On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
> On Thu, October 9, 2014 10:08 am, Igal @ getRailo.org wrote:
> > On 10/9/2014 12:22 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> >> On 10/08/2014 07:50 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> >>> Again, this is just $0.02 worth of my own opinion, definitely
Bare bones is fine, but you miss out on the tools which may make your life
easier. As an example you can configure a DB (PostgreSQL, mySQL, whatever)
using the command, but it is frequently more time-cost effective to use a
tool.
Things like SSH used to be optional at one time. Now it is in every
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2014, Keith Keller wrote:
>
> I suspect that sshfs's relatively poor performance is having an impact
>> on your transfer. I have a 30TB filesystem which I rsync over an
>> OpenVPN link, and building the file list doesn't ta
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> >
> > > Don't forget that the time taken to build the file list is a function
> of
> > > the number of files present, and not their size. If you have many
> > millions
> > > of small files, it will indeed take a very long time. Over sshfs with
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
> On Wed, October 29, 2014 4:02 pm, Beartooth wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:44:42 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> >
> >> ... Basically, if one thinks he knows
> >> more than system vendor, he is just schizophrenic. And we, normal
> >> p
rs - and that means patching and if
that means some downtime, then the users in general would not be put out,
if their expectations had not been raised to expect no downtime.
Cheers,
Cliff
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
> On Wed, October 29, 2014 6:32 pm, Cliff Pr
I used to work with IBM mainframes back when the dinosaurs were hatchlings.
At one place I worked the machine was powered off on Friday at 5pm and
powered up at 7am on Monday! Can you imagine that these days?
We soon went to 24x7, but the reason was not because the users wanted it.
It was because
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:21 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 1:07 AM, Cliff Pratt wrote:
>
>> I used to work with IBM mainframes back when the dinosaurs were
>> hatchlings.
>> At one place I worked the machine was powered off on Friday at 5pm and
>> powere
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Arif Hossain wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 14:11 +, Giles Coochey wrote:
>> --ms00020507030501060609
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>
>> On 14/03/2012 13:59, Arif H
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> hello list,
>
> I'm trying to build a postfix rpm that has mysql support included.
> I've found the line where I need to define mysql support but it seems
> that I am being tripped up by some build dependencies:
>
> [root@beta SPECS]# rpmbuild
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:14 AM, wrote:
> bob wrote:
>> On 5/3/2012 1:59 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Tim Evans wrote:
On 05/03/2012 01:43 PM, bob wrote:
> so last night all my servers were severely probed and they tried to
> So I sent them the info and said it must be a hacked ser
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
> I am trying to get BackupPC working with automount as documented in
> this CentOS HowTo:
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BackupPC
>
> I think my CentOS6 box's NetBIOS name resolving is not working
> correctly as when I try to access the mount
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
>> I don' t think that would happen anytime soon. AFAIK if you check
>> distrowatch Oracle Linux ranks #50 and CentOS ranks #8.
>>
>> Also, I read somewhere that ORCL has 8,000 paid custmers to their
>> Linux subscr
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Harold Pritchett wrote:
> Problem: My network uses the 192.168.1.0/24 network. Since is the most
> common network in all of the world it begins presenting problems when I want
> to set up vpns, or try to do other routing.
>
> The solution: Change the network fr
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:00 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Tue, September 4, 2012 16:51, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> That should happen directly without C's involvement if the netmask is
>> 255.255.0.0 on A and B's eth1 interfaces.
>
> It is not. The netmask on those interfaces is 255.255.255.0.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Blake Hudson wrote:
>
> Alexander Dalloz wrote the following on 10/16/2012 1:41 PM:
>> Am 16.10.2012 20:13, schrieb Les Mikesell:
> ]# netstat -pant|grep ":25"|grep LISTEN
> tcp0 0 209.216.9.56:25 0.0.0.0:*
>
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
