Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 and KVM failure

On 04/21/2011 01:16 PM, Kenni Lund wrote: > 2011/4/21 Ian Forde : >> Turns out that wasn't the only problem I faced in my migration. With 2 >> KVM servers, both sharing a volume mounted via NFS for VMs, I migrated >> all VMs to the second node, upgraded the first, them moved them all back >> to KV

Re: [CentOS] Still a kvm problem after 5.6 upgrade

On 04/21/2011 11:01 AM, Kenni Lund wrote: > 2011/4/21 Johnny Hughes : >> On 04/21/2011 06:11 AM, David McGuffey wrote: >>> redlibvirtError: internal error Process exited while reading console log >>> output: qemu: could not open disk image /dev/hda >> >> You

Re: [CentOS] Attaching LinkSys WRT54GL to CentOS machine

On 04/24/2011 01:15 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Kenni Lund wrote: > >>> I have a LinkSys WRT54GL router, >>> which I would like to attach to my CentOS-5.6 server, >>> to set up a LAN 192.168.2.* . >>> The server is attached to the internet >>> through a Billion modem/router which has a single ethe

Re: [CentOS] FYI - pci_mmcfg_init kernel error after upgrading to 5.6

On 04/25/2011 08:58 AM, Windsor Dave L. (AdP/TEF7.1) wrote: > Just thought I'd pass along an error I received this weekend after > upgrading two servers to 5.6. Both are HP Proliant DL380 servers > running 64-bit, but one is a G6 model and one is a G7. After the > upgrade and the reboot to the

Re: [CentOS] FYI - pci_mmcfg_init kernel error after upgrading to 5.6

On 04/25/2011 10:19 AM, Ned Slider wrote: > On 25/04/11 15:44, Windsor Dave L. (AdP/TEF7.1) wrote: >> On 4/25/2011 10:26 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 04/25/2011 08:58 AM, Windsor Dave L. (AdP/TEF7.1) wrote: >>>> Just thought I'd pass along an error I receive

Re: [CentOS] FYI - pci_mmcfg_init kernel error after upgrading to 5.6

On 04/25/2011 04:32 PM, Windsor Dave L. (AdP/TEF7.1) wrote: > On 4/25/2011 5:15 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 04/25/2011 10:19 AM, Ned Slider wrote: >>> On 25/04/11 15:44, Windsor Dave L. (AdP/TEF7.1) wrote: > > > >>> >>> I saw and reported the is

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 - SRPM's

On 04/25/2011 09:16 AM, Filipe Rosset wrote: > On 04/21/2011 06:41 PM, Bob Hepple wrote: >> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:30:37 +0100 >> Karanbir Singh wrote: >> >>> On 04/21/2011 12:18 AM, Bob Hepple wrote: Hmmm - it's 10 days on and I still can't see all of the [a-l] *.src.rpm's. I strongly s

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 x86_64 hosting unreachable Virtualbox 4.0.6 bridged guests

On 04/26/2011 03:28 AM, Philippe wrote: > Hi, > > On a box running CentOS 5.6 x86_64 and Virtualbox 4.0.6, I have > configured 2 guests (WinXP x86 + CentOS 5.6 x86_64) in bridged mode. > The hosting box and the two guests are dhcp enabled. The hosting box > get its address normally, but the 2 ho

Re: [CentOS] updating libvorbis

On 04/26/2011 04:20 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote: > Hello, > > On a machine with CentOS-5.6, I need libvorbis >= 1.2, so I have > recompiled and packaged libvorbis. > But I get the following error : > > $ rpm -U /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/libvorbis-1.2.3-phn.1.x86_64.rpm > /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x

Re: [CentOS] updating libvorbis

On 04/26/2011 04:34 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote: > [ replying to myself ] > > Le mar 26 avr 2011 11:20:44 CEST, Philippe Naudin a écrit: >> ... >> Who knows how to make rpm understand than 1.2.3 is newer than 1.1.2 ? >> I have tried : >> %define name libvorbis >> Name:%{name} >> Prov

Re: [CentOS] FYI - pci_mmcfg_init kernel error after upgrading to 5.6

On 04/26/2011 06:27 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello Johnny, > > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 09:26 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 04/25/2011 08:58 AM, Windsor Dave L. (AdP/TEF7.1) wrote: >>> There are apparently performance implications due to this issue. >>

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6/CentOS

On 04/26/2011 07:48 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/26/2011 08:43 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the >>> VIA Eden Processor? >> Possibly ... Does that processor have PAE? The non-PAE kernel wa

Re: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?

On 04/26/2011 02:54 PM, Richard Mollel wrote: > Hi, > > Please note RHEL has just released a fix for this issue: > > http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0466.html > > > Lets hope it makes it into centos soon... > I started building it about 20 minutes ago ... it will be released in a coupl

Re: [CentOS] Cacti rpm for el5.6 with php53

On 04/27/2011 03:00 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:09:36PM -0400, Denniston, Todd A CIV > NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: On Behalf Of Pasi Kärkkäinen >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 11:13 >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 04:34:53PM

Re: [CentOS] ssh in while in fsck

On 04/27/2011 03:22 PM, Brian Mathis wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:14 PM, wrote: >> My manager reminds me that "in the old Sun days", the ssh server came up >> first, *before* the fsck on boot, so that if there was a problem, and fsck >> was waiting for an answer, you could remotely ssh in,

Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest

On 04/28/2011 06:46 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > On 4/28/11, Gleb Natapov wrote: >> So why don't you use virt-manager? > > The original intention was to run the host without any graphical > desktop or anything not necessary to host the guests. That was based > on reading and such which recomme

Re: [CentOS] libvirt security update CVE-2011-1146

e it is on Scientific Linux. > Is there any particular reason why the above rpm update is still not > available on mirrors ? > This was pushed, it just had a .el5 instead of .el5_6 dist tag, so it looks older than the other update. Corrected and repushed. Thanks, Johnny Hughes sign

Re: [CentOS] ETA

On 04/28/2011 12:25 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > Dear developers, > > I don't care for reasons, arguments, or flamefests. I need to plan my > workload. > > By now I have half a dozen servers overdue for reimaging. I can put this > off for another week or two, but not really much longer. > > There

Re: [CentOS] ETA

On 04/28/2011 01:18 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > At Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:25:26 -0500 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > >> >> >> >> Dear developers, >> >> I don't care for reasons, arguments, or flamefests. I need to plan my >> workload. >> >> By now I have half a dozen servers overdue for reimaging. I

Re: [CentOS] ETA

On 04/28/2011 01:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 04/28/2011 01:18 PM, Robert Heller wrote: >> At Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:25:26 -0500 CentOS mailing list >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear developers, >>> >>> I don&#

Re: [CentOS] libvirt security update CVE-2011-1146

a "Template" to then modify can generate modified copies of that content ... BECAUSE ... content is NOT software and the Red Hat content is NOT open source. This is also why we do not duplicate the whole content from security advisories. We can point you at it, we can not grab it a

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On 04/29/2011 11:17 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > The bickering here about Centos 6 has made me wonder what is actually > legally necessary to re-distribute the RPM files that come with RHel6. > > I am not starting a flame ware, I hope. I'm just curious about what > is minimally necessary go from RHe

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On 04/29/2011 12:26 PM, Todd Rinaldo wrote: > > On Apr 29, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 04/29/2011 11:17 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: >>> The bickering here about Centos 6 has made me wonder what is actually >>> legally necessary to re-distribute t

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On 04/29/2011 02:49 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: >> >> That "good faith effort" is required for all packages (GPL or not). >> >> And yes, it is legally necessary make that good faith effort not to >> infringe upon someone else's trademarks. >> >> This is specifically called out here: >> http://www.redha

Re: [CentOS] I have RHel6. How does that turn into Centos 6?

On 04/29/2011 03:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/29/2011 3:08 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >> But, legally, yes, someone COULD distribute some of the RH files. > > I thought these days you couldn't get the binaries in the first place > without also getting a support

Re: [CentOS] community communication

e have, then they would already be fixed. Every time we (the CentOS Team) post on this list, it leads to a huge thread with same detractors looking to post bad things about the CentOS team. Then the same "CentOS Fanbois" come to our rescue. Then I (Johnny Hughes) post something tell pe

Re: [CentOS] since CentOS 5.6 upgrade, squid crashes

On 05/03/2011 03:20 AM, Laurent CREPET wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2011 09:46:05 +0200 > Laurent CREPET wrote: > >> I will look at the latest RPMs to check differences on >> /etc/logrotate.d/squid. > > I'm suprised... it seems that both packages have not been modified for a > while. > >> [root@sta

Re: [CentOS] virtdown script

On 05/03/2011 09:39 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > virsh list | grep -v -e Id -e --- -e Domain-0 | awk '{print $1}' Do you want the "ID Number" or the "Name" to pass in? That gives you the number, I think you want the name ... that would be $2 not $1. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signat

Re: [CentOS] libpq.so.4 missing

On 05/03/2011 04:36 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > - Original Message - > | On 05/03/11 1:50 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > | > Anyone else seeing this when trying to install httpd? My mirror is > | > completely up to date and the machine is a fresh install of CentOS > | > 5.6 > | > | /usr/l

Re: [CentOS] Centos under (vmware vs KVM)

On 05/04/2011 03:58 AM, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote: > Hello, > > we are using several centos servers under Vmware. We are having more > and more requests for server space for each business application (let assume > that these business requests are for different type of services: > databases, web a

Re: [CentOS] apache docroot permissions

On 05/04/2011 02:49 PM, Johan Martinez wrote: > > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Kenneth Porter > wrote: > > User apache only needs read access except under special conditions, > such as > a script that needs to store configuration in a file. And a

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

On 05/06/2011 01:31 PM, Benjamin Smith wrote: > I was wondering what feedback might be offered by the CentOS community > on their experiences using Scientific Linux? > > > I'm a long-time Centos user, and am basically happy with CentOS. I > understand there are delays getting EL 6 out. We have be

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 updates

On 5/13/20 3:57 AM, Phil Perry wrote: > On 13/05/2020 01:22, Bill Maidment wrote: >> Hi >> Is it my imagination/impatience, but I don't seem to have received any >> updates to CentOS 8 recently. >> I'm thinking particularly of firefox which was updated in CentOS 7 for >> a critical security update.

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find centos-release-8.1-1.1911.0.9.el8.src.rpm

On 5/29/20 3:16 PM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for centos-release-8.1-1.1911.0.9.el8.src.rpm. > Does anyone know where to find it. The only thing I see in vault is > centos-release-8.1-1.1911.0.8.el8.src.rpm. > > Regards, > You can get all source code from git: https://git.c

Re: [CentOS] How to rebuild the kernel

ranch from kernel.org) You can grab our srpms from: http://vault.centos.org/altarch/7/kernel/Source/SPackages/ or https://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-kernels.x86_64/kernel/ We intend to keep making these kernels for the lifetime of CentOS Linux 7 if they work for

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

On 6/1/20 7:25 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > I'm used to using "git diff" and "svn diff" to view changes in my > development system. Is there a similar thing that works with changes > between a repository package and the installed RPM? Ie. something that > shows the changes in /etc hinted at by "rpm

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

On 6/5/20 11:55 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > --On Friday, June 05, 2020 9:10 AM -0500 Johnny Hughes > wrote: > >> These are two totally separate programs and projects. > > I'm not talking about diff'ing the yum and dnf programs. I'm talking > about diffing

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

On 6/5/20 2:21 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 6/5/20 11:55 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote: >> --On Friday, June 05, 2020 9:10 AM -0500 Johnny Hughes >> wrote: >> >>> These are two totally separate programs and projects. >> >> I'm not talking about diff

Re: [CentOS] yum/dnf diff

On 6/5/20 4:31 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > --On Friday, June 05, 2020 1:39 PM -0700 John Pierce > wrote: > >> don't most packages create a .rpmnew file if you've modified the previous >> package file ? > > That file is created AFTER you've made edits, and reflects only the > state of the file in

Re: [CentOS] C8 install problems

On 6/8/20 9:05 AM, ejm wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to install C8 from a DVD I made onto a 1Tb disc partitioned into > 2 ext4 partitions. > > The first partition contains C7 which I installed via a DVD. > > Trying to install C8 yields an error indicating the file /dev/root is missing. > >

Re: [CentOS] Blog article about the state of CentOS

my butt off everyday to make CentOS Linux the best it can be. If you want to compare what the CentOS team (a small team) can do compared to Oracle (a tmulti billin dollar corporation who bought Sun Microsystems .. took over Java and Open Office, etc) .. well, we can not provide the resources they ca

Re: [CentOS] Amd es1000

On 6/18/20 3:47 PM, John Pierce wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:04 AM paride desimone wrote: > >> The throuble is the radeon driver. I've already tried to install the gui, >> but the system hung on start gui. >> The es1000 is a shit gpu. >> >> > > those are just intended to provide a minimal

Re: [CentOS] Bootable USB keys : which brand ?

On 6/19/20 9:48 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > In my daily work I'm mainly using USB keys for work : one with CentOS 7, one > with OpenSUSE Leap 15.1, one with Slax Live for data recovery purposes, one > with Ghost4Linux and one with FreeDOS which I use for flashing the odd BIOS. > > Last we

Re: [CentOS] Blog article about the state of CentOS

On 6/17/20 12:11 PM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Hi Johnny, > thank you for your and all centos team works. > > Many of us know how much work is needed for building new releases and > maintaining C6 and C7, plus CentOS Stream and modules (Appstream). This is > a huge work for a small team. Again tha

Re: [CentOS] Blog article about the state of CentOS

On 6/18/20 11:12 AM, Thomas Bendler wrote: > Hi Johnny, > > Am Mi., 17. Juni 2020 um 16:16 Uhr schrieb Johnny Hughes > : > >> [...] >> No one is trynig to make anything slower. >> > > This is good to hear but ... > >> [...] >> I can a

Re: [CentOS] Blog article about the state of CentOS

On 6/19/20 10:18 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 6/18/20 11:12 AM, Thomas Bendler wrote: >> Hi Johnny, >> >> Am Mi., 17. Juni 2020 um 16:16 Uhr schrieb Johnny Hughes >> : >> >>> [...] >>> No one is trynig to make anything slower. >>> >

Re: [CentOS] Blog article about the state of CentOS

On 6/17/20 3:53 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Noam Bernstein said: >> Of course. My only question is whether the observation that the gap for >> CentOS 8 is indeed larger than we have come to be used to for CentOS 7. > > So, I took a look... and the answer is "it's not" (with a sm

Re: [CentOS] Amd es1000

19 giu 2020, 14:58 Johnny Hughes ha scritto: > >> On 6/18/20 3:47 PM, John Pierce wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:04 AM paride desimone >> wrote: >>> >>>> The throuble is the radeon driver. I've already tried to install the >>

Re: [CentOS] Updating microcode_ctl froze Centos7

On 6/17/20 2:36 AM, Robin Lee wrote: > On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 22:25 +0200, Robin Lee wrote: >> On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 09:20 +0200, Robin Lee wrote: >>> Today when I ran yum update two packages came up microcode_ctl >>> and unbound-libs. The updating process went fine until it >>> outputted >>> >>> R

Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird 68.10.0

r secure boot items (that is .. the 'Boot Hole' issue) for el7 and el8 for the .. therefore some other updates were pushed back. I am trying to finish up the 'Boot Hole' el7 updates right now .. 2 other people are currently working on the el8 items. Once these get pushed .. h

Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable

On 7/31/20 11:24 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > > Il 31/07/20 13:08, ja ha scritto: >> On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 22:35 +1200, Alan McRae via CentOS wrote: >>> I am running an Intel x64 machine using UEFI to boot an SSD. >>> >>> Installing the latest yum update which includes grub2 and kernel >>> 4.18.0

Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable

On 8/1/20 1:59 AM, Jon LaBadie wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:20:28PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > ... >> >> The issue seems to be with the shim package (not the grub or kernel >> packages) and we are currently working with Red Hat on a fix. This >> issue h

Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable

On 8/2/20 2:04 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > > Il 01/08/20 22:03, Greg Bailey ha scritto: >> On 8/1/20 6:56 AM, david wrote: >>> At 02:54 AM 8/1/2020, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Hi Johnny, thank you very much for clarification. You said that in the centos infrastructure only one s

Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable

On 8/2/20 7:06 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > At Sun, 2 Aug 2020 06:59:06 -0500 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 8/2/20 2:04 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>> >>> Il 01/08/20 22:03, Greg Bailey ha scritto: On 8/1/20 6:56 AM, david wrote: > At 02:54 AM 8/1/2020, Alessandro Baggi w

Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable

On 8/2/20 6:59 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 8/2/20 2:04 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> >> Il 01/08/20 22:03, Greg Bailey ha scritto: >>> On 8/1/20 6:56 AM, david wrote: >>>> At 02:54 AM 8/1/2020, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>>>> Hi Johnny, >>&

Re: [CentOS] Boot failed on latest CentOS 7 update

On 8/2/20 2:47 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > > Il 02/08/20 00:42, Mike McCarthy, W1NR ha scritto: >> It appears that it is affecting multiple distributions including Debian >> and Ubuntu so it looks like the grub2 team messed up. See >> >> https://www.zdnet.com/article/boothole-fixes-causing-boot-

Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable

> >> You need only replace the files you currently have installed, not >> install every file. >> >> Please report both positive and negative results. >> >> Thanks, >> Johnny Hughes >> > I updated my Centos 7, and it's awaiting a reboot.  The

Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable

Thanks for the reports .. it is not the first weekend spent on this issue .. not even the first in a row :) The CentOS Stream update should be release in a few minutes unless we hit a snag in testing. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable

On 8/2/20 8:12 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 8/2/20 8:10 AM, Marc Balmer via CentOS wrote: >>>> >>>> Please report both positive and negative results. >>> >>> A previously afftected Aures nino POS-terminal boots just fine with CentOS >>>

Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable

rpm >> >> x86_64/Packages/shim-ia32-15-8.el7.x86_64.rpm >> >> x86_64/Packages/shim-unsigned-ia32-15-8.el7.x86_64.rpm >> >> x86_64/Packages/shim-unsigned-x64-15-8.el7.x86_64.rpm >> >> x86_64/Packages/shim-x64-15-8.el7.x86_64.rpm >> >>

Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable

On 8/2/20 8:47 AM, david wrote: > At 06:37 AM 8/2/2020, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 8/2/20 8:30 AM, david wrote: >> > At 06:10 AM 8/2/2020, you wrote: >> >> On 8/2/20 8:04 AM, david wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > &

Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable

On 8/2/20 7:51 PM, Pete Biggs wrote: > >> >> You just need to reinstall the kernel and it should work. >> >> > Is it possible to bump the kernel version number to make sure the > kernel gets re-installed on automated installs? Or would this break > the compatibility with RHEL? > Well .. It woul

Re: [CentOS] Fixing grub/shim issue Centos 7

On 8/4/20 1:31 AM, lpeci wrote: > Hi all, > > I had the same problem with my UEFI bios machine and I fixed it so for > Centos 7: > > 1) Boot from an rescue linux usb > > 2) When the rescue system is running: > >     2.1) #chroot /mnt/sysimage > > 3) Config network: > >     3.1) # ip addr add

Re: [CentOS] Fixing grub/shim issue Centos 7

On 8/4/20 9:51 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 8/4/20 1:31 AM, lpeci wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I had the same problem with my UEFI bios machine and I fixed it so for >> Centos 7: >> >> 1) Boot from an rescue linux usb >> >> 2) When the rescue syst

Re: [CentOS] Fixing grub/shim issue Centos 7

On 8/4/20 10:45 AM, ja wrote: > On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 10:36 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: >> Once upon a time, Johnny Hughes said: >>> The issues should now be resolved. >>> >>> If you just mount /mnt/sysimage, set an ip address and upgrade (to get >>>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Security Advisories OVAL feed??

On 8/5/20 1:05 AM, cen...@niob.at wrote: > On 04/08/2020 23:50, Jon Pruente wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:34 AM wrote: >> >>> Q5) If the answer to the last question is "no": shouldn't there be such >>> a resource? >>> >> CentOS doesn't publish security errata. If you need it then you should

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Security Advisories OVAL feed??

On 8/5/20 10:45 AM, cen...@niob.at wrote: > On 05/08/2020 16:49, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 8/5/20 1:05 AM, cen...@niob.at wrote: >>> On 04/08/2020 23:50, Jon Pruente wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:34 AM wrote: >>>> >>>>> Q5) If th

Re: [CentOS] Fixing grub/shim issue Centos 7

On 8/6/20 8:57 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 04/08/2020 à 08:31, lpeci a écrit : >> I had the same problem with my UEFI bios machine and I fixed it so for >> Centos 7: >> >> 1) Boot from an rescue linux usb >> >> 2) When the rescue system is running: >> >>     2.1) #chroot /mnt/sysimage >> >> 3)

Re: [CentOS] Fixing grub/shim issue Centos 7

On 8/7/20 2:40 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > > Il 07/08/20 08:22, Johnny Hughes ha scritto: >>> "How on earth could this have passed Q & A ?" > > Hi Johnny, > Niki's question is spread, legit, in the thoughts in many and many users > so don'

Re: [CentOS] Fixing grub/shim issue Centos 7

yum-cron to keep all my server updated on a daily basis. > > And my question "How could this have passed Q & A" was obviously directed at > Red Hat... and *not* at Johnny Hughes and the CentOS team who do their best to > deliver the best possible downstream system. I raise my mor

Re: [CentOS] Fixing grub/shim issue Centos 7

On 8/7/20 5:30 AM, Phil Perry wrote: > On 07/08/2020 10:01, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 8/7/20 3:46 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >>> Le 07/08/2020 à 09:40, Alessandro Baggi a écrit : >>>> Probably many users have not updated their machines between the bug >>>&g

Re: [CentOS] Fixing grub/shim issue Centos 7

On 8/9/20 2:49 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > > Il 07/08/20 17:39, Leon Fauster via CentOS ha scritto: >> Am 07.08.20 um 17:17 schrieb Alessandro Baggi: >>> >>> Hi Johnny, >>> >>> what is the current status of the notification tool for security >>> updates on C8? There are possibilities to get soon

Re: [CentOS] ZFS fails with latest C8 kernel

On 8/10/20 1:43 AM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: > As if last weekend's UEFI debacle wasn't bad enough, it now seems the > latest C8 kernel (4.18.0-193.14.2) is incompatible with the current > ZFSOnLinux packages (0.8.4-1). When booted to the latest kernel, ZFS is > inaccessible on my C8

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 kernel-4.18.0-193 shim issue

On 8/13/20 11:23 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > Hey All, > > Is it safe to allow the 193 series kernel update now?  Last time I tried > that my system refused to boot.  I had to roll back to the 4.18.0-147 > kernel to get my machine to reboot. > > Since that happened I've been watching this mail list

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 kernel-4.18.0-193 shim issue

On 8/17/20 7:05 PM, david wrote: > At 07:11 AM 8/17/2020, you wrote: >> On 8/13/20 11:23 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> > Hey All, >> > >> > Is it safe to allow the 193 series kernel update now?  Last time I >> tried >> > that my system refused to boot.  I had to roll back to the 4.18.0-147 >> > ker

Re: [CentOS] Tracking or checking backported kernel patches from upstream

On 9/2/20 9:46 AM, Carlos A. Carnero Delgado wrote: > Hi! > > I'm interested in finding out if a couple of upstream kernel patches were > backported into CentOS (RHEL), in particular this one > > and this o

Re: [CentOS] EL8: rebased firefox dumped core

On 8/30/20 9:48 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > EL8: Since the new update of firefox (rebased), I get a lot of > coredumps while playing videos. Anyone experiencing the same? firefox-78.2.0-2.el8_2.x86_64 .. just played several youtube videos with no issues on my main workstation. signatu

Re: [CentOS] A Request to Add module to CentOS Linux (3.10.0-1127.18.2.el7.x86_64) 7 (Core)

On 9/15/20 8:09 AM, Phil Perry wrote: > On 15/09/2020 05:28, Dedoep wrote: >> Hi Phil, >> >> Not sure if you've had time to look at this? As mentioned middleware, >> like >> docker-ce, is preventing us from moving to el8. >> >> Thanks >> Dan >> > > Hi Dan, > > I've succeeded in backporting mac802

[CentOS] CentOS Linux updates released (RSS Feeds)

/centos-8-x86_64-AppStream.xml This is for people who have asked about what rpms are updated and how to see when new updates happen on CentOS Linux 8.  But it works for all versions of CentOS (There are xml files for all repos of CentOS Linxui 6. 7, and 8 .. Also CentOS Stream). Thanks, Johnny Hughes

Re: [CentOS] C8 - Register with Red Hat

On 8/17/20 4:37 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > I am still in the low end of the learning curve with Centos 8, and keep > getting warning > messages to register with Red Hat. Is this a requirement for C8. I do not > have a user ID > with Red Hat; will they give a user ID for a Cent

Re: [CentOS] JFS for CentOS 7

On 9/27/20 6:32 PM, H wrote: > On 09/25/2020 05:42 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:51 AM H wrote: >>> On 09/15/2020 08:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H wrote: > I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I > remem

[CentOS] CentOS 7 (2009) in progress

populated in 7 to 10 days: https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CR And the final release completed in less than 40 days. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Logitech C922 webcam

On 9/29/20 12:30 PM, H wrote: > Just installed the above USB webcam but it is not recognized by dmesg | grep > usb, nor does Zoom recognize it. I was under the understanding it should not > require a driver, or? > > I am running CentOS 7. > I have a C270 that I use .. it just works. sign

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] CentOS 7 (2009) in progress

On 9/30/20 2:14 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:38 PM Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> OK all .. RHEL 7.9 source code updated today. >> >> I am currently working to start the build of CentOS 7 based on that >> [CentOS 7 (2009) ]. >> >>

Re: [CentOS] No sound after latest Firefox update (firefox-78.3.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64)

On 9/29/20 9:16 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: > With Firefox updated to firefox-78.3.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64, I cannot get > sound from Firefox. I've tried restarting pulseaudio, also logging out > and logging back in. No help. Other A/V apps work just fine. Downgrading > to firefox-68.12.0-1.el6.centos.

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On 10/20/20 2:04 PM, R C wrote: > RHEL 6 has the same problem, also firefox 78 on a 64 bit machine. And if this is the case, it should also be broken in CentOS until it is fixed in RHEL source code. > > > On 10/20/20 11:35 AM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: >> Jonathan Billings wrote: >> >>>   I'm l

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 78 under CentOS 6 -- no sound?

On 10/20/20 3:32 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 10/20/20 2:45 PM, Robert Heller wrote: >> At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:35:59 -0400 CentOS mailing list >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Jonathan Billings wrote: >>>   I'm less concerned with firefox being broken on 32-bit CentOS 6   systems when the platfor

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 updates missing

On 10/27/20 8:04 AM, Marco via CentOS wrote: > Hi, > > Is there some reaseon why recent CentOS 8 updates (Thunderbird, Firefox) > are missing? > Yes .. we are in the middle of a 7.9.2009 upgrade too. We also have an issue with several module build failures (python27, llvm, rust) which are in pr

Re: [CentOS] Cuentos live cd

On 10/23/20 4:50 PM, Leonardo Cuyar Morales wrote: > Hi list, sorry about my autocomplete. I asked about any documentation on > build a centos livecd with my custome utities and applications. > > On Saturday, October 17, 2020, Leonardo Cuyar Morales > wrote: >> If there any guide / howto yo Bulls

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice locking up

On 11/3/20 6:10 AM, Kuang-Chun Cheng wrote: > Mike McCarthy, W1NR 於 2020年11月3日 週二 下午7:56寫道： > >> >>> Can you reproduce the problem with this document? >>> >>> And, when the crash happened, could you still ping the computer from >>> another device in the network? >>> >>> Crashing hard so that only

[CentOS] Reminder: CentOS 6 EOL on 30 November 2020

updates pushed to vault.centos.org.  Therefore, security issues will no longer be fixed, etc.  You should take the rest of the month to either move to a newer versoin of CentOS Linux ... or to procure Extended el6 support from Red Hat (EUS RHEL 6). Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description

Re: [CentOS] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

On 12/8/20 8:35 AM, Bill Gee wrote: > Aside from the the latest shiny - what are the advantages of CentOS 8 Stream? > What are the benefits? > > I read through the announcement and FAQ, but they do not address that > question. Is it just a name change? Is it an attempt to put CentOS on a > s

Re: [CentOS] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

On 12/8/20 8:35 AM, Bill Gee wrote: > Aside from the the latest shiny - what are the advantages of CentOS 8 Stream? > What are the benefits? > > I read through the announcement and FAQ, but they do not address that > question. Is it just a name change? Is it an attempt to put CentOS on a > s

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

On 12/8/20 10:29 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 11:15:04AM -0500, Rich Bowen wrote: >> That page was never a contract. It's a web page published by an open source >> project. Please do not misconstrue it as a contract. > > I don't think anyone seriously thought it was a con

Re: [CentOS] Update CentOS 6 one last time?

On 12/8/20 10:31 AM, Paul Storck via CentOS wrote: > Hello, is it possible to install the final updates for CentOS 6? > I ran a yum update and I received this message "Error: Cannot find a valid > baseurl for repo: base" > I assume it's due to the EOL of CentOS 6? > Yes, and archived version of

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

On 12/8/20 11:02 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:59 AM Rich Bowen wrote: > >> >> >> On 12/8/20 11:29 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> I see a lot of promises that Stream will have better engagement with >>> the community. Why would we trust these promises? >> >> "Better en

Re: [CentOS] unsubscribe

On 12/8/20 11:12 AM, Daniel Worden wrote: > Could you please unsubscribe this email address. I was not aware of the > volume of messages this would create and I would like to resubscire using a > different email address. Done. Thanks, John

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

gt; Am 08.12.2020 um 18:11 schrieb Johnny Hughes : >> >> On 12/8/20 11:02 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:59 AM Rich Bowen wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/8/20 11:29 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: &g

Re: [CentOS] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

On 12/8/20 1:04 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, Rich Bowen wrote: > >> The future of the CentOS Project is CentOS Stream, and over the next >> year we’ll be shifting focus from CentOS Linux, the rebuild of Red Hat >> Enterprise Linux (RHEL), to CentOS Stream, which tracks just ahead

Re: [CentOS] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

On 12/8/20 2:01 PM, cen...@niob.at wrote: > On 08/12/2020 15:48, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 12/8/20 8:35 AM, Bill Gee wrote: >>> Aside from the the latest shiny - what are the advantages of CentOS 8 >>> Stream?  What are the benefits? >>> >>> I read

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >