In addition to building GTK3, they would also have to update glib2, glibc,
atk, and roughly a dozen or more additional packages to support just
building base GNOME 3.
It would be a monumental change leaving them with a distribution that was
no longer CentOS.
Just adding my $.02 in-case it helps.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 15/08/2013 23:58, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So, what about redistribution of copies?
>>> learn the difference between trademarks and software licences
>>>
>> So, if you
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 16/08/2013 12:34, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> RedHat --> Production Systems, with paid-for support, something goes wrong
>> then I have some commercial comeback to get it fixed. High change control
&g
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.08.2013 14:07, schrieb Andrew Wyatt:
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Giles Coochey
> wrote:
> >>> While I agree that CentOS will always have support while it is
> community
> >> dr
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> I'm running a piece of network backup software called 'bacula', on a
> minimal CentOS 6.4 install.
> I got everything working pretty well, but there's one piece giving me some
> problem-- a component which gives status info via a GUI.
> In
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>
> Really? Are none of the trademark-restricted additions packaged into
> GPLed items? Or is redistributing the trademark OK as long as nothing
> is changed? If you could obtain a copy and didn't care about RNH,
> could you ship straigh
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Reindl Harald
> wrote:
> >
> >> Exactly my point. Everything is about derived works. So binaries
> >> cannot be exempt from the requirement that the work as a whole can
> >> only be distributed under a lice
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald
> wrote:
> >
> >>> redistribution of SOURCE.have you READ the GPL ?
> >>
> >> Please quote the section that you think exempts binaries
> >
> > *THE WHOLE GPL TALKS ABOUT SOURCE CODE DAMNED*
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 08/16/2013 03:12 PM, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
> > RedHat's trademarks are the only reason why you can't take the RedHat ISO
> > and distribute it to whomever you want.
>
> Not exactly. The aggregate collection,
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 11:37 AM, carlopmart wrote:
> On 17/08/13 12:03, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> > Hey there,
> >
> > CentOS is using what kernel? 2.x??
> > which was not designed to work with newer hardware but Fedora works fine
> > with it.
> > If you need specific functions like EMAIL WEB et
Try using the reboot=pci grub parameter.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Terre Porter wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I'm looking for help figuring out why I am having problems with shutting
> down a machine.
>
>
>
> I have tested the machine using Fedora 19 and Ubuntu 12 Live CD's and both
> power d
Thanks for this, looking forward to kicking the tires to see what they did
with GNOME 3.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/
>
> Go get it ( maybe consider using a mirror ), play with it, test it, and
> file reports. Dont use
close an app - that's awesome! (not)
Meh, this really should be labeled an alpha it has so many problems but I
guess it's easy enough to bootstrap their sources to spit out all of the
missing dependencies.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Alain Péan wrote:
> Le 11/12/2013 18:26,
Yes, there are many missing -devel packages. It's possible that they
didn't fit on the media though, I haven't connected the system to RedHat's
repositories.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 12/16/2013 01:27 PM, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> But, the bigger question is where it leaves us if
> they just decide to quit after assimilating most of the related
> systems under a build ecosystem that no one else can reproduce easily.
>
>
I don't expect that it would ever be necessary,
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Russell Miller wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2014, at 5:09 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
> wrote:
> >
> > That presumes that your conservative attitude is the majority opinion
> > though. Systemd is one of the features that I have been looking forward
> > to in CentOS 7 becaus
>
>
> Then that grey headed guy or gal
> gentlely leads the Q&A into a critical edge case that completely breaks
> the proposal.
When you do that to a certain developer you get banned from a certain G+
feed for make believe "personal attacks" because changing the conversation
is much simpler th
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
> > >>
> > This is an unfortunate problem in the community today, anyone who
> disagrees
> > with status-quo is "just an antique", it's
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 10:27:41AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > Scott Robbins wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 02:09:49PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> > >> On 08.07.2014 13:57, Scott Robbins wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Very tru
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
>
> On 07/08/2014 02:04 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > Steve Clark wrote:
> >> On 07/08/2014 12:55 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >>> On 07/08/2014 12:44 PM, Hal Wigoda wrote:
> You aren't old.
> >>> And I am a young 21. three times ov
systemv? Too soon?
On July 8, 2014 4:07:43 PM CDT, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>> On 07/08/2014 04:19 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Reindl Harald
>
>>> wrote:
> Unless you are offering to do that for me, for free, on all my
> systems,
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:00 PM, wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
> > On 07/09/2014 01:38 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> >> and (b) why you think an unpredictable daemon should be resurrected to
> >> continue its unpredictable behavior.
> >
> > I have had services that would reliably crash under certain
>
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:19 AM, wrote:
> William Woods wrote:
>
> Please stop top posting.
> >
> > On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >> William Woods wrote:
> >>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning
> >>> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clar
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:38 AM, wrote:
> Steve Clark wrote:
> > On 07/14/2014 11:26 AM, William Woods wrote:
> >> On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >>> William Woods wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Please stop top posting.
> On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:52 AM, wrote:
> Andrew Wyatt wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:38 AM, wrote:
> >
> >> Steve Clark wrote:
> >> > On 07/14/2014 11:26 AM, William Woods wrote:
> >> >> On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:19 AM, m
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Les Mikesell
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
> > >>
> >> Anyway, he also seems determined to see it all as black and white,
> rather
> >> than looking at the *much* larger set of bugs and vuln
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 12:02 -0500, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
>
> > 5.x is ancient and had its own set of flaws over its lifecycle.
>
> 1/3 of my servers use C 5.10, 2/3 use C 6.5. I use C 5.10 as my
> indivi
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 14:05 -0500, William Woods wrote:
>
> > On Jul 14, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> > > C 5 works well for me.
> > >
> > > Centos 5 Fan :-)
>
> > That is probably the most pointless comment you have m
28 matches
Mail list logo
