I manage several Fedora 14 servers. They was not upgraded due to
several reasons (systemd unreliability, K12LTSP support absence),
some newer packages I was building & updating manually, some
other (OpenOffice, Mozilla) was possible update from projects
binaries.
Now I consider the options to migra
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 07/07/2014 06:47 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>> Reading about systemd, it seems it is not well liked and reminiscent of
>> Microsoft's "put everything into the Windows Registry" (Win 95 onwards).
>>
>> Is there a practical alternative to omnipresent, or invasive, systemd ?
Aly Khimji wrote:
> It would appear the samba4 DC isn't available for C7 just yet.
>
> "As Fedora and RHEL are using MIT Kerberos implementation as its Kerberos
> infrastructure of choice, the Samba Active Directory Domain Controller
> implementation is not available with MIT Kereberos at the mome
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/7/2014 11:56 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:48:36 -0700
>> John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>>> >On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
> >And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM
>>> >
>>> >https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits says 1GB m
James Hogarth wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2014 13:01, "Frantisek Hanzlik" wrote:
>>
>> Are somewhere for these distribution available (unofficial) Samba4
>> RPMs packages with Heimdal Kerberos?
>>
>
> http://www.enterprisesamba.com
>
> We use these at m
Frank Cox wrote:
> I've curious about where and how Centos 7 gets its ntp configuration from.
>
> When I installed the operating system, I went through this page and told it
> to use "network time", as shown:
>
> http://media.if-not-true-then-false.com/2014/07/06-centos-7-date-and-time-748x560.p
6 matches
Mail list logo
