Re: [CentOS] Kernel Upgrade and RAID Card

2008-07-13 Thread Johnny Hughes
Ryan Nichols wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: Ryan Nichols wrote: Ok, I've got a RocketRAID 2300 and when i do the update of the kernel it breaks the raid card since the OS is on the raid card itself, i need to install the driver into the new kernel.. Whats the best way to do this? I am re

Re: [CentOS] so many problem CENTOS 5.2 with DELL servers????

2008-07-14 Thread Johnny Hughes
mcclnx mcc wrote: I have been installed CENTOS 5.2 on several DELL servers and have following problems (even latest patches apply): 1. DELL 2650 can NOT boot under CENTOS 5.2 PAE mode Did you install the PAE kernel and are you booting the PAE kernel? 2. DELL R900 can NOT boot under CENTO

Re: [CentOS] Bug-buddy and bug reports for GNOME 2.16...

2008-07-14 Thread Johnny Hughes
MHR wrote: There seems to be some hostility to the idea of this being a GNOME or Evolution problem: Bug 542280 – Refuses to report bugs because gnome 2.16.x is too old View Bug Activity Product:bug-buddy Component: general Version:2.16.x Status: RESOLVED Resolution:

Re: [CentOS] background process

2008-07-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
Mogens Kjaer wrote: David Hlác(ik wrote: Sorry for such lame question but .. When i am connected to server using SSH . How can i fetch process to background and close ssh session and not kill that process? And how can i later connect to server and fetch process from background to console? All

Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: anything in CentOS 5.2 that uses opendns.com when browsing web?

2008-07-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
William L. Maltby wrote: On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 07:41 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: I have it working, with one glitch (cannot get to the IPCop web interface from my Desktop) in the Backup IPCop box. Did you remember to use the alternate port? E.g on my local net https://homegroanfirewall:

Re: Updated bluez - Re: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 41, Issue 7

2008-07-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
Robert Moskowitz wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 9. CESA-2008:0581 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 bluez-utilsUpdate (Johnny Hughes) How do I find out what was changed? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0581.html signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [CentOS] Bug-buddy and bug reports for GNOME 2.16...

2008-07-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
Lanny Marcus wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On CentOS 5.2 (and 5.1 and 5.0, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux of the same versions, which happen to be the most current ones available), the bug buddy "tool" consistently refuses to

Re: [CentOS] can I host a Ubuntu / Gentoo repository on a CentOS server?

2008-07-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
Rudi Ahlers wrote: - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:10:00 -0400 From: Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] can I host a Ubuntu / Gentoo repository on a CentOS server? To: CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Problem with mod_proxy_ajp.so

2008-07-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, After updating httpd package it outputs an error when restarting apache. Problem was "workarounded" commenting out line 2 of /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy_ajp.so Starting httpd: httpd: Syntax error on line 210 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: Syntax error on line 3 of /etc

Re: [CentOS] yum remove -- wants to remove a ton of stuff

2008-07-16 Thread Johnny Hughes
fred smith wrote: I've got a Centos 4 box at work, where I noticed a pile of old kernels lying around and no longer needed. I did "rpm -qa | grep -y kernel > list" then edited the list to remove from it the newer kernels, then "yum remove `cat list`". Yum has come up with a list of 71 packages i

Re: [CentOS] Re: pear

2008-07-16 Thread Johnny Hughes
David Hrbáč wrote: Scott Silva napsal(a): Isn't a little late to ask if something is safe AFTER you do it? ;-P On testing virtual? ;-P As it is not safe to use cpan to install modules for perl, I was asking if pear is the same or not. It is exactly the same and for the same reasons. If you

Re: [CentOS] yum remove -- wants to remove a to n of stuff

2008-07-16 Thread Johnny Hughes
Bowie Bailey wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: You are trying to remove kernel-utils ...you don't want to do that. That might cut back the deps a bit. Also, i never remove packages with yum, but with: rpm -e `cat list` But, that is just my advise. I didn't think there was any

Re: [CentOS] Re: pear

2008-07-16 Thread Johnny Hughes
David Hrbáč wrote: Johnny Hughes napsal(a): It is exactly the same and for the same reasons. If you need something, look in DAG or EPEL or ATRPMS and if it is not there, I would build it if I were you. I think so, then I do not see the point of providing centosplus php-pear-MDB2 without

Re: [CentOS] Re: pear

2008-07-16 Thread Johnny Hughes
David Hrbáč wrote: Johnny Hughes napsal(a): The point is that it's required for some dependency in that repo, and the other thing you asked about was not required. We are not trying to replace DAG or EPEL in centosplus or centos-extras ... so the only things that are in there are things

Re: [CentOS] openldap package compilation flags?

2008-07-16 Thread Johnny Hughes
tblader wrote: Hello All. How do I find out what flags were used to compile the Centos openldap-2.3.27-8.el5_2.4 rpm package? I'm specifically wondering if it was compiled with --enable-lmpasswd Thanks! If you download the SRPM and install it, then you can look at the spec file. Server is bui

Re: [CentOS] Custom CentOS iso's

2008-07-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
Tracy R Reed wrote: I have a consulting client who has a Linux based storage appliance which is based on Fedora Core 2. I'll pause here while you laugh... They need to upgrade to something more easily supported and CentOS is the chosen distro. They have the source RPM's for their old system

Re: [CentOS] Replacing custom kernel with another - with same identifier

2008-07-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
Antti J. Huhtala wrote: to, 2008-07-17 kello 09:16 +0100, ne.. kirjoitti: On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 08:05, Antti J. Huhtala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What is the safe way to remove the previous installed kernel version without taking out the uninstalled new version? Is the latter safe in ~/rpmbu

Re: [CentOS] Problems with building an rpm

2008-07-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
Robert Moskowitz wrote: thanks for replying. R P Herrold wrote: On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I followed the setup instructions from http://www.owlriver.com/tips/non-root/ ... the author is known to me ;) Assuming that you are in /etc/sudoers And then asked for a passwo

Re: [CentOS] Problems with building an rpm

2008-07-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
Robert Moskowitz wrote: wow Johnny Hughes wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: thanks for replying. R P Herrold wrote: On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I followed the setup instructions from http://www.owlriver.com/tips/non-root/ ... the author is known to me ;) Assuming

Re: [CentOS] Q about CentOS-4

2008-07-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
Craig White wrote: I have a client with a server on CentOS-4 and I'm looking to upgrade to latest horde/imp/etc. clearly php 4.3.9-xx is not up to the task but I see that upgrades for php & mysql are in CentOS-Plus I see that CentOS-4 projects to get security updates until 3/2012 which probably

Re: [CentOS] yum update glitch on latest update to 5.2

2008-07-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
Akemi Yagi wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:01 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: gecko-libs = 1.9 is needed by package nspluginwrapper Something missing? This is a known issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455601

Re: [CentOS] yum update glitch on latest update to 5.2

2008-07-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
Lanny Marcus wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:01 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ]# yum update Loading "priorities" plugin Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.hmc.edu * updates: mirrors.versaweb.com * kbs-CentOS-Extras: centos.karan.org

Re: [CentOS] gecko-libs dependency resurfaces

2008-07-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
Ben Mohilef wrote: In doing an update of centos 5.2 this morning, I observed that the old gecko-libs dependency issue caused yum update to fail because it was required by nspluginwrapper (x64_86), devhelp, yelm and firefox. Also, a firefox (x64_86) showed the red hat splash screen rather than

Re: [CentOS] Custom CentOS iso's

2008-07-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
Tracy R Reed wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: We install the SRPMS and move all the tar files out of SVN and into a directory, keeping all the patches and text files in SVN. We put the tarballs in a webdav directory (in a subdirectory under SRPM name) How do you know which tarballs go with which

Re: [CentOS] Yum strangeness

2008-07-18 Thread Johnny Hughes
Jeff wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Sam Drinkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I was about to do an update on my server, but looking at what the output was and here's the output from the beginning with other parts left off. I currently don't even have the clamav server installe

Re: [CentOS] Yum strangeness

2008-07-18 Thread Johnny Hughes
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: William L. Maltby ha scritto: And look at using the yum priorities plugin so you can safely mix repos. I have one question about this: Which is the "safest" setup for priorities? base, update and extras: priority=1 ATrpms (which should not replace _any_ base package

Re: [CentOS] Cannot boot from DVD on an Intel Svr to install CentOS 5.2

2008-07-19 Thread Johnny Hughes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm new to CentOS and I want to install CentOS 5.2 on an intel computer to use it as a server. I downloaded the CentOS 5.2 DVD iso i386 and did the md5sum, burned the DVD and everything was Ok but when I try to boot the server with the DVD, it simply does nto boot,

Re: [CentOS] Load Average ~0.40 when idle

2008-07-19 Thread Johnny Hughes
listmail wrote: Are you running X ... how many processes (on average are running). Running X and logged in with applets and such, I have this: === top - 17:18:49 up 4:13, 3 users, load average: 0.15, 0.27, 0.32 Tasks: 153 total, 2 ru

Re: [CentOS] Bind Firewall Rules

2008-07-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
John Hinton wrote: OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53 is no longer enough. how do you mean? opening port 53 in is still enough ... the outbound port is what is randomized not sure what kind of

Re: [CentOS] recommended repo for php 5.2.3 +

2008-07-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
no problems recommending his repo for latest and greatest web stack with centos. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] OCI

2008-07-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
Mad Unix wrote: My Question is: How to build the OCI8 extension module for php5 under CentOS5? You will need to rebuild the RPM with ociheaders installed and with the --with-oci8 switch ... http://www.2question.com/demo/install_php_on_redhat_linux_with_10g.html signature.asc Descriptio

Re: [CentOS] ps to pdf

2008-07-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
Craig White wrote: I need a way to convert files that I save with Firefox as a 'print to file' to 'pdf' I tried 'convert' but that rendered the text as graphics which grew the file and wasn't what I wanted. How would someone accomplish this - or can I just print to a PDF? My firefox in cento

Re: [CentOS] VNC server problem

2008-07-23 Thread Johnny Hughes
Gopinath Achari wrote: hi, i just installed the vnc and vncserver package. i started the server with command vncserver :2 when i connected to vncserver using vncviewer 192.168.1.101:5902 i prompted for the password then it display i windows with a terminal but when gui is enabled by

Re: [CentOS] TLA -- GNU Arch 1

2008-07-23 Thread Johnny Hughes
for centos-5. There is a version in rawhide that one can try to build: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/source/SRPMS/tla-1.3.5-5.fc9.src.rpm Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [CentOS] How to get additional packages? How secure is Yum?

2008-07-23 Thread Johnny Hughes
extras. As others have said, if the 3rd party repos do not meet your requirements WRT security updates, then you will have to research and build your own. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] BackupPC won't fork after CentOS 5.2 upgrade

2008-07-24 Thread Johnny Hughes
Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Friday, July 04, 2008 9:21 AM +1000 Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1 x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start. What RPM are you using for BackupPC? We have a backuppc rpm

[CentOS] CESA-2008:0616 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 thunderbird Update

2008-07-24 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0616 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0616.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: thunderbird-1.5.0.12-14.el4.centos.i386.rpm src: thunderbird-1.5.0.12-14.el4.cent

Re: [CentOS] POOR: results using 'dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT'

2008-07-24 Thread Johnny Hughes
.d is POOR: 26 queries in 1.3 seconds from 1 ports with std dev 0.00" if this is a centos machine (your dns server) ... you may have a line like this in the config named.conf file: query-source address * port 53; Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [CentOS] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s!

2008-07-26 Thread Johnny Hughes
Ian jonhson wrote: Dear All, I selected CentOS5 in my works and installed them in two DELL PowerEdge1950. However, a trouble blocked me during the machines run after two days. The machines crashed and the syslog said it got the following messages: -- part dump of /var/log/messa

Re: [CentOS] problems with update of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3

2008-07-26 Thread Johnny Hughes
Gregory P. Ennis wrote: List, I have an 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5xen X86_64 machine that is failing to update perl. I did not see any bugs reported on the list and was wondering if anyone else had the same problem with a solution. Thanks, Greg Ennis Updating: perlx86_64 4:5

Re: [CentOS] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s!

2008-07-28 Thread Johnny Hughes
Ian jonhson wrote: BTW, the patched kernel by PF_RING is version 2.6.25.3. I do not have anything that new in testing .. however we do have this, which you might try to see if it still happens: http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/kernel-rt/ Dell might also have modules posted for this machin

Re: [CentOS] rebuilding firefox-2.0.0.16 from fc8

2008-07-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
Mark Pryor wrote: hello, I started with ftp://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/8/SRPMS/firefox-2.0.0.16-1.fc8.src.rpm with the hope of rebuilding it for el5/centos. All of the dependencies were available (mostly from rpmforge) except one: something called system-bookmarks.

Re: [CentOS] Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s!

2008-07-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
warranty. We don't have too many servers (about 20 in 5 locations) or workstations (about 150 in 5 locations) but I have had no problem with Dell machines or their service ... maybe I am just lucky. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description:

Re: [CentOS] Cannot boot from DVD on an Intel Svr to install CentOS 5.2

2008-07-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Finally after days of trial an error I got the origin of the problem and how to solve it. I'm working from a Vista computer, so what I say here is related to this environment. 1. You have to download images (iso files) using FireFox web browser. Internet Explorer does

Re: [CentOS] Bug Policy [was Re: Does sprof work on CentOS5?]

2008-07-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
Hywel Richards wrote: Hywel Richards wrote: No matter how I try, I can't seem to get a library profile from sprof on CentOS5. Does anyone know if sprof actually works on CentOS5? I'd be very interested to hear if anyone is using it successfully. At the moment I'm trying something like this

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.0 package updater asking me to update more than I installed

2008-07-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Mark Walker wrote on Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:58:37 -0700: When I get the list of packages to be updated, there are things that I don't recognize having installed. Nevertheless, they probably *are* installed. There's a lot been installed during setup and because of dependencie

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.0 package updater asking me to update more than I installed

2008-07-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
Mark Walker wrote: Here's what I'm doing. In the gui environment, gnome, there's a box in the upper right corner that reports about updates available every once in a while. I click on it and I get something called "Package Updater" that lists the packages that can be updated according to the

Re: [CentOS] nss_ldap 5.2 update question

2008-07-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
David Halik wrote: Hi all, I was just wondering when this update will trickle down into the Centos repo: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0611.html Obviously, it just came out yesterday, so I'm not expecting it to suddenly appear. ;) Just curious what the turn around time usually is

Re: [CentOS] nss_ldap 5.2 update question

2008-07-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
David Halik wrote: Great, I didn't realize it was going to be so fast. Thanks for the info. Johnny Hughes wrote: David Halik wrote: Hi all, I was just wondering when this update will trickle down into the Centos repo: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0611.html Obviously, it

Re: [CentOS] xfs on 5.2 (live cd + dvd)

2008-07-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
Michael Kress wrote: Hello, I'm planning a server migration and being able to mount xfs file systems with the live cd would be a cruical feature. So before I download and try ... can anyone tell me whether the xfs is included in the 5.2 live cd? I do not know if the standard xfs modules in

Re: [CentOS] xfs on 5.2 (live cd + dvd)

2008-07-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
Bill Campbell wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2008, Florin Andrei wrote: Michael Kress wrote: I'm planning a server migration and being able to mount xfs file systems with the live cd would be a cruical feature. So before I download and try ... can anyone tell me whether the xfs is included in the 5.2

Re: [CentOS] xfs on 5.2 (live cd + dvd)

2008-07-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
Bill Campbell wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote: Bill Campbell wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2008, Florin Andrei wrote: Michael Kress wrote: I'm planning a server migration and being able to mount xfs file systems with the live cd would be a cruical feature. So before I downloa

Re: [CentOS] Will CentOS 6's upstream be based on Fedora 10?

2008-07-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: Hi All, The subject says it all. I'm asking because I've found Fedora 9 to be buggy as hell - it is one of the worst Fedora releases I've ever used (and I've been using it since Fedora Core 1). I'm putting up with it for my work laptop, but it's not fun. :( My main

Re: [CentOS] Re: [Ntop-misc] PF_RING crashed the CentOS5 - BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7

2008-07-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
Scott Silva wrote: It seems that you tried to patch the CentOS kernel and it didn't work. A patch for a newer kernel probably wouldn't apply clean, and the CentOS kernels coming from RHEL are heavily patched already. The last time I played in the kernel there were at least a hundred patches. Pr

Re: [CentOS] Re: [Ntop-misc] PF_RING crashed the CentOS5 - BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7

2008-07-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
Johnny Hughes wrote: Scott Silva wrote: It seems that you tried to patch the CentOS kernel and it didn't work. A patch for a newer kernel probably wouldn't apply clean, and the CentOS kernels coming from RHEL are heavily patched already. The last time I played in the kernel the

Re: [CentOS] Missing dependencies

2008-07-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
Guy Boisvert wrote: Hi! I have a new shiny CentOS 5.2 server freshly installed. I wanted to install VMWare Server but the installer wants to compile a module. I thought, no problem: Let's install compiler and libraries. So i did: yum groupinstall "Development Libraries" "Developmen

Re: [CentOS] enterprise backup solution (probably amanda?)

2008-07-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
Sean Carolan wrote: If a disk based archive will work, backuppc ( http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/) is fairly painless and it's scheme of compression and hardlinking duplicates lets you keep about 10x the history you'd expect. If you need offsite copies you'll have to run an independent instance

Re: [CentOS] FreeNX and FF3

2008-07-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
Craig White wrote: Anybody else notice how poorly Firefox 3 update on CentOS-5 works via NX connection? Any suggestions on fixing the visual artifacts/bad redraws? hmm ... it doesn't seem any worse to me than before. I am running a remote desktop, but currently I my client on the same LAN as

Re: [CentOS] FreeNX and FF3

2008-07-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
Craig White wrote: On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 22:27 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: Craig White wrote: Anybody else notice how poorly Firefox 3 update on CentOS-5 works via NX connection? Any suggestions on fixing the visual artifacts/bad redraws? hmm ... it doesn't seem any worse to me than b

Re: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen - SOLVED

2008-07-31 Thread Johnny Hughes
MHR wrote: Thanks to Ritesh Khadgaray: Is there anything I'm missing? Some other configuration file or record somewhere I need to tweak? with gconf-editor, check "/desktop/gnome/screen/default/0/resolution" . -- Ritesh Khadgaray ?Ph: +919970164885 ?Desktop LinuX N Stuff, RHCE Software Mainte

Re: [CentOS] stale NFS locks

2008-07-31 Thread Johnny Hughes
Craig White wrote: On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 21:36 -0700, nate wrote: Craig White wrote: short of restarting...is there a trick that I can do to umount/remount? try umount /home/storage/users -l -f perfect - thanks Craig If that ever also fails, you can find (and then kill) the processes

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 10/21/2011 06:36 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/21/2011 06:16 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Vreme: 10/21/2011 12:25 PM, Fajar Priyanto piše: >>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Steve Walsh wrote: >>>> Except. >>>> >>>> If you have

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 10/21/2011 06:25 AM, Steve Walsh wrote: > On 10/21/2011 10:16 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Vreme: 10/21/2011 12:25 PM, Fajar Priyanto pis(e: >> As far as I am aware, how I understood official explanation, packages >> that are introduced in CR repo already PASSED QA testing, but are in >> li

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 10/21/2011 08:43 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > On Fri, October 21, 2011 15:39, Bowie Bailey wrote: >> On 10/21/2011 9:33 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: >>> >>> OK. So my question is. I have Centos 6.0 installed on a couple of >>> systems. >>> >>> I have not modified any repos or installed any repos etc..

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 10/21/2011 08:43 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > On Fri, October 21, 2011 15:39, Bowie Bailey wrote: >> On 10/21/2011 9:33 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: >>> >>> OK. So my question is. I have Centos 6.0 installed on a couple of >>> systems. >>> >>> I have not modified any repos or installed any repos etc..

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 10/21/2011 09:17 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > On Fri, October 21, 2011 16:02, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: >> >> >> Giles Coochey wrote: >>> So Centos 6.0 is EOL? >> >> not familiar with the rhel life cycle are you? >> Read this: >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/ >> __

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
So, trust me, it is MUCH more complicated now than it was with previous releases to build. With the 5.7 release, there were several SRPMS that did not make it to the public FTP server without much prompting from us. And with the Authorized Use Policy, I can not just go to RHN and grab that SRPM

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 10/21/2011 12:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >> They have created an optional channel in several of those groupings that >> is only accessible via RHN and they do not put those RPMS on any ISOs >> ... an

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 10/21/2011 12:37 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Gary Greene > wrote: >> I've never quite understood how anything containing any GPL-covered code could have any redistribution/use restrictions added. >>> Trust me ... the Linux Foundation thinks it is O

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 10/21/2011 12:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 10/21/2011 10:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> Johnny, chill. I don't blame him for be

Re: [CentOS] dell: mtpbase: ioc fault state?

2011-10-24 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 10/24/2011 04:49 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > Hi List, > > Any ideas what is wrong with controller? It is running latest 5.x > series of centos and driver spills out following warnings at random > times: > > mptbase: ioc0: WARNING - IOC is in FAULT state (1600h)!!! > mptbase: ioc0: WARNING - Is

Re: [CentOS] ps locking up

2011-10-27 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 10/27/2011 07:58 AM, James Shupe wrote: > I have a client running a CentOS 6.0 machine with cPanel. The machine is > fully updated with both cPanel (RELEASE) and the OS. > > At first, I noticed that after cPanel's dcpumon ran (even once), > applications that depend on ps lock up and iowait jump

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 10/28/2011 12:47 PM, Ned Slider wrote: > On 28/10/11 18:31, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Patrick Lists >> wrote: >>> How is, say, being required to pay a license fee as a consequence different from losing something you have already contracted and paid

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-01 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/01/2011 03:50 PM, Brian Mathis wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: >> Tony Mountifield wrote: >>> In article >>> , >>> Brian Mathis wrote: When Redhat announced the changes they made it very clear they were trying to prevent other companies (like Oracle

[CentOS] CentOS Directory Server 8.2 for EL5

2011-11-05 Thread Johnny Hughes
Please help me get these packages into Extras. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-08 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/07/2011 09:17 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > >> On Monday 07 November 2011 22:23:09 Reindl Harald wrote: >>> Am 07.11.2011 22:50, schrieb Marko Vojinovic: Typically, you have no way of knowing the physical structure of the "cl

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-11 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/10/2011 07:40 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 14:30 -0500, Lamar Owen wrote: >> On Thursday, November 10, 2011 02:20:25 PM Bob Hoffman wrote: >>> The newer stuff is cool, but it lacks the polish of a ready to go >>> system. Centos has the polish, but lacks the new stuff. >>> s

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-11 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/11/2011 07:11 AM, Craig White wrote: > On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 04:20 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 11/10/2011 07:40 PM, Craig White wrote: >>> On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 14:30 -0500, Lamar Owen wrote: >>>> On Thursday, November 10, 2011 02:20:25 PM Bob Hoffman w

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-11 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/11/2011 08:04 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 7:45 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:28:26PM +0100, Alain Péan wrote: >> >> Seriously. This is _not_ the list for this. Readers should not have to >> wade through the morass of this thread or even spe

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-11 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/11/2011 09:50 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >> This list is for the community to use to get and provide support for >> CentOS ... not for constant bellyaching and non stop whining. This list >> has become non

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-12 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/12/2011 08:08 AM, Christopher Chan wrote: > On Saturday, November 12, 2011 03:59 PM, Nataraj wrote: Not to necessarily feed this thread ... but the last 2 posts have been sane and relevant (as much as this topic can be). I used to use Debian as my distribution of choice before RHEL came out

Re: [CentOS] Trouble with Mailman

2011-11-12 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/12/2011 09:07 AM, John J. Boyer wrote: > I have set up Mailman on a virtual private server from 1and1 running > Centos, though I can't tell which version. The system has 2 GB of > memory. Mailman is receiving posts, but it is not sending them out to > everybody. It is also getting some out

Re: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)

2011-11-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/15/2011 06:56 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > >> Currently, CentOS build system should be in much better shape and we >> will see how it will do for coming 6.2 point release (already in beta). > > Thanks very much for that. > I found your account most interesting an

Re: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)

2011-11-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/14/2011 08:56 PM, Alan McKay wrote: >> Both CentOS and Scientific Linux *aim* at 100% binary compatibility >> and they are both doing their best toward that goal. However, neither >> is perfect. > > That's interesting. So how is it they've managed to come out with 6.1 > (and so long ago at

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-11-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/15/2011 04:47 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 15.11.2011 23:43, schrieb John R. Dennison: >>> >>> I was wondering if it would be safe to just stay with the 'standard' >>> repo for centos and wait for 6.1 that way or do you suggest adding the >>> CR repo as a necessary event? >> >> Depends

Re: [CentOS] UC UC What happened to 6.1

2011-11-16 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/16/2011 05:59 AM, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Rushton Martin wrote: > >> Only that with fixed point releases you set aside a day or so to >> download, burn, transport and load. You wouldn't want to be doing that >> daily on the off chance that something relevant has been adde

Re: [CentOS] UC UC What happened to 6.1

2011-11-16 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/16/2011 10:13 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >> The point I think john is trying to make is that you can also just put >> the updates and CR repos on a DVD (it might not fit) or usb hard drive / >> key

Re: [CentOS] UC UC What happened to 6.1

2011-11-16 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/16/2011 11:19 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/16/11 9:15 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> When we update the mirrors on mirror.centos.org ... we put the packages >> on first, then the metadata. > > if I'm updating my own mirrors with lftp, what files should I postpon

Re: [CentOS] UC UC What happened to 6.1

2011-11-16 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/16/2011 11:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >> >>>> The point I think john is trying to make is that you can also just put >>>> the updates and CR repos on a DVD (it might not fit) or usb hard dr

Re: [CentOS] yum update fails / problem

2011-11-18 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/18/2011 03:50 AM, Götz Reinicke wrote: > Am 18.11.11 10:18, schrieb John R Pierce: >> On 11/18/11 1:10 AM, Götz Reinicke wrote: >>> may be someone has an idea what's broken on one of our RH EL 6.1 server. >> >> if its a Red Hat 6.1 server, you should contact Red Hat technical >> support, you

Re: [CentOS] Having less languages in Firefox (hunspell dictionaries provide too many locales)

2011-11-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/21/2011 06:43 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote: > Hello, > > on CentOS 6, I am routinely writing mails in English, German and > French and using the related hunspell dictionaries for the spelling in > Firefox (I'm using Google Apps). > > This works fine but the problem is that languages are added

Re: [CentOS] iso size?

2011-11-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/21/2011 02:15 PM, Brian Mathis wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Vreme: 11/21/2011 08:13 PM, Beartooth piše: >>> >>> I've been being told, over and over, by K3B, Brasero, and >>> Isomaster, on two machines, with three different downloads of 6.0, th

Re: [CentOS] Any ideas?? -- Re: EC2 compatible kernel for centos 6?

2011-11-23 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/23/2011 11:40 AM, Robinson Tiemuqinke wrote: > I tried several ways but still no help. The following are the output (stock > Centos 6 2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.x86_64 kernel), grub works fine and it located > kernel and initial ramdisk. but kernel booting faied at the very beginning... > > Any su

Re: [CentOS] How to get RHEL EUS source rpm.

2011-11-24 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/24/2011 04:53 AM, huyfuo wrote: > I want to get kernel-2.6.32-71.36.1.el6.src.rpm(RHBA-2011:1412-1). > I have no RHEL subscriptions. > There's no EUS srpms in ftp.redhat.com. Red Hat only publishes the Extended Support Source Code to the people who are subscribers of Extended Support. That

Re: [CentOS] how to install standard software on systems with heterogeneous hardware?

2011-11-29 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/29/2011 12:37 PM, Thomas Burns wrote: > I've been thinking about ways to proceed if I need to set up 5 > machines with basically identical software but somewhat variable > hardware. A simple approach would be to just set up my golden system > and clone the disk, but the hardware differences w

Re: [CentOS] Moving server

2011-11-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/30/2011 06:18 AM, ken wrote: > On 11/30/2011 06:36 AM Timothy Murphy wrote: >> I want to move my home server over to a new machine, >> both running CentOS. >> (The present server is running CentOS-5.7, the new one 6.0.) >> I'm thinking of moving things over one at a time, >> starting with ema

Re: [CentOS] Moving server

2011-11-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/30/2011 06:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 30.11.2011 13:45, schrieb Johnny Hughes: >> On 11/30/2011 06:18 AM, ken wrote: >>> On 11/30/2011 06:36 AM Timothy Murphy wrote: >>>> I want to move my home server over to a new machine, >>>>

Re: [CentOS] checking package versions in various releases

2011-11-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/30/2011 10:15 AM, Alan McKay wrote: >> I'd be hesitant to put an EOL product on my production machines as well. > > Let me rephrase that - I am hesitant to put ANY virtualization on > these production machines. Mainly because I am very new here and do > not know the environment very well ye

Re: [CentOS] duqu

2011-11-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 11/30/2011 12:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > There's an article on slashdot about the Duqu team wiping all their > intermediary c&c servers on 20 Oct. Interestingly, the report says that > they were all (?) not only linux, but CentOS. There's a suggestion of a > zero-day exploit in openssh-4.3

Re: [CentOS] System Time - UTC and Local Time

2011-12-01 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 12/01/2011 10:17 AM, Johan Martinez wrote: > I have installed CentOS on a VM by checking 'System Clock uses UTC' option. > Later I selected CST time zone. Now the date command shows UTC time with > CST timezone: "Thu Dec 1 04:14:39 CST 2011". How do I change system > clock to show CST local t

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >