5.6.
If 5.6 is not forthcoming I think many of us would like to see at least
the security updates to cover potential vulnerabilities.
Many thanks to the development team for all their hard work! :-)
Respectfully,
Cal Webster
___
CentOS mailing list
Ce
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:28 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Cal Webster wrote:
>
> > java-1.6.0-sun
>
> non FOSS, non-source provided, no? This is in an addon
> channel in RHEL, and so far as I know we have never shipped
> such
You're right - s
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 11:30 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
>
> > I know the development team is furiously working to get 5.6 out the door
> > so I understand that there will be delays. However, it was my
> > understanding
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 22:00 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> I wish people would read the list archives instead of posting the same
> kind of questione time and again.
>
> Kai
Thank you for your thoughts Kai.
I have invested quite a bit of time reading the CentOS and CentOS-Devel
archives, includin
x27;ve been so generously
given in CentOS and other OSS projects. Hopefuly, others will do the
same and we'll all benefit and live happily ever after... er, um...
okay, well at least we'll all benefit. :-)
Very Gratefully Yours,
Cal Webster
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:08 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
>
> > ...based on my experience, for use in all non-certified enterprise
> > operations (large and small) on general-purpose computers.
>
> Wow, what a grea
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 13:08 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Mailing List wrote:
> > On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used
> >> ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the
> >> network woul
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 14:42 -0400, Mailing List wrote:
> On 4/13/2011 1:08 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> >>
> >
> > there are two other 238 kernels - do they show the same behavior?
>
> I will install kernel-2.6.18-238.5.1.el5.centos.plus and let the list
> know how it goes. I totally forgot that th
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 15:10 -0400, Mailing List wrote:
> On 4/13/2011 2:50 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
[snip]
>
>The ntp server does connect to the internet fine. the version of
> ntp is as follows.
>
> ntp-4.2.2p1-9.el5.centos.2.1
>
>The time is not off by
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 16:00 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
[snip]
> The avc messages are in /var/log/audit/audit.log
>
> ausearch -m avc -ts recent
>
> Will also show you recent AVC messages.
>
> audit2allow -la
>
> will search for any avc message in /var/log/audit/audit.log or
> /var/log/message
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 13:06 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Running v5 64bit on a Dell 1950.
>
> A cluster of 3 DB machines, identical hardware. One of them suddenly
> became slower 2 weeks ago.
>
> tar -zxf with a large file on this machine takes 1.5 minutes, but takes
> only 10 seconds on any o
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 16:22 -0400, Mailing List wrote:
> On 4/13/2011 3:35 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >
> > I'm running the same kernel and ntp versions and I'm having no problems
> > at all on ntp servers or clients.
> >
> > If my previous suggestions di
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 17:42 -0400, Mailing List wrote:
> On 4/13/2011 5:24 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > ntpq -c pe -c as
> root > ~# ntpq -c pe -c as
> remote refid st t when poll reach delay
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 13:28 +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
> > On 4/14/2011 6:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >>
> >> Is it really true that the time is working perfectly with one of the
> >> other kernels (the older ones)?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Johnny,
> >
> >Yes, As long as I run the older
It's possible that your #2 server has not rebooted or had problems with
the latest kernel or just has the default set to something other than
"0" in grub.conf.
What's the output of:
egrep 'default|title' /etc/grub.conf
yum list kernel | grep kernel
./Cal
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 16:18 +0200, Hans
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 16:37 +0200, Hans Vos wrote:
> Hello Cal,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> > It's possible that your #2 server has not rebooted or had problems with
> > the latest kernel or just has the default set to something other than
> > "0" in grub.conf.
>
> I did a reboot and check
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 17:00 +0200, Hans Vos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Ryan is right. The mirrors need to sync up. That's most likely the
> > cause. Still, it's curious why you have two kernels listed in grub.conf
> > and only one listed from yum. You should also see the 2.6.18-238.el5xen
> > kernel li
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 11:07 -0400, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Hans Vos wrote:
> > Well, I copied the /var/cache/yum/timedhosts.txt file from server 1 to
> > server 2. Then run yum update and all kinds of errors came flying at me.
> > So I just SCP'ed the whole /var/cac
I'm getting yum update errors when attempting to update nss:
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: nss-3.12.10-2.el6_1.x86_64 (updates)
Requires: nss-softokn(x86-64) >= 3.12.9
Installed: nss-softokn-3.12.7-1.1.el6.x86_64
(@anaconda-CentOS-201106060106.x
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 02:14 -0800, John Doe wrote:
> From: Cal Webster
>
> > Error: Package: nss-3.12.10-2.el6_1.x86_64 (updates)
> > Requires: nss-softokn(x86-64) >= 3.12.9
> > Installed: nss-softokn-3.12.7-1.1.el6.x86_64
> > (@anacon
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 13:00 -0600, Devin Reade wrote:
> --On Friday, July 22, 2011 11:10:29 AM -0700 Jerry Moore
> wrote:
>
> > It appears that chkconfig is re sequencing or re ordering the start
> > priority of various services when turning on a service using chkconfig.
> [...]
> > The only solu
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 12:47 -0700, Jerry Moore wrote:
>
> On Jul 22, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > System V init has been replaced by "upstart"
> >
> > Upstream Deployment Guide:
> > http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linu
ftware and drivers and access the forums, etc.
More relevant information below...
I'd be grateful for any ideas or advice on this. I desperately need to
retrieve vulnerability reports, patches, and other DoD resources.
Thanks!
Cal Webster
Smart Card Reader:
SCM Microsystems Inc. SCR3
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:08 -0500, mark wrote:
> On 12/03/14 17:34, Cal Webster wrote:
> > Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
> > CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil
> > web sites.
> >
> &g
On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 18:20 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Cal Webster
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 17:35
> > To: CentOS List
> >
l see it if you do a search in DADMS. We do
use CentOS for local general purpose servers and workstations.
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
> > CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for cons
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
> that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
> use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
I would recommend RHEL for critical sys
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:30 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:08 -0500, mark wrote:
> >> On 12/03/14 17:34, Cal Webster wrote:
> >> > Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
> >> &
ait for the community to fix something then get it
integrated into RHEL before filtering down to CentOS. If this is
acceptable then CentOS is an option.
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
> >> Gotcha, I a
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 09:33 -0500, Scot P. Floess wrote:
> I think you can also use
>
> X --config
>
> That should build an /etc/X11/xorg.conf file for you...
That's a good start (the command is actually "Xorg -configure") but it
may leave open questions to the OP and others who may consult this
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 16:16 -0400, Selwyn Schultz Sr wrote:
> I am very new to installing Linux on laptops. I got it working on another
> Toshiba I owned without to much trouble, and then decided I wanted to
> experiment with KVM so I bought this laptop with an I5 chip.
>
> Anyway I tried modprob
don't, see this article:
Set Up an RPM Build Environment under CentOS
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SetupRpmBuildEnvironment
Note: Watch for line-wrap below.
Best Regards,
--Cal Webster
=[Rdesktop Workaround]=
##>> Retrieve and install the CentOS source
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 19:17 +, James Pearson wrote:
> Cal Webster wrote:
> >
> > In short, rdesktop 1.6.0-10 is buggy and unstable. See this upstream bug
> > report for more:
>
> There are more recent versions of rdesktop available via 3rd party repos e.g.
&
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 13:50 -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:51:48AM -0500, Cal Webster wrote:
> > rdesktop has been spewing error messages since the update to CentOS 6.4.
> > Aside from the continuous stream of errors in the terminal window from
> >
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 09:57 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> brick writes:
> > Hi
> >
> > My system is CentOS 6. I need to edit xorg.conf. But it can't be find in
> > /etc/X11. Where is it? How can I get the default setting?
>
> /var/log/Xorg.0.log will tell you which configuration Xorg is currently
See Red Hat Bugzilla bug #846852 for details.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846852
FYI:
We discovered that after updating to EL 6.3 on our x86_64 server, autofs
5.0.5-54 broke our nightly backups that rely on automounting an NFS
share hosted on another EL 6 machine on our local netw
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 18:37 -0400, Cal Webster wrote:
> See Red Hat Bugzilla bug #846852 for details.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846852
>
> FYI:
>
> We discovered that after updating to EL 6.3 on our x86_64 server, autofs
> 5.0.5-54 broke our nightly
We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on
servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred
on similar connections to EL 6.2 servers.
On the client machine a normal vncviewer display appears with the
expected graphical login until the mouse point
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > We began experiencing failed vnc connections to the console display on
> > servers that have been updated to EL 6.3. No such failures have occurred
> > on similar connecti
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>> We began experiencing failed vnc connect
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wro
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 08/15/2012 09:47 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 20:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wro
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:46 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wro
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:46 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wro
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 19:46 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 17:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 08/16/2012 11:43 AM, Cal Webster wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 13:56 -0500, Johnny Hughes wro
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 10:23 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I am nearing the end of a project that moved our disparate services
> and hosts onto kvm virtualized servers. What I am now contemplating
> is setting up my desktop as a virtual host and using one of the guests
> as my primary workstation.
46 matches
Mail list logo
