Please don't post HTML messages. Firefox renders your messages in about
4 points. Quite unreadable.
Please, this is not meant to start a war.
Thanks.
--
Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists
easever/centosplus/$basearch/
gpgcheck=1
enabled=1
gpgkey=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5
Yum updates everything else. I don't see the problem reading yum and
yum.conf man pages. Any help appreciated!
Bob
--
Bob Taylor
___
comment the
mirrorlist line and uncomment the baseurl line (which doesn't work.
Thanks in advance.
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 10:10 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2008 9:52 AM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm having the same problem as Valent Turkovic. I have the
> > following /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo (mind the line-wraps):
>
> Would yo
s excluded due to repository priority protections
Reading Local RPMDB
Building updates object
Could not find update match for kernel
No Packages marked for Update/Obsoletion
I see nothing other than the second to last line.
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
s enabled 99
addons CentOS-5 - Addons enabled 99
extras CentOS-5 - Extras enabled 99
Looks OK to me. What the hell is our problem? All my updates are via
yum. I recei
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 23:02 -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:56:58PM -0800, Bob Taylor wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 20:24 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
[snip]
> Coming in late on this thread, but...
>
> 1. Can you point your repo's at a differe
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 15:58 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
[snip]
> sounds like the mirror you are updating from is not up to date.
I *think* I'm using
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/updates/$basearch/
I have found that there is no kernel at rpmforg
t; /usr/bin/yum -e 0 -d 0 -y update
> sleep 10
> /usr/bin/yum clean headers
> fi
> -=-=-=-=-
I commented out the clean headers and sleep lines. Stopped yum-updatesd
and executed the script from the command line and it just sleeps (ie, ps
aux &qu
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:27 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 1:58 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bob Taylor wrote:
> >
> > sounds like the mirror you are updating from is not up to date.
> >
> > We currently know that one mirror
ntium II's. Searching for answers in the dark.
Shouldn't yum update kernel work update just the kernel* rpms?
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 02:22 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:27 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > > On Feb 19, 2008 1:58 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 23:14 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > Hm. I just noticed http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/i386/RPMS/
> > kernel listings are i686.rpm. Could my problem be this is confusing yum
> > as I use i386 and this is the i386 director
fc6
yum-priorities-1.0.4-3.el5.centos.2
yum-repolist-1.0.4-3.el5.centos.2
yum-skip-broken-1.0.4-3.el5.centos.2
yum-updatesd-3.0.5-1.el5.centos.5
yum-utils-1.0.4-3.el5.centos.2
yum-versionlock-1.0.4-3.el5.centos.2
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 09:28 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 10:58 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > OK .. lets go at this a different way
ntos.org/?release=5&arch=i386&repo=os error was
[Errno 14] HTTP Error 506: Failure To Connect To Web Server
Has CentOS.org changed their url?
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 14:41 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems everybody is out of ideas why yum is not updating the kernel.
> > The following kernels are installed in /boot:
> >
>
kernel-headers.i386 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5
updates
Doesn't look like the problem is in plug-ins but maybe updates?
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 19:56 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 15:37 -0800, Bob Taylor wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 14:41 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
&g
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 03:47 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
[snip]
> based on this output ... somehow your kernel is excluded in update set,
> even though it sees kernel-doc.noarch and kernel-headers.i386.
>
> This leads me to believe that there is a "exclu
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 06:25 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 23:45 -0800, Bob Taylor wrote:
[snip]
> == Useless/uninteresting lines snipped =
> [rpmforge] name = Red Hat Enterprise $releasever - RPMforge.net - dag
> mirro
t; thread. :)
I agree. Waaay to long. Now what do the experts have to say about this?
All packages *except* the kernel files are i386. I want to end this,
please?
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
e. I still
> think you should let someone log in as root into your box and figure it
> out for you. :)
I would love this. However I don't know what my IP is nor how to find
out. It's been too long and too much has changed.
--
Bob Taylor
gt; www.whatsmyip.org or some similar site...
Wow! Thanks Ray
> Or, just reinstall :)
I *do* have a sense of humor. :-)
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
rmine if your base installation
> is correct.
It is *not* a yum config problem.
> If it isn't a config problem then we can look at permissions and
> network next.
See above.
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 15:02 -0500, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> Bob:
>
> > I agree totally! The problem is with rpm. It refuses to install a non
> > i386 rpm.
>
> What are the contents of the ~/.rpmmacros file (for root)
el was installed manually using --ignorearch.
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 mtrr pge mca cmov
pat pse36 mmx fxsr up
bogomips: 797.12
--
Bob Taylor
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 16:34 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 12:41 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > Bob,
> > >
> > > Lets get this fixed so we can kill this t
cifies the default kernel package type
DEFAULTKERNEL=kernel
> The interesting error from RPM suggests that it thinks the machine is an i586
> (or atleast not i686).
uname -imp:
i686 i686 i386
Don't know why the kernel says it's an i386. Kernel bug?
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 23:44 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 12:10 -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > Well, exactarch=0 might work around this from a yum
> > standpoint (as far
> &
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 00:43 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> Garrick Staples wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:25:32AM -0500, Ross S. W. Walker alleged:
> > > Bob Taylor wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 23:44 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wr
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 00:19 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
[snip]
> > uname -imp:
> >
> > i686 i686 i386
> >
> > Don't know why the kernel says it's an i386. Kernel bug? Gateway
> > purchase?
>
> i386 is the architect
hat changes your IP periodically (my database
retrieval program is totally busted!). :-)
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 22:46 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 00:19 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> >
> >> Bob Taylor wrote:
> >>
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >
> >>> uname -imp:
>
ls. After Ray and I
resolve this issue, I will send a last email to the list hopefully
ending this subject with the resolution to this problem.
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Ray Van Dolson please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 11:22 -0800, Garrick Staples wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:19:36AM -0800, Bob Taylor alleged:
> > I can not remove it with the command rpm -e kernel-2.6.18-53.1.13 but
> > can if I add .el5 to the end it does. Before I deleted it I ran the
>
> Tha
s
> yours... but, my /etc/rpm/platform is:
> Mine reports the same as yours and I have no problem updating kernels.
I believe this was in reference to uname -imp which mine results in
i686 i686 i386
Notice the processor. By all accounts it should be i686.
--
Bob Taylor
__
there is the culprit.
[snip]
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 10:33 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
[snip]
> >>> The contents of,
> >>>
> >>> # cat /etc/rpm/platform
> >> i386-redhat-linux
> >
> > Good
> Shouldn't this be i686-redhat-linux ?
Bingo! Better
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 14:16 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 08:14 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> what happens if you edit /etc/rpm/platform and change it too:
> >>
> >> i686-re
The problem which began this long an laborious thread has been solved
with an edit of /etc/rpm/platform replacing i386 with i686. Whatever
created this file thinks my cpu is not an i686.
Many thanks to all who helped track this down!
Hitler is dead. End of thread!
--
Bob Taylor
ke this one! I'm a nice guy, really!
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
; and here:
>
> http://www.fedorafaq.org/
>
> The OP had a lot of kitchen sinks installed maybe a broken plugin
> was the cause of all that grief. Probably right around the time
> he installed that repo and things stopped working.
I presume this comment is in regards
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 06:29 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
[snip]
> > OK! Thanks Johnny. You just confirmed a bug here. Now I will, as time
> > allows, see if I can discover why /etc/rpm/platform is incorrect. Since
> > the file is in an rpm directory, s
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 12:19 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 06:29 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > >
> > > If we can nail down something that changed /etc/rpm/platform
kernel.i686 2.6.18-8.1.14.el5
Oct 24 05:43:29 Updated: kernel-headers.i386 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5
Dec 03 11:10:12 Updated: kernel-headers.i386 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5
I wonder if you can find a culprit?
--
Bob Taylor
Nov 20 05:05:19 Updated: perl-XML-Parser.i386 2.35-1.el5.rf
Nov 20 05:05:27 Updated: syslinu
em in modifying /etc/rpm/platform
As I install packages I will check the platform file.
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Changed thread subject to (hopefully) put requests under the same
thread.
Unless I have missed a replacement package, I would like to see gnucash
included. I *think* I found it in FC8.
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
My wife purchased an HP Deskjet F340 all-in-one printer last year.
CentOS 5 includes hplip-1.6.7. I need at least hplip-2.7.10 which I have
had to install via tarball. Is there any plans to update this package
soon?
Thanks
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 12:17 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My wife purchased an HP Deskjet F340 all-in-one printer last year.
> > CentOS 5 includes hplip-1.6.7. I need at least hplip-2.7.10 which I have
&g
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 14:41 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> >
[snip]
> Instead of the whole HPLIP tar ball you can download just the particular
> CUPS PPD file for a printer and install that under /usr/share/... and
> it should then be supported.
I
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 13:37 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > My wife purchased an HP Deskjet F340 all-in-one printer last year.
> > CentOS 5 includes hplip-1.6.7. I need at least hplip-2.7.10 which I have
> > had to install via tarball. Is there any plans t
gt;
> Well, yes that could work. use "yum erase package name" to remove it.
> But, can one install a specific version of a package from the yum command?
>
Use rpm -i --oldpackage filename?
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
een looking for supported rpms for XEmacs and Gnucash.
What repos do I need to add to obtain these two apps with their
dependencies and at least one example for CentOS?
Thanks in advance.
Bob
--
Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
CentOS mailing l
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 10:47 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On 10/13/07, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm new to CentOS. I was running Fedora core 3 before I installed CentOS
> > 5.0.
> >
> > I'm looking at the files in CentOS /etc/yum.d and t
I have rpms for xemacs 21.5.27-8.fc8. I *think* they will work on Centos
5? If not I can get the sources. However, at this point, I have one of
those dependency hell problem. I need, for now, libtinfo. Does anyone
now what package it is in?
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTEC
Has anyone noticed the time change from Daylight to Standard Sunday? Is
there a fix in the works?
--
Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 17:30 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > Has anyone noticed the time change from Daylight to Standard Sunday? Is
> > there a fix in the works?
>
> Yes, time did change. And just at the right moment - when DST ended.
>
> Maybe
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 13:33 -0400, Andy Harrison wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 10/31/07, Bob Taylor wrote:
> > I have rpms for xemacs 21.5.27-8.fc8. I *think* they will work on Centos
> > 5? If not I can get the sources. Howe
t scheme. Since Mexico follows the U.S., this
requires a major change in Mexico's law. Oh well...
Sorry about the tequila! :-)
--
Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I am getting the following daily:
etc/cron.daily/yum.cron:
** Message: sqlite cache needs updating, reading in metadata
** Message: sqlite cache needs updating, reading in metadata
I have run "yum clean dbcache" each time I see this. What am I missing?
Bob
--
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 17:48 +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > I am getting the following daily:
> >
> > etc/cron.daily/yum.cron:
> >
> > ** Message: sqlite cache needs updating, reading in metadata
> > ** Message: sqlite ca
ug in pup? Shouldn't sysreport be
removed first then sos installed? Will try command line yum update -y.
Bob
--
Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
se that no updates
> > are available.
>
> Check /etc/yum.conf and see if there's an exclude=kernel line
Assuming a 32 bit CPU, I would also check /etc/rpm/platform. Something
overwrote mine to i386.
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentO
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 08:19 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 09:56 -0400, Erek Dyskant wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 08:39 -0500, Lanny Marcu
for the above! I need to leave now, but I will check
> that out, ASAP! Lanny
Have you looked at the file /etc/rpm/platform? If it has been changed
you will not get any kernel updates.
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
re was Usenet *groups* now
there are email lists. What's the difference? The names.
Bob
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
r
about 15% swap. All I do is logout. Oh, this is my only computer. If
anyone wants to tell me to buy a new one, please send me the money.
Otherwise keep your silence. :-)
Bob
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
do not list the manufacturer/model of the media card reader and
audio.
Any hardware guru see any problems?
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 14:41 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On 6/10/08, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Best Buy currently has an eMachine on sale for less than $300.00
> > without monitor. I didn't see any recent complaints on
[snip]
> HW guru I am not.
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 09:25 +0100, Nigel Kendrick wrote:
[snip]
If you, or others like you, insist on using HTML for email to this list
please set your font size to 10!
Thank you!
Bob
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
ter than the base os and server apps, but it seems like an upstream
> policy change especially for the big jump in firefox.
Unfortunately Firefox 1.x has become useless on too many sites. A reply
from one was, essentially, gotta keep up with the Joneses.
I've noticed several HTML emails that evo says are unknown attachments
with a blank page on message display. Selecting Edit as New Message
results in seeing the email in the composer. Anyone seeing this? CentOS
5.2.
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS ma
Evidently I have a wrong priority for centos plus? I have the priority
in every item in CentOS-base.repo set to 1. I *think* the kernel in
centos plus was a special one.
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 14:29 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I found I have the following kernels installed last night:
> >
> > kernel-devel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5
> > kernel-headers-2.6.18-92.1.6
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 23:01 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Centosplus's priority was 1. I had totally forgotten a special kernel
> > was in that repo and no, I don't have the kernel ex
ead now? Please?
Bob
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
er if responses similar to this
loses potential users or loses existing customers. Personally, it
disgusts me.
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 11:54 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > Bob Taylor wrote:
[snip]
> > Exactly the *wrong* response. I wonder if responses similar to this
> > loses potential users or loses existing customers. Personally, it
> > disgusts me.
>
> It is not
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 05:48 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 11:54 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >>> Bob Taylor wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >>> Exactly the *wrong* response. I wonder if responses s
eing around till about 20:00 - Depending
> on how many people are around and what the feeling is - we might nip
> around to Ragam ( mostly authentic South Indian food ), a few doors
> down.
[snip]
Quick! Send U.S. dollars for 1 round trip ticket from Yuma, AZ U.S. an
.
Bob
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> Random drive by surveys, and request for comments on a blog posts etc
> are definitely a waste of time for *this* list.
Of course this crap should *not* be tolerated, including spam.
Enough soap box from me.
Bob
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing
needing a valid answer. List maintainers can do what I
do. Skip the thread.
All too many people just need a place to *start* or a gentle *hint*.
Just *how* many lists are we supposed to be members of?
Bob
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
number of times to generate a google search without luck. Where
do I go to find an answer?
Sometimes to find an answer to a question you must ask somewhere. I'd
rather see someone ask than go back to w*s!
Bob
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 10:02 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
[snip]
Karanbir,
Have you looked at Usenet? It's user post/OT list history? Should give
you good information on splitting a list into one or more parts and the
results of doing so.
Bob
--
Bob T
all users contributing to that thread, into the
> moved-to-list, would be great to have!
Any programmers want to volunteer?
I have said enough already. Goodbye to this thread.
Bob
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 18:12 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > Have you looked at Usenet? It's user post/OT list history? Should give
> > you good information on splitting a list into one or more parts and the
> > results of doing so.
>
> Las
> Christmas, is grumpy and feels like being the list police.
> > Lighten up man...
> >
>
> Do me a favour while I turn the Christmas Turkey. Ask this
> geezer called Mark A. Lewis to stop top-posting.
Guys, you're on a two way street. Having said that, i
Good morning/afternoon,
I seem to have lost the repodata for sourceforge. I do not remember
where I got the repodata from. Could someone give me a URL please?
Thanks a bunch!
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 15:05 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 1-13-2009 11:51 AM Bob Taylor spake the following:
> > Good morning/afternoon,
> >
> > I seem to have lost the repodata for sourceforge. I do not remember
> > where I got the repodata from. Could someone giv
find compatible GRE between version 1.9.0.5 and 1.9.0.5.
I'm sorry, I'm at a complete loss. What's a GRE?
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 11:13 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > After installing my backup of /home and seeing firefox not restart, I
> > started it from the command line with the immediate error:
> >
> > Could not find compatible GRE between
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 22:31 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
> > > Try "sudo xulrunner --register-global", because somehow firefox believes
> > > that it cannot find a working xulrunner instance on your machine.
> >
> > Your second
g the space between "no" and "keep" otherwise I don't know.
My gmail works with just the "ssl".
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
Bob Taylor
## apcupsd.conf v1.1 ##
#
# for apcupsd release 3.14.3 (20 January 2008) - redhat
#
# "apcupsd" POSIX config file
#
# = General configuration parameters
#
# UPSNAME xxx
# Use this to give your UPS a name in log files and such. This
# is particulary
t;Error contacting host localhost port 3551: Connection refused
>
> You have suggested the NETSERVER directive be off, but you want
> a client side app to communicate with it:) Turn that "on" and
> restart it.
OK. Did that. Now listening on 127.0.0.1:3551 tcp instead of Unix D
1 B
00:00
= Matched: dbus-python
=
dbus-python.i386 : D-Bus Python Bindings
ann:/etc# rpm -q dbus-python
dbus-python-0.70-7.el5
Name switch! Confused me also!
--
Bob Taylor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
