Re: [CentOS] Server reboots unexpectebly.

On 1/16/2011 9:24 AM, compdoc wrote: > > I've seen one memtest iteration pass, but 2 or 3 were needed before a > failure showed up. That's not usually the case, though... > I have a server right now which passed three memtest iterations but throws intermittent errors on one DIMM when it gets war

Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?

On 01/20/2011 02:55 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > I don't agree with that, sorry. > > A few years ago one of our staff members decided his salary isn't good > enough so he started a side-line business, on our company time. He > stole some of our client's data (contact details, emails, and even > contr

Re: [CentOS] mysqld status discrepancy

On 01/25/2011 09:19 AM, ken wrote: > Bug, explainable, or expected?? Checking the status of mysqld as root, > then as a regular user: > > # /etc/init.d/mysqld status > mysqld (pid 4806) is running... > > $ /etc/init.d/mysqld status > mysqld dead but subsys locked > As expected. The PID file for M

Re: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos - ATH9K disaster

On 01/25/2011 09:49 AM, Always Learning wrote: > I persuaded a reluctant friend to buy a new computer. I enthusiastically > extolled the joys and benefits of Centos and promised to install it on > his new machine - dual booting with Micro$oft Windoze 7. [...] For a new laptop your best hope for a

Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64

On 01/27/2011 07:37 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 27 January 2011 15:06, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> For those of you that have been using the ext4 technology preview on CentOS >> 5.5, how has it panned out? Does it perform as expected? How do you feel the >> stability, creation of the FS a

Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

On 02/15/2011 07:59 AM, R - elists wrote: > Eero, > > that is great, as long as you consider and actually donate to CentOS > regularly > > statistically, most people that download or use CentOS, do not donate. > That, statistically speaking, could be influenced by the fact the monetary donation

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization platform choice

On 03/27/2011 02:57 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > Some may be bored with the subject - sorry... > > Still not decided about virtualization platform for my "webhotel v2" > (ns, mail, web servers, etc.). > > KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose, only it is too bad CentOS 6 > will not be out in time

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

On 04/07/2011 03:52 PM, Scott Silva wrote: > > The GPL says they must release source. It doesn't say they have to also > release any magic spells they use to compile it. > Actually, it *does*. If the code was released with missing 'magic fairy dust' required to actually compile the GPL derived bi

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

On 04/15/2011 06:05 AM, Christopher Chan wrote: > > Woohoo, next we will be seeing md raid6 also giving comparable results > if that is the case. I am not the only person on this list that thinks > cache is king for raid5/6 on hardware raid boards and the using hardware > raid + bbu cache for bette

Re: [CentOS] recommendations for copying large filesystems

Mag Gam wrote: I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via network. What is the best option to do this? I am planning to use rsync but is there a better tool or better way of doing this? For example, I plan on doing rsync -azv /largefs /targetfs /targetfs is a NFS mounted

Re: [CentOS] OT: looking for a rsync equivalent for Windows platforms

Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know of a good & free rsync type program for Windows > platforms? Like most of us, I need to work on both Windows & Linux > environments, and would like to sync some data (music, videos, photos, > documents, thunderbird profiles, FF bookmarks, etc) betwe

Re: [CentOS] CentOS/SNMP update breaks MRTG?

Noob Centos Admin wrote: > I got itchy fingers over the weekend and decided to fix what wasn't > broken and upgraded one of the older servers from Centos 5.2 to Centos > 5.3. Following the recommended process of updating glibc and such > before the rest, it appeared to work perfectly and rebooted w

Re: [CentOS] looking for RAID 1+0 setup instructions?

Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi Oliver, > It's not the same thing :) > Although they work, and do the same, the installer CD & mdadm needs to > support it. The specific appliance that I want to install, doesn't > support RAID 10, so I need to install RAID 1 + RAID 0, i.e. setting 2x > RAID 1 mirrors, and t

Re: [CentOS] SSL and virtual hosts?

Tracy Phillips wrote: > > > 1) Use a wildcard cert. You can use *.somedomain certs to serve > multiple > SSL domains on a single IP so long as they fit in the *.somedomain > pattern. > > > This is incorrect. > > apache can't read the headers since the traffic is encrypted. If it >

Re: [CentOS] ext4?

On 08/07/2010 11:05 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote: > On 08/07/2010 10:55 AM, James Bensley wrote: > >> On 7 August 2010 17:41, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: >> >> >> >>> so a mount -t ext4 should work, as kernel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5 provides >>> /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.8.1.el5/kernel/fs/ext4/ext4

Re: [CentOS] Ethernet Quad

On 08/12/2010 05:56 AM, Daniel Bruno wrote: > Hello, > > Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x? > I don't know about 10/100. For 10/100/1000 I use Intel quad port boards. They work fine. -- Benjamin Franz ___

Re: [CentOS] tar - ssh - standard out

On 08/12/2010 05:33 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Why do you need any other process involved to work with a data stream? If you > want to collect it to a remote file, you can | ssh remotehost 'cat> > path_to_file'. Just be sure to quote the redirection so it happens on the > remote side. > > At

Re: [CentOS] Ethernet Quad

On 08/12/2010 06:06 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Jerry Franz wrote: > >> On 08/12/2010 05:56 AM, Daniel Bruno wrote: >> >>> Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x >> I don't know abo

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

On 8/12/2010 8:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Warren Young wrote: >> >> The strategy I recommended is based on the fact that its worst case >> behavior (a small negative jump every hour) is not a problem for me. If >> it is a problem for your application, you need a different design. > > It's a bad

Re: [CentOS] best ways to do mysql backup

On 08/14/2010 03:58 PM, John Hinton wrote: > > For uninterrupted delivery of dynamic content from the database... or no > downtime, replication to a slave is the way to go. This is 'sort of' a > T-ing effect, except it is to another database. That slave database > however can be stopped, a mysgldum

Re: [CentOS] best ways to do mysql backup

On 08/15/2010 09:49 AM, n...@li.nux.ro wrote: > Tuptus writes: > > >> Nic by się nie stało gdyby Agnello George nie napisał: >> >>> we have multiple servers approx 10 and each has about 100 GB of data in >>> the /var/lib/mysql dir , excluding tar , mysqldump and replication how do >>> w

Re: [CentOS] tools one could to use to troubleshoot for Apache

On 08/20/2010 11:16 AM, Agnello George wrote: > Have a question , Suppose i had a client tell me that he can access > the web page but it takes long time to view the pages the website > is a static website ( suppose this website does not server dynamic > data or does not connect to a databa

Re: [CentOS] how long to reboot server ?

On 09/03/2010 02:15 PM, Ross Walker wrote: > > This is good info! > > What I am wondering is if there is a way to prevent new kernels from becoming > the default by... default? > > That way one won't be "pleasantly" surprised that after a long uptime and > several updates, that on the next reboot

Re: [CentOS] OT: linux desktop market share more than 1%

On 10/08/2010 03:25 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On 10/8/2010 4:09 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> But OS X can legally only run on Apple (tm$$$) systems, where Linux can >> run on *anything* and anybody's inexpensive hardware. >> > Apple hardware is fairly priced when compared on quality.

Re: [CentOS] the wandering MAC?

On 10/13/2010 1:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > > But the ifcfg-ethX scripts don't run if the HWADDR entry doesn't match > the NIC MAC. How do you get the right name connected to the right nic > so you can even run ifconfig sensibly? > You don't *have* to use HWADDR in the ifcfg-* file. Just commen

Re: [CentOS] FYI: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Release Candidate Available to Partners

On 10/19/2010 04:10 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Benjamin Franz wrote: Yes, to partners :) I'm pretty sure Deyan is referring to their GPL obligations to make the source code available for most of it. GPL doesn't say you have to distribute source code to the whole world, only to people y

Re: [CentOS] FYI: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Release Candidate Available to Partners

On 10/19/2010 04:16 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > hi Guys, > > On 10/19/2010 12:00 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote: >> I'm pretty sure Deyan is referring to their GPL obligations to make the >> source code available for most of it. > .. this has nothing to do with it... > Yes, it does. http://www.softwa

Re: [CentOS] FYI: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Release Candidate Available to Partners

On 10/19/2010 05:03 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: On 10/19/2010 12:52 PM, Jerry Franz wrote: Once you publish/distribute GPL licensed code to *anyone*, your obligation to provide source kicks in for *everyone*. In practice, few people hammer at a company "in process" over it. But you *c

Re: [CentOS] FYI: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Release Candidate Available to Partners

On 10/19/2010 05:37 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> Only on v3 license code. Most code is still under v2. > and what license is the distro shipped as ? > That is a very good question. The *support and subscriptions* are under RH's own license. The *code* in the packages are under the licenses of

Re: [CentOS] FYI: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Release Candidate Available to Partners

On 10/19/2010 06:10 AM, mehdi wrote: > how open yum.conf in mode read write 1. You need to do it as the 'root' user. Log in as 'root' and then you will be able to edit it. 2. Please don't hijack unrelated threads. To start a new topic, post a completely new message with a usefully relevant su

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

On 11/28/2010 09:31 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote: > [...] > And then, one day, it won't work. Worse - it doesn't always *log* what > it is doing in a way that you can figure out. Occasionally not at all. > So you spend a few hours poking at the system until you try the magic of > turning off SELinux. A

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

On 12/06/2010 06:06 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > Did you take a look at the AVC messages? Are you running setroubleshoot? Yes to both. > Usually running something like restorecon -R -v /var/ftp would have > cleaned this up, if it is a simple mislabel in /var directory. The point is *I shouldn't

[CentOS] Nerd rage (Was: IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?)

On 12/08/2010 07:03 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > Honestly, I had no one in mind. > I remember in an effort to get a life outside tech, I joined a mailing > list for something else. I hadn't realized how most people top post, > don't trim, and still use aol. It really is worth noting that the bottom

Re: [CentOS] What NAS device(s) do you use? And why?

On 12/11/2010 09:24 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > With 100TB, DIY is out of the question ;-) I wouldn't say that. It would be...challenging...but not out of the question. But Aberdeen (note - I have no financial interest. They are simply someone I've seen marketing Linux based SAN/NAS machines

Re: [CentOS] adobe flash

On 12/13/2010 12:05 PM, Sven Aluoor wrote: > 2010/12/13 Pintér Tibor: >> On 12/13/2010 06:30 PM, Ritika Garg wrote: >>> I have CentOS5.5 installed in the system. After updating the version of >>> firefox, the videos are playing on the internet. Earlier the message >>> "flash player download require

Re: [CentOS] OT: programming language for morons (newbie friendly language in Open Source world)

On 12/13/2010 04:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 12/13/2010 6:08 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote: >> >> I don't know about that. I started on Apple Integer BASIC back in 1980, >> dropped to assembly on multiple platforms, and eventually ended up doing >> OO style design in Perl in the 90s *before* it offi

Re: [CentOS] Tar so slow! Is there anything faster?

On 01/06/2011 05:47 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote: > I need to tar up a good 100 GiB of files, but tar is progressing at a > rate of about 1 MiB per second. Is there something, anything, faster? tar is normally screaming fast unless you use bzip2 compression (or gzip compression on an underpowered CPU).

Re: [CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems

Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:51:54 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: [...] [...] IOW: What did you try to do? What happened? What did you expect to happen? What does your config look like? Are there any errors in the log file? Ralph [...] Indeed. Here is a summary: [

Re: [CentOS] RAID on Email Server

Matt wrote: Right now its running pretty good but here it is. Device:rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/srkB/swkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util sda 0.60 142.80 67.20 170.20 678.40 2292.80 339.20 1146.4012.52 118.53 615.66 4.21 99.92 You have

Re: [CentOS] HA Storage Cookbook?

Steve Thompson wrote: On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Gordon McLellan wrote: I meant SAS; specifically Seagate Barracuda ES.2 drives. Here's a tiny version of their huge url: http://tiny.cc/3X9fI No, they are not the super fast and expensive 15krpm database drives. Indeed. They're not SAS either. Fro

Re: [CentOS] [OT] stable algorithm with complexity O(n)

David Hláčik wrote: > Well, something with linear complexity O(n) which i have to prove, > > Merge sort, Insertion sort or selection sort does not have O(n) complexity. > > I believe that something like RadixSort, CountingSort, BucketSort > altought i am not sure I'm not especially inclined to

Re: [CentOS] [OT] stable algorithm with complexity O(n)

Marko Vojinovic wrote: [...] > Basically, count the number of appearances of every number in your set. If > you > have a set a priori bounded from above and below --- which you do, > [1, n^2] --- you first allocate an array of integers of length n^2. By definition, your proposed algorithm is

Re: [CentOS] [OT] stable algorithm with complexity O(n)

Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > > Jerry Franz wrote: >> Marko Vojinovic wrote: >> [...] >>> Basically, count the number of appearances of every number in your set. If >>> you >>> have a set a priori bounded from above and below --- which you do, &g

Re: [CentOS] [OT] stable algorithm with complexity O(n)

Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Sunday 14 December 2008 03:33, Jerry Franz wrote: >> [...] >> By definition, your proposed algorithm is O(n^2), not O(n). >> >> ;) > > Oh, you mean because the upper bound is n^2, right? Sure, of course, this > particular case is

Re: [CentOS] can't install rrdtool, problems with dependancies

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Jim Perrin wrote on Sat, 24 Jan 2009 08:47:43 -0500: > >> or packaging >> oversite in rpmforge > > no, I know it works. I just installed it from rpmforge using 'yum install rrdtool' with no problems. -- Benjamin Franz ___ Cen

Re: [CentOS] smartd and 3ware 9xxx configs

Jim Perrin wrote: > I'm looking to do a bit more monitoring of my 3ware 9550 with smartd, > and wanted to see what others were doing with smart for monitoring > 3ware hardware. > > Do you have the smartd.conf configured to test, or simply monitor health > status? > Are you monitoring the drive as

Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for a backup

dnk wrote: > Hi there, > > I am currently setting up a server that will house my backups (simply > using rsync). > > This system has 4 X 500 gb drives and I am looking to raid for max > drive space and data safety. Performance is not so much a concern. > > My experience with software raids

Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for a

Benjamin Franz wrote: > Make a RAID5 as follows for a LVM partition using the rest of your > available space as follows (just under 1500 Mbytes): Sorry. Typo. Just under 1500 Gbytes. -- Benjamin Franz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http:

Re: [CentOS] 32 or 64 bit (4 gb ram)

Paul Hussein wrote: > there still doesnt seem to be a 64bit java plugin You can use the 32bit plugin if you change the launcher script to launch the 32 bit version of firefox instead of the 64 bit version. > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Florin Andrei > w

Re: [CentOS] ssh - alternate ports, and host verification

dnk wrote: > I have a centos box that will need to ssh into 2 other centos boxes > (with keys). Now one of these boxes is a firewall, and another is a > system behind the firewall. I have rules in my firewall to punch into > the system behind the FW. > > Now if i connect to the IP (sine the p

Re: [CentOS] OT Question about raid 5

Per Qvindesland wrote: > Hi List > > I am hoping that someone here could perhaps give me a straight answer > on a question that someone asked me today > > I have always belived that if you have 5 hard drives 1 50gb second > 50gb third 20gb fourth 60gb firth 30gb that the largest would then be >

[CentOS] A Group is Its Own Worst Enemy (was: EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux))

On 05/17/2011 03:06 AM, John Doe wrote: > Maybe all the non-technical discussions could go into a "CentOS > Politics/Philosophy" new list...? And on that note, some required reading for everyone in this floating flame war. Don't skim it - read it. http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_enemy.html

Re: [CentOS] Feed a list of filenames to vim

On 05/18/2011 08:06 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote: > On 05/17/2011 09:19 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote: >> There are some googlable ways to feed a list of filenames to vim, but I >> stumble on weird results. > [...] > > The easy way for me is 'avoid the shell - use Perl instead': > > perl -e 'my @files = grep(!

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

On 05/23/2011 09:39 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 05/23/2011 02:31 AM, Kevin Thorpe wrote: >> Just be aware that SSDs wear out. They have a limited number of write >> cycles. Nowadays they all do 'wear levelling' to even the writes >> across the drive but even so they don't last very long in hea

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition

On 05/23/2011 11:01 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Now, the question is, is is there any way to tell EXT3/4 to use a > separate drive as a cache drive for the same purpose? OR, how about > telling CentOS to use a separate drive for caching purposes in the > same way? You can use an external journal on a

Re: [CentOS] Vim scripting - cursor motion

On 06/09/2011 08:37 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > > I'd highly recommend perl for this because it can also do the SQL part > directly via DBI without all of the intermediate contortions you'll have > to do in files otherwise. It should take about half a page of your own > code to connect to the DB, re

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates

On 06/14/2011 08:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Yeah, but some people appear to think (or at least that was what I got > from the post of the guy I was replying to) that fedora is good enough for > production. *blink* Absolutely not. I was talking about Ubuntu Server LTS. I don't use Fedora

Re: [CentOS] Software Protection on centos

On 05/03/2010 04:50 AM, premr...@digilink.in wrote: Hi, I would like to have a software protection for my hardisk. I have some query regarding that (1) In Centos, is it possible to do a hardisk protection. Ex : Even if the hardisk is taken from a PC and used on another PC, it should not be

Re: [CentOS] Benchmark Disk IO

On 05/19/2010 06:14 AM, John Doe wrote: > From: Matt Keating > >>> I don't usually use iozone (I usually use bonnie++) so take this with >>> a grain of salt, but those speed look suspiciously like cache speeds. >>> Bump the size (-s parameter) up to twice your real RAM size. >>> >> Will

Re: [CentOS] Odd failure of smbd to start from init.d - CentOS 5.4

On 05/20/2010 04:46 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > > Also, since "sh /etc/init.d/smb (re)start" works but "/etc/init.d/smb > (re)start" doesn't, I can't see how the difference between those two > invocations would change the handling of the lock files. It's still the same > script being run. Just some

Re: [CentOS] Odd failure of smbd to start from init.d - CentOS 5.4

On 05/25/2010 04:11 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > Hi Brian, > > I've been all over the environment comparisons before, I think. The question > currently is: > > What can be the difference between > > "/home/smb restart" - which works, and > "/etc/init.d/smb restart" - which fails > > when a diff betwe

Re: [CentOS] Odd failure of smbd to start from init.d - CentOS 5.4 - it's that fine SELinux

On 05/26/2010 08:23 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 05/26/2010 08:44 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote: > > [...] >> The *theoretical* system security improvement of SELinux is trumped by >> the *practical* observation that I have had existing systems broken by >> SELinux multiple times on the mere handf

Re: [CentOS] Odd failure of smbd to start from init.d - CentOS 5.4 - it's that fine SELinux

On 05/27/2010 08:51 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 05/27/2010 05:55 AM, Jerry Franz wrote: > >> I have *twenty* virtual machines I deploy updates to before it ever >> touches my production systems. Not everything is testable on >> non-production machines. >>

Re: [CentOS] PHP file upload limit

On 06/09/2010 12:32 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: Eero, I've got 4 GB of swap. At the moment all 4 GB less 100 MB of it is available. That logically should be enough to allow me to upload a 2 GB file, I would think. Looking at the bugtracker: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3118 "PHP is not

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization as cheap redundancy option?

On 6/25/2010 7:33 AM, Brian Mathis wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin > wrote: >> I'm wondering if virtualization could be used as a cheap redundancy >> solution for situations which can tolerate a certain amount of >> downtime. >> >> Current recommendations is to run so

Re: [CentOS] Redundant LAN routing possible?

On 7/10/2010 2:21 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > I've been reading that it's possible to set up a system with multiple > NIC to provide redundant internet connectivity such that it will > switch to a secondary connection if the primary ISP fails. > > Is it possible in a similar way to setup redund

Re: [CentOS] Redundant LAN routing possible?

e enough that worrying about a 50 second reconfiguration is something that happens once in several years in the first place. -- Jerry Franz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Desktop Supercomputer

On 7/17/2010 2:11 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > Q. If I can compute in cloud, in which cloud can I supercompute at an > affordable or sponsored cost? > > I may be a gamer, AE student, Graphic designer, renderer and so forth. > > Now which part of above you did not understand? > > sigh... how

Re: [CentOS] mixing MX and CNAME

On 02/25/2013 08:06 AM, aurfalien wrote: > Hi, > > Has any one had problems with mail clients were your DNS is like this; > > doman.com MX 50 mail.domain.com > domain.comMX 100 mail2.domain.com > > domain.comCNAME www.domain.com > > The short answer is you can't do that

Re: [CentOS] RAM Requirements

On 11/23/2013 07:40 AM, Fred Smith wrote: > I doubt it was an actual 80386. For some years the minimum CPU > requirement has been i686, which was Pentium Pro or greater. More > recently the additional requirement of a CPU with PAE capabilities. I > rather doubt that a processor that ran RH9 (a d

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 full backup software?

ill revert > to the system from backup ;) > > What can you recommend? I would recommend Clonezilla: http://clonezilla.org/ -- Jerry Franz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Convert "bare partition" to RAID1 / mdadm?

omething like UnionFS (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UnionFS ) to allow you to both use the filesystem *and* automatically propagate all updates to the new volume during the migration. - Jerry Franz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 6.2 - How to check for a failed disk using LVM with a hardware RAID (3ware)

On 04/05/2012 05:38 AM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote: > CentOS Community, > > What commands can I use to check the disk health of the system when LVM2 > is being used on top of a RAID 10 using a HARDWARE 3ware raid card. The > OS sees a hardware raid usually as one big drive. Is there a way to > check th

Re: [CentOS] True bond howto for Centos 6

On 05/13/2012 10:16 AM, bob wrote: > > from what i get it is a problem with libvirt, using a bridge that is > going through a bondon the same machine. > It must be rather detailed to fix and only a few people seem to use that > route. (like you and me) > I've been running 14 CentOS5 VMs with b

Re: [CentOS] rsyslog.conf - why the "-" in this entry? mail.* -/var/log/maillog

On 06/05/2012 07:30 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > In dealing with an unrelated issue I came across this in rsyslog.conf. > [...] > Why is there a "-" before /var/log/maillog? [...] A leading '-' indicates the the log is written asynchronously. It is a performance tune to keep writing the syslog fro

Re: [CentOS] problem with machine "freezing" for short periods

On 07/27/2012 07:23 AM, Vanhorn, Mike wrote: > > As a followup, I've determined that it is network related, but I'm still > not sure what the problem is. I did go back to CentOS 5.2, but the problem > still exists with that version, too. > > Basically, what seems to be happening is that the network