Re: [CentOS] Gnome Terminal and xterm problems

h no issues. Have you ever tried sniffing for network traffic related to a hung session? -- Dave K Unix Systems & Network Administrator Mount Laurel NJ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos as a desktop, advisable?

nd for supporting a large deployment, they need to be a repo, building/installing manually just isn't an option. -- Dave K Unix Systems & Network Administrator Mount Laurel NJ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

On 7/26/07, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well ... actually, having plus lower is a good thing. BUT, it requires you to exclude the packages that exist in Base/Updates if you use the Plus repo. Sounds like a choice between "some of plus" versus "all of plus&q

Re: [CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities

ltiples of 10 on the first setup to make tuning easier. Also, I think I've found that if you really want to use the "plus" repo it needs to be the same priority as "base" and "updates". -- Dave K Unix Systems & Network Administrator Mount Laurel NJ _

Re: [CentOS] Forcing ifcfg-eth0 to use the same nic in multi nic machine

> same machine to have the same MAC. I guess you haven't worked with Sun systems lately. Although every Sun NIC does have it's own MAC address, by default the system uses one MAC for all of them. I have yet to decide if this is a Good Thing or not -- Dave K Unix Systems

Re: [CentOS] Question on upgrading hardware

tion issues. But that will also downgrade a lot of packages back to the original release versions, so a full update will be required afterwards. By the way, you have made backups of all your important/critical/valuable data, right? (Backups of /etc and /boot can also be