On 8/22/07, Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having snapshot technology is great. Who else supports it?
>
Roll your own:
http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/
http://www.dirvish.org/
--
Jiann-Ming Su
"I have to decide between two equally frighteni
CentOS 4 without any problems.
What am I missing with CentOS 5? Thanks for any tips.
--
Jiann-Ming Su
"I have to decide between two equally frightening options.
If I wanted to do that, I'd vote." --Duckman
"The system's broke, Hank. The election baby has peed in
the bath wa
to see what the loaded OS would think the USB is. And, after
reboot, the CentOS 5 system saw the USB as sdb1. So, there's
something about the install kernel that's not loading the usb drivers
correctly.
--
Jiann-Ming Su
"I have to decide between two equally frightening options.
If I w
Is it kudzu? Thanks for any insights.
--
Jiann-Ming Su
"I have to decide between two equally frightening options.
If I wanted to do that, I'd vote." --Duckman
"The system's broke, Hank. The election baby has peed in
the bath water. You got to throw 'em both out."
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Larry Brigman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
>> I've been installing CentOS via PXE and using a serial console
>> interface. The installation works great. I notice that during the
>> install proces
>
Which one to use seems to come down to what you're using that
particular filesystem for. I'm using xfs with CentOS 5.2 on one of my
system's non-root filesystem. Seems to work well. I haven't used jfs
on CentOS in a while, but not for any of the reasons you've lis
d is behind the first two.
>
Supposedly ext3 has sped up with the 2.6 kernels.
http://linuxgazette.net/122/piszcz.html
The only thing I don't like about ext3 is the fsck. On relatively
small filesystems, it's an annoyance. But on huge filesystem,
500-1000GB, a system may take a
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
>>
>> The only thing I don't like about ext3 is the fsck. On relatively
>> small filesystems, it's an annoyance. But on huge filesystem,
>> 500-1000GB,
8 matches
Mail list logo