On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> I just did a Google Image search for "centos 5 wallpaper" and found
>> the "old" CentOS 5 background. It was 1024x768 so it was perfect for me.
>
> I still have a couple systems not upgraded, what is the file name of the
> "old" wallpaper
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 4-6-2009 5:55 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
>> My question is who updates those drivers, as the v173.08 Nvidia drivers are
>> now almost a year old? Would there be any other good repo with more current
>> drivers suitable for use with
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:22 AM, fred smith
wrote:
> I finally, as someone else suggested, downloaded the desired kernel file
> from one of the mirrors, did "rpm -uvh" on it followed by "yum -y update"
> and it all applied without complaint.
Please do NOT install the kernel with the -Uvh option.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> Follow on: I read the 5.3 Release Notes (again) and the NTFS "Tips
> and Tricks" on the Wiki (again) and started following the
> instructions, again. I am not sure whether it was trying to install
> the NTFS packages again, or the shutdown l
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On 4/11/09, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> Good to hear things are working again. When you boot to a new kernel,
>> dkms kicks in and rebuilds kernel modules automatically. You
>> probably saw some delay during the first boot
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> Les: Years ago (before CentOS 5?), I did have a FAT partition like
> that. The current SW available for CentOS, for NTFS, has been doing a
> great job for me. I don't recall having this problem, with previous
> CentOS upgrades, and it was ea
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> interestingly, I can no longer reproduce this failure myself on a recently
> upgraded centos-5.3 box using mock-0.9.14 (from epel).
So, we can use mock-0.9.14 from EPEL on CentOS 5.3 (with the current
CentOS yum) without any issue?
Akemi
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> So, we can use mock-0.9.14 from EPEL on CentOS 5.3 (with the current
>> CentOS yum) without any issue?
>
> of course. (what would make you think otherwise?)
Well, I heard from one of the CentOS devs
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Terry Hull wrote:
> I’m trying to build a 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 kernel without kabichk. I have
> downloaded the sources, installed the compiler, etc and ran the following
> command
>
> rpmbuild -bb --target=`uname -m` --without kabichk --with baseonly
> --without d
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Terry Hull wrote:
>
> On 4/14/09 3:12 AM, in article
> bfa89a870904140112s490d223ch440cf009d20e8...@mail.gmail.com, "Akemi Yagi"
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Terry Hull wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Terry Hull wrote:
> It may also be of note that I've done this on two separate machines. I
> guess I'm a little puzzled by this. It must be true that very few people
> actually have to turn off kABI, or this would have come up before. I know
> that I can turn o
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> nothing sinister here was not getting HDMI sound on my motherboard,
> did some searching
> seemed like I needed to update to alsa 1.0.19 so I tried it. compiling
> from source. Ran into compile errors so
> I wanted to backout to the defaul
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> I never thought of that given that they come from the plus repo. So its only
>> a matter of time then before it appears for the 5.3 kernels... If I have
>> time this
>> weekend, I'll yank an srpm down from the 5.2
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Gordon McLellan wrote:
> I'm experiencing lots of kernel errors when reading or writing to a
> disk that is part of an mdadm softraid-5 array. Since originally
> detecting this problem, I have isolated it to one disk, but I'm not
> sure what the cause of the error
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 8:34 AM, JohnS wrote:
> I don't reacall any one really saying if there was indeed a fix put into
> that PAE or any Specific Kernel for CentOS. Can the CentOS Kernel
> Builder Comment Please?
>
> Also See: +1
> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/VMWare_Server?highlight=(1
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Beartooth wrote:
>
> I have an ASUS EeePC 701 (with 2GB of RAM and an 8 GB card), on
> which I've installed CentOS on the hard-drive-plus-card. But it can't
> even use my eth0.
>
> Anybody know what drivers (for wireless as well as ethernet cable) I
> nee
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
> The iphone runs UNIX natively underneath, so if you jailbreak it you
> get access to a full openssh install as well as a bash shell. There
> are also ssh terminal apps available from the Apple App store, though
> I have not used them so I cann
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
wrote:
> CentOS Developers, could you please build the RPMs for the latest
> version 2.0.0.21, and investigate why the issue with 2.0.0.19 not
> being present in the "updates" repo 5.3 happened, and why the new
> package 2.0.0.21 was not rebuil
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Can someone help me figure out what I have to do about to get update to
> work with this happening:
> --> Processing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime for package: httpd
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.i38
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:17 AM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 03:52 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> Run a 'yum clean all' and try again. Please see:
>>
>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3613
>>
>> Akemi / toracat
> ---
> Let the Re
2011/5/11 Rainer Traut :
> You could also ask on the elrepo mailinglist.
> There was a request not too long ago.
>
> http://lists.elrepo.org/pipermail/elrepo/2011-April/000637.html
>
> So maybe you can install centos 5.4, then install their newer aacraid
> driver and then you can update the kernel
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> • 2011-01-13: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.6
>> • 2010-11-10: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
>>
>> 2 months elapsed from release of 6.0 before 5.6 and more than another month
>> before 4.9
>>
>
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:41 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2011, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> But, yes, there are a few missing srpms even as of now ...
>
> bug number please
Jeff_S knows. He filed a bunch at upstream bugzilla requesting the
release of mis
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:31 PM, wrote:
> On May 12, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
>
>> CentOS chose another. Personally I happen to
>> agree with CentOS' choice here.
>
> +1
I think *both* distros made the right choice. :)
CentOS and SL handle security updates differently. CentOS's ch
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
> the centosplus postfix is being built now, will be released asap
> Next time, use bugs.centos.org for reminding us to fix it too ;)
So, perhaps this one will help?
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4866
Filed about 3 weeks ago but it has had
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Eric Viseur wrote:
> CentOS has the complete RHEL binary compatibility, which SL doesn't always
> have. Can be a decisive thing, sometimes.
Just to be more precise ... No clones (including CentOS) have
*complete* RHEL binary compatibility. Both CenOS and SL *aim*
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Was installing centos 6 and found this:
> ./CentOS-5.6-x86_64/CentOS/gtk+-1.2.10-56.el5.i386.rpm
> ./CentOS-5.6-x86_64/CentOS/gtk+-devel-1.2.10-56.el5.i386.rpm
> ./CentOS-5.6-x86_64/CentOS/gtk+-devel-1.2.10-56.el5.x86_64.rpm
> ./Cent
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 7/13/2011 12:31 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Possible approach would be NX (Nomachine) or FreeNX client/server.
>> Connection is via SHH but you get full GUI Access and sound and (local?)
>> printer.
>> NX server is easier to install
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone packaged the freenx server for 6.x yet?
>>
> aTrpms has them.
It looks as if the stuff in ATrpms is not being maintained. The nx
package required by freenx-server/client is dated 2007 (spec file) a
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Frank Cox wrote:
>>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:36:08 +0200
>>> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>>
Gnome System Monitor used to crash on RHEL Beta. Have you ran update as
soon as you installed? It is mos
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Baptiste AGASSE
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've a little problem with CentOS 6 and EFI on Dell Poweredge R510...
> My Logical disk (hardware raid) is a little bit greated than 9TB, so i must
> use EFI in order to see the whole disk space and boot on it, but my box don't
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>>
>> > > On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:52 AM, Michel Donais wrote:
>>
>> > >> The version is CentOS-6.0-i386-bin-DVD.iso
>> > >> With each virtual machine I get this result at the beginning of the
>> > >> installation:
>> > >> "This kernel requi
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Markus Falb wrote:
>>> Announcement made but the updates are still missing. I just had a look
>>> on mirror.centos.org and I could not find it.
>From a Forum post this morning:
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=32234&start=0#forumpost1
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:29 PM, wrote:
>>> In later Fedora releases, GDM has become less and less functional:
>>> configurability has been removed, more so as releases occur. From my
>>> (known to be flaky) memory, that includes the ability to tu
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Mark wrote:
> When I created a CentOS VM (using VMWare WorkStation), I installed
> with the first DVD, and the disk partitioning and installation was all
> done automatically with almost no input required from me.
>
> The problem with this is that the /boot partiti
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 7/26/2011 10:46 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> I have reported the problem to VMware:
>>
>> http://communities.vmware.com/thread/309617
>
> Is this an artifact of offsetting the start of a partition for block
> ali
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Helmut Drodofsky
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX
>
> says: NX and FreeNX are only available for Centos 4 and 5
>
> Alternative?
nx/freenx for CentOS-6 is under development. You can follow the status here:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=45
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/02/2011 08:18 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 04:53:37AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>> The current testing version can
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Helmut Drodofsky
wrote:
> The rpms from ATrpms.net have not installed correct. E.g. I'm missing the
> entries for /etc/init.d/freenx-server or something like that.
The stuff at atrpms is not being maintained, and if I remember, the nx
package is old and yet labele
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> I have updated that web site. What is the path of the .ssh directory
>> that is giving you a problem? Does running restorecon on the directory
>> solve it?
>
2011/8/5 Peter Kjellström :
> Our X520 are still stable except for one recent problem, 2.6.18-238.9.1 ->
> 2.6.18-238.12.1 broke it quite bad. With 238.12.1 our servers start dropping
> all incomming packets after a while. Sanity can be (temporarily restored with
> a "ethtool --negotiate ethX").
>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could CentOS kernel keepers apply following patch on current kernel?
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95785/
(snip)
> Could this be applied on stock CentOS kernel so that I could return on
> un-customized kernel use?
Because
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Morten Stevens
wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:17:02 +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
>
>> The issue is a bug in vmxnet3 driver, which is not able to disable
>> LRO mode when the kernel is telling the driver to do so.
>> The patch for it applies on 2.6.32 kernels as well
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Matti Aarnio wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could CentOS kernel keepers apply following patch on current kernel?
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95785/
>
> (snip)
>
>> Co
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Matti Aarnio
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Could CentOS kernel keepers apply following patch on current kernel?
>
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>>> I have updated that web site. What is the path of the .ssh directory
>>> that is giving you a pro
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Matti Aarnio
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Could CentOS kernel keepers apply following patch on current kernel?
>>>> http://patchwork.ozl
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 08/26/2011 09:01 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>> The CentOS forum is pretty useless IMO
>
> The CentOS Forums are a very very good resource for many people and the
> people spending time managing and posting there are doing a very good
> job. I
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I'm not all that excited about using another repo.
(snip)
> I extracted the source for 2.6.32.46 and found the fs/hfsplus directory.
> The above files are present. I changed the makefile to the above.
>
> All the files compile - however I dont k
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Lee Perez wrote:
> Afternoon All,
>
> Just ran yum update and it burped on the following:
>
> Package xulrunner.i386 0:1.9.2.20-3.el5_7 set to be updated
> --> Processing Conflict: firefox conflicts xulrunner >= 1.9.2.19
>
> firefox-3.6.18-1.el5.centos.i386 from ins
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> On 09/20/2011 04:40 PM, John Doe wrote:
>> So apparently no "libXm.so.4" in base, repoforge or elrepo...
>
> There's a 32 bit version of openmotif in CentOS 5.7 x86_64.
Right, as Nicolas pointed out in his post, openmotif 32-bit is missing
in
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed CentOS 5.4 on a 64bit-server. It's the first time I
> work with this sort of hardware. Doing rpm -qa | sort | less shows that
> most of the packages seem to be installed twice: once for i386
> architecture, and then aga
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
>
> and i have a couple questions and observations. first, the entry for
> centosplus reads:
>
> "Popular packages from this repository include: postfix with database
> support, a r
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Martin Jungowski wrote:
> Been experimenting with CentOS 5.4 some more. In order to get my wireless
> card to work (Broadcom BCM4311) I need Broadcom's wl.ko driver (http://
> www.broadcom.com/support/802.11/linux_sta.php).
> I downloaded the 2.6.27 kernel source
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Tom Georgoulias
wrote:
> I have a python script that monitors the VMs on physical host servers
> running Xen, but the script doesn't work properly on a server I just
> built with KVM. The script runs as a non-root user and simply gathers
> some details on the sta
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Todd Cary wrote:
> I am obviously missing something since a cat of the repo file shows it
> disabled and I still get the same errors.
>
> [testing]
> name=CentOS-$releasever - Testing
> arch=$basearch&repo=testing
> baseurl=http://dev.centos.org/centos/$releasever
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Nicholas L. Soms wrote:
> Dear collegues!
>
> I've got one question about drbd-kmdl packages.
> As I can see at
> $ rpm -qp --qf "%{DESCRIPTION}" kmod-drbd-8.0.16-5.el5_3.i686.rpm
> This package provides the drbd kernel modules built for the Linux
> kernel 2.6.18-1
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Nicholas L. Soms wrote:
>> Dear collegues!
>>
>> I've got one question about drbd-kmdl packages.
>> As I can see at
>> $ rpm -qp --qf "%{DESCRIPTION}" kmod-drbd-
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
>>No, it is a kernel version independent, kABI-tracking kernel module.
>>So, it should survive each kernel update. No need for rebuilding. (It
>>is different from drbd-kmdl)
>
> Akemi,
> Funny, there was just a thread on the extra repo's dr
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Martin Jungowski wrote:
> I'll try the wireless module next. Could you tell me what exactly is
> different about a realtime kernel compared to a non-realtime kernel? Is
> it just the scheduling?
I think that the best source of information is at the MRG web site:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Martin Jungowski wrote:
> Bad news. Just like my self-compiled 2.6.25 and 2.6.27 kernels my laptop
> froze with your kernel and the wl.ko module, too. It didn't kernel panic
> and it lasted significantly longer than with 2.6.18 but it still froze in
> the end.
>
>
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Nicholas L. Soms wrote:
> OK, thank you!
>
> One more question.
> Does anyone have the same problem - when installing drbd-kmdl package via
> yum, madwifi packages needs to remove. May be I missed something, but I also
> need madwifi packages =)
There is some conf
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:13 AM, wrote:
>> why dkms?
>> use nvidia-x11-drv-173xx and kmod-nvidia-173xx from elrepo, the kmod is
>> kabi-tracking.
>
> That's the one I think I'm using. Somehow, when I did my most recent
> update, to kernel 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5, or whenever it did an X update, I
>
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:37 PM, wrote:
>> If you do not have any other dkms-dependent packages, you should
>> remove all dkms-xxx.
>
> Mmmm... I was afraid to do that, not being sure what else it loads.
> However, if I rpm -qa | grep dkms, I only see dkms itself.
In that case, you can safely
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:56 PM, wrote:
>> ls -l `find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko`
>
> How 'bout find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko -ls?
> 30965907 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 Mar 18 09:48
> /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.2.1.el5/weak-updates/nvidia.ko ->
> /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Susan Day wrote:
> Hi;
> I have an old version of Python (2.4.3) and I'm trying to upgrade (to 2.6);
> however, when I try
> yum upgrade python
> it tells me that it's already got the latest and greatest...presumably of
> 2.4.3. I've tried
> yum list python
> and i
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Susan Day wrote:
>>
>> "Where can I get the latest version of XyZ.rpm for CentOS? I cannot
>> find it anywhere."
>> (
>> http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-472ce8446ebcfc82ca1800f775ba0e629ac835c7
>> )
> Well that states that the latest "stable version" is su
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a CentOS 5.4 box and am trying to use it to control either
> of the two old cameras we've got, one being Nikon Coolpix 990 and the
> other Nikon Coolpix 995. Accessing either I get the following message:
>
> ---
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> Is the camera set to the PTP mode? Try running 'tail -f
>> /var/log/messages' while connecting the camera and see how it is being
>> recognized.
>
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> Looking good. Now what do you get with the command:
>>
>> gphoto2 --auto-detect
>>
>> Akemi
> [antw...@bepstein][~/scratch] gphoto2 --auto-detect
&
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> [antw...@bepstein][~/scratch] gphoto2 --capture-image
>
> *** Error ***
> An error occurred in the io-library ('Could not claim the USB
> device'):
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:57 PM, brick wrote:
> Hi
> I plam to install R statistic package. Does CentOS5.4 provide R statistic
> package by yum? If not , how can I add it? Thanks
> brick
R is available from the EPEL repository.
Akemi
___
CentOS mailin
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> I have applied a patch to the spec for a digium srpm,
> dahdi-linux-kmod-2.2.1.1-1_centos5.2.6.18_164.15.1.el5.src.rpm
> and have what I thought was all I needed for deps:
(snip)
> Anyone know what I might be doing wrong?
Instead of build
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:14 PM, James Bensley wrote:
>> What is this supposed to be Mike? I can't get to the site, eventually
>> it times out?
> It is spam.Either Mike spammed the list, or he has a virus.
Or spammer used a forged 'From' ad
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Barry Brimer wrote:
> Quoting Matt :
>
>> Which Fedora release is the CentOS 5.x kernel based on? I am wanting
>> to know which Fedora rpm's I would have the best luck installing on
>> CentOS 5.x 64 bit.
>
> Fedora Core 6. Please understand that FC6 is no longer
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Brunner, Brian T.
wrote:
>
> I solemnly puke upon people who break things and call it progress. Get
> ye to Redmond.
>
> I upgraded Centos3.8 to Centos5.4; smbmount is gone. Mounting a WinXP
> share requires a new instantiation of the old command
>
> smbmount \\\
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Tsuyoshi Nagata
wrote:
> Will CentOS5.5 include this upstream fix?
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0301.html
> -Tsuyoshi
Yes, it is part of the forthcoming CentOS 5.5.
Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cen
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Eduardo Grosclaude
wrote:
> Has anyone succesfully compiled a PAPI+perfctr-enabled kernel? I've
> been mixing and matching instructions from the PAPI distribution and
> those from CentOS wiki to no avail.
You might want to read through this Forum thread:
https://
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:28 PM, wrote:
> I want to upgrade a 5.4 box with the 2.618 kernel to a shiny new 2.6.32
> kernel. Anyone done it? Is it possible? Are there gotcha's to watch out for?
>
> Any advice is appreciated. A link to a decent howto would be awesome.
You did not tell us why you wa
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 6:49 AM, JohnS wrote:
> There is of one place that has a RT Kernel if you want to try it so
> maybe that person will post a link to this thread for you.
Are you referring to me, John? :)
You are welcome to provide the link as far as it is stated that they
are for testing
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On May 10, 2010, at 8:53 AM, JohnS wrote:
>> You say efficiency loss. That could mean anything from the power
>> input
>> down to the kernel. It looks like that can be determined by oprofile
>> and latencytop. Latencytop will give you the
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:00 AM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:31 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
>> > Oprofile will show where those precious latencies timings are being
>> > used. It of course adds lat
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Brunner, Brian T.
wrote:
> It answered that question (thanks!) and uncovered another:
>
> Has anybody run CentOS 5 with the rt kernel that Akemi Yagi has built?
>
> If so, what modules etc have to be updated to use it? (this is asking,
> has
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> In fact centos already makes i586 kernels for centos5. I wouldn't be
> surprised if they did the same for centos6.
Well, CentOS provides i586 kernels for CentOS-4 but not -5.
Akemi
___
CentOS maili
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:05 PM, wrote:
> Let me start by saying that no, I can't get a new card for my user.
No problem with that.
> So, I've got the 96 nvidia driver. I've rebuilt it several times before,
> and Nvidia's installer's always worked fine. Actually, I have the 73 on my
> system, a
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Ron Loftin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 16:34 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> mark wrote:
>> Akemi wrote:
>> So, at this point, we've given up - his machine wasn't on a UPS, and given
>> the power in this building, there's a high probability of a surge, and
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, wrote:
>> I have an email form that worked fine until now. For some reason, if I
>> send
>> an email to an email address at a domain that I control, I can receive the
>> email TTW no problem. However, if I try and push it to, for example, this
>> gmail account,
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Aniruddha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've read some posts in the forums which seems to indicate that not
> every CentOS version is well supported. Is it possible to install
> CentOS 5.5 on a server and only apply security updates for 7 years? Or
> is the preferred way to up
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> since I upgraded from CentOS x86_64 5.4 to 5.5, I noticed that Firefox
> has become significantly slower on GMail (or Google Apps Mail).
>
> The page becomes slow to scroll as soon as there are more than a few
> mails in a conver
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> RedHat (and thus CentOS) backports esentual drivers and patches. Even
> though the kernel version is 2.6.18 (CentOS/RHEL 5), it contains bits
> and pieces from newer kernels. There is also the elrepo repository,
> which contains a pile of
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 8:22 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
> You omit mentioning that (from tracking latencies to
> appearing) the CentOS site, wiki, MLs, CentOS' planet are all
> regularly trawled by major search engines. The Forum and the
> bug tracker are also indexed but less often.
Earlier last y
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 3:14 PM, John Thomas
wrote:
> 00:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation nForce3 250Gb
> AC'97 Audio Controller (rev a1)
It is possible that your problem is related to this bug:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4335
( sound and system problems in CentOS 5.5
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:02 AM, David Mansfield wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I'm trying to rebuild the kvm SRPM (kvm-83-164.el5_5.9.src.rpm)
> on a centos 5.5 x86_64 and it's failing with the message:
>
> error: Failed build dependencies:
> kernel-devel-x86_64 = 2.6.18-194.el5 is needed by kvm-83-
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Eric B. wrote:
> I've got CentOS 5.3 installed as a Xen client installed. I've recently been
> trying to install TrueCrypt on the VM, but am having miserable troubles with
> the Fuse kernel module.
>
> To date, I've installed the following packages:
> yum install
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 07:47:40AM -0700, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>> 2. Edit /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
>>
>> DEVICE=eth0
>> HWADDR=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
>> ONBOOT=yes
>
> Don't you need a
> BRIDGE=br0
> line here?
Yes. Some more u
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> I have a CentOS 5.5 system that is dual-boot CentOS 5.5 and Windows XP
> w/SP3 formatted with NTFS (for the Windows partition, of course). I
> have installed fuse (ntfs-3g) to allow read/write access to the NTFS
> partition from CentOS.
>
>
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Matthew Valentino wrote:
> I'm relatively new to CentOS. I ordered a VPS and requested CentOS 5.5. As I
> was installing packages, I noticed that some of the versions are pretty old
> - for example, Postfix is v 2.3 in the repo (and, according to Postfix's
> website
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:42 AM, sync wrote:
> Hi, guys:
>
> I attempt to compile a kernel on CentOS 5.3 i386 which is installed in the
> Virtualbox machine,
> and its kernel version is 2.6.18-128.el5 ,the new kernel version is
> 2.6.34.1
>
> All make procedure is running ok.
> I can generate ini
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Mark wrote:
> I have an Everex laptop (ick, but it was super cheap) that has an
> Atheros wireless NIC in it, but I can't seem to get it to connect to
> my wireless in-home LAN. Here's what I've done so far (that isn't
> working) - any suggestions?
Have you looke
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> Have you looked at these CentOS wiki articles?
>>
>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless
>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/NetworkManager
901 - 1000 of 1365 matches
Mail list logo
