>
> Assuming you wanted an answer... For one thing the powerbooks got 'close
> lid, sleep, open lid wake up, grab a fresh network connection and
> continue' right about a decade ago and the odds of that working with any
> PC hardware/OS combination even today are pretty dismal and it makes a
> lapt
>
>> I also have a Macbook Pro running CentOS just fine as well. However Fedora
>> is a lot farther ahead driver wise and application wise. It also took
>> longer to configure CentOS to a good state.
>
> I'm not sure I'd call it running CentOS if you had to add
> drivers/components/firmware to mak
>
> That's your opinion. I'm perfectly happy running CentOS on my Dell XPS
> M1330, and furthermore pretty much everything works fine straight out of
> the box:
>
Wait, that cannot be so. Another happy user? :)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
>>
>> So what you are essentially saying is any OS that you install on any
>> machine, that you have to add drivers to, is not running that OS??
>
> Not in the sense that you can say the OS 'works' on the hardware in question.
> You might say you can make it work if you add/replace parts.
>
Ok, I
* Timo Schoeler (timo.schoe...@riscworks.net) wrote:
> May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/
>
> Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because
> their own tools are not able to handle co
5 matches
Mail list logo
