Hello
I've recently discovered the announcement regarding the change in direction
for the CentOS project and I imagine like many others, I'm confused and
concerned about what this means moving forward.
I work for a small web development agency and we offer hosting as part of
our package to client
I guess we need to wait and see how the dust settles. For those lucky
enough to still be on CentOS 7, there's a bit of breathing space although
these things take time to plan and implement of course. Those unlucky
enough to have updated to CentOS 8 have less than a year to decide to move
to stream
least one
ship to jump to.
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 21:48, Jon Pruente wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 3:32 PM Jamie Burchell
> wrote:
>
> > I'm sure it's my lack of understanding, but there feels too much hope
> > pinned on "Rocky", which seems like one pe
still trying to make sense of
the impact in real-terms i.e. what actually changes if we move to Stream.
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 21:59, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 21:32:18 +
> Jamie Burchell wrote:
>
> > The uncertainty is frustrating and unsettling.
>
> I certainly
In that case, it sounds like a non-issue for the way we currently use
CentOS.
As there's a simple migration from CentOS 8 to Stream and Digital Ocean
currently provide CentOS 8 images, it'll be interesting to see what they do
moving forward.
___
CentOS m
ing software.
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 22:51, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 1/5/21 11:32 AM, Jamie Burchell wrote:
> > is the change a non-issue for my use-case?
>
>
> Probably. For a lot of users, Stream is a drop-in replacement that's
> better than CentOS was, because it gets
> Probably. For a lot of users, Stream is a drop-in replacement that's
better than CentOS was
We will need to (manually) migrate to Stream 9.x after 5 years instead of
10 though?
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 22:51, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 1/5/21 11:32 AM, Jamie Burchell wrote:
> &
Off topic for sure, but it's a shame this has to be a manual process of
destroying and rebuilding every X years. Even Microsoft has gone the Apple
way and just perpetually updates Windows 10 now.
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 23:20, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 1/5/21 3:02 PM, Jamie Burche
>>
> Do you use tools like ansible/chef? If you can put the time in,
> you can make your webservers rather distro agnostic. I would even put
> terraform on the table. It is not like your customers will know the
> difference.
>
>>> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 23:20, Gord
I'm thinking at least
for my situation and has already been said, Stream might actually be a positive
but I shall wait and see what happens. And as for the 5 years LTS, that will be
the same for every distro anyway.
Cheers
Jamie
> On 6 Jan 2021, at 17:56, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
>
Didn't the CentOS Vault repo ensure that every package ever published was still
available?
> On 7 Jan 2021, at 07:03, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 1/6/21 8:01 PM, Strahil Nikolov via CentOS wrote:
>> - No chance to "yum history undo last" as there are no older packages
>
>
> I've seen that m
The RHEL announcement is of no use to me or my company. We spin up DigitalOcean
droplets for each of our client websites/apps. If we were utilising horizontal
scaling we'd have even more droplets per website/app. We'd easily have over 16
installations.
> On 21 Jan 2021, at 19:57, Scott Techlist
Can RH put a stop to projects like Rocky Linux?
> On 22 Jan 2021, at 18:04, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 07:25:04AM -0500, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS
> wrote:
>> I wonder whether RH plan to fight back FUD they've brought upon by their
>> December announcement.
>
> I
Good. At least I can consider moving to that without fear of RH pulling the
plug!
> On 22 Jan 2021, at 20:39, Marc Balmer via CentOS wrote:
>
>
>
>> Am 22.01.2021 um 21:36 schrieb Jamie Burchell :
>>
>> Can RH put a stop to projects like Rocky Linux?
>
So RH could make it difficult for downstream projects such a Rocky Linux.
> On 22 Jan 2021, at 20:46, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/22/21 2:39 PM, Marc Balmer via CentOS wrote:
>>>> Am 22.01.2021 um 21:36 schrieb Jamie Burchell :
>>>
>>> C
How about using yum history to find when and why the package was installed?
yum history summary dnsmasq
yum history package-list dnsmasq
Jamie
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 20:56, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 3:31 PM -0500 Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>
> > or one can lo
I'm pretty sure I encountered this and needed to yum install cyrus-sasl-plain
to resolve it.
> On 29 Mar 2021, at 20:31, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My main mail server is running CentOS 7 with Postfix and Dovecot.
>
> Last week I was surprised to see that Postfix had some troubles on
Sorry, re-read your question and realise my suggestion would only help you get
SASL authentication working.
> On 31 Mar 2021, at 09:19, Jamie Burchell wrote:
>
> I'm pretty sure I encountered this and needed to yum install
> cyrus-sasl-plain to resolve it.
>
>>
This tool might be of interest to you:
https://ssl-config.mozilla.org/#server=apache&version=2.4.41&config=intermediate&openssl=1.1.1d&guideline=5.6
Don't forget to configure to match your software versions and requirements.
Cheers,
Jamie
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 at 10:03, Adrian Jenzer
wrote:
> D
19 matches
Mail list logo
