On 02/09/2011 05:53 AM, Agnello George wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> i got two server webserver1 and webserver2 i want to rsync some data
> form webserver1 to webserver2 using a user called syncuser
>
> ( syncuser is added to the group apache : adduser -G apache syncuser )
>
> here is my command :
>
> [
On 02/09/2011 07:50 AM, Denis Zaharov wrote:
> Dear mailing list members,
>
> There was a branch about clusters, but I have a certain task.
>
> There are two servers with CentOS 5.5 installed.
> The servers are working with Zabbix (monitoring system for traffic,
> using a MySQL), wiki and RT (al
On 02/10/2011 12:37 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 10/02/11 02:05, Larry Vaden wrote:
>> In order to avoid a cross post, the following background quote is from
>> scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ewan Mac Mahon wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm a little bit hazy on the deta
On 02/10/2011 01:33 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:53:09AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> This is correct, CentOS would add an updated package somewhere (our
>> people.centos.org site or the centos-testing repository would be the
>> likely
On 02/11/2011 09:36 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 at 6:38pm, Drew wrote
>
>>> RHEL and CentOS have much, much tighter basic privilege handling. The
>>> complexity of the NTFS ACL structure, for example, is so frequently
>>> mishandled that it's often ignored and simply dealt
On 02/12/2011 12:57 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> In fact, you can do things very easily with *nix acls that are very
>> difficult in Windows. For example, you can set different 'Default'
>> permissions (what will be on things created in the directory) than the
>> permissions that are actually on
On 02/12/2011 10:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 2/12/11 6:54 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
OTOH, for mere backup using rsync and ssh might work even better and be
somewhat simplier.
>>>
>>> except that provides no point in time restoration ability.
>>>
>>> I prefer backup schemes that
On 02/12/2011 03:19 PM, Peter Ivanov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i am getting the following error in CentOS 64 bit with php 5.2
>
> I cant get mysql functionality running and the ioncube loader
>
> Please help, i am very desperate
>
>
> Here is my output:
>
>
>
>
> [root@host ~]# php -v
> Failed l
I never install i386 and x86_64 packages on my servers. Not saying that
is what is causing your issue, but I see you have both installed.
Is this on a real machine or a VPS with one of those stb type kernels?
Did this ever work or is this a new install?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP dig
On 02/12/2011 04:13 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> I never install i386 and x86_64 packages on my servers. Not saying that
> is what is causing your issue, but I see you have both installed.
>
> Is this on a real machine or a VPS with one of those stb type kernels?
>
> Did this ev
On 02/14/2011 07:31 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 12:08 +, Keith Beeby wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> So the 'fix' is applied directly to the host os,
>>
>> no, to the *guest* OS instances. [please, do not top-post].
>>
>>> i
On 02/15/2011 06:33 AM, Lucian wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 02/15/2011 06:01 AM, Lucian wrote:
>>> Ok, shouldn't there be at least 1 more person that can do and access
>>> whatever you can?
>>
>> yes, there is and they can.
>
> Happy to hear that! The next
On 02/15/2011 09:02 AM, ann kok wrote:
> Hi
>
> Anyone experienced in DRBD
Sort of ...
>
> ls it good in using mysql redundant?
>
I use DRBD to keep whole servers redundant ... one of the things it
keeps redundant is mysql.
If the machine was only a database server I would likely do it
diffe
On 02/15/2011 09:59 AM, R - elists wrote:
>
> Eero,
>
> that is great, as long as you consider and actually donate to CentOS
> regularly
>
> statistically, most people that download or use CentOS, do not donate.
>
Money is not the real issue. It is time, and more importantly trust.
We can no
On 02/15/2011 05:21 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>>
>
>> Now Fred had read this book about how adding farmers to a field won't
>> necessarily make the fruit grow any faster. Maybe it's true, he
>> thought. Some of the experienced farmers had already been helping
>> anyway, so that was something.
>
On 02/16/2011 04:31 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 15/02/11 17:25, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
>> Let's see. 7 weeks after a RHEL release, we have:
>
> For RHEL6, lets make that 14 weeks. And RHEL5.6 got released 9 weeks after
> RHEL6.
>
The FIRST build of a distribution (the .0 of 4.0 or 5.0) ta
On 02/16/2011 09:20 AM, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> As I said before, Oracle has not had their stuff released for very long
>> and while Scientific Linus has released some Alpha/Beta stuff along the
>> way, they al
On 02/16/2011 09:03 AM, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> Because they also have $dayjobs too ... Oracle (with billions of dollars
>> and unlimited machines and personnel) just released their el6 on Friday.
>>
>> I
On 02/16/2011 10:50 AM, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> Apparently there was some confusion around the release of SL 5.6
>> alpha. Troy Dawson cleared it up in his post to the main SL mailing
>> list:
>>
>> http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=i
On 02/16/2011 11:17 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 14:58 +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> Nothing happened, not one person beyond the
>> usual-people actually did anything.
>
> When you have time please tell all of us, preferably on this list, what
> resources you need an
On 02/16/2011 01:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 2/16/2011 12:41 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>>
>> The wireless on the X31 is an Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless LAN 2100
>> 3B Mini PCI Adapter (rev 04). Intel wireless chips are *very well*
>> supported *out of the box* under CentOS. You do need to do
On 02/16/2011 04:32 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:03:57PM -0800, Benjamin Smith wrote:
>
>> IMHO, if you are intending to install an O/S, and will need to have an
>> Internet connection, you should ALWAYS have a thumb drive and another
>> computer
>> with a confirmed
On 02/16/2011 05:03 PM, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Larry Vaden wrote:
>>
>> N.B. pkgs.org is showing that CentALT is at current code and Fedora is
>> using a release candidate!
>
> Per a discussion with an Internet2 professor this PM:
>
> ACHTUNG: Note the repo is app
On 02/18/2011 02:26 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:15:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> Red Hat still has not put several of the sources in their public tree
>> either.
>>
>
> So CentOS6 cannot be released, or even built completely
On 02/18/2011 09:29 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 18/02/11 15:12, Larry Vaden wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 02/18/2011 02:26 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:15:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
On 02/18/2011 12:39 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 14:13, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 02/18/2011 02:26 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:15:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Red Hat still has not put s
On 02/19/2011 01:13 AM, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> Just for the record ... we (the CentOS Project) do not recommend this
>> site. They are using our name without permission.
>
> Attribution goes to EliteMoly:
>
On 02/20/2011 03:22 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 04:19:23PM -0500, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>> I am getting an error that I am not familiar with when I restart ssh.
>
>> [root@virtcent01:~] #service sshd restart
>> Stopping sshd: [ OK
On 02/20/2011 04:58 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> good call! yes this is a custom ssh. It's a version that has LPK
> capabilities (LDAP public keys) included. It is the product of an rpm
> built from a spec file and tarball that was patched with LPK.
>
> [root@LCENT01:~] #rpm -qa | gre
On 02/20/2011 07:30 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 02/16/2011 04:31 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>>> On 15/02/11 17:25, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
>>>> Let's see. 7 weeks after a RHEL release, we have:
>>>
>&
On 02/21/2011 08:33 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 02/20/2011 07:30 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 02/16/2011 04:31 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>>>>>
On 02/21/2011 11:08 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 2/21/11 10:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> So you are now saying that you cannot scale out this work to more people
>>> to release faster ? This is something that has to be done by Karanbir only ?
>>>
>>
On 02/21/2011 11:18 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 02/21/2011 11:08 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 2/21/11 10:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>>> So you are now saying that you cannot scale out this work to more people
>>>> to release faster ? This is some
On 02/21/2011 11:23 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> The packages have to be built in a specific order, preferably the order
>> that they are originally produced in, so that they can be linked
>> properly. Packag
On 02/22/2011 02:35 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> Calling it Enterprise is important because doing so establishes the
>> *origin* and the *objective* of the work: a BUG-FOR-BUG-IDENTICAL
>> de-branding/re-branding of Red Hat ENTERPRISE Linux.
>
>
> How about BugforbugIdenticaldebreandin
On 02/24/2011 07:12 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 02/23/11 6:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
>>> know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version
On 02/24/2011 02:05 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> I know the development team is furiously working to get 5.6 out the door
>>> so I understand that there will be delays. However, it was my
>>> understanding that "Critical" security updates and those that are
>>> "remotely exploitable" woul
On 02/24/2011 05:43 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Johnny Hughes <mailto:joh...@centos.org>> wrote:
>
>> I am not saying this to be a smart a$$ or be negative ... just saying
>> that other enterprise distributions exist that provide long term
>
On 02/24/2011 10:47 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 2/24/11 8:56 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:44:32PM +1300, Machin, Greg wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Rather use ESXi 4.1 and get
>>> up and running quickly. If your hardware is not on the supported list
>>> there are other lists of
On 02/27/2011 09:13 PM, JD wrote:
> Any word on approximate release date of Centos 6?
The real answer is that 4.9 is ready for release (Already tested by QA).
We are testing 5.6 right now in QA.
There was a particularly nasty bug in anaconda for 5.6 that we were
working on for almost a week wit
On 02/28/2011 03:49 AM, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm trying to find a way to automate checkdisk every 1 month on a weekend.
> in other words i want checkdisk to run every saturday morning.
>
> i can of course change the default mount/count though that wont let me
> control WHEN it wil
On 03/02/2011 04:45 PM, David Hrbáč wrote:
> Dne 2.3.2011 01:14, Dag Wieers napsal(a):
>> >From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CentOS
>> RHEL4:2005-02-14
>> CentOS-4: 2005-03-0923 days
>>
>> RHEL5:2007-03-14
>> CentOS-5: 2007-04-1229 days
>>
>> RHEL6:2010-
On 03/03/2011 05:57 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> Just curious... CentOS4 lifetime tracks RHEL4 somewhat... Since RedHat
> has announced LTS (Long Term Support) for RHEL4, are there plans to
> extend the CentOS 4 support window?
No, BECAUSE ... Red Hat does not publicly release the sources for their
Long
On 03/03/2011 11:44 PM, Jimmy Bradley wrote:
> I do have one question about Cent OS 6.
> Sonetimes back, I remember reading that the plan was to spread the iso's
> over multiple cd's, rather than put it all on 1 dvd. Is that still the
> plan? As far as when it's released, I say take all the tim
On 03/04/2011 02:31 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Is there any (easy?) way to migrate running standalone CentOS 4 or 5
> systems to xen virtual stacks?
>
> Rebuilding those systems from scratch on the xen machine would take
> plenty of work.
I think I would use KVM guests and not Xen guests ... but
On 03/05/2011 04:07 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> This post appeared on another forum:
>
This kernel change does not impact the ability to rebuild the source as
is, it just makes it much harder to do anything except build the
pristine kernel from kernel.org or the Red Hat kernel.
You can still compar
On 03/08/2011 09:51 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> ok that's great! thank you!
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:29 AM, compdoc wrote:
>>> But my question remains is there any way to instruct
>>> yum to automatically select the right package architecture
>>> through a setting in one of the config files rath
On 03/07/2011 02:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Keith Keller wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:34:24AM -0600, Sean Carolan wrote:
>>> Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
>>> sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
>>> loopback address?
On 03/11/2011 04:06 PM, PJ wrote:
> Interesting entries in /var/log/cron:
>
> -snip-
> (this runs 24/7 every 5 minutes as normal...)
>
> Mar 11 02:20:01 web1 crond[12919]: (webuser) CMD (wget -q
> www.domain.com/cron.php >/dev/null 2>&1)
> (fast forward to 3 AM, the same cron job starts get
On 03/15/2011 08:17 PM, David McGuffey wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 21:21 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
>> On 03/15/2011 12:54 PM, David McGuffey wrote:
>>> Finished installing CentOS 5.5 x86_64 on a new Dell tower workstation
>>> that has a quad core Intel processor and 8 GB of ram. BIOS ha
On 03/15/2011 04:32 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hello list!
>
> I have been instructed to install very specific version numbers of
> httpd and php on the company web servers. Here's what I've tried so
> far
>
> [root@ec2-50-17-114-126 ~]# yum install php-5.2.17-1.w5.i386
> Loaded plugins: fastestmir
On 03/20/2011 05:02 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> On Mar 20, 2011, at 1:52 PM, William Warren wrote:
>
>> On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
.
> I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct
> competition with
>>
On 03/21/2011 07:08 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Matthew Feinberg wrote:
>> I don't see the problem here. I just tested this and it works fine. The
>> drupal6 package only requires php 5.2 or greater.
>
> Right. The php53 package is in the upstream vendor's upd
On 03/22/2011 08:18 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 3/22/11 8:07 PM, William Hooper wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On 3/22/11 7:38 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
You missed my point to the poster. While Centos is my defacto
production OS, he mention
On 03/22/2011 08:37 AM, Sam Trenholme wrote:
> Hello everyone:
>
> * DNS does not have a "refresh rate". In DNS, the person running the
> domain determines what the "refresh rate" (it's called TTL in DNS) for
> their records is; for example, Google has a TTL of "once per hour" and
> my domains (m
On 03/23/2011 07:53 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>>
>> And then looking at the reason for the fails:
>>
>> Differing package requirements certmonger-0.30-4.el5.x86_64.rpm.out:
>> --- work/SL-req
On 03/26/2011 07:46 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>> There have been a number of recent conversations on the developer list and
>> this list about CentOS. My initial thought was why not have CentOS and SL
>> merge. Since they have different goals I can understand the reason not to.
>> So my next q
On 03/27/2011 07:36 AM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
>>
>> What makes you think CentOS is not willing to be commercially sponsored?
>> (Or only work developing CentOS?)
>>
>> I would LOVE to be able to do CentOS as my only job.
>>
>> No one that we know of is willing to pay a full time salary for 1 or 2
On 03/28/2011 05:25 AM, sync wrote:
> Hello,guys:
>
> I try to compile heartbeat 3.0.4 from official sources on CentOS 5.5 x86_64 .
>
>
> When I start the heartbeat configuration, I encountered a problem:
> ./ConfigureMe configure --prefix = /path/hb
>
> .
> .
> .
> checking for hea
On 04/04/2011 04:11 AM, Cal Sawyer wrote:
> Hi
>
> I use the Chromium build from:
>
> http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~cxs548/chrome
>
> The highest Chromium rev you can run with the RHEL5.x flash-plugin
> chrome-10.0.612.0.tar.gz is v10. chrome-11 is incompatible with
> flash-plugin-10.2.152.27-0.1
On 04/06/2011 03:53 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> yOn Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> On 04/04/2011 11:14 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>> Nobody else really can give an update, the process is pretty much closed
>>> to the general public. So if the only person why can provide information
>>> is off
On 04/07/2011 08:11 AM, Radu Gheorghiu wrote:
> On 04/07/2011 03:58 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
>> On 04/07/2011 08:41 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> Please try to maintain some semblance of professionalism when you post
>>> to this list.
>> This coming from
On 04/09/2011 12:04 PM, compdoc wrote:
>> A similar incident was reported during the QA. Look at the .xml file.
>> If it says type='raw', change it to type='qcow2' and restart libvirtd.
>> Would that fix the problem ?
>>
>> Akemi
>
> Thank you. After reading your message, I googled the error and f
On 04/08/2011 07:25 AM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
>>
>> As I seem to have started this little subsection of the thread, please
>> let me give just one small example to help clarify the situation as it
>> appears there is still a lot of misunderstanding surrounding this issue.
>>
>> Let's look at
On 04/07/2011 03:46 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
>>
>> If you do not like how your hairdresser does you hair you will go to
>> other one. If you do not like the taste of bread you are buying, you
>> will go and by from other bakery.
>
>
> I have never been insulted or belittled by my hairdres
On 04/10/2011 07:36 AM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
>>
>> The goal of the centos project is to produce an RPM that is exactly like
>> the upstream RPM in every way that is legally possible.
>>
>> The checks we do look at libraries that binaries link to, size of the
>> packages and a list of the fil
On 04/10/2011 08:52 AM, Olaf Mueller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am searching for an internet usb surf-stick (umts) that works under
> CentOS. Is anyone using such a stick and if so, which chip has this
> usb-stick?
>
> Would a Huawei E160E chip work under CentOS? Or maybe under CentOS with
> the 2.6.3
On 04/11/2011 05:07 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> On 4/11/2011 4:02 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
>>> On 11/04/11 20:16, Digimer wrote:
/putting on asbestos pants.
each release is more complex than the last. The web of dependency grows,
so t
On 04/11/2011 04:45 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Riccardo Veraldi
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello, after updating to Cents 5.6 and so to kvm-83-224
>> my KVM virtual machines qemu qcow2 based images do not start anymore.
>> Looking at VM console the error message is that VM media is no
eleaseProcess
The point here is that we are not going to share access to our actual
build system and we are not going to give you our actual build scripts
off that system as they use names that we do not want to publish and
contain files that we can not allow people to have access to. But these
On 04/12/2011 07:24 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 04/11/2011 05:07 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>>> On 4/11/2011 4:02 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
>>>>> On 11/04/11 20:16, D
On 04/11/2011 04:50 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
> For a long period of time, my Apache root directory has been
> /home/httpd. For security reasons, this is not so good as
> SELinux has informed me. Now all of the files have been copied
> to /var/www/etc with owner and group "root". The privileges ar
On 04/11/2011 08:58 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> On 11.4.2011 16.07, Torres, Giovanni (NIH/NINDS) [C] wrote:
>> 5.6 version of the virtualization guide from RedHat includes Xen and KVM:
>
> Oh damn. I didn't notice the URL which said 5.2. Thanks.
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterpris
On 04/12/2011 02:55 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Keith Keller wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:59:56PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote:
>>
>>> Erm, the dev(s) *suggested* using an alternative distribution.
>>
>> The developers never suggested using this list to raise funds for any
>>
On 04/13/2011 02:59 AM, Alexander Farber wrote:
> Hello fellow CentOS users,
>
> until now I was using CentOS 5.5 with php 5.3 through this file:
>
> # grep -v ^# /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Testing.repo
> [c5-testing]
> name=CentOS-5 Testing
> baseurl=http://dev.centos.org/centos/$releasever/testing
On 04/13/2011 04:45 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:15, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> Farkas Levente wrote on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:36:15 +0200:
>>
>>> these shouldn't have to be there (they are from older release):
>> they are not there, check the official repo, rsyncing without del
On 04/12/2011 08:09 PM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 21:43, Cal Webster wrote:
>> Also, the upstream vendor provides no economical
>> way to mirror RHEL updates on isolated networks - Satellite is out of
>> the question. RHEL 4 updates must be painstakingly retrieved man
On 04/13/2011 10:24 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 4/12/2011 5:40 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>> There is no compelling reason
>> to tamper with a system that works that I have seen so far.
>
> Is there any amount of elapsed time that will convince you otherwise?
>
> I'll refrain from calling this passa
On 04/13/2011 12:28 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 4/13/2011 11:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> People have a choice. They can use CentOS or they can use something else.
>
> Or they can try to convince the project not to follow the Whitebox
> example of not matchi
On 04/13/2011 03:21 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
I am sure if you do then you will have a mailing list on which your
fanbois can post that they want to give you money.
But this list is not for that purpose.
>>>
>>>
>>> Once again an unne
On 04/13/2011 10:31 AM, Mailing List wrote:
> On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used
>> ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the
>> network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot kee
On 04/14/2011 06:23 AM, Mailing List wrote:
> On 4/14/2011 6:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> Is it really true that the time is working perfectly with one of the
>> other kernels (the older ones)?
>>
>>
>>
>
>Johnny,
>
> Yes, As lo
On 04/16/2011 12:18 AM, Devin Reade wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> have all your configuration under a change management system, with an at
>> least semi-automated installation procedure, such as kickstart.
>
> Or have the self discipline to keep a text file (or other record) of
> *all* ch
On 04/17/2011 09:52 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi Akemi,
>
> On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 18:18 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> See also:
>>
>> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=30939&forum=37
>
> Please don't take this the wrong way, but not everybody reads the
> forums. P
On 04/18/2011 07:51 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:07:04PM -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote:
>>
>> At any rate, there are work-arounds -- for those who use Evolution,
>> the SL update is probably the best. I'm kind of surprised that Red Hat
>> has not issued a fix yet.
>
>
On 04/18/2011 10:48 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:07:04 -0500 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>> There is a known issue with one of the security updates on that
>>> version of glibc.
>>>
>>> That said, it's still
On 04/19/2011 05:13 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 04/18/2011 07:51 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>>
>>> There is an update in QA at Redhat now to address these issues.
>>
>> Do you know a bug entry wi
On 04/18/2011 12:09 PM, Volker Poplawski wrote:
> On 04/18/2011 06:52 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>> Actually I'm trying to figure out where these lines originate from
>>
>> I see
>>
>>> Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.86989
>>> + umask 022
>>> + cd /home/user/rpmbuild/BUILD
>>> + LA
On 04/18/2011 09:02 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Jim,
>
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 07:40 -0400, Jim Perrin wrote:
>> Have you tested these updates to see if you have experienced any
>> issue? Documenting symptoms people should watch for so that they can
>> make their own decisions is far
On 04/19/2011 06:19 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 04/18/2011 03:34 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
exclude=xorg-x11-server-utils-7.1-5.el5_6.1
to their updates repo config.
>>>
>>> this sounds like extremely bad advice.
>>
>> Not as bad, however, as installing the update.
>>
>
> Jim put it
On 04/18/2011 09:02 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Jim,
>
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 07:40 -0400, Jim Perrin wrote:
>> Have you tested these updates to see if you have experienced any
>> issue? Documenting symptoms people should watch for so that they can
>> make their own decisions is far
On 04/18/2011 10:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 4/18/2011 10:18 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> Where is it (besides their bugzilla) that upstream warns customers of
>> this known issue? I am all for fixing things and posting things and
>> such, but CentOS (with no
If you have already installed the Scientific Linux packages by Troy
Dawson then you do not need to install these packages as the libraries
are the same.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
On 04/19/2011 05:27 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>>
>> Here's a more objective view from Linux Mag:
>>
>> http://www.linux-mag.com/id/8608/?hq_e=el&hq_m=1231269&hq_l=12&hq_v=41484763bd
>>
>> If you have trouble with the link, some relevant quotes:
>>
>
> Wow, that must smart. Still, should come as no su
On 04/20/2011 09:18 AM, Brian Mathis wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Ian Murray wrote:
>> Okay, maybe that was an assumption too far in regards to "respect".
>>
>> Perhaps not so one-sided if he had received an email reply from the devs
>> assuming he did indeed send one to KB. To be
On 04/20/2011 02:29 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
> I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never give
> me
> sufficient information to start a competing rebuild.
Why would anyone give another entity all the things required to replace
them? Red Hat does not give us nearly
On 04/20/2011 11:52 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/20/2011 02:29 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>>
>> I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never
>> give me
>> sufficient information to start a competing rebuild.
>
> Why would anyone g
On 04/21/2011 01:04 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>>> 'yum update' runs into the following error message.
>>>
>>> Package libuser-devel-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.i386.rpm is not signed
>>
>> I got this too, there's two ways around it:
>>
>> 1) Wait until the package is signed and then update.
>>
>> 2) Run: y
On 04/21/2011 06:11 AM, David McGuffey wrote:
> After the upgrade, my VMs stopped loading. Found others with the problem
> and followed the guidance to use virsh to dump the xml file of the VM,
> undefine the VM, edit the xml file to change 'raw' to 'qcow2', redefine
> the VM from the edited xml, a
On 04/21/2011 08:34 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>> Not updating is entirely sensible and sounds like the best default position.
>> Installing a package you'd expect to be signed when it isn't signed should
>> ring alarm bells.
>
> I agree that my first answer was probably wrong, even with all
> dis
401 - 500 of 2594 matches
Mail list logo
