Re: [CentOS] What is wrong with yum?

2008-04-19 Thread Jim Perrin
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Olaf Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does yum sometimes forget it's release version? It shouldn't, unless the distroverpkg definition in /etc/yum.conf is wrong, or the package that distroverpkg references is out of date. What do you have listed there, and w

Re: [CentOS] New firewall, need mac changed

2008-04-19 Thread Jim Perrin
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have read a few ways to do this, but not 100% sure. > I need the interfaces reliably associated to the hardware (there are more > than one), so the ifcfg-ethn has the mac address in it. I need to match the > mac add

Re: [CentOS] vectoring IRC / Jabber logins to AD?

2008-04-21 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Rogelio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Excuse my ignorance (I just got crap on the #centos IRC channel for this > question), but is there a (easy!) way to have and IRC and/or Jabber server > relay a login to a Microsoft Active Directory server for authentication? > >

Re: [CentOS] Console Screen Saver

2008-04-22 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How does one access the properties associated with the blanking CentOS does > at init3? > How would I disable this for example? You'd use setterm for this. See this thread -> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2

[CentOS] OFF-TOPIC: Job opportunity in Augusta Georgia

2008-04-30 Thread Jim Perrin
WAY Off topic here, but if anyone's in the Augusta, Georgia area and wants to work as a web developer(css, html, flash, php, photoshop and the other usual goodies), we've got a job opening. If you like abuse, long hours, low pay, and lots of stress, we have the perfect job for you. -- During tim

Re: [CentOS] case insensitive file system

2008-04-30 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does the entire filesystem need to be case insensitive, or is this a web based product, where you can do some apache rewrite-fu to make this work instead? -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a re

Re: [CentOS] OFF-TOPIC: Job opportunity in Augusta Georgia

2008-04-30 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > WAY Off topic here, but if anyone's in the Augusta, Georgia area and > > wants to work as a web developer(css,

Re: [CentOS] serial port in linux

2008-05-02 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:00 AM, gopinath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i have centos 4.2. Okay, your first task is to run 'yum update' immediately. CentOS 4.2 is nearly 3 years out of date, and with proper updates would be at 4.6 right now. I have install a PCI card having serial port

Re: [CentOS] ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB

2008-05-05 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Brent L. Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe Florin Andrei had a typo in his message. No other file system > will be as reliable as *XFS*. I've had XFS recover from system failures that > Ext3 would/could not recover from. If you want dependability

Re: [CentOS] SELinux policy module sources

2008-05-05 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Ingemar Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lots of questions, but the documentation on this subject isn't exactly > stellar. :) With CentOS 5, you don't really need the selinux module source anymore. It's usually enough to clear the logs and in permissive mode

Re: [CentOS] Reseted net statistics

2008-05-11 Thread Jim Perrin
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:56 AM, happymaster23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just before I was experienced this problem I was updating two packages with > yum (perl-HTML-Parser.i386 3.56-5.el5 and epel-release.noarch 5-3). In > /var/log/messages is nothing about it. At the same day someone attemp

Re: [CentOS] Reseted net statistics

2008-05-11 Thread Jim Perrin
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:34 AM, happymaster23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for answer, > > last number of transefered data that I seen was about three or four > gigabytes - this is too low for roll over or not? 4GB is just about the extent of the 32bit range for the increments used in

Re: [CentOS] Curiosity when installing CentOS 5.1 in addition to W98 & WXP

2008-05-12 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 1:17 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got half way through an installation of CentOS on a box that has > Window$ 98 in the first partition and Window$ XP in the second, where > CentOS was designated for partitions 3 (/boot - 128MB) and 4 (/) and > had some strange r

Re: [CentOS] broken GFS

2008-05-14 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK ... you are officially an ass .. I will no longer reply to your mails or > help you in any way. Yes. When I signed on with CentOS it was explicitly written into my requirements that *I* be the only 'official' ass. Yes

Re: [CentOS] Re: tar spanning

2008-05-14 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Fajar Priyanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Googling my own name 'Fajar Priyanto Linux' returns 12,300 hits from Google. > Maybe someday we can compile a top-ten list for this? :) Oh hell no. If we go down that road we're doing it RIGHT, with a winner-take-all br

Re: [CentOS] missing from Centos51 src tree: ".../drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/Makefile"

2008-05-15 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:54 PM, snowcrash+centos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >yum install kernel-devel kernel-xen-devel > > and usual, Oh, we're going off instinct here.. this might get ugly... >ln -s /usr/src/kernels/`uname -r`-`uname -m` /usr/src/linux >cd /usr/src/lin

Re: [CentOS] awstats, webalizer or...

2008-05-20 Thread Jim Perrin
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So what does everyone out there use to generate web statistics these > days? Are the tried and true awstats or webalizer still the best out > there? I'm a fan of awstats, simply because I can consolidate all my service

Re: [CentOS] XFS + LVM

2008-05-21 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Alain Terriault, Mr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any comments will be more than welcome, The biggest issue with XFS has been the 4kstack limitation on the x86 kernel. If you're using x86_64, you should have no real problem with xfs on top of LVM, because the x86_

Re: [CentOS] IPChains

2008-05-28 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Chris Heiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How can I tell if its running? IPChains is pretty oldschool. The only version of centos which might still use ipchains would be 2.1. What version of centos are you using? You can probably get the information you want f

Re: [CentOS] Blocking external usb storage

2008-06-04 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Kevin Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 1. unplug any usb storage 2. rmmod ehci_hcd >> 3. add a line in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist >> blacklist ehci_hcd > > Wouldn't that prevent him from using USB as a whole? Yes, it would. 'blacklist usb-storage' is a better

Re: [CentOS] Installing GLIBC for CentOS 4.6

2008-06-04 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Dongyoon Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to modify pthread library ( e.g. manipulating some functions ) > in glibc, so I want to compile and install modified glibc. > However, I failed to compile glibc and need some help. How can I fix the > problem? Messi

Re: [CentOS] kernels and irc

2008-06-05 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:35 AM, James Bunnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed CentOS > 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS 5 was one > kernel behind, as in RHEL it is at -53, the gentlemen then told me t

Re: [CentOS] kernels and irc

2008-06-05 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> 2. You can not be a ass on our IRC channels, or on our mailing lists. > > I object to your language on the list! > > You MUST use the word "an" as a preposition to a noun beginning with a vowel!

Re: [CentOS] syslog - python

2008-06-09 Thread Jim Perrin
2008/6/9 David Hláčik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thanks a lot, > > so how can i relalize it? :) Doesn't help you now, but rsyslog has the ability to filter by regular expression in addition to the usual log facilities, and rsyslog will be in 5.2 when it gets released. So if you can wait until 5.2 come

Re: [CentOS] syslog - python

2008-06-09 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:18 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try syslog-ng... > > It has much better filtering facilities.. Not to disparage syslog-ng, but you may want to check out rsyslog. It'll very likely be the default in centos6, and is currently the default in fedora. You can check the fed

Re: [CentOS] syslog - python

2008-06-09 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Tim Verhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a sneak preview I can already tell you that CentOS 5.2 already will > have rsyslog instead of the old plain syslog. I know it's in 5.2, I just didn't realize it was replacing syslog already. Thanks for the heads up :-P

Re: [CentOS] Copying files from specific date.

2008-06-09 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Rajeev R. Veedu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear all, > > > > Does anyone aware of any utility to copy files which are created or modify > form a specific date ?. Use find with either -exec or with xargs, and pass it either a -ctime or -mtime option for what you

Re: [CentOS] LVM and ext3 filesystem question

2008-06-14 Thread Jim Perrin
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can someone please explain what the purpose of stride is on ext3? I have > been "googling" this for hours and wasn't really able to understand the > underlying concepts. How does it fit with LVM, PV create's metablock size, > an

Re: [CentOS] 3ware performance in CentOS

2008-06-19 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have a look at these pages: > > http://www.bofh-hunter.com/2008/06/13/3ware-performance-in-centos/ > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444759 > > I'm comparing the default 5.1 64bit kernel with the patched one pos

Re: [CentOS] 3ware performance in CentOS

2008-06-19 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How would I know if I'm affected by this bug? I'm using the 9690SA > controller. > Russ Mostly, if you're using the stock 3w9xxx module that comes in centos, you're affected. If you're using the 3ware driver from 3ware/

Re: [CentOS] Help with gcc 4.3.x and libfortran errors

2008-06-19 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Scott R. Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Web searching has yielded a myriad of hits, including various bug reports. > > Is this a known bug with a workaround, or do I need another package to make > it work, or do I need to adjust my configure line to make thin

Re: [CentOS] 3ware performance in CentOS

2008-06-20 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Anyway, I did a test with the 2.6.18-93.el5.bz444759 kernel and there's no >> difference: 65 minutes, 27 MB/s. Looks like it doesn't matter which kernel I >> use, at least for this simple test with dd. No. Since you're

Re: [CentOS] 5.0, 5.1, 5.2 history/diff?

2008-06-24 Thread Jim Perrin
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Scott R. Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a detailed history/diff of what 5.1 adds/removes/changes from 5.0, > and the same for 5.2 from 5.1 and 5.0? > > I checked around the centos.org but couldn't obviously find this. More than what's in the wiki?

Re: Yogunluk: Re: [CentOS] 5.1 to 5.2 upgrade - perfectly smoothe

2008-06-27 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like somebody randomly typed some words on a keyboard. Cat-like typing detected -> http://icanhascheezburger.com/2007/05/15/cat-like-typing-detected/ -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth b

Re: [CentOS] why yum cannot find lighttpd?

2008-06-30 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:55 PM, hce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to install lighttpd in CentOS 5.2, but yum list lighttpd > returned an error of "no matching packages to list". Should it be > installed from source tarball? lighttpd is not part of the default operating system, whic

Re: [CentOS] Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure

2008-07-01 Thread Jim Perrin
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Next time you want to present such a massive amount of logs put them up on > the web and warn people ;-) Thanks. I don't think he did it intentionally, so how's about we all forgive and forget, or turn the other cheek, or w

Re: [CentOS] Floorsweepers (Was: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure)

2008-07-01 Thread Jim Perrin
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Sorin Srbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, some internal joke with you CentOS dev-guys or something I take it? Indeed. Mostly, I do irc support when time permits, and am known to be irritable and short with my advice (hence the paradox in me calling for some forg

Re: [CentOS] RHEL vs. CentOS

2008-07-02 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:38 PM, NiftyClusters Mitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Exactly, > RedHat service (not free) uses the redhat update network and tools > like "up2date" > to deliver updated RPM packages to their customer. They do not distribute > yum > by default and they do not have a

Re: [CentOS] rpmforge-release install/rpm problem

2008-07-03 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> go look at the http code in rpm :D > > do you get the same result? This is a known issue with rpm's http code. It doesn't do cookies. It can't really follow redirects (302 or otherwise) well, and generally it's a hack. Tha

Re: [CentOS] Message size rejected

2008-07-03 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My daughter needs to send me a large file. It appears that it is getting > through my ISP, but being rejected on my CentOS mail server. The message > she's getting says Much as I dislike getting or giving "you asked for x,

Re: [CentOS] Best Java code for Centos 5.2s Firefox 3

2008-07-07 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK. I just upgraded a test system from 5.1 to 5.2 and there went all of my > efforts to get Java working. All those alternative commands that I lost > track of what really worked > > So I need the JDK. I have that

Re: [CentOS] UTF-8 support in PCRE

2008-07-07 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Amitava Shee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, building from source will work. I just want to know if there is a > package (in some yum repository) somewhere so that updates, patches etc. > gets applied with "yum update". It would be nice to do something like > > yu

Re: [CentOS] UTF-8 support in PCRE

2008-07-08 Thread Jim Perrin
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Okay kids, for those following along I'd like to take a moment to sum this thread up so far No it isn't Yes it is No it isn't Yes it is No it isn't Yes it is. Thank you. This has been a brief email summary. You may not re

Re: [CentOS] More current version of bluez

2008-07-14 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Centos continues to fall behind in with the state of bluetooth development. Well, what do you want? A bleeding edge distro with a few months of life expectancy, or a stable, tested distro with a long shelf-life? You ca

Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up smp kernels

2008-07-14 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have used the package-cleanup utility to remove old kernel packages, > but I noticed that it only removes the 'kernel' and 'kernel-devel' > packages. It does not touch 'kernel-smp', 'kernel-hugemem', etc. What > is the r

Re: [CentOS] vncviewer via gateway option question

2008-07-14 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do I set up this environment variable on my notebook. Would I modify my > .bash_profile file, and is the format of the added line:\ > VNC_VIA_CMD=/usr/bin/ssh -p 7722 -f -L "$L":"$H":"$R" "$G" sleep 20 You could a

Re: [CentOS] can I host a Ubuntu / Gentoo repository on a CentOS server?

2008-07-15 Thread Jim Perrin
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 5:20 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whfg ybbx ng *ubj* bgure qvfgevohgvbaf jnag gb unir gurve ercbfvgbevrf > frg hc naq sbyybj gung. Abeznyyl zveebevat n pbzcyrgr ercbfvgbel fubhyq > or rabhtu. Fb lbh orggre nfx gung ba n Hohagh be Tragbb yvfg. Dammit, ho

Re: [CentOS] centralized patch management

2008-07-16 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In addition, Spacewalk is the recently "opened" version of RHN > Satellite and it should be able to run with CentOS. I don't think it's > a perfect solution yet however as it still requires Oracle on the > back-end and I

Re: [CentOS] End of support / life

2008-07-18 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Sam Drinkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since I'm not ready to upgrade to the CentOS 5 line anytime soon, Can > someone tell me when support for the 4 line will come? > Many thanks... There's http://centos.org/product.html which lays it all out for you, specs i

Re: [CentOS] crontab for nobody

2008-07-20 Thread Jim Perrin
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Every day I see this in chkrootkit's log - > > Checking `crontab'... Warning: crontab for nobody found, possible > Lupper.Worm... not infected > > I know I met this once before, but I can't remember whether there is any cure

Re: [CentOS] OCI

2008-07-21 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Mad Unix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am running centos5 , I want to compile my apache with php to support the > following > > './configure' '--with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs' > '--with-mysql=/usr/local/mysql' '--with-zlib-dir=/usr/lib/' > '--enable-versioni

Re: [CentOS] /etc/hosts missing localhost?

2008-07-21 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any reason why /etc/hosts would be missing the line, > 127.0.0.1 localhost? Nope. It's there by default in some form or another. By default, it usually looks like this -> 127.0.0.1 installname localhost.l

Re: [CentOS] 3ware 9650SE drivers for CentOS 5.0-EL kernel 2.6.18-8

2008-07-23 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Gert Vandenreyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to install K12LTSP based on CentOS 5.0-el 32bits kernel 2.6.18-8 > on a server with 3ware 9650SE raid controller. Does anybody know where I can > find a driver diskette for the raid controller as this

[CentOS] OT: Content system preferences, KnowledgeTree vs Alfresco

2008-07-24 Thread Jim Perrin
We're in the market for a new content system at work. Right now it's between KnowledgeTree and alfresco. Mostly we're looking for something with the ability to upload, tag with various meta-data, and share among various other systems via webdav, cifs, etc. Does anyone have any personal preference

Re: [CentOS] You didn't give me some packages, so now I'm giving you some! R, TexLive, LyX, Gnumeric, etc.

2008-07-24 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want up-to-dateish versions of TexLive, R, gnumeric, emacs, but on a > more-or-less stable base of Centos-5.2. I asked for packages in this, > but got no answers. So now I've built them and will let you try them > if you

Re: [CentOS] smartd on RAID controllers?

2008-07-27 Thread Jim Perrin
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems I can't smarm monitor disks on RAID controllers? I tried on > several machines with two different controllers and on all I get this when > starting up smartd: > /dev/sda is the virtual disk as it appears to CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect

2011-09-27 Thread Jim Perrin
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Alex Bajan wrote: > > Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect > > 1. Prove it. 2. You already asked yesterday http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-September/118186.html (see how useful the list archive is for when you need to reference s

Re: [CentOS] Odd issue with C6 and NIS

2011-09-27 Thread Jim Perrin
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:55 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > I seem to have this very odd issue with CentOS 6 WRT NIS. I have taken the > package selection that I used with CentOS 5 and basically plopped it into my > C6 kickstart file (see below). On C5 this works just fine and I'm able to > log

Re: [CentOS] Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect

2011-09-27 Thread Jim Perrin
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:22 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > that is an archive of a 4 year old message that was sent to the many > thousands of subscribers of this mail list and is permanently archived > on dozens or even 100s of servers around the world that maintain mail > list archives. you can

Re: [CentOS] Migrating CentOS 5 -> 6: where to put /etc/inittab respawn scripts?

2011-10-05 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:54 AM, R P Herrold wrote: > > I don't know WHAT you are looking at, if anything, but it is > not a CentOS 6 install; 'upstart' is a non-starter for the > future, and certainly not in CentOS' upstream's plans > > Yeah, about that. -> http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red

Re: [CentOS] duqu

2011-11-30 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:01 PM, John Hinton wrote: > > How would you automate daily logins from another server to do something > like rsync the entire /etc directory to a backup system? > Key restrictions in authorized_keys from="10.10.10.10" command="rsync -azv blah/blah/." ssh-key-info-here

Re: [CentOS] Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?

2011-12-27 Thread Jim Perrin
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Michael Lampe wrote: > But I found almost nothing under /usr/lib. When you were using the 5.x branch, biarch was done on install via what some consider a glitch in the installer. There was generally much complaining about the whole load of x86 packages when peopl

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

2012-01-04 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 6:30 AM, mcclnx mcc wrote: > Does anyone know CENTOS/Redhat 6.X compatible to ORACLE software (X86 and > X86_64) version like 9.X, 10GR2, 11G and 11GR2. > > Any official document say that? Apart from everything else said here, this is well worth a read -> http://en.commun

Re: [CentOS] Possible SAN Issue

2009-05-14 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Alan Bartlett wrote: > Just a quick ping to the general m/l. > > Is there a SAN expert out there who could spare some time to have a > look at this forum post, please? > > URL -- > http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=20273&forum=39 If you u

Re: [CentOS] When will we be moving to lighttpd 1.5?

2009-05-17 Thread Jim Perrin
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:15 PM, James Matthews wrote: > I know I can compile it however I prefer to use the package manager and > having an updated version. > > -- > http://www.goldwatches.com Run 'rpm -qi lighttpd' to see where you got the lighttpd package from. Once you know where it came from

Re: [CentOS] Double packages

2009-05-22 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Eduardo Silvestre wrote: > Hello Johan, > >  thanks but i know that. I just want keep im my system packages x86_64. Why > yum return packages i386 when $basearch is x86_64? In some cases you can get away with nuking all of them immediately following install. This

Re: [CentOS] Where to put .htpasswd

2009-05-27 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote: > Hi All, > > Where is the proper place to put .htpasswd so I can password protect > directories in /var/www/html? > > /etc/httpd/run? In theory if you have root access to the system, you really shouldn't use .htaccess files unless

Re: [CentOS] re-install over internet

2009-06-13 Thread Jim Perrin
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>Although I have never done it, you can boot anaconda from grub and I wonder >>if you couldn't put a ks= as parameter in the grub conf? Setting up software >>raid in ks is easy. You can also install via url with ks. > > I just did this and i

Re: [CentOS] Need to rebuild installation CD

2009-06-19 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: >> Pinnacle Technology Holdings E-Mail Disclaimer: > ... LOL ... > Tru Oh GREAT, first we reproduce his email without his company's consent, and NOW you make fun of the disclaimer They're going to sue us for sure now. We should probably try t

Re: [CentOS] Missing php* packages

2009-06-24 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:24 AM, wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to migrate one of our fedora-based servers to CentOS. Our PHP > developers doesn't allow us to switch because there are no crucial (for them) > php packages: > php-smarty > php-adodb > php-accelerator > It is not acceptable for us

Re: [CentOS] 2TB partition limitation on X86_64 version??

2009-06-26 Thread Jim Perrin
2009/6/26 mcclnx mcc : > > we have DELL server with Centos 5.3 X86_64 bits version on it.  This server > also have couple MD1000 connect to it.  We configured MD1000 as one hardware > Volume size 2990GB. > > I tried to use "fdisk" to partition this 2990Gb volume and "fdisk" can only > see 2000GB

Re: [CentOS] 2TB partition limitation on X86_64 version??

2009-06-26 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Gary Greene wrote: >> fdisk has a 2TB limit, not the OS. Barry's information is correct. >> > > It's too bad RHEL hasn't moved to GNU fdisk instead of using the ancient one > from the linux-utils package. The GNU fdisk utility uses libparted to do > it's work. Fi

Re: [CentOS] Schnitzer, Ted is out of the office.

2009-06-26 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Julian Thomas wrote: > Smart autoresponders keep track of where they have responded and don't send > more than one msg to the > same person.  Of course, it's uncertain if it uses the "From" or "Reply-to" > for that test. So one autoresponder message, and it gene

Re: [CentOS] usb

2009-06-28 Thread Jim Perrin
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 3:03 PM, mattias wrote: > are usb disable in centos 5.3 > if so how to enable? No, USB is not disabled in centos 5.3. Perhaps if you could provide a bit more detail as to what led you to this conclusion, folks on the mailing list could provide a more useful answer than a st

Re: [CentOS] usb

2009-06-28 Thread Jim Perrin
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:21 PM, mattias wrote: > Sorry > I connect my usb stick to the serer > Nothing happened > Fdisk -l dosent help me Well, that could be a few things. Try watching the logs (/var/log/messages) when you insert the media. Was anyone else administering this machine prior to you

Re: [CentOS] OT: errors building packages from src.rpm (trying to rebuild RHELIPA)

2009-07-06 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:59 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote: > Hi all, > >  I am trying to rebuild RHELIPA packages downloaded from ftp.redhat.com. All > goes ok except from python-psycopg2 package. When I try to rebuild, gives me > these errors: Translated: > RPM build errors: >     user brewbuilder d

Re: [CentOS] Glibcxx_3.4.9 not found

2009-07-20 Thread Jim Perrin
2009/7/20 Chris Heaton : > Hi, > I am running CentOS 5.3. 64 bit version. I have tried updating the OS but > every time I run an application I need it reports that Glibcxx_3.4.9 is > missing.  I tried to do a search for this but cannot find it for my system. Without knowing more about what you're

Re: [CentOS] Glibcxx_3.4.9 not found

2009-07-20 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:05 PM, William L. Maltby wrote: > IIRC, this upgrade had an exception due to yum? IIRC, we were to upgrade > glibc first and then the rest? I could be mis-remembering I guess. Nope. You're correct, that was this past upgrade. But that was still a reasonably minor version

Re: [CentOS] install cups-devel error on CENTOS 5.3

2009-07-28 Thread Jim Perrin
2009/7/28 mcclnx mcc : > > I have CENTOS 5.2 on DELL server. Please do consider updating. There are several bugs and security issues which have been addressed in 5.3, which has been around for quite some time now. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act

Re: [CentOS] Default PHP Build ! include Mysql Support?

2009-07-29 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Chuck wrote: > > Do you need to roll your own PHP build to support MySQL now? I don't see > support built into the included libphp module.. It's not compiled in statically. It's built as a module. You need to install php-mysql. yum list php\* will show you loads o

Re: [CentOS] Default PHP Build ! include Mysql Support?

2009-07-29 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Chuck wrote: > > So PHP now supports modules and you can add/remove features on the fly? Or > does installing the php-mysql module replace the libphp.so module in the > apache tree? PHP supports modules, though not on the fly. You still have to restart/reload http

Re: [CentOS] Open Letter to Lance Davis

2009-07-30 Thread Jim Perrin
calling and leaving messages without your reply. > >   Please do not kill CentOS through your fear of shared management of the >   project. > >   Clearly the project dies if all the developers walk away. > >   Please contact me, or any other signer of this letter at once, to arrange

Re: [CentOS] Open Letter to Lance Davis

2009-07-30 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> The problem is this situation is erroding the trust >> in this project. This goes back to my original post in this thread about transparency in the project. I don't see it as erroding the trust, but it's not building any good will either.

Re: [CentOS] Apache not liking directories outside of /var/www

2009-07-31 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > I found an even simplier solution - disabled SELinux. I've got a > firewall and that is plenty. No. It's really not. If someone exploits apache, or php, they'll be coming in via port 80 or 443 which your firewall has helpfully allowed so th

Re: [CentOS] Apache not liking directories outside of /var/www

2009-07-31 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > I am running mod_security and also if the intruder gets to the shell > level they will be able to bypass the SELinux entirely. I believe in > security too but security should not be crippling. Agreed, however your statement is contradictory.

Re: [CentOS] traceenable for httpd

2009-08-06 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > On centos 5.3 x86_64 I can add "traceenable off" to httpd.conf and that > works well. > however this doesnt seem to work for centos 4.7 i686. > Is there a similiar named option on 4.7? No. That option didn't come out until after the httpd include

Re: [CentOS] xmlsupports?

2009-08-19 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM, chloe K wrote: > Do you know the apache coming from fedora to support xml? > > how can I check? You need to clarify a bit as to what you're looking for specifically. The versions of apache in centos can all be said to support XML, as xml is simply a markup langua

Re: [CentOS] httpd - mysql - paypal.com.tar - hacker

2009-08-21 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: >  - Keep phpMyAdmin up to date.  Best way to do this is to use a >    package from a well known repository like EPEL that keeps the >    package at the latest version for you. I've not beaten EPEL up too much on things like this, but here i

Re: [CentOS] httpd - mysql - paypal.com.tar - hacker

2009-08-21 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > Nope, but you can take steps to prevent (or make it more difficult) for > people that shouldn't be accessing it from accessing it. > > Apache allow from, etc... basic authentication, make sure you're using > HTTPS and selinux. Along these

Re: [CentOS] SELinux messages after compiling new kernel

2009-08-27 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > How can I fix these errors? Easy. Use the kernel provided in the distribution. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mail

Re: [CentOS] Setting up large (12.5 TB) filesystem howto?

2009-08-28 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to set up an iscsi 12.5 TB storage for some data backup. > > Doing so, I had some difficulties to find the right tool, maybe it's > also a question of the system settings... > > The server is a 32Bit CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Need httpd / apache RPM > 2.2.3 for 5.3

2009-08-28 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Alan McKay wrote: > Hey folks, > > It looks to me like the httpd on CentOS is stuck at 2.2.2 - what's up > with that?  Even after a yum upgrade. > > I need 2.2.10 or greater, and would prefer to get it via yum or at > very last an RPM if at all possible.  But I can

Re: [CentOS] Need httpd / apache RPM > 2.2.3 for 5.3

2009-08-28 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Alan McKay wrote: > H, OK, I get it. > > Certainly the CentOS team as a way in which they produce this RPM. > Is this method public?  And if so, is it easy to obtain, and run > against the latest Apache source code to produce my own RPM? The CentOS method is

Re: [CentOS] help with bonobo

2009-09-09 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > > What do I do now? You consider providing a bit more detail as to what you were doing when you got that message, whether it happens every time, if it appears to be related to something specific (every time I start firefox, I get X), any packa

Re: [CentOS] help with bonobo

2009-09-09 Thread Jim Perrin
> Jim, > > Only thing I did last was a "yum update"... on centos 5 x86_64. > This happens every time I reboot. > > once I hit the OK button it looks like everything still comes up and > runs as normal. > > I was hoping that based on the output of the "bonobo-slay" someone might > new what to do...

Re: [CentOS] help with bonobo

2009-09-09 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > This machine auto logs on, X windows starts and I see this error > message, a few seconds later > my application starts up as normal . > >  rpm -qa | grep bonobo > libbonoboui-2.16.0-1.fc6 > libbonobo-2.16.0-1.fc6 > libbonoboui-2.16.0-1.fc6 > li

Re: [CentOS] yum issue with extras repo?

2009-09-11 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, drew einhorn wrote: >> Rather than trying to figure out what you have and how to fix it, >> it may be easier to start over an build a new system from scratch. So? Yum is simply hanging for him, not failing with python errors or incompatible package messages. Rat

Re: [CentOS] yum issue with extras repo?

2009-09-11 Thread Jim Perrin
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:23 AM, drew einhorn wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Ralph Angenendt > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 09:01 -0600, drew einhorn wrote: >>> > This is related to the problem at hand how? >>> > >>> >>> The OP has a problem resulting from mixing standard and 3r

Re: [CentOS] yum issue with extras repo?

2009-09-11 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Dave Stevens wrote: > Hello All, > > As you can see below I am having a problem checking for updates. This > happens repeatedly. I have to kill the process then rerun. I have > tried "yum clean all" but no joy - the process hangs again on "extras" > - see second lis

Re: [CentOS] problem with a repo

2009-09-14 Thread Jim Perrin
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > > If the problem is with the RPMforge repository (from your e-mail that > is not completely clear) you should report it on the RPMforge mailing > list: > http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users >From the sounds of things, hi

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >