> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:20:37 +0200
> "HvL" == Henk van Lingen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HvL> Hi,
HvL> [CentOS 5]
HvL> What is the best way to remove the shutdown and suspend
HvL> options from menu's for normal users?
HvL> After googling around, I added "SystemMenu
>>>>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:51:42 +0200
>>>>> "HvL" == Henk van Lingen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HvL> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 03:49:34PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider
HvL> wrote:
>> Just set HaltCommand to nothing:
>>
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:35:15 -0700
> "BM" == Ben Mohilef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BM> I noticed that there are no openoffice.org-xxx-2.0.4-5.4.17.2
BM> rpms in Centos 5 update. So I tried to build openoffice
BM> 2.0.4-5.4.17.2 (sans language packs) on a x86_64 from RH 5
Hi!
I'm having a problem with compiz on a Centos5-machine (I know compiz
is only "Beta", but it looks s cool). When I use the gconf-editor
to edit settings of the plugins (for instance
/apps/compiz/plugins/scale/allscreens/options/initiate_edge) they work
as expected, they get written to the
Hi!
I've got a fileserver currently running under 5.3 with the
/home-partition being an XFS-filesystem. I use the kmod-xfs from
extras. It works great ;)
Now: as I understand it from the release-notes the 5.4 kernel has XFS
already built-in. Right? Or is it just a kmod-package ("technology
previ
>>>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:36:06 -0700
>>>>> "AY" == Akemi Yagi wrote:
AY> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Bernhard Gschaider
AY> wrote:
>> I've got a fileserver currently running under 5.3 with the
>> /home-pa
Hi!
I want to test some software on my CentOS 5 machine that is not too
happy with the system python (2.4). So when I install a python to my
machines I want it to be
a) clean: in other words it should be a RPM
b) safe: it should not remove the system-python (in order not to break
the system-
>>>>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:24:24 -0500
>>>>> "JP" == Jim Perrin wrote:
JP> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Bernhard Gschaider
JP> wrote:
>> a) clean: in other words it should be a RPM b) safe: it should
>>
> On Tue, 27 May 2008 21:51:07 -0400
> "WLM" == William L Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
WLM> On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 17:19 -0700, MHR wrote:
>> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Robert Spangler
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Can I use one out of the Fedora's
Hi!
When trying to prepare a workstation with (so that the real "yum
upgrade" doesn't have to download the packages)
yum upgrade --upgradeonly
it fails with these messages:
Error: Missing Dependency: libegroupwise-1.2.so.12 is needed by package
evolution
Error: Missing Dependency: libgtkhtml
Hi!
I know that the nvidia-drv-x11-package is from RPMForge, but I thought
I might mention it here.
I have a machine with a NVidia-card and because of the ease of use I
use the rpmforge-package for that.
After upgrading the problem was that during rebooting as soon as the
machine hit the RHGB (
Hi!
I'm using CentOS 5.1 (x86_64) machines which authenticate using
LDAP. At the start of booting I get messages like this:
udevd[1158]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server
ldaps://ldap.server.example.com/: Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[1158]: nss_ldap: reconnecting to LDAP server...
udev
>>>>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:17:56 -0400 (EDT)
>>>>> "MAJ" == Marko A Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MAJ> On Tue, June 24, 2008 3:08 pm, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I know that the nvidia-drv-x1
>>>>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:25:11 -0500
>>>>> "JH" == Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JH> Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
>> Hi! When trying to prepare a workstation with (so that the
>> real "yum upgrade"
, 2008 3:18 PM To:
J> centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with
J> nvidia-drv-x11 when upgrading to CentOS 5.2
J> On Tue, June 24, 2008 3:08 pm, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I know that the nvidia-drv-x11-packag
Thanks for the answers
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:51:37 -0400
> "MS" == Meenoo Shivdasani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MS> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Johnny Hughes
MS> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There is a BUG with nss_ldap:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
I noticed, that the directory
/usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5/plugins/
is NOT created on CentOS 5.2. Therefor for instance the flash-plugin
is not installed for the new firefox
(After manually creating the directory and setting the right symlink
it works all right)
_
>>>>> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:03:26 +0100
>>>>> "KS" == Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
KS> Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
>> I noticed, that the directory /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5/plugins/
>> is NOT created on Cen
Judging from the frequency of my messages here one could think that
I'm too stupid to upgrade a workstation to 5.2 (but the servers I've
tried work without problem)
OK. The problem: I've tried to upgrade a 5.1-x86_64-workstation to 5.2.
During the upgrade immidiatly after (according to the
/var/l
>>>>> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:49:22 +0100
>>>>> "KS" == Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
KS> Bernhard Gschaider wrote: Also, sitewide plugins are better in
KS> /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/ which comes from the xulrunner rpm.
&g
OK. I managed to beat the machine into submission. But a slight
incertainty remains.
>>>>> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:34:26 +0200
>>>>> "BG" == Bernhard Gschaider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BG> Judging from the frequency of my messages here one c
>>>>> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:39:22 -0400
>>>>> "WLM" == William L Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
WLM> On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 20:27 +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to say: "Hey RPM, have a loo
>>>>> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:53:16 +0200
>>>>> "BG" == Bernhard Gschaider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:39:22 -0400
>>>>> "WLM" == William L Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
gt; ambiguities below.
WLM> On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 11:58 +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
>>
>> Sorry. Stupid question again: and if I find inconsistencies,
>> then the
WLM> Keep in mind that *some* inconsistencies are expected. Local
WLM> co
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marko
J> A. Jennings Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 3:18 PM To:
J> centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with
J> nvidia-drv-x11 when upgrading to CentOS 5.2
J> On Tue, June 24,
>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:40:38 -0700
>>>>> "M" == MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
M> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Bernhard Gschaider
M> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi John!
>>
>> As I unde
Hi!
I'm justing in the process of setting up a new fileserver for our
company. I'm installing CentOS 5.3 (64 bit) on it.
One of the "problems" with it is that it has a 3.5TB filesystem for
the user data which I formatted during setup as an ext3. Now my
experience with our current fileserver is t
Thank you all for your quick answers (you guys must have started
typing BEFORE I hit the Send-button).
The general consensus seems to be "If you can start anew: use
XFS". This leaves one question: as the XFS is not included in the
standard-kernel which option offers the "smoothest sailing"
(espec
Hi!
I have the following problem: I have a server (CentOS 5.3 x86_64) on
which I want to install a virtual Xen-machine (CentOS 5.3 x86_64), I
ssh from my workstation (Centos 5.3 x86_64 do you see the pattern ;) )
to that server and start the virt-manager. I create a new Guest
(Paravirtualiuz
Thanks for the replies so far.
>>>>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:06:08 +0100
>>>>> "MMG" == Marcelo M Garcia wrote:
MMG> Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have the following problem: I have a server (CentOS 5.3
Thanks to everyone who took the time to answer in this thread.
I'm just writing this message to give this thread some closure and am
not expecting any answers
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
> "IM" == Ian Murray wrote:
>> > This (and other replies) lead me to two possib
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:47:07 +0200
>>>>> "BG" == Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
BG> Thanks to everyone who took the time to answer in this thread.
BG> I'm just writing this message to give this thread some closure
BG> and
>>>>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:43:57 +0300
>>>>> "PK" == Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
PK> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 06:04:06PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider
PK> wrote:
>> >>>>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:47:07 +0200
>> &g
Hi!
Some weeks ago the "Running Xen"-book was recommended to me on this
list. A nice book, but it gave me crazy idea: One of the
recommendations (which sounds very reasonable to me) was to have
instead of a single file that serves as a disk-image to have to
files: one of them (which is mounted to
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:54:44 -0700
> "JRP" == John R Pierce wrote:
JRP> Mag Gam wrote:
>> At my university we have 50 computers in the lab. We would like
>> to use a scheduler to schedule our fluid models, and I was
>> wondering what is a good suggestion?
>>
J
Hi!
I've got a CentOS4.7-machine as a fileserver. The machine also serves
as the LDAP-server against which all regular users are
authenticated. The problem I am having is that the machine takes a
very long time to boot. Most of the services start up rather quick,
but three services take quite a l
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:25:55 -0400
> "FB" == Filipe Brandenburger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FB> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:17, Craig White
FB> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> add this to the bottom of /etc/ldap.conf
>>
>> timelimit 30 bind_timelimit 30 bind_policy soft
Hi!
During the last weeks I experienced some performance problems with a
large file-system on XFS basis. Sometimes for instance ls is
painfully. Immidiatly afterwards ls on the same directory is
immidiate. I used strace on this ls and found that during the first ls
the lstat-calls need approx 0.0
>>>>> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:59:02 -0400
>>>>> "RW" == Ross Walker wrote:
RW> On Apr 9, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Bernhard Gschaider
RW> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> During the last weeks I experienced some performance prob
ing myself before I do anything
about it).
I swear to god: I did not do anything else with the xfs_*-commands
than the stuff mentioned above
Bernhard
--- Begin Message ---
>>>>> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:59:02 -0400
>>>>> "RW" == Ross Walker wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:58:39 +0100
>>>>> "JP" == James Pearson wrote:
JP> Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
>> Before I'd try to defragment my whole filesystem (see attached
>> mail for whole story) I figured "Let's
)
Footnotes:
[1] PEBCAB: Problem exists between chair and keyboard
>>>>> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:54:53 +0200
>>>>> "BG" == Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
BG> Before I'd try to defragment my whole filesystem (see attached
BG> mail for whole story) I
42 matches
Mail list logo
