Phil Schaffner wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 15:20 +0300, Sergej Kandyla wrote:
Hi all,
Is there some way to upgrade from Fedora Core 6 to Centos 5 (on remote
serv) ?
Thanks in advice!
I would expect a migration similar to that described under "Migration
from RHEL5 to CentOS5" on http://w
Ted Miller wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ted Miller wrote:
Is there a file system + configuration that will let me share a
directory, and anyone who has access to something in that directory
on the server will also have access (and lack of access) to the same
files from the client? Clients
Arghh, system-config-securitylevel had "security" enabled. So what does that do
to start iptables? That was a lot of wasted time :)
chkconfig iptables off
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.
MHR wrote:
I need to get a wireless device for an upcoming trip (USB is
preferable to PCMCIA for a long list of reasons) and I'm wondering if
anyone has any experience with or recommendations for such items,
particularly which ones work with Linux/CentOS. Right now I'm
debating between a reasona
d not apt.
This is not meant to be negative about apt use, just point out that yum
is the official way to do updates.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://list
fabian dacunha wrote:
fabian dacunha wrote:
Dear All,
I have recently installed centos 5 and working fine
now i have a query with apache
1) does apache gets installed with mod perl with the defult install of
centos 5
cause when i start up apache there is no mention of mod perl
also
httpd -
does with unbreakable linux.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
;6 month distro" model and their newer products
require "GNOME 2..x" or
gtk-2.-x (also same potential issue for QT and KDE).
So, that newer version may or may not work.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
this, well we can't be certified.
Note, only one version of Ubuntu (6.0.6 LTS) and no Debian or Fedora
versions are certified.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
John Thomas wrote:
Gary wrote:
My question is that I will need secure access to those servers via X, not
just the C/L terminal. What do you recommend for a good secure CentOS
program which would do this. Would also want to access via a high
port, but
I am sure just about any program will allow
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a few servers that I really have to build already. Got to buckle
down and get it done; no more waiting for 5.2 as a 'reason' to put it
off for another day.
I will be building a local repository for 5.2 as soon as the ISOs are
posted (well as soon as my 768Kb DS
ceejay cervantes wrote:
Hi,
Is it not ok to use both plugins at the same time? I have read from the wiki
page of centos that you must use only either protect base or priorities plugin.
I have been using the the config file below for months and did not encounter
any problems. I used priority=
Matt Harwood wrote:
All,
Apologies for cluttering the list, but I just wanted to say hello and
prepare all for a barage of silly discussions from a tech-hypochondriac!
We have recently purchased two servers running CentOS, and as I'm from
more of a Debian based background, it would be good if
fred smith wrote:
I'm using Centos 4.x (fully up to date) on a system at work. I have also
been using firefox 2 (directly from mozilla.org) on it for a long time,
and it tends to work just fine.
yesterday I installed the new FF3 release. It works fine too, with one
exception: The print dialog
performance. The redhat
bug report has the kernels built for 3ware performance. Once 5.2 is
rolled out, Johnny Hughes has stated he would consider building a
kernel for the 444759 bug.
OK, there is a kernel for this in the Testing repo , the version is:
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.bz444759
This kerne
Jerry Geis wrote:
Is there a method to get a 586 (i586 text) install to a 486 level?
I am looking for information guidance on this.
I have looked into using debian/386 which stinks in my opinion,
slackware doesnt quite have it either.
So I am wishing/hoping there is a NOT TO painful way to ge
nate wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
I still think Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, or one of the BSD's will be your best
option on that hardware. But Gentoo would take forever to compile/install on
that hardware.
I thought I read at some point that Debian etch dropped 486 support.
Another option may be Ce
John R Pierce wrote:
Hemraj S wrote:
Hi,
I m currently running my production servers on RHEL 4.6 & would like
to migrate to Centos4.6 as it has more benefits & advantages. I looked
at the Centos release notes available at
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4.6/os/i386/RELEASE-NOTES-en.html and
everyone when it is really ready, I promise.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
...
Why don't you check? :)
On a 5.1 machine ready for 5.2:
# yum update >/tmp/update.log
n
# yum upgrade >/tmp/upgrade.log
n
# diff /tmp/update.log /tmp/upgrade.log
2c2
< Setting up Update Process
---
> Setting up Upgrade Process
Looks to me that upd
rg-impress openoffice.org-writer
openoffice.org-math openoffice.org-calc openoffice.org-graphicfilter
openoffice.org-draw openoffice.org-xsltfilter openoffice.org-base
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Cent
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
This will be the first version change with my local repo so I want to
check the steps out.
I have a /Centos/5.1 directory with all the contents of the ISO CDs.
I have a /Centos/5 directory with a symbolic link to the 5.1 directory.
I ASSUME that I will create a /Centos/
Michael wrote:
After failing to install on two different machines that were running
Windows, I realized that one machine had a bad hard-drive, and the other
bad memory. So I've collected the good parts into one machine and
installed CentOS with SME. This was the fastest install of Linux I have
Gerald Balzer wrote:
Hi,
has the CentOS version of php 5.2.x also been released yet? I couldn't
find it.
The version of php for centos is 5.1.6-20 ...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.
fabian dacunha wrote:
Dear All,
i have the following setup
CentOS 5 server running as a primary DNS server for a long time and is
working perfectly fine
the server is on public IP and we have abt 5 zones apart from the reverse
n local zone
now our sister company have recently setup their own
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Sorry to be dumb, but what is the point of calling it Centos-5.2?
Think of it as a rebase with added kernel drivers, some newer features
and so on, while still basically being CentOS 5.
Or - if you come from the windows world - CentOS 5, service pack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:41:37 -0500
Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ...
and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are
really just a "frozen point in time"
Les Mikesell wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
CentOS-5 is the Release
CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ...
and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are
really just a "frozen point in time" of CentOS-5.
Yum upgrades will always g
A.B. wrote:
I've been trying to create a Linux distribution based on CentOS 5, similar
to (actually, exactly like) how CentOS is based on RHEL. I have been unable
to find any information about this. Most of what I find are tutorials and
instructions on using Kickstart. Sometimes I've found allusi
Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Hi!
When trying to prepare a workstation with (so that the real "yum
upgrade" doesn't have to download the packages)
yum upgrade --upgradeonly
it fails with these messages:
Error: Missing Dependency: libegroupwise-1.2.so.12 is needed by package
evolution
Error: Mis
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.2#head-447967c60eb305ef2c5dbbc3f4e8b3c4c5170632
You can try the nss_ldap from our testing repo for this bug:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/
This may help with the problem.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Descript
Les Mikesell wrote:
Thanks! The new yum seems a bit different - maybe it's the
fastestmirror plugin. Would you recommend doing a 'yum update yum rpm'
before the complete run?
It should work OK either way, but I would do:
yum upgrade yum\* rpm
(just to make sure you get the newer plugins
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I've run into some trouble with a new cPanel VPS, and noticed that it's
running CentOS by default, installed via the CentOS http server.
My question is, how do I downgrade CentOS to 5.1?
There is no way to downgrade, however you can install from a centos-5.1
tree, but cen
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I do not know the command line for symbolic links. I created the
symbolic link of /Centos/5 to /Centos/5.1 in Nautilus which does not
have a method of changing a symbolic link. Only deleting it and
creating a new one.
Not that I know of, I always just delete an rec
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I've run into some trouble with a new cPanel VPS, and noticed that
it's running CentOS by default, installed via the CentOS http server.
My question is, how do I downgrade CentOS to 5.1?
There is no way to downgrade, h
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Ian Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was upgrading a CentOS 5.1 box to 5.2 remotely, and I lost my ssh
connection to the server. Now when I rerun the "yum upgrade" it fails due
to conflicts in the transaction check stage. Before I dig
kfx wrote:
Hi list,
Since the upgrade to 5.2, when I log into my server with a ldap account
I have these 2 errors messages:
-bash: [: =: unary operator expected
-bash: [: -le: unary operator expected
After investigation, the trouble come from two scripts in /etc/profile.d:
/etc/profile.d/krb5
number of major issues are fairly small compared to that.
We have identified several upstream issues that we have put in the
Release Notes (see the known issues section) and for most we have
testing packages to fix them.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dunc wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2??
I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
__
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
I thought the 'updates' directory contained updates for everything from
5.0 forward ?
No.
updates/ gets emptied out on a new point release and then is rebased on
the os/ tree for the new release.
Right ... BUT, base + updates are all the latest
Wojtek Pilorz wrote:
After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ]
crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000
with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) stepping 03,
CPU1 the same).
I get kernel panic at powernowk8_init+
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Wojtek Pilorz wrote:
After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ] crashes each time early in boot
process on Compaq ProLiant 3000
with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai)
stepping 03, CPU1 the same).
I get kernel
Bernd Bartmann wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Bernd Bartmann wrote:
Hi,
the latest updates for perl, xorg-x11, net-snmp, openoffice.org for C4
were announced for the ia64 and s390(x) archs, but not for i386 and
x86_64 altough they are available on the updates mir
tech wrote:
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Me thinks they call that yum-fastestmirror :)
Me thinks that doesn't work.
fastest mirror give me the lowest values for .tw sites. Which, I think
mean the fastest. They are in fact, the slowest. Here are some real
numbers:
base 856 kb 27:38
updates 91
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 26 June 2008 10:51:18 pm Harry Sukumar wrote:
Dear All
But even after adding him to wheel, sys and adm group he is unable to
install using yum
Ok, I'm new to CentOS and yum, but it seems to me that installing software
would need to have write permissio
Brett Serkez wrote:
All,
I have a fresh CentOS 5.2 server that I am just starting to customize,
it is very close to stock.
This morning I ran yum update:
=
Installing:
kernel-xen i686 2.6.18-92.1.6.
os/5/testing/i386/RPMS/jpackage-utils-1.7.5-1jpp.1.el5.centos.noarch.rpm
See if this helps
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
some of which
provide rsync. Here is the list of public mirrors:
http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=13
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is there a way to coax several hosts behind the same caching proxy to
use the same URL as the 1st choice but still fail over and try others if
there is a problem? And preferably without having to manually edit
files on each machine or coordinate
Les Mikesell wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is there a way to coax several hosts behind the same caching proxy to
use the same URL as the 1st choice but still fail over and try others
if there is a problem? And preferably without having to manually
edit files on each machine or coordinate
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
My update to 5.2 fails on one machine because of this error:
Transaction Check Error:
file /etc/init.d from install of chkconfig-1.3.30.1-2 conflicts with
file from package AcronisAgentLinux-9.5.8076-1
file /etc/init.d from install of chkconfig-1.3.30.1-2 conflicts with
Brian wrote:
On Sat, June 28, 2008 2:02 pm, AnneWilson wrote:
Just type 'yum' without parameters, to get a list of possibilities. I
think 'yum list' may be what you are looking for. (I don't have Fedora or
CentOS on this laptop so I can't check.)
No CentOS or Fedora ... is there any other OS
t;*" instead
in /etc/shadow, so the that same restriction to login is now enforced in
the shadow file (where the system will look if you have shadow passwds
enabled).
This issue was caused in CentOS-4 (a /etc/passwd.rpmnew file) due to an
update to the "setup" rpm in March
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Greg Bailey wrote:
Any advice on this? I didn't see anything on the CentOS wiki or FAQ
as to how or when to use upstream's bug system.
Maybe we should add something to the wiki about this, and even in the
FAQ's since people are likely to ask about this and they do.
Ba
Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
AnneWilson
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 11:21 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Copy of own messages
For some reason I'm no longer seeing copies of my own messages. I've checked
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 09:24 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Removing perl.i386 fixed this...
Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: "Ralph Angenendt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:34:11 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / B
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 16:46 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
I am still having this same problem. The only non-CentOS package I have
installed is Astro::Time via cpan. I have looked at the bug report but
am not sure what to do next. I have two x86_
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
It looks like some perl thing is trying to keep the perl at the OLD level.
(you have plenty of rf packages, which is rpmforge ... those are
NON-CentOS pacakges. I am not saying those are the problem, just
pointing out your original statement is in error where you list o
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Thanks again for your help!!!
is it possible that you have extras set at a different priority than
base ... you also have the protectbase installed along with priorities
(not recommended).
You should have these settings for [extras], [base] and [updates]
sections in C
John wrote:
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | t
Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
From: Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In this case you DO NOT want to integrate these changes
[...]
This issue was caused in CentOS-4 (a /etc/passwd.rpmnew file)
due to an
update to the "setup" rpm in March ... and in this case, you can
re
Ben Marsh wrote:
Hi,
With the release of 5.2 "yum update" seems to be upgrading our
computers from CentOS 5.1 to CentOS 5.2. I note from release notes for
5.2 that you are only supposed to get 5.2 if you type in "yum upgrade".
On two seperate machines entering "yum update" has resulted in
Scott Silva wrote:
I'm having a problem with a fairly new server.
Running yum upgrade I get the following:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/yum", line 29, in ?
yummain.main(sys.argv[1:])
File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 105, in main
result, resultmsgs = bas
drew einhorn wrote:
Hi, we have a new customer to support. They have RHEL5 not CentOS5.
Is there a summary of the differences between RHEL and CentOS?
We have come across differences in how yum works. There is
magic involving the rhnplugin that connects us to invisible
repositories not mentio
Les Mikesell wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
CentOS-5 is the real version ... 5.2 is just a point in time set of
updates for CentOS-5. Understand that if you had RHEL-5 and ran an
update, it would also update you to the same packages. What this
means is that 5.2 is just an update set for
Jerry Geis wrote:
After upgrading to 5.2 I now have gam_server running.
How do I turn it off?
nothing with gam in /etc/init.d
If you are running gnome, I don't think you want to turn it off
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
C
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
"sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start" return OK but there is no BackupPC
processes.
This fails also.
# sudo -u backuppc /usr/bin/BackupPC -d
# echo
Tom Brown wrote:
one of my developers is using a mod_python module called xml.dom.minidom
and its causing the issue as outlined below
http://www.dscpl.com.au/wiki/ModPython/Articles/ExpatCausingApacheCrash
This is on CentOS 4.5 and so Apache 2.0.52-38 - I cant change the OS
version but i co
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Tom Brown wrote:
one of my developers is using a mod_python module called
xml.dom.minidom and its causing the issue as outlined below
http://www.dscpl.com.au/wiki/ModPython/Articles/ExpatCausingApacheCrash
This is on CentOS 4.5 and so Apache 2.0.52-38 - I cant change
Kevin Thorpe wrote:
I'm having a spot of bother with a large (900GB) partition.
fdisk claims it's 900GB. I made an ext3 fs on it and df says it's only
94GB. Which is correct? Or did I do something wrong?
If this partition is on a LARGER drive, you may need to use parted and
not fdisk to crea
Ben wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
"sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start" return OK but there is no BackupPC
processes.
This fails also.
Shaun Meyer wrote:
On Fri, July 4, 2008 10:22 am, Kwan Lowe wrote:
Good morning to you all:
I've been trying for a few hours to connect to the tracker for the
5.2 x64 DVD. It has been giving a "connection refused" error. A few
days ago the 5.2 i386 downloaded succesfully. Is the tracker down
MHR wrote:
Where I work, we have an application that has been merrily running
away (and being built) on FC1 (yes, you read that right).
One of my assignments is to bring this up to CentOS, but on my first
effort, I ran into this interesting "feature." The original build
process (FC1) uses mkdep
Daniel Bruno wrote:
Hi,
I have a server with Centos 5 + DRBD installed and is working fine, but when
i run yum for udpate system show this error:
Transaction Check Error:
file /etc/drbd.conf conflicts between attempted installs of
drbd-8.0.12-1.el5.centos and drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos
file
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a newly built drive with 5.2 fresh install (that I will be
cloning shortly) in my DECtop and it is failing with X the same way the
upgrade from 5.1 drive did (not too supprising there).
In 5.1 X worked. I could startx from init 3 and get into GNOME. Also
VNC i
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Can you identify which one of these packages individually is requiring
the 32-bit perl? In other words, can you install perl-LDAP without it
wanting to pull in the 32-bit perl? Same for all of them...
You can also do an rpm -q -R -p on the .rpm file to see what it
requ
drew einhorn wrote:
In looking at the possibility of using yum-priorities on a RHEL5 system,
I noticed on thing that is different from my recollection,
I see that the default priority it 99,
but I seem to recall that it used to be 1.
Is my memory faulty, or did it change?
Actually 99 seems to m
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a newly built drive with 5.2 fresh install (that I will be
cloning shortly) in my DECtop and it is failing with X the same way
the upgrade from 5.1 drive did (not too supprising there).
In 5.1 X worked. I could
Mark Hull-Richter wrote:
This was working in 5.1 - I am now getting errors when I try to run a
flash video in seamonkey under CetnOS 5.2. Here is the error:
For application/x-shockwave-flash found plugin
/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
sh: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/l
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Just to muddy the waters on this a bit more... for me, the rpmforge
perl-Time-HiRes package won't install as it conflicts with my base
installation of perl.
Yea, I just figured that out.
This is on a RHEL5.2 x86_64 system however.
So I assume an x86 install doesn't h
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:55:03AM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
This is on a RHEL5.2 x86_64 system however.
# rpm -qf --queryformat '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n'
/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I would say it is the "Best" one ... it seems there is a problem in this
instance.
Its just not my day :P I used my gmail to sign up to rpmforge, and received the
sub confirmation
instantly, replied to it and received my membership confirmation. Sent an email
regardin
Santi Saez wrote:
Dear Srs,
yum-updatesd-0.9-2.el5 appears that it's not working on freshly
installed CentOS 5.2, using:
# rpm -qa "yum*"
yum-metadata-parser-1.1.2-2.el5
yum-updatesd-0.9-2.el5
yum-3.2.8-9.el5.centos.2.1
yum-fastestmirror-1.1.10-9.el5.centos
I see some bugs ([1], [2] and [3]
and I have absolutely no desire
to put services into my ldap directory...
So I've taken out the -p argument, and all is well...
Thanks for the assist though!
This also may have to do with the nss_ldap issue ... try my nss_ldap
from the testing repo (if you have nss_ldap installed).
http:/
Craig White wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 09:51 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Santi Saez wrote:
Dear Srs,
yum-updatesd-0.9-2.el5 appears that it's not working on freshly
installed CentOS 5.2, using:
# rpm -qa "yum*"
yum-metadata-parser-1.1.2-2.el5
yum-updatesd-0.9-2.el5
yum-3.2
Gavin Carr wrote:
The current beta version of Firebug doesn't appear to install on
Firefox 3 on CentOS 5.2, apparently because it's reporting itself as
3.0b5 rather 3.0. I tweaked the minVersion requirement in the xpi to
3.0b5 and it seems to be working fine for me now.
In case anyone else is
has changed between 5.1 and 5.2?
Look in the release notes for C5 (search for nss_ldap):
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.2
Try my fixed RPM here:
http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/nss_ldap/5/
Upstream bugzilla entry here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=44
Ben wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ben wrote:
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
"sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start" return OK but there is no BackupPC
processes.
This
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 04:20:30PM -0600, Kenneth Burgener wrote:
On 7/7/2008 2:26 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
on 7-7-2008 12:45 PM Kenneth Burgener spake the following:
"The CentOS 5/RHEL 5 repository from atrpms.net is safe to use, if
you only use the stable version. Packages in
Michael Rock wrote:
To be specific it listed it as "RedHat 5.0 Client".
http://www.linuxtested.com/results/asus_p5k-vm.html
They did not test sata though
Hard Drive Seagate ST320410A 20G (IDE)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
Jul 8 21:17:05 dell2400 restorecond: Will not restore a file with
more than one hard link (/etc/resolv.conf) No such file or directory
The above MIGHT be related to your other thread ... if there is an issue
with the /etc/resolv.conf file, there will be a problem with name lookups.
sign
OK, I can verify that for me (CentOS-5.2 updated,
Firefox-3.0-2.el5.centos) this link:
http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:Administration_Manual:Booklet
Causes X to crash.
I can replicate it every time I try with Firefox under CentOS 5, but it
works fine with Konqueror. An E
dnk wrote:
Any one have a tutorial for setting up backup pc on centos 5? I already
have it all installed (centos test repo), but looking more so for
configuration steps that are CentOS centric.
Not a exactly a guide, however there is a README.centos in the
/usr/share/docs/backuppc- dir that
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all
I've been thinking about using CentOS on a Dell R200 server and turn it
into a firewall / network monitor / traffic shaper in our datacentre,
instead of using a dedicated firewall device.
One of the devices that I have been looking at, with my limited budget,
is th
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make Firefox 3 work in CentOS 4.
So far I was able to do it by installing the evolution28-* rpms, which
have a more recent GTK, Cairo, Pango, etc. With those libs installed
and configured, Firefox 3 from mozilla.org works fine.
The only thing is th
Sean Carolan wrote:
I'm attempting to block access to port 53 from internet hosts for an
internal server. This device is behind a gateway router so all
traffic appears to come from source ip 10.100.1.1. Here are my
(non-working) iptables rules:
If it is behind a gateway router, how is port 5
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
How do I find out if Python 2.4.3 contains abi?
I'm not sure what you're asking. Python's ABI version would be 2.4.3,
but if you're referring to a module 'abi', I don't think one exists?
You can always fire up python and type 'import ' to se
Robert - elists wrote:
I was checking out Dag's ( not dagw ;-> ) new blog...
I don't know how much, if at all, this has been debated...
http://dag.wieers.com/blog/using-apt-in-an-rpm-world
if he is so adamant about apt over yum, why are we using yum still?
Laziness? ;-) ...or are we just tas
Kenneth Burgener wrote:
On 7/13/2008 8:50 AM, David Hláčik wrote:
Hello, little tricky question :
i have a file of packages for removal , which looks like that :
atk libart_lgpl libXfixes audiofile libXcursor libxslt alsa-lib esound
how to , provide that file to yum, using pipe, or redirec
Ryan Nichols wrote:
Ok, I've got a RocketRAID 2300 and when i do the update of the kernel it
breaks the raid card since the OS is on the raid card itself, i need to
install the driver into the new kernel.. Whats the best way to do this?
I am reading the manual from the manufacter, but i dont se
801 - 900 of 2594 matches
Mail list logo
