Re: [CentOS] RE: Largish filesystems [was Re: XFS install issue]

Just wondering if any one ever consider/use Coraid for massive storage under CentOS? http://www.coraid.com It seems like a very reasonable option.. comments ? I$ilon could also be a option for petabytes storage http://www.isilon.com/products/index.php [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To start I wish

[CentOS] sendmail and spam

Hi, What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ? On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam. Looking around I found new players, well some I did not know then and they are very interesting..

Re: [CentOS] Chroot'ed SSH

easy way to get sshd ver.5 installed on centos5 http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-ssh/stable/SRPMS/ rpmbuild --rebuild openssh-5.0p1-1.el5.hrb.src.rpm worked for me .. but honestly, has excited has I was, I do not find chroot to be that useful .. if I remember correctly, the chroot directory has

[Fwd: Re: [CentOS] School Server Setup]

Hi Harry, Has much has I like Centos and RH for big sophisticated setup, it would not be my first choice for your project. For 25 systems and if you want this done without spending to much time, Clarkconnect would by my first choice for server side OS (#2 would be SME). For me CentOS x64 is

Re: [CentOS] 5.1 to 5.2 upgrade - perfectly smoothe

the only problem I had was with ldap. the fix is at http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/nss_ldap/5/x86_64/ without this update, I am not sure anyone can have a stable 5.2 on ldap it all my problems with Mailscanner (email), perl and webmin thanks, Tim Alberts wrote: I run 3 servers and I upgr

[CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?

Hi, I notice other users reporting problems with NFS lockd and was under the impression the problem was solve with "kernel-2.6.18-92.1.13.el5". I am runing x86_64 versions of "kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus" ( i need XFS) on my nfs server and "kernel 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5" on my clients. I

[CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ? (update)

removing all my centos+ kernels and using kmod on top of redhat kernels fix my nfs lock problem. thanks, alain Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Filipe Brandenburger > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:44, Alain Terriault >&g

Re: [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ? (update)

Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Do you mean you replaced the CentOS-Plus kernel with a kernel from RedHat? > no > Or are you using a CentOS-Base (instead of Plus) kernel now? > yes .. apologies for the confusion > When you replaced it, did you upgrade it as well? What was the version > of the

[CentOS] centos.plus kernels

hi, I experienced 3 problems that i am 99% sure related to kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus.x86_64.rpm #1 on a nfs server problem : constantly appearing on all my machines "lockd:

[CentOS] openssh version 5

Greetings, It just strike me that they are no available version of OpenSSH version 5 or any available versions with the ChrootDirectory option. Any reason why ? Thanks, ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/li

[CentOS] XFS + LVM

Hi, I see old post on the web discouraging the use of XFS on top of LVM, mostly seems to be driver problems .. in any case it was not reassuring. I was wondering, with current drivers and kernels (CentOS5), if they are any issue doing so. I have no real need for LVM, I am just use to it and occa

RE: [CentOS] sendmail and spam .. thanks

Thanks, This is a very useful mailing list and CentOS works like charm on PowerEdge hardware. Merci, alain ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

RE: [Fwd: Re: [CentOS] School Server Setup]

Little substance .. I have live and still working system with .. - Centos with +100 users, ldap (LAM), sendmail (or postfix), web, samba, netatalk, dhcp .. all with certificates on a bunch of dell 1950 and MD1000. Because it is scalable, stable 24/7 and for 100 users+ worth all the time spending