Hi
CentOS 5.4(final) 2.6.18-164el5PAE. I am trying to prevent removable
USB and eSATA devices from occupying /dev/sdX devices ahead of a 3ware
RAID controller. For example: at boot, if a USB drive and eSATA HDD
(connected to an LSI 1068E onboard controller, reflashed in "IT" mode to
handle hotpl
't appear to be the right place and that's about as deep
down as i know how to go.
cheers,
cs
--
Message: 30
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:24:42 -0400
From: Phil Schaffner
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Controlling the order of /dev/sdX devices?
To:
Message-ID: <4d948
Apologies in advance for excerpting or leaving out the messages sent to the
list as i was in digest mode so got them all in one lump.
Rudi Ahlers:
You could assign a LABEL to each hard drive. The LABEL is attached to the
drive's UID (I think?) so even if you move the drive to anther port it will
fstab (or has a 'noauto' line in
/etc/fstab with the idea of mounting it manually later or has something
in automount's config for automounting it), the hot plug system should
not touch it, no matter what /dev/sdXX it happens to land at, so long as
you are using volume labels or s
Sawyer
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Controlling the order of /dev/sdX devices?
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Cal Sawyer
wrote:
Apologies in advance for excerpting or leaving out the messages sent to
the list as i was in digest mode so got them all in one lump.
Rudi Ahlers:
You could assign a
be a replacement for it at some
point?
- cal sawyer
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Lamar Owen
Sent: 01 April 2011 14:18
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Controlling the order of /dev/sdX devices?
On F
I think that everyone lese lives in a far more ordered universe than i
do. My "problem" - no, wait - "challenge" is that i have zero control
over the origin of incoming media on USB and eSATA. Could be any brand
of USB stick sold under the sun or HDDs formatted FAT32, NTFS, ext2/3.
The only const
...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Lamar Owen
Sent: 01 April 2011 15:19
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Controlling the order of /dev/sdX devices?
On Friday, April 01, 2011 09:53:06 am Cal Sawyer wrote:
> Nope, no LVM on the RIAD array. It just needs to load right after the main
>
Hi
I use the Chromium build from:
http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~cxs548/chrome
The highest Chromium rev you can run with the RHEL5.x flash-plugin
chrome-10.0.612.0.tar.gz is v10. chrome-11 is incompatible with
flash-plugin-10.2.152.27-0.1.el5.rf. Looks like
flash-plugin_10.2.153.1-0.1.el5.rf is
Re quad-port NICs: AOC-SG-i4 is good, too, and smaller than the UG version.
iirc, it uses a newer Intel chipset as well. Oddly, it isn't listed on
Supermicro's site except as a PDF factsheet. I have a few of them and they
work well. There's also the Intel EXPI9404PTL, but here in the UK it's a
I like my Atto ExpressPCI UL5D. Supports LUNs > 2TB, which iirc, Adaptec still
(?) doesn't.
- csawyer
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Benjamin Hackl
Sent: 08 April 2011 10:31
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentO
In a past life when i was working with IRIX systems, i changed from innd to
DNews (http://netwinsite.com/dnews/install.htm,
http://netwinsite.com/dnews/faq1.htm#2). Looks like it's been out of
development since 2007 (but what's changed nntp-wise since 2007? dunno), but
it was a piece of cake
Haven't been able to reach atrpms.net for over a week from London, UK,
when i last looked for it after a couple of intervening months. Did i
miss something?
And if atrpms is truly defunct, where's a good place to obtain updated
versions of vlc and mplayer now?
thanks!
- cal
Thanks to Earl for the NUX repo recommendation. Good VLC and ffmpeg
versions (for CentOS) here.
From what i can tell, atrpms died a death earlier this year or the end
of last
cheers
- cal sawyer
Earl A Ramirez wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Is ATRPMs dead?
On 14
Hi
CentOS 6.7 (kernel 2.6.32-573.el6.x86) ...
Wanted to set up group quotas on a new ext4 filesystem. When i was
initialising via quotacheck, received this message
> quotacheck -vcg /HOMES
quotacheck: Your kernel probably supports journaled quota but you
are not using it.
I liked
From: Les Mikesell
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Best way to duplicate a live Centos 5 server?
To: CentOS mailing list
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
>> Am I missing something glaringly obvious here, or is the only way I'm
>> going be able to migrate is to shutdown the C5
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Best way to duplicate a live Centos 5 server?
To: CentOS mailing list
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:21 AM,
Cal Sawyer wrote:
>> >
>> > ReaR has suddenly become very interesting to me, probably explaining why
>> > it utterly fails to work properly
Hi, all
I have a number of machines that are out of sync with one another by
virtue of having done a yum update after a base 6.2 install at different
times (all were previous CentOS 5.3) Consequently, systems are a mix of
2.6.32-220.7.1, 2.6.32-220.13.1 or 2.6.32-220.17.1.
So 2 questions:
-
In my experience, LAG/LACP won't provide aggregatation, only failover
and fault tolerance. For link aggregation, you don't need to configure
the switch ports - just set bonding to mode=6 for balanced
transmit/receive and plug up the the NICs to a group of ports on the
switch. However, balance-alb
t/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Am 06.08.2012 19:44, schrieb Rainer Duffner:
>> >
>> > Am 06.08.2012 um 19:22 schrieb Cal Sawyer :
>> >
>>> >> In my experience, LAG/LACP won't provide aggregatation, only failover
>>> >> and fault t
20 matches
Mail list logo
