On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Marc Deop wrote:
>
> Or should I install the generic rpm package from Oracle? anyone knows the
> differences?
>
>
CentOS ships with mysql already. Use what's provided in the distribution for
best results.
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth be
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Vinay Nagrik wrote:
>
> The reason we want to do it because there are many vulnerabilities in older
> versions of openssh. Few are listed below.
>
Have you checked these against the rh security database? I'd be willing to
bet that they've all been addressed via ba
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:53 AM, hadi motamedi wrote:
>
> I upgraded from centos 5.6 to centos 6.0 to have all of the new
> featues on GIMP at hand. I selected Desktop when installing. But I
> don't see it under Applications -> Graphics as I had it under my
> previous centos 5.6 . Can you please
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:37 PM, david wrote:
> Folks
>
> The system involved is a 32-bit system...
>
> If the system really is 32bit, then I'd question how you installed the
rpmforge repo, as it's looking for 64bit packages.
It's entirely possible that you installed the 64bit rpmforge-release p
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Dan Burkland wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have been exploring the various intrusion detection systems available for
> the Linux platform and was wondering what ones you all would recommend? I
> have used AIDE before and while it is extremely easy to setup, it does no
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> I don't have enough experience to assess the security issues. Does
> anyone have an opinion on this? It would be simple and feasible to
> allocate another domain as suggested above.
The compilers themselves aren't really a security risk, but
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> i'm trying to install jboss where it asks me for java 1.5
> i have both 1.4 and 1.6 installed
> with JAVA_HOME pointing to 1.6
>
> i downloaded jdk-1_5_0_17-linux-i586.bin and executed it..
> though nothing changed..
> when i e
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:04 AM, testwreq wreq wrote:
> Apache was working with self signed certificate. We changed the ssl.conf
> file to read certicates from godaddy and it it failed to restart because of
> incorrecrt parphrase.
>
> bash-3.2# /sbin/service httpd restart
>
> Stopping httpd:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:31 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> If you absolutely have to have 2.6 for some user application, I would
> compile and install it to run somewhere else, like /usr/local/python26
> or /opt/mystuff/python26
The IUS Community repository has a newer version of python,
installabl
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:01 AM, f...@ll wrote:
> I was looking for centos 5.4 package rsyslog version 5.x or 4.x as rpm.
> Any repo exist with this package?
In 5.5, rsyslog will be rebased to 3.x. If you really need a 4.x
version, the IUS community repository has it packaged.
--
During times
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 7:53 AM, f...@ll wrote:
> Thx, and I have other question, there other exist repositories like IUS
> Community?
Yes. There are a number of additional repositories that can be used to
add or update packages on your system. There's a list of known ones on
the centos wiki.
-
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> I have found one suspicious entry in /var/log/messages:
>
> Apr 12 17:34:14 fisds0 named[5210]: client 192.168.2.7#10242: updating
> zone 'forsoft.com/IN': deleting an RR
>
> This would seem to indicate that the printer i
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Jure Pečar wrote:
> Yes but it doesn't show up under 30day trial subscription. Is it available
> for accounts with paid subscription?
I don't see it in my channel listings (for paid subscription) yet.
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth bec
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 5:52 AM, hadi motamedi wrote:
> Thank you for your reply. I am trying like the followings:
> #expect
>>set name 172.16.17.160
>>set user id
>>set password pwd
>>set cmd1 "cd /tmp"
>>set cmd2 "cp log.cap /export/home"
>>set cmd3 "logout"
>>spawn telnet $name
>>expect "log
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Chaitanya Yanamadala
wrote:
> hai
> i need to upgrade my apache to 2.3.5 and what i need is to compile it out
> by myself not to use the rpm.. so where i am stuck is that i require to have
> the apr 1.3 but i got the 1.2.7 with me, so i have downloaded the apr-1.3
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Thom Paine wrote:
> LOL, so who is checking his email?
Not really something to laugh about if it's true.
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Bob Taylor wrote:
>> BOB TAYLOR HAS DIED PLEASE REMOVE HIS NAME FROM YOUR E MAIL LIST THANKS
Also, not really someth
2010/6/28 Tsuyoshi Nagata :
> Hi,
> Your answer is just install MySQL5.1 from source code.(make install)
> next time requies B, B requires C,...
That's a horrible idea. At least use the package management system so
that dependencies can be tracked properly. Installing from source
builds directly
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Susan Day wrote:
> Hi;
> I've got MySQLdb installed (bridge to Python) and I can't figure out how to
> upgrade it. I did a find and got these paths:
>
> /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/SQLAlchemy-0.6beta2-py2.6.egg/sqlalchemy/dialects/mysql/mysqldb.py
> /usr/lib/p
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> But seriously, aside from the nice theory about how each package management
> system cures all dependency problems (which isn't 100% true), how many
> people have actually found themselves in trouble from, say, building their
> own LAMP stac
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> (Wouldn't it be nice if CentOS had 2.6.5 instead 2.4.3? Python improved
> dramatically between those two. My systems all get Python 2.6.5 alongside
> 2.4.3 because (a) 2.6.5 has a lot of useful features I'm not going to refuse
> to use just
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> Sanity here is relative. If you go to the main support channels for stuff
> like Apache or PHP or Python or Postfix or whatever, and you're having
> trouble because of some bug that they fixed literally years ago, but which
> your distro of
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:55 PM, John Jasen wrote:
> Googling the CVE # and the vendor will usually turn up the patched
> version or disposition quickly.
An easy way to nail down CVE verifications is via
http://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/
This url allows you to search and verify CVE issue
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:52 PM, wrote:
> I get an email from security, I see the article on slashdot, and other
> places, that Adobe's issued an update to acroread... but yum update
> AdobeReader_enu is still telling me there's no update. Has anyone seen it
> yet, in the repositories?
Nope. I
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Wahyu Darmawan
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I have problem with my servers. I use two of HP Blade Servers and RHEL 4.6
> installed on them, and have IBM DS4700 connected to them.
>
> In those servers are running RHCS (Red Hat Cluster Suite) with GFS for
> handling Ora
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 3:28 AM, hadi motamedi wrote:
> Dear All
> I have centos running on my VBox guest on my Windows host. I need to install
> centos on the attached external usb hard disk ,connected to my guest
> machine.Can you please let me know how can install centos on this external
> usb
ment. The user requirement now requires email
click-thru validation so it should be working now as Akemi says.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
trokes.
Nope. We're still air-gapped from the RHEL business units. We have lines
of communication to other RH community projects, but nothing that would
line up with this thread.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @
?
Yes, anyone can file a bugzilla report. It's separate from the paid
customer support ticketing system. There's no SLA or obligation to
respond to bugzilla as there is for paid support tickets.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter:
tained in the bugzilla entry and
comments linked below:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161682
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos
inal post - please change the thread and start a new one.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
announcement. I don't see
any need yet for a 'public name and shame' style posting. I prefer to
handle matters with a bit of discretion in a direct, and private manner
out of respect for members on the list.
tl;dr, just because you don't see it publicly doesn't mean w
lled in?
>
I'm not sure of a one-step 'chroot-friendly' way to do this. You could
probably script this up by abusing debuginfo-install's --installroot
option after some minor chroot prep-work.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
tw
o a more modern version.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174442
In theory this should put transparent terminal support back in
gnome-terminal.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
;t as friendly as 'eth0' but also keep names
sane and avoid the hair-tearing issues you're experiencing currently.
You don't appear to be adding anything via your append line that would
disable biosdevname, so I must assume you're using a much older 6 base
install.
--
Jim
ibC. A yum command is also acceptable.
Those src.rpms contain the source and the patches. You may want to read
over http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM for info.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
tOS. You'll need to create it in /etc/dhcp, or by putting the
requested options in /etc/dhcp/dhclient.d
For CentOS 7, it should be safe to use
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/dhcp.git/plain/README.dhclient.d as
guidelines should you choose the latter route.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project
t least try it.
>
> Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve?
Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the app.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 04/02/2015 01:28 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
Soliciting our feedback *before* changing everything regarding release
names would
have been nice.
We did.
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-February/012873.html
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
On 04/02/2015 02:29 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
On 04/02/2015 01:28 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
Soliciting our feedback *before* changing everything regarding release
names would
have been nice.
We did.
http://lists.centos.org
mises a lot of fun…
> Maybe someone would have already copr’ed or obs’ed it ?
>
Indeed.
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/gnome316-upstream/builds/
It looks like some of the builds failed, so YMMV. Also the usual support
disclaimers of "if it breaks you get to keep both p
there any nice way to get tlsv1.2 support to centos 5?
>>> upgrading os to 6 is not option available.
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately not.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
_
install (text mode only) seems to be using F1 as X11, I have
> to switch to ALT-F2 to get a login prompt. What controls that?
> X is not running, this is a console only.
systemd somewhere. I've not dug far enough into that.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.cento
m. TL;DR it's all
terrible, and the vendors have little to no incentive for fixing it.
Note: we (CentOS) do not validate CVE closure separately. We rebuild
source provided by RH, assuming that they have done the due diligence.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project
.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
egulations, networks,
and varied systems.
Article is a bit dated, but I don't imagine the situation has improved
since I stopped doing Defense consulting.
http://www.wired.com/2010/10/read-em-all-pentagons-193-mind-numbing-cyber-security-regs/
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://ww
t;
> When I tried yum upgrade php, it says "no packages marked for update"
>
> Can you please give me some pointers so that I can continue.
>
Security fixes are backported. Don't focus so much on the version
numbers. See https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/
ore specific?
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
TTPS with Firefox 38
>>> shows it has established a TLS 1.0 connection so this should not really
>>> effect CentOS 5.
>>>
>>
>> You are correct, it will not automatically negotiate a downgrade only.
>> Thank goodness. Still will impact a lot of sites,
On 05/14/2015 03:39 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 14:25 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
>> We've produced a disk image intended to help hardware vendors and
>> enthusiasts who are interested in bringing CentOS to their AArch64 based
>> platform. T
ullet.
Look at the superfish fiasco if anyone thinks otherwise.
The other side to this is many people update from outside .centos.org.
Who's cert would you use for mirrors.kernel.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/ for
example?
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
he upgrade
> I can't imagine how long it would take me.
If you have a good config management environment set up, rolling out a
new build to replace older systems is much easier than walking through
an update on each system. I really recommend people use ansible, chef,
puppet.. whatever th
e up. Troll? Spam? Someone clueless who thinks this is "funny"?
>
> mark, and this is not a support team (that's one that gets PAID)
Dunno. The original was filtered to spam and so I missed it. I've marked
them as moderated for now, and we'll
cturer: Dell Inc.
Product Name: Latitude E6420
Version: 01
Base Board Information
Manufacturer: Dell Inc.
Product Name: 032T9K
Version: A01
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
untered this? If so, what did you do to resolve it?
>
> TIA,
> John
>
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ead people to think we do.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
.html
IUS has been a very good/reliable way to get more recent versions of
things, and the folks responsible for it are active both on irc and in
the mailing lists.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
I see:
>
> cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release 6.3 (Final)
>
> i.e., this box is 6.3. Shouldn’t it be looking for 6.3 repo info?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -wes
> ___
> CentOS mailin
rs,
>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
> ___________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
>
t me know anybody has
> built the same
Upstream removed support for standalone i686 installs, but we've been
building/maintaining it as an alternate architecture similar to arm. You
can find the media here -> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/i386/
What is it specifically you'
github (
https://github.com/CentOS/Artwork ). The deadline for submission is
midnight Eastern Time on Monday April 25th. Thanks and lets see your ideas!
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
On 7/11/13 4:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> There was an upgrade on a couple of our servers yesterday, mid-afternoon
> our time, of httpd and httpd-devel, and suddenly SiteMinder (bleah)
> stopped working correctly, and is now pegging a cpu, according to top. So,
> as a last resort, I tried downg
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Helmut Drodofsky
wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> I have made:
>
> service nfslock stop
> service xinetd restart
> service nfslock start
>
> Then both is possible.
>
>
RPC dynamically assigns ports for nfs unless it's told not to. If you
configure it with specific ports def
On 07/29/2013 08:53 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Gstreamer depends on later glib and gtk that
> CentOS 6 does not have.
>
> Suggestions?
What's wrong with the gstreamer in CentOS already?
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity |
x27;s not a bug we introduced as part of the rebuild process,
it's usually better to not have it addressed by us. Going down that road
would move us away from the compatibility we strive for. Worst case
scenario would be that our patch introduces other issues, or is
incompatible with a futur
nnounce list is where we'll post when it's
officially out the door.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
boot that can be passed to the standard kernel which fix
issues like this. (reboot=pci in grub.conf for example)
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos
usr/share/doc/kernel-doc-2.6.32/Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt
so you could have reboot=bios, reboot=triple, reboot=kbd, reboot=acpi, etc.
Supposedly you can stack them as well, but I prefer cycling through them
to find the one that works, and using it.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Proj
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Sam Suresh wrote:
> as i was trying to install in my laptop , it was stuck will an problem, the
> graphics was not seen on the display, means display goes black, when i look
> into display closely negative images were seen, thought might be a problem
> in dispaly
t chrome on a system. This script pulls in packages
that no longer get updated, abuses LD_PRELOAD, builds as root, and quite
possibly consumes raw orphaned kittens.
This script should be classified as a criminal offense.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @B
Keep in mind that --skip-broken lets you bypass a problem, but the problem
still exists. If you miss enough updates, you will get breakage.
If you have conflicting repositories enabled that cause --skip-broken to be
needed and you use it regularly, you're asking for problems.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013
t that someone else comes up with, great. If not, the base/updates
will always be there, minimal included.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hugely incorrect and outright FUD. The point of this is to *build*
community. Offering free RHEL would fracture and destroy several
communities, as well as damaging likely damaging Red Hat's reputation in
the eyes of everyone inside those communities and anyone outside who
wanted to throw sto
t;
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> are other people on the list also /not/ seeing my mails?
>
> _______
> C
taller for
RT, but you'll be able to do things in a 'more correct' way than
overwriting the system perl via cpan bundle updates.
- --
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
hange. It's the core sig.
>
> So much for that.
>
> It didn't take long for Red Hat to get their mitts all over CentOS, huh?
We were already doing this sort of thing with the Xen4CentOS build, and
the plus repo before the RH agreement. We're simply able to expand o
e the isos, so
Your words, not ours :-)
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ns
using CentOS as the platform.
Examples: adding xen support, distributing cloud-init enabled images, or
building in glusterfs support.
These are community driven efforts, and you don't have to use them if
you don't want to.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twit
On 03/31/2014 08:16 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 03/31/2014 07:28 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
>>> Initial reaction: Crap!
>>>
>>> One of the best things about CentOS, in my opinion, w
build tools used. If someone wanted to take that up as a
SIG/project, I'd be fine with it. I'd likely also call them a masochist,
but hey.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
still be able to yum OK?
>
> I have to add the DVD as a repo. Here's what I do:
You shouldn't need to do this. There should be a redhat.repo file in
/etc/yum.repos.d
You simply need to enable the repo listed in it to use yum for the beta
packages.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS P
indows systems, since
they insist on trying a specific path, as well as using backslashes that
must be translated.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.or
l you're reading. But -f has a specific
> function and *this* *isn't* *it*.
>
Don't feed the trolls, and be careful of the CC. He's not on the
mailing list proper for a reason.
- --
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG K
oning properly. If the host is
implementing a thread limit it's entirely possible that this is the
cause, as yum and rpm start quite a few threads.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS
entos.org/Cloud/Docker or https://www.docker.io/
- --
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird
2013 19:51
>-
> href="centos/">centos/25-Jan-2014 11:51
>-
> href="mirrorscripts/">mirrorscripts/28-Feb-2014
> 02:07-
> href="server.id">server.id22-Sep-2004 15:24
>0 centosk2
> href="timestamp.txt">timesta
servers, and, as others have mentioned, multiple layers is the way to go
> rather than relying on just one tool.
>
>
>
>
> John.
>
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
O" into
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX
just to further tell it to go away.
- --
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG
taller tools (either rpm or yum). Some 3rd party
repositories like IUS or software collections have python27, and that's
the best way to install it. If you've built your python from source,
then you've circumvented the package manager and done "Bad Things".
--
Jim P
each. It required too many code changes to
really call it 'CentOS' as an end product. CentOS 7 seems to (per the
beta and rc) require far less changes, so we'll be actively taking a
look at both v7 and v8 to see what's feasible.
> Redsleeve will be active for a while, thus.
On 05/28/2014 12:59 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 05/28/2014 09:56 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
>>
>> On 05/26/2014 07:18 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> On 05/26/2014 07:47 PM, g wrote:
>>>> On 05/26/14 22:21, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>&g
> request/response parser for C
> Repo: scl
> Matched from:
> Filename: /opt/rh/nodejs010/root/usr/lib64/libhttp_parser.so.2
> Filename: /opt/rh/nodejs010/root/usr/lib64/libhttp_parser.so.2.0
> Other : libhttp_parser.so.2()(64bit)
> ___
ubtu VM and the Ububtu
> cannot connect to the host server.
That's pretty much how macvtap works.
http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Guest_can_reach_outside_network,_but_can't_reach_host_(macvtap)
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/8833/bridged-networking-with-kvm-and-macvtap/
--
J
ldn't you be able to have multiple versions installed?
>
I consider this a bug, as the SCL's should be self-contained. We'd need
to see if this occurs upstream as well, and then file a bug there if so.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ourlogicalfallacyis.com/pdf/FallaciesPoster16x24.pdf
I'll let you pick the appropriate one for your argument.
Naming is a separate issue that applies to all repos. EPEL isn't special
in that regard. It's also not part of the issue here. The problem here
is an extraneous Provides that's pull
ser for C
> Repo: scl
> Matched from:
> Filename: /opt/rh/nodejs010/root/usr/lib64/libhttp_parser.so.2
> Filename: /opt/rh/nodejs010/root/usr/lib64/libhttp_parser.so.2.0
> Other : libhttp_parser.so.2()(64bit)
> _________
much
> like the old Fedora preupgrade + something like fedup.
>
There is. It's not ready yet, and requires a fair amount of patch work.
If someone would like to take on the challenge, details live here ->
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2014-July/011277.html
d
Essentially you just need to jam the right voodoo in a local dconf
config file and 'dconf update'.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.or
the source patch.
The source for everything in centos is at git.centos.org
For more information, see http://wiki.centos.org/Sources
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing lis
re.
You're actively subverting the package manager, rather than addressing
the issue. To fix this properly you would need to find a repository
which contains these packages, built for CentOS 7. Linking won't fix this.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @B
this in place, specifically to try to get people to not do what you're
doing.
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.o
501 - 600 of 648 matches
Mail list logo
