Dec 21, 2007 6:35 PM, Tom Laramee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yum install httpd-symbols
>
Well, once you enable or create (forget which) the debuginfo repo
that's available at http://vault.centos.org, then you can do a 'yum
install httpd-debuginfo'
On Dec 28, 2007 10:16 AM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> drive. Dump tends to be unhappy if the filesystem changes during the
> run, so you might be better off using tar. Also, some tape drives are
Note what Linus has to say on the topic here:
http://lwn.net/2001/0503/a/lt-dump.php3
11 matches
Mail list logo
