As per the Redhat Virtualisation Expo yesterday... API/ABI
compatibility is maintained within the point releases. If your stuff
is certified on 5.4 it will run on 5.5/5.6.
In addition there are compatibility libraries to get anything running
on 5.X on 6.0... and when you move to 6.0 then anything
>
> This... is theory. In practice, major architectural changes will break
> things and need to be tested. For example, the anaconda environment
> for RHEL 6 does not contain the "dirname" command. The environment for
> RHEL 5 did. I anticipate that CentOS 6 will also lack it. Who would
> know that
On 27 January 2011 15:06, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For those of you that have been using the ext4 technology preview on CentOS
> 5.5, how has it panned out? Does it perform as expected? How do you feel the
> stability, creation of the FS and the administration of it is? Ideas and
> comments
Work is currently ongoing on QA for 5.6 ... once that is out then
you'll start seeing the other updates that depend on that.
James
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> Ah, so that's what it is. I had kind of assumed everyone had been
> distracted by work on CentOS 6, until I saw the recent massive update
> to CentOS 4.
>
Centos6 is pretty much on hold until 5.6 is out the door due to the
number of systems it has an impact on (ie no existing C6 systems to
up
On 7 February 2011 15:55, Jerry Geis wrote:
> What will be the correct way to migrate ext3 to ext4 going from 5.5 to 5.6?
> Will something after the update ask if you want to migrate the file systems?
> Looking forward to some file system speed ups with large files.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jerry
>
>
> Our network consists of aaa.bbb.ccc.0/19. That's CIDR notation for
> 8,192 addresses.
>
But what has that got to do with "www.yahoo.com moved into our /19"
your comment is pretty unclear.
>
> IMHO, fully updated purpose-built servers running 4.8 should have more
> or less the same vulne
>
> I think I do; he's an ISP, and apparently someone inside his address block
> (the CIDR notation /19; his actual block is publicly found by doing a quick
> nslookup of his domain name, noting the IP address of the DNS server(s)
> listed, and then a whois of the IP address of the DNS server(s)
>
> Joe, Randy and James are my mentors of 15, 5 and 5 years,
> respectively, and all said the same thing, namely "nuke and repave, be
> sure to be current on BIND" since it is a purpose-built box (ns1).
>
Perhaps is it a difference in language and what you mean by mentor and
where I would mean ol
>
> Johnny has remarked on the importance of trust.
>
> My trust in RedHat went down when I learned they are not shipping all
> the SRPMs. Some say it is due to human error. If that is the case,
> why should I think they are better at backporting security fixes than
> at making sure a manifest of
> Far be it from me to take credit for someone else's work. I also don't
> have the CentOS 6 information, which is what I've really been wanting
> all along.
There is no C6 info yet. Maybe he will release it once it's all worked
out. After all this I wouldn't blame him if he didn't.
How hard
> I don't want to raise the drama, so please don't take this wrong. In
> this case though, I do think that a warning on the ML about a security
> issue is justified. You can't be too careful.
>
Except that this issue does not affect BIND in rhel and thus CentOS
therefore making it yet more pointl
>
> as someone else said, directories need 'execute' privilege (which really
> means permission to list the dir).
Not quite... +r allows listing of the directory and +x allows
traversing (cd) into/through the directory.
James
___
CentOS mailing list
Cen
> Setting up Upgrade Process
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> --> Processing Dependency: libgnokii.so.4()(64bit) for package: kdepim
> ---> Package gnokii.x86_64 0:0.6.29-1.el5 set to be updated
> --> Processing Dependency: libical.so.0()(64bit) for package: gnokii
> --> R
>
> Out of date mirror for whom? I currently have the same gnokii as you do
> (6.2.27), but yum is complaining that it now wants to update it to
> 6.2.29 but can't as kdepim (and others) have a dependency on the old
> version. Unless I've misread the error message?
>
gnokii-0.6.27-2.el5.x86_64 is
>> On my system I can see that dep in EPEL given by the package I mentioned.
>
> i.e. the package I have installed, the same as you.
> Presumably your machine will try to update to the newer gnokii.x86_64
> 0:0.6.29-1.el5 in due course too.
Nope I said the info was found from yum info from the rep
> You need qemu-spice for using SPICE, which does not ship with RHEL5 or
> RHEL6. On top of that, SPICE is only supported by Red Hat for RHEV, not
> libvirt. That may change in the future, ... but when, nobody knows ;-)
>
> --
No you don't Dag.
qemu-kvm and libvirt in RHEL6 already supports SPICE
>> KVM is included, you just have to select it. There is a loyal following of
>> Xen in the community, but I use KVM for my servers. I'm often called 'dumb'
>> for even talking about KVM, but I like it. (and I'm not saying, nor have I
>> ever said, that KVM is better than Xen)
>
> Yes, I know KVM i
>
> Interesting, could you shed a light on what exact XML is needed ?
http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsGraphics
http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsVideo
You need to set the video type to qxl and the graphical type to spice
... then set the appropriate attributes on the eleme
> Then I run "tailf /var/log/message" command and find the following error
message :
> kernel :CIFS VFS: server IP of type Samba 3.0.25a-04.E6 returned
unexpected error on SMB posix open, disabling posix open support. Check if
server update available.
>
>
What is the size of the ISO?
Can that
> Oh , The ISO size is about 4.7G . But that can work well before
>
Before what? Was there a change?
A quick google leads to (at least one point in time) needing -o lfs in
the mount command to the samba instance since large file support
wasn't there by default...
Unfortunately I don't have
2011/3/4 fakessh @ :
> hello list centos.
>
> I installed the packages libp11 and engine_pkcs11 of fedora core 14 on
> my centos 5.5 to allow me to compile the latest version of bind. this
> is the only way I found to compile bind 9.7.3. you know another way to
> compile bind 9.7.3 on centos 5.5
>>the entire site needs passwd protection except for the Below Urls .
>>
>>http://beta.somesite.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/large_1990782-e1299229
>>617964.jpg
>>
>>http://beta.somesite.com/?cat=592&feed=rss2
>
> With my limited knowledge could a ReWrite rule work here?
>
Take a look at the
> One we start our qualification, we might need some help in resolving
> issues/defects on CentOS. Can we open a channel or Point of contact who will
> be able to help us out with such issues.
>
>
>
> I would also request to forward this email to the right forum if the mailing
> list we are sending
On 9 April 2011 23:42, Tom Brown wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there any ETA for the SRPM's from the base tree of 5.6? I need to
> get my hands on the src for the centos-release package as i have to
> rebuilt it to prevent the repo definitions from being included.
>
> I see the src's for the updates RPM's bu
On 12 April 2011 13:06, Bernard Fay wrote:
> Well, I would like to know what will be the changes before we apply the
> updates. I would like to generate a kind of a report showing what will be
> the changes for all packages with available updates.
>
> Is there a way to do it?
>
> Thanks
> Bernard
>
> Except for a handful, all of my systems are on 5.5. I don't have to update
> until this is fixed
>
Then you are probably vulnerable to the CVEs you do realise that
'5.5' stopped getting updates when 5.6 was released?
Apart from a specific costly situation upstream there is only '5' a
Depending on the script placing it in /etc/init.d could work (with
appropriate symlinks to /etc/rc.x) however does the script follwo standard
behaviour for /etc/init.d scripts? (eg start, stop, restart, status.)
If you just want the script/java file called you could just pop it into
/etc/
On that today perhaps those thinking of ext4 for production systems -
especially shared multiuser systems - should check out CVE-2009-4131 ...
CVE-2009-4131: Arbitrary file overwrite in ext4
Insufficient permission checking in the ext4 filesytem could be
exploited by local users to overwrite arbi
Best advisory link I've found:
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3468
2009/12/11 James Hogarth
> On that today perhaps those thinking of ext4 for production systems -
> especially shared multiuser systems - should check out CVE-2009-4131 ...
>
> CVE-2009-413
Owned by apache in tmp?
Sounds like an insecure web app or injection attack.
2009/12/13 Thomas Dukes
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann
> > Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2009 10:18 PM
>
I have google gears installed on our 64bit firefoxes on firefox 3.5.5 in
centos 5.4 with flash 10 - all from rpm ;)
Works very nicely..
2009/12/17 Marko Vojinovic
> On Wednesday 16 December 2009 23:51:43 Jake Shipton wrote:
> > On 16/12/09 23:37, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 16
code is tested
working on HTML5 ported code (safari/firefox)
Plenty of time to do that ;)
2009/12/17 Ryan Pugatch
> James Hogarth wrote:
> > I have google gears installed on our 64bit firefoxes on firefox 3.5.5 in
> > centos 5.4 with flash 10 - all from rpm ;)
> >
> >
ost recent working version - 0.5.33
if you need it let me know and I'll mail my XPI
2009/12/18 Dave >
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:15 AM, James Hogarth
> wrote:
> > I have google gears installed on our 64bit firefoxes on firefox 3.5.5 in
> > centos 5.4 with flas
FF profile that already
has that XPI installed along with some other bits desired by default.
2009/12/18 Dave >
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:12 AM, James Hogarth
> wrote:
> > I have an RPM package for a default firefox profile I deploy to our boxes
> -
> > that contai
Don't bind it to an IP (so listen shows 0.0.0.0) on either node of the
cluster? When the IP address is floated across it will still accept requests
on that then - in additional the the real node IP address.
Given that you are talking a public IP address however it depends on your
network confi
Yes that's why it depends on his ISP and network layout
Ideally he'd have his firewall allowing http in to his public IP (with
appropriate routing) and the floating IP actually be a private IP in the
internal address space that floats between two systems with private IPs in
the relevant networ
I was wondering this myself (we use F5) but if he doesn't have the budget
for a redundant pair of F5's )they are pricey...) then he may be trying to
get resilience this way
That said a single front end apache server with mod_proxy and load balanced
across N nodes (depending on front end firew
Or I can highly recommend configuring a local spacewalk server It is
certainly usable right now overall (even if still under development in some
areas) and the Redhat guys are very quick to squash reported bugs.
Getting it runnign here has made my life much easier in provisioning,
configuring
On 1 February 2010 08:33, hadi motamedi wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:24 AM, MHR wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:04 AM, hadi motamedi
>> wrote:
>> > Dear All
>> > On my CentOS server , the '/boot/grub/menu.lst' has the right
>> > configuration
>> > but when I reboot my CentOS serv
On 3 February 2010 10:20, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am aware that mounting filesystems with noatime option greatly
> increases speed.
>
> I have tried to follow discussion on the pros and cons of using noatime.
>
> I have however not been able to mount with the option relatim
On 3 February 2010 12:52, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:38 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
>> RHEL doesn't have a reltime enabled kernel so centos doesn't either by
>> default. I believe that there is a kernel in plus that is reltime
>> enabled b
For pure RHEL/Centos/Fedora environments (especially centos/rhel) I
can recommend Spacewalk for any reasonable number of systems (20+) for
the combination of package management, configuration management and
kickstart management...
James
___
CentOS mailin
On 4 February 2010 21:48, wrote:
>> For pure RHEL/Centos/Fedora environments (especially centos/rhel) I
>> can recommend Spacewalk for any reasonable number of systems (20+) for
>> the combination of package management, configuration management and
>> kickstart management...
>>
> Has it improved
On 5 February 2010 13:18, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> 2010/2/5 James Hogarth :
>>
>> There has been substantial development since last April. 0.7 is very
>> usable in production (and indeed makes my life much easier) and 0.8 is
>> due soon.
>>
>> James
>
> What I miss in that overview is the memory size of clients. I found
> "virsh dominfo " but that is for just that one client (and I
> have several running).
> The same question for "xm top". I found that there seems to exist
> virt-top, but I could not find this in a repository for Centos5.
>
For
>
> Funny I was thinking about a similar script line. Then I thought, this
> is silly I must have overlooked the obvious. Let's ask the list :-)
> The machine is dual bootable (Xen/Kvm). It serves as a backup for two
> other machines running Xen (centos5). That's basically the only reason
> I'm sti
>
> James, I'd be interested in knowing some of how you handled the ESX to KVM
> migration, and some caveats you might have found along the way.
This is from our internal wiki from notes I wrote at the time - will
be pretty busy here between now and christmas but happy to answer any
specific issu
On 5 January 2012 22:57, Jeff wrote:
> Thanks for the help and info!
>
Here's the relevant link from the upstream vendor's release notes:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/6.1_Release_Notes/ar01s01.html
Naming convention for network interfaces
Traditionally, netw
>
> Do we know if this bug affects Centos?
>
The bug did not affect centos 5.
The bug did affect centos 6.
The fix from the upstream vendor was released on Monday afaik.
The centos update was released Tuesday evening.
James
___
CentOS mailing list
Ce
A while ago when doing my RHCE someone mentioned to me a rather nifty
site that can randomly break a system in a variety of ways - useful
for practical testing of a candidate.
It was something like monkey test or something...
Anyway as you can see my memory is failing me does this ring a
Okay found it... don't know where I had monkey from...
For the record if useful for anyone else:
http://trouble-maker.sourceforge.net/
James
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
As a heads up since this might have a large effect on people
The upstream vendor has rebased form firefox 3.6 onto firefox 10...
This effects both centos5 and centos6.
I'm not sure reading this whether this is the extended update support
version of if they intend to follow Mozilla's new rele
Does virt-manager show anything for the guest when connected to the kvm
host?
Sent from Android Mobile
On 4 Aug 2010 16:31, "Kevin Chang" wrote:
> Good morning everyone. This is my first post to this list. I am very new
to
> Linux so please bear with me. Also, English is not my first language so
>>
>> i just don't want to teach off of 5.3, only to find out later that
>> they've been keeping up to date and 5.5 would have been a more
>> appropriate choice. thanks for any tips.
>
> On a certain level there really isn't much difference from a general
> admin POV -- it does not really make s
I do find this behaviour very odd... if you are not intending to get support
from redhat why not just install CentOS in the beginning so you can still
get updates? Ah well...
Sent from Android Mobile
On 8 Aug 2010 18:58, "John R Pierce" wrote:
> On 08/08/10 9:11 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> wh
>
> BUT, let's say you decide to allocate 10GB to /, 4GB to swap & 1GB to /tmp.
> Suddenly your / partition is full and you can't install more stuff. With LVM
> you can quickly shrink /home and increase the size of /. All on the go
> without having to reboot. I found this very handy while working o
On 9 August 2010 12:08, James Bensley wrote:
> Hi Keith, thanks for your detailed reply. I haven't tried this yet..
>
> What I have done is follow this tutorial to build the latest kernel
> (http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel) which in the end game me
> an rpm of it for installation howev
>
> "Bloody cushty mate" ;)
>
Nice :) Glad to hear you got it worked out...
RHEL kernels do have ext4 enabled by default but in 5.4 (I think)
it was labelled ext4dev to indicate that there was the *possibility*
of changes to it as a development system that could potentially result
in manual s
On 9 August 2010 16:28, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> Why install RedHat without a subscription? Because all the world knows
> RedHat.
> Why not switch to CentOS and get updates? Because CentOS is one of the
> best-kept secrets of the web.
>
> How many google searches on RedHat and Updates and Licen
RHEL6 will not have xen for hosting. It could be a xen guest. If you are
teaching with the concept of having guests under the RHEL host and you want
your teachings relevant going forwards you will need to cover kvm.
Sent from Android Mobile
On 9 Aug 2010 19:35, "Paul Heinlein" wrote:
> On Mon,
Google redhat virtualisation guide to get the official docs.
Sent from Android Mobile
On 9 Aug 2010 19:41, "Boris Epstein" wrote:
> Hello listmates,
>
> Is there a good manual anywhere on how to boot a dual-boot
> Linux/Windows machine into Linux and launch the Windows as a XEN
> virtual machine
And that's ignoring the reason for the higher release libc such as
security...
Sent from Android Mobile
On 9 Aug 2010 19:43, "John R Pierce" wrote:
> On 08/09/10 11:24 AM, Dan Burkland wrote:
>> Machine is running 5.3 and somehow both packages got updated to
libgcc-4.1.2-48.el5 when they need to
Ah I just reread and saw the 5.3... you have known security issues anyway in
that case...
Sent from Android Mobile
On 9 Aug 2010 20:36, "James Hogarth" wrote:
> And that's ignoring the reason for the higher release libc such as
> security...
>
> Sent from Android Mob
On 9 August 2010 20:19, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Thanks . I saw those docs and many more, but for some reason could not find
> the scenario I am interested in.
> Thanks.
> Boris.
Okay re-reading your specific point I think I misread it at first. My
initlal reading was that you wanted to take a dua
>
> really pop3 box? Usually pop3 stores mail on local machine.
>
> on imap system imapsync is really good tool to do this.
>
> maybe there is some tools available: http://www.athensfbc.com/imap_tools/
>
> br,
>
You are confusing protocol with client
And yes I'd suggest fetchmail scripted to
Look into either redirectmatch if no mod_rewrite or rewriterule with
mod_redirect
On 17 Aug 2010 18:14, "Craig White" wrote:
> Is there some easy way to rewrite just the base URL to another URL but
> leave all other URL's unmolested?
>
> i.e.
>
> http://www.example.com = rewrite to another URL
>
Better still would be
user1 (ALL)=user2 /bin/bash
Leave off su entirely and
sudo -H user2 -i
as user1
On 19 Aug 2010 15:57, "mcclnx mcc" wrote:
> This work correctly. Thanks.
>
> --- 10/8/19 (四)，John Kennedy 寫道：
>
> 寄件者: John Kennedy
> 主旨: Re: [CentOS] how to setup account which can 'su" t
On 19 August 2010 20:12, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:47 PM, mcclnx mcc wrote:
>> Sorry. following way does NOT work.
>> user1 (ALL)=user2 /bin/bash
>> Leave off su entirely and
>> sudo -H user2 -i
>> as user1
>
> Because you have to run
> sudo -i -u user2
> as user1
> __
On 19 August 2010 20:39, David wrote:
> Getting "bnx2i: iSCSI not supported, dev=eth0" for all the NIC adapters
> on all of my R710's running CentOS 5.5.
>
> Here is an sample of the error messages:
>
> bonding: Warning: either miimon or arp_interval and arp_ip_target module
> parameters must be s
On 19 August 2010 21:10, David wrote:
> Pardon my banter, after drinking some more coffee and waking up, I think
> I pretty much answered my own question
>
> In this case, "not supported" MOST likely means not currently enabled
>
> I return you to a better program already in progress.
>
>
Load isn't a bad thing. Load is the number of processes in the run queue.
You have 16 cores and only 5 processes in the run queue. Are you witnessing
poor responsiveness on that server?
What are you trying to really troubleshoot?
On 20 Aug 2010 19:49, "Ed Donahue" wrote:
> We are currently runni
The Google/yahoo site test tools and firebug are great for diagnosing site
responsiveness issues too...
On 20 Aug 2010 19:36, "Whit Blauvelt" wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:46:19PM +0530, Agnello George wrote:
>> Have a question , Suppose i had a client tell me that he can access the
>> web
Ok let's see pf -efc if we can and see what is listed as in the run queue
On 20 Aug 2010 22:07, "Ed Donahue" wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Brian Mathis
wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Ed Donahue wrote:
>>> We are currently running CentOS 5 update 4 on a Dell R910 server 1
That doesn't really help him...
I'm in a similar situation but I think we just have to wait on further
information...
The week long crash course + test on the RH site currently mentions Xen...
given that is dead now from RH perspective it def seems better to wait for
now.
James
On 24 Aug 2010 1
initrd for that kernel ok for all the required modules?
On 24 Aug 2010 09:53, "Eric Doutreleau"
wrote:
> well
> yes the drive is bootable as i can boot from it
> it s when the kernel need to find the root device that it s the problem
> it s like it can't find the volume group
>
>
> Le 23/08/2010
On 27 August 2010 14:41, wrote:
> Stefano Sasso wrote:
>> 2010/8/27 Ski Dawg :
>>> After spending a little bit of time searching around today, I have run
>>> across 2 that seem like good options, cfengine and puppet.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any thoughts about either of these tools? Is there
>>>
> Why? The current CentOS kernel isn't anywhere near the latest, nor is a
> fair bit of other stuff in CentOS 5.5. And there are lots of folks running
> yr-old releases.
I... I... I don't really know how to answer this one...
Anyone who is running *CentOS* from a year ago is strongly urged to
upg
>
>
> Thanks to everyone for the replies, and the links to articles for
> further research. I will definitely continue reading those.
>
> At this time, we are not interested in Spacewalk because of the Oracle
> db requirement, but I will investigate the other options as well.
> --
> Doug
Given yo
On 27 August 2010 19:30, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/27/2010 1:14 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>
>> Please only comment on stuff you have genuine *current* knowledge of
>> and not something you dabbled in a year ago... technology changes
>> quickly especially in a pro
Fair enough - it didn't meet your requirements and you found something
better that did :)
My experience is that when managers/VPs start specifying a tech to use
as opposed to a problem to solve things tend to get irritating
quickly.
I feel very fortunate to be in a company that looks to the futur
>
> Keep in mind that next year the work you are doing now will be in the
> past and they may want to toss it (and the people who did it) for the
> next new thing. Let us know how that works out for everyone. My
> experience has been that the companies that hang on to the past do so
> because the
>> At any rate I stand by my position that in tech if you are going to
>> put an opinion piece out on a mailing list, a blog or another medium
>> it should be relevant to the current situation and not something you
>> tried a year ago and didn't work out great so you advise others to
>> steer clear
Hi all,
I have a Centos server exporting a filesystem via NFSv4 and from my
Ubuntu desktop I can mount it specifying the nfs version as 4 fine and
read/write data.
>From another Centos system trying to mount this exported filesystem
results in "mount.nfs4: Cannot allocate memory" every time.
Bee
On 7 September 2010 15:16, James Hogarth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a Centos server exporting a filesystem via NFSv4 and from my
> Ubuntu desktop I can mount it specifying the nfs version as 4 fine and
> read/write data.
>
> From another Centos system trying to mount thi
On 1 December 2010 14:13, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> I have a server where we use tmpfs as a cache for temporary files used
> by a web application. But occasionally this tmpfs thinks it is full
> when it isn't.
>
> [r...@flask-yellow tmpfs]# touch file
> touch: cannot touch `file': No space lef
>>
>> If you're running a database on it, you might re-think using a
>> journaled filesystem. For that, ext2 will be faster and much
>> less prone to unrecoverable data loss.
>
> Did you mean EXT4, or in actual fact EXT2? I thought EXT4 was faster than
> EXT2?
>
The optimum on an EXT basis for a f
>
> Downloaded centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64.rpm and
> redhat-logos-60.0.14-10.el6.noarch.rpm from CentOS repo
>
> rpm -e --nodeps sl-release redhat-logos
> rpm -hiv redhat-logos-60.0.14-10.el6.noarch.rpm
> centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64.rpm
>
> yum update
>
> reboot, and voilà
>
> Yes, I know, for that machine, it's just a desktop that has x-window, gnome
> and a console opened up all day. I don't mind it if it function strangly...
> In any event, I'll just wipe the whole thing...
>
Ah fair enough - just wanted to give a heads up (and point to the yum
reinstall option) in
>
> An idle question:
>
> What is the advantage of switching to CentOS 6 if you already are
> running SL6? Or at least... what is the purpose? I'm not really clear on
> the difference (other than CentOS is the noisier bit of the party).
Plus when you have many systems (read 100+) to manage it is f
>
> When I try to sync CentOS 6 from different ftp mirrors using spacewalk
> command "spacewalk-repo-sync" I get this message " 'Unable to load
> package', 'Invalid information uploaded to the server' " for 38
> packages. When I check, these 38 packages are not named correctly.
>
> For example, sy
> Indication was when they supported (or just
> forced, cant remember witch) Virtualization only on x86_64 on
> RHEL/CentOS 5.x.
>
They only support KVM as a host technology for virtualization now. KVM
requires the CPU virtualization extensions to function. The functions
are only available on the
> I built a CentOS 6 machine to host several CentOS 6 guest servers. As all
guests will be Internet facing I set up the host with two bridged NICs and
assigned an Internet facing IP address to br0 and a local IP address to br1.
>
> Each guest was installed using br0 and br1 with virtio drivers. On
>>
>> Initial thought is a routing issue particularly with multiple NICs.
>>
>> What does 'ip r s' reveal?
>>
> That was it! ip r s showed that I had the local facing NIC (eth1) as the
> gateway, which caused all outgoing packets to be routed to the local network
> DUH!.
>
Yup been there before
>
> I am trying to install DFM 4.0.2, and have tried on both CentOS 4.8
> i386 and CentOS 5.5 x86_64. I have edited my /etc/redhat-release file
> to be equal to RHEL's, as the DFM installer immediately aborts if that
> isn't right. However, I still have errors during the install:
>
...
> Commun
>>
>>> I'm looking for CentOS 5.0 x86_64 dvd iso (preferably not torrent);
>>> must be 5.0
>>
Out of curiosity why 5.0? That hasn't had any security updates since
2007-11-07 RedHat maintains ABI annd API compatibility throughout
the major number line and anything that was 'written for 5.0' sho
> I was certain I had missed some steps in setting up the exports, but simply
> could not remember them. Nor could I find the guide that got me started
> before. This morning I found it. I cannot recommend this guide too highly -
> so you might like to bookmark it for a reference sheet - for nex
>
> pg x.y versions prior to 9.0 replaced the PG 8.1 that came in EL5 (9.0
> and later install to new directories so they can exist side by side).
> further, the newer libpq isn't directly compatible with the older libpq,
> so this compat-libs package provides a 'shim' library to fake the older
> v
On 22 August 2011 20:48, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 08/22/2011 07:01 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
>> I have a shared web server that users can SSH / SFTP into to access their
>> web content. Each users home directory is in a change root, and I use
>> "mount -o bind" to put their respective w
> However I am curious to know why strange sites contact our servers on
> port 123 and why the installed Centos time software listens on every
> available IP address.
>
For your first part either people probing you or have you checked to see if
a previous admin had joined the ntp.org pool with you
1 - 100 of 443 matches
Mail list logo
