> Hi! Did anyone tried this on 5.4? having a look on
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Install_On_Partitionable_RAID1
> is would seem that that mkinitrd patch is no longer required.
> Can someone ack this?
i just looked at the mkinitrd on my stock 5.4 system and it does not seem
to have patches in
a recent post on bugtraq hilighted an issue with how upstream has
configured apache to invoke php, namely using addhandler, which has the
behavior of matching the extension anywhere in the file. this means
that foo.php.jpg will be run as php. where this becomes an issue is web
apps that allow
>> a recent post on bugtraq hilighted an issue with how upstream has
>> configured apache to invoke php, namely using addhandler, which has the
>> behavior of matching the extension anywhere in the file. this means
>> that foo.php.jpg will be run as php. where this becomes an issue is web
>> apps
>> I had both of these on my server, and just now replaced them with
>> similar sections.
>
> Just a comment about the FilesMatch thing. The proposed additional
> ForceType will not work in there according to the httpd docs. Not that
> this makes a big difference.
what in the docs are you reading
>> what in the docs are you reading to indicate forcetype won't work?
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#forcetype
> says it works only if given in directory-type context and that's unlikely to
> happen here. You would rather set the FilesMatch global.
i think that directory contex
Hello,
in system-config-date i have checkbox synchronize date before service
startup.
Which config switch,file does it affect? I want to turn it on on my CentOS
machine without xauth , just editing config files , i was hoping it could
be
in /etc/sysconfig/ntpd but no.
ok ... I do not see exact
after this latest centos 5 kernel update, i am seeing 40 second delays on
automount points. nothing in the rpm changelog looks obviously related to
autofs and the autofs module seems to be the same as the previous kernel.
i'm starting to do some strace'ing and other debugging, but nothing has
On Sat, 24 May 2008, Marko A. Jennings wrote:
What type(s) of filesystems are you experiencing this with? I am seeing
no additional delays with CIFS filesystems after the upgrade.
for nfs mounts. i am using a centos 4 nfs server, but from running strace
and enabling -d for automount, the de
i had previously been having issues with automount being slow with this
new kernel and i tracked it down to dns delays which were being caused by
ipsec not working. i have spent a few hours poking around and ipsec seems
quite broken with this new kernel. esp packets go in and out just fine,
b
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Ned Slider wrote:
See here:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853
thanks. i had looked in the upstream bugzilla and not found anything
obvious, but didn't think to look at the centos bug database. i'll
remember that for next time.
___
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this one,
there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853
that bug entry does say to use the upstream bug for info about a
workaround, but
i haven't found anything online to talk about this, so maybe i've got
something odd going on here. i have my xen set up to save/restore on dom0
reboot. almost everything works fine, but cron on the guest os'es
(everything is centos 5 x86_64) stop processing jobs. i'm guessing it is
missing a
On 09/27/2011 11:55 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> I seem to have this very odd issue with CentOS 6 WRT NIS. I have taken the
> package selection that I used with CentOS 5 and basically plopped it into my
> C6 kickstart file (see below). On C5 this works just fine and I'm able to
> log in wit
On 09/29/2011 09:23 AM, Alain Péan wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Le 29/09/2011 18:18, Joe Pruett a écrit :
>> since you mention nis, i'll guess you use automount as well. so be
>> warned that centos 6 has some issues with automount. if automount
>> requests are mad
On 11/09/2011 05:53 AM, Mike VanHorn wrote:
>> You'll probably need to add a pam_access.so reference to the stock
>> /etc/pam.d/password-auth. Make the first "account" line
>>
>>account required pam_access.so
> My CentOS system doesn't have a stock password-auth file. I tried creating
> one w
>> I know...google...BUT:
>> Does someone has good howtos, docs, descriptions, opinions in forums, or
>> similar things about IPv6 and "related things"?
>> I just think it would be a very good idea to collect some links about it...
>> Regards, and thank you in anticipation
>
> The wiki ( wiki.cento
> Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> I've been getting over the last months several of these notices. Sometimes
>> a few per day. What's the problem? Can't this be avoided?
>
>>The mail system
>>
>> : mail forwarding loop for centos@centos.org
>
> I haven't the faintest idea *why* those hap
> H, OK, I get it.
>
> I know I can build the latest Apache on CentOS, and what we currently
> do is put it into /usr/local - which I guess works.
>
> I'd really prefer to have an RPM though.
>
> Certainly the CentOS team as a way in which they produce this RPM.
> Is this method public? And if
> Has anyone succesfully setup, and used CentOS as an iSCSI server? I'm
> trying to setup a server with 4x500GB HDD's, setup in RAID 10 to act
> as an iSCSI server for a virtualization project, but I can't find a
> decent howto on how to setup an iSCSI server using CentOS.
>
> I would like to setup
as i'm reviewing the courseware for the rhel (centos) course
i'm teaching next week, i'm going to ask the occasional question,
possibly technical, possibly more policy.
first one involves the choice for virtualization. the course has a
short section involving virt using xen but everything i've
> Fedora 13 does save the guest on shutdown so I would expect this will be
> supported in RHEL6/CentOS 6 too. But when do you actually power down a
> RHEL/CentOS server? And if you did, wouldn't you have migrated the
> guests to another box already?
>
mainly it is an issue for a quick reboot of th
the big piece that i've been waiting for is ipv6 stateful firewalling.
without that, ipv6 has been a non-starter for me.
On 11/10/2010 12:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:40:52PM -0600, Matt wrote:
>> What does 6 bring with it? Anything new in virtualization and cloud
>
it looks like one of the recent updates will sometimes chmod /dev/null
to 600. out of 20 machines i've updated, 3 of them had the odd
/dev/null perms afterwards. i haven't tried to identify what it doing
it yet, but wanted to give a heads up to others that might start seeing
weird behavior.
_
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>> Have anyone used both XEN & KVM before? What are your experiences
>> with either, in comparison to each other? We've been using XEN for
>> about 4 years now, and only use CentOS as our server platform. I'd
>> hate to move to Debian or OpenSuse just for
On 11/17/2010 10:35 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:16:51 -0800 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>> it looks like one of the recent updates will sometimes chmod /dev/null
>> to 600. out of 20 machines i've updated, 3 of them had the odd
>> /dev/null perms afterwards. i haven't
a while back i reported an issue where /dev/null was getting set to 600
perms after a system update. i finally figured out what it is. i don't
care about failed logins and have limited space on some servers, so i
symlinked /var/log/btmp to /dev/null. the initscripts package does a
chmod 600 /var
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> The man page for lastb says if you just complete delete /var/log/btmp
> the system shouldn't recreate it on its own.
>
> That is the simplest answer.
i have done this for now, but the initscripts rpm will recreate it for me
if it updates (how helpful
i (and others) have missed messages on centos-devel as well. did other
people not see the 4.7 announcement message? i'm wondering if the centos
list server is having some kind of issue.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.or
from looking at the regexs for the subscriptions, i can see that the
announcement would not be caught by any of the arch specific
subscriptions. so that explains why i (and probably others) didn't see
it. mystery solved.
___
CentOS mailing list
Cent
my poor little toshiba libretto (p-120) won't boot with the new 4.7 i586
kernel. i've reverted back to the previous kernel for now. anyone else
using the new i586 kernel successfully on old hardware?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://l
rpmforge has just released a new perl-DBD-mysql for el4 that has an
obsoletes against perl-DBD-MySQL and the protectbase yum plugin doesn't
grok obsoletes. the priorities plugin does. so if you are having issues
with this, install the yum-plugin-priorities first, make sure that the
CentOS-Bas
also, i'd like to suggest that the priorities plugin be made added to the
base install and that the centos-base repos be configured with priority 1.
it looks like c4 has the priority setting, but c5 doesn't and neither have
the plugin installed. it seems like this would create a little more
st
Anything like this would probably have to be an upstream thing. But it
would probably be a good idea for people to put this into their
kickstart configs...
i think that the yum setup diverges from upstream already, so i don't see
this as a big change from that.
___
the problem is mixed up session ids. i have made a quick patch based on
the upstream update. i've attached it. it is for the c4 version,
but probably would apply to c5. apply it with:
cd /usr/share/squirrelmail
patch -p3 < FILE
also, after this sometimes customers will have to clear the SQ
>> Anyone knows any Cisco netflow analyzer that could run on Linux/Windows? I
>> know that cisco ASDM works at somewhat level but too rough...
>>
>> For example, CIsco ASDM can only shows at IP level and only three types
>> graph, like top 10 source Address, top ten destination level, or top ten
>>
i think that previous versions did this as well, but for sure the newest
ypserv in 5.3 replaces /var/yp/Makefile with a new copy. needless to say
if you've made any changes to that file, you will not be happy. we had a
couple hours of phone calls after passwords stopped working. the original
has anyone replaced the sun jdk with the new openjdk and had any issues?
i had forgotten it was now in 5.3 until the errata announcement came
through.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> I am using the c5-testing repo to fetch PHP 5.2.6 and related
> libraries, required for the LAMP apps that I want to use. php-mcrypt
> still seems to come from the extras repo and is version 5.1.6 and the
> php binary doesn't load this module.
>
> Any ideas on howto get php-mcrypt 5.2.6?
as i wa
Would you be willing to make the RPM available?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Joe Pruett wrote:
as i was waiting for the c5-testing repo to catch up with redhat, i went
ahead and built my own. i had to take the php-extras rpm and merge the
php changes between 5.1.6 and 5.2.6 into it
On 03/12/2010 04:19 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Does anyone know how I can monitor our server's for blacklisting? We
> run a large amount of shared hosting& reseller hosting servers and
> from time to time one of the IP's will get blacklisted. I'm looking
> for a way to be notified if any of our IP's
i guess that upstream doesn't consider the samba3x packages should be
treated the same way as other packages, but i just wanted to warn folks
that the recent samba3x update changed a default setting. if you rely on
hostnames in a hosts allow/deny clause (and possibly elsewhere), things
won't work u
my nightly webalizer runs have gone from about 2 hours to over 8 hours.
this change happened sometime after november. webalizer hasn't changed
in years, but bind was updated in january, so i am thinking that is the
likely culprit. has anyone else noticed a similar slowdown? i am going
to dig throug
On 01/30/2013 09:44 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Nux! wrote:
>
>> On 28.01.2013 13:07, SilverTip257 wrote:
>>> Google Auth
>>> http://www.noktec.be/archives/1351
>>>
>> http://zonereseau.com/en/post/two-factor-ssh-authentication-via-google-secures-linux-logins-392
>>
On 03/03/2013 07:35 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:56:26AM +0800, Earl Ramirez wrote:
>> On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 21:49 -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
>>> Has anyone gotten 64-bit google earth to run on el6 x86_64?
>>>
>>> It dies almost immediately, complaining for lack of ld-lsb.so.3.
On 09/23/2013 09:39 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello,
>
> gpk-update-viewer on my CentOS 6 desktop gives me an error about
> untrusted updates. When running yum update from a terminal I get the
> following error:
>
> Package chkconfig-1.3.49.3-2.el6_4.1.x86_64.rpm is not signed
>
> No oth
what about RHSA-2014:0624-1?
On 06/05/2014 06:38 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0626 Important
>
> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0626.html
>
> The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
> syncing to the mi
46 matches
Mail list logo
