On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why won't the installer let me choose XFS for my partitions?
The distro kernel (thus installer CD) does not have xfs support.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://list
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Alan Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 03/05/2008, Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The new router hardware has an Attansic L1 Gigabit Ethernet adapter, which
> the internet tells me is supported from kernel 2.6.21..
> >
> > Any chance of the Cen
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Morten Nilsen wrote on Sat, 03 May 2008 16:02:34 +0200:
>
> > Please consider adding xfs support.. It doesn't please me to run things
> > on ext3..
>
> Oh, it doesn't please you ... well, then ... ;-)
>
> It's in the Cen
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:53 AM, David Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> We have a user who needs to do some work with PAPI, which requires the
> perfctr patch applied to the kernel proper. Before I do that work here, I
> wanted to ask the list if anyone knows of a repo where such k
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have the following entries, below, in today's log file (for yesterday,
> 10th May).
>
> - yum Begin
>
>
> Packages Installed:
>lzo.i386 1.08-4.2.el5.rf
>lib
2008/4/19 Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> I normally only release kernels for CentOS Plus with the same numbers and at
> the same times as the upstream kernels.
>
> Since I did screw this up, I will release a new version as soon as I can
&g
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 6:39 AM, Martyn Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:10 PM, js <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Maybe, because XFS seems to be important, is it possible to build xfs
> right
> > after the kernel src build?
> >
> > Is this far more longer than on
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Doug Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Humor turned off for a minute, completely and honestly, can someone
> explain to me *why* this is the etiquette here? In every fashion, I
> find it sooo much harder to follow. Does it date back to some dead text
> based ma
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Carol Anne Ogdin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jumping in late here: I sincerely wish that this list was maintained on any
> of the quality "bulletin board" or "Forum" tools. It would reduce my eMail
> load, allow me to zoom in on just the issues of interest to me
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Matt Hyclak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 07:54:26AM -0700, Carol Anne Ogdin enlightened us:
>> Thanks, Johnny, for your comments.
>>
>> Can you post some URLs for CentOS forums you mentioned in your reply? I've
>> searched high-and-low with
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I love alpine. It works with UTF-8 so you can read spam in the original
> Hebrew or Chinese, but it's text-only so you avoid NSFW images. You get
> foreign language practice in an HR-acceptable manner. Woohoo!
Yes, alpine
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Barry Brimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there plans to release kernel-2.6.9-67.0.15.plus.c4.i586.rpm ??
>
> Thanks,
> Barry
I am sure Mr. Hughes will add those missing kernels shortly.
Are you currently running the 2.6.9-67.0.xx i586 kernel ? Multiple
peop
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Timothy Kesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm trying tio install WLAN - USB - Stick Netgear WG111v3.
>
> ndiswrapper -i wg111v3
>
> works.
>
> I can see ndiswrapper -l
>
>wg111v3: driver installed
>device (0846:4260) present
>
> But a
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:33:53 +0200, Daniel de Kok wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Jerry Geis
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I want to put this on my desktop that is running 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5.
>> Is
>> there a way or do I just wave to use 2.6.24 or 25.
>
> yum install kmod-kvm
>
> s
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Nicholas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For the Realtek drive maybe you can try using
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/realtekr1000
Realtek drivers can be found in the CentOS wiki:
http://wiki.centos.org/HardwareList#head-851e245f4f537add3de9c3c6a6d686771fb01bfa
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have limited experience with iptables and would love some guidelines. Any
> pointers
> would be greatly appreciated!
This CentOS wiki may help:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/IPTables
Akemi
_
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Tom Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, so I need to bring up a new vm and was wondering what the state of vm
> kernels for centos. I have read this http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189
> about the tick divider but it wasn't clear what the best step forward i
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Tom Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> OK, so I need to bring up a new vm and was wondering what the state of v
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running CentOS 5.1 with all updates, and the xen kernel. For some
> reason the OS is not seeing the full amount of ram.
> #uname -a
> Linux CentOS-VM-A 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5xen #1 SMP Tue May 20 10:03:27 EDT 2008
> x86_64
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> Wonder if this is related to a known issue with the xen kernel.
>>
>> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=12491&forum=38
>>
>>
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Kenneth Burgener
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a Tyan S3870 (K855A) motherboard which I would like to perform a burn
> in test with. lm_sensors needs a kernel module compiled to be support this
> motherboard's sensors.
>
> The instructions, for compiling the
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jerry Geis wrote:
>>
>> What went wrong?
>
> Also, I can see you are still doing your old "ask on the list rather than
> actually work out what the problem is" trick :/
Jerry,
You have been posting a lot of questions an
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jerry,
>>
>> You have been posting a lot of questions and getting a lot of help as
>> well. Maybe it's time for you to give something back to the
>> community? For example, it would be nice if you could respond to the
>>
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Ryan Lewon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 01:48:07AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>> Gopinath Achari wrote:
>>
>> I note that package is from the rpmforge repository (since its name
>> includes .rf.), so you could add support for rpmforge to you
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:50 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chuck wrote:
>> I am using the CPAN version of CGI:
>
> But why? The perl package in CentOS provides CGI.
...And here is my favorite quote. Jim Perrin explains why CPAN should
be avoided:
http://lists.centos.org/piperm
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've just installed CentOS 5.1 x64, from the 1st CD (minimal installation)
> and then tried to install Apache, but keep on getting this error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum install apache
Please try 'yum install h
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have a look at these pages:
>
> http://www.bofh-hunter.com/2008/06/13/3ware-performance-in-centos/
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444759
>
> I'm comparing the default 5.1 64bit kernel with the patched one po
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Bart Schaefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Bart Schaefer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Apparently the justification for this is that it makes Firefox work
>> better on PDAs and other small-screen devices. Firefox3 introduced
>> "a
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 6:21 AM, Grzesiek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why standard Centos 5.2 kernel does not have a module "pata_via." I
> have an old motherboard and IDE drive. The standard kernel does not
> work. Kernel include a module "pata_via" only in centosplus. It is a
> bug?
pata_via is
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:49 AM, Kevin Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone point me at a yum repository containing a CentOS 5 version of
> bacula?
Check out the EPEL repository. Please see (near the bottom):
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
_
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:02 AM, James Marcinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I recently installed CentOS 5 and was trying to locate the kernel-smp
> packages but without success. Have these packages been removed from the
> distro or renamed? Does anyone know how many processors the
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Alex White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Perrin wrote:
>>
>> I don't think he did it intentionally, so how's about we all forgive
>> and forget, or turn the other cheek, or whatever else you wish to do
>> just this once.
>>
>> YES I realize the humor involved in
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Sorin Srbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And who might this "revered" Jim Perrin be? Obviously he seems to be some kind
> of big cheese, but what does he do etc?
He certainly is. Jim sweeps the floors for CentOS.
___
Cen
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:18 AM, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MHR wrote:
>
>> I thought it might be a feature of the lists, or gmail, but I can't
>> find anything that explains it - the messages don't even show up in my
>> trash.
>
> I do see all of my own posts, so perhaps it is a feature of
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:29 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, for DKMS users it should auto recompile on Kernel Upgrade. For users of
> the Proprietary Nvidia Driver it will not. You will have to manually
> recompile it.
I have not done this for a while but you can automate the installat
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 11:59 PM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Akemi Yagi
> Once you find the way to get the installalation working without human
> intervention, you can put
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 09:55:03AM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> This is on a RHEL5.2 x86_64 system however.
>
> # rpm -qf --queryformat '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n'
> /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-t
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where do I get Yaz and libyaz package for CentOS 5?
Try the EPEL repository. See
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories for details
(near the bottom).
Akemi
_
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:46 PM, dnk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8-Jul-08, at 1:40 PM, Matt Hyclak wrote:
>
>> Installing xorg-x11-xauth is usually enough.
>>
>> Matt
>
> Yeah I added that one (xorg-x11-xauth), xfs (started), and yet when i run an
> app, no go.
>
> # ssh -Y [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Filipe Brandenburger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically the steps to configure rpmbuild to work on your machine are:
>
> $ mkdir -p ~/rpmbuild/{BUILD,RPMS,SOURCES,SPECS,SRPMS}
> $ echo '%_topdir %(echo $HOME)/rpmbuild' >~/.rpmmacros
>
> And then to rebuild a so
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am compiling a custom kernel. When I do a make oldconfig, and then
> make rpm, I get a kernel rpm. The problem is I am not getting the
> initrd image. Is this normal?
Please try following this wiki:
http://wiki.centos.org/How
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 5:57 AM, Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks
>
> Actually, I am using Redhat distribution. I though CentOS would be
> very similar to Redhat's kernel build.
>
> TIA
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL P
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 7-11-2008 4:17 PM Al Sparks spake the following:
>>
>> I was tasked with migrating a bunch of printer entries from one box to
>> another.
>>
>> What I did is I got a list of printer names along with IP addresses and
>> usi
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Kurt Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dag Wieers wrote:
>> If you actually looked at the CentOS wiki, you would have found this when
>> searching for madwifi:
>>
>>http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless
>>
>> which should help. If it doesn't, we'd
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 7-14-2008 3:14 PM Akemi Yagi spake the following:
>>> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/PrinterDefinitions
>>
>> If I'm not mistaken, the printconf command has been deprecated and is
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well it was that make rpm command that finally failed. And sudo was the
> problem. I got a message something like:
>
> Assuming that you are in /etc/sudoers
>
> And then asked for a password.
>
> Which password?
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:01 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Missing Dependency: gecko-libs = 1.9 is needed by package
> nspluginwrapper
>
> Something missing?
This is a known issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455601
Akemi
_
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Antti J. Huhtala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I just finished building a custom kernel from 2.6.18-53.1.21 source rpm
> - this time with ISA bus and ISAPNP support which I accidentally left
> out of my previous attempt.
> Unfortunately, this time I for
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found I have the following kernels installed last night:
>
> kernel-devel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5
> kernel-headers-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.centos.plus
> kernel-devel-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5
> kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5
> kernel-2.6.18-92.1.6.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Centosplus's priority was 1. I had totally forgotten a special kernel
> was in that repo and no, I don't have the kernel excluded in
> base/updates. I have since increased the priority of all Centos repos
> other than base t
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Manuel Reimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - My second question is about:
> http://www.cs.arizona.edu/people/justin/packagemanagersecurity/attacks-on-package-managers.html
Please read: http://planet.centos.org/
Akemi
__
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> Was it ever a part of Centos?
>>>
>>> Supposedly I need it and my colleague is providing me with an rpm, but
>>> he implies that 'seems to have been removed from Centos'
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Mag Gam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not an option at my university :-(
Then you can try the patched kernel offered by Johnny Hughes:
http://people.centos.org/~hughesjr/kernel/5/bz32/
Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
C
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> This is the first time I've ever used a mailing-list so bear with me :-)
>
> I've just got a new dedicated server from Hostik and they've installed
> CentOS 5.2 on the system (awesome!) and came pre-installed wit
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:25 PM, David Halik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>>
>> on 7-29-2008 11:41 AM David Halik spake the following:
>>>
>>> Hi all, I was just wondering when this update will trickle down into the
>>> Centos repo:
>>>
>>> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:14 PM, TechGuy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been trying to mount a windows file share so I can use it for
> remote storage particularly for my Deki Wiki attachments.
>
> Anyway, I seem to have a mount established by doing the following.
>
> 1. Added following line
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Is there anything special in the way of configuration that
> is required to enable a CentOS box to act as the point of
> origin for an http request routed to it via a SOCKS ssh
> link?
>
> I have researched this matter and the recommended
>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:12 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> - Original Message -
> | On 10/10/11 9:39 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> | > It looks like I am also having trouble with rsh on C6 ...
> | rsh was deprecated 10+ years ago, along with all the other r things...
> | they aren't even
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:12 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> Did you install just @core? I have done @core as described earlier with rsh
> and rsh-server and it just hangs so I'm missing something. On the
> workstation install it works using the exact same setup so I think I'm
> missing a pack
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>>> If absolute 100% binary compatibility is not required, but admin-level
>>> compatibility and source-level compatibility with upstream EL is,
>>> Scientific Linux is coveri
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 11/01/2011 04:50 PM, Digimer piše:
>> On 11/01/2011 01:46 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
>>> I have been reading the threads on here with great ernest about redhat
>>> making a move to throw off centos compilations.
>>
>> Having spoken to
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Phil Savoie wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Using the following to ssh into my home to get mail, I suddenly get this:
>
> ssh -o TCPKeepAlive=yes -o ServerAliveInterval=240 -L
> 110:192.168.100.108:110 phil@FQDN
> phil@FQDN's password:
> bind: Cannot assign requested address
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> Basically from what I gather, while Red Hat cannot restrict access to
> sources, they can restrict access to binaries. And since CentOS has a
> goal of binary compatibility with upstream, they are essentially left
> trying to hit an unknown ta
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Denniston, Todd A CIV
NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote:
> I have been seeing something for quite some time which has confused me
> considerably for over a year, perhaps one of you can help me understand.
>
> Assumed: rpm queries are against _a_ database.
> Assumed: da
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:56 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> What you are seeing is indeed odd. I see 'version 3.1' but not '3.2'
>> anywhere on the Summary line of bash. What is your kernel by the way?
>> uname
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 11/25/2011 07:35 PM, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
>> I'm looking into the RPMs changelog for the 6.0CR kernel, and didn't
>> find mention of receive packet steering (RPS) and receive flow steering
>> (RFS).
>> This was inc
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:19 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Is this available for CentOS and if so then where is this
> package located? Yum cannot find it in the configured
> repositories and I can seemingly only locate the
> Scientific Linux version through Google.
I suggest you file a request t
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> CentOS 5.7 x86_64. Lots of hosts NFS mounting a file system. All are
> configured identically (same LDAP servers, same DNS, same autofs config,
> same patches, etc). On some of them I see an NFS mount displaying a host
> name:
>
> % df -P |
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Emmett Culley wrote:
> I finally decided to install the CR repo on one of my CentOS 6 machines that
> I use as a host for some VMs (also running CentOS 6).
>
> Before updating the host I updated a VM that was not critical to test the
> process and was able to bo
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0800
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> Yes. The version of autofs must be different. It's a known issue and
>> has been resolved in later versions of autofs. Please see:
>>
>> https
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> On 12/05/2011 04:52 PM, Beartooth wrote:
>> I don't even know how to tell what kernel a prospective download
>> has. I do know that some of my other PCs list kernels with and without
>> "PAE" in the grub display.
>
> PAE means p
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:08 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>> On Monday, December 05, 2011 11:11:45 AM Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>> FYI, the ELRepo project now provides kernel-ml for EL6 [1] that
>>> includes a non-PAE kernel [2] (thanks t
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:03 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> On 12/05/2011 07:00 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I thought CentOS6 didn't come with a non-PAE kernel, more specifically,
the standard 32bit kernel requires PAE even if it doesnt have PAE i
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Georgi Meyer wrote:
> HI All,
>
> I am new to Linux so please bare with me.
>
> I am running Centos 5.7 with FreeNX-0.7.3-8.el5 and I have successfully
> installed everything and configured my first user. However when I log in
> using the NX Client I see the deskto
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:38 PM, lee_yiu_ch...@yahoo.com
wrote:
> In CentOS/6.2/os/x86_64/Packages (x86_64 main), there are those packages
> available:
>
> jasper-libs-1.900.1-15.el6.i686.rpm
> jasper-libs-1.900.1-15.el6.x86_64.rpm
> krb5-libs-1.9-22.el6.i686.rpm
> krb5-libs-1.9-22.el6.x86_64.r
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:53 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/21/11 9:00 AM, centos-announce-requ...@centos.org wrote:
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Release for CentOS-6.2 i386 and x86_64 (Karanbir Singh)
>>
>
> odd. I subscribe to CentOS-Announce, yet I never got this message. I
> got the on
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> On Centos 5.6 this works as expected. On Centos 5.7 this also works but
> also outputs "RTNETLINK answers: No such device".
>
> It seems the script is not broken but the code path executed is now very
> different (due to the missing
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> What worked for me was running "virsh edit" against each (now
> shutdown) domain, removing all the tags in the
> section, e.g.,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> All the VMs started withou
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> I just installed CentOS 6.2 32 bit today. When I try to start the
> Virtual Machine Manager I get a error:
>
> Packages required for KVM usage
>
> The following packages are not installed:
>
> qemu-kvm
KVM is not available for 32-bit. You n
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> I did this:
>
> [root@mushroom yum.repos.d]# rpm --import
> http://elrepo.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-elrepo.org
> [root@mushroom yum.repos.d]# rpm -Uvh
> http://elrepo.org/elrepo-release-5-3.el5.elrepo.noarch.rpm
> Retrieving http://elrepo.org/elrepo-r
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> I did this:
>
> [root@mushroom yum.repos.d]# /etc/yum.repos.d
> [root@mushroom yum.repos.d]# rm -f elrepo.repo
> [root@mushroom yum.repos.d]# yum clean all
> [root@mushroom yum.repos.d]# rpm -Uvh
> http://elrepo.org/elrepo-release-6-4.el6.el
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Riccardo Veraldi
wrote:
> Hello,
> is anyone experiencing this ?
> I have a sympa process (bulk.pl) which triggers this bug:
>
> [ cut here ]
> WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:5914 thread_return+0x232/0x79d() (Not tainted)
> Hardware name: X8DTU-
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:23 AM, kasi viswanath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the procedure described in building customer kenrels centOS5.0.
>
> Except for one step where spec file to comment 25 lines from 638, I did every
> thing.
I assume you are referring to:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Cust
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:17 PM, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for latest centosplus kernel source rpm , which should be
> kernel-2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.centos.plus.src.rpm to date.
> Maybe someone could provide a link to it?
I'm afraid it's been forgotten. :( I was told it would be pushed short
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:34 PM, fred smith
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:15:18AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> I used to use the NVIDIA drivers directly from the nvidia.com, but since
>> I upgraded my workstation to CentOS-6.x I have been using elrepo's rpms
>> for nvidia with no issues.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
> Finally got a chance to install Centos 6.x x86_64 version and having an
> issue with the latest version of freenx. This is a desktop install on a
> esxi 5 with all updates and only thing I have installed is the latest
> vmware tools. When I en
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Filipe Brandenburger
wrote:
> Use kmod-xfs from extras (it should be already enabled in your yum
> config) unless you already need the centosplus kernel for another
> reason.
>
> See here:
> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus#line-7
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I recently noticed that Thunderbird updates are missing from CentOS 5.
>
> There are a few updates pending, I am going to look into this today. For
> both c4 and c5. We should be all caught up with
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>> There are a few updates pending, I am going to look into this today. For
>>> both c4 and c5. We should be all caught up within the next 24 hrs.
>> Any update on this is greatly appreciated. I'm asking because of this
>> forum post [1]:
>
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:00 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> We can't be the only ones still using C4 i386.
>
> indeed not. quite a lot of our development/test systems are Centos 3
> and 4 i386. Many of them are hardware that doesn't support am64
Yes, my own servers (not many -- nevertheless) are
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:00 PM, nate wrote:
> Ned Slider wrote:
>
>> I think the point is that there must be something very wrong/broken if
>> a) security updates are missing for over a month, and b) people don't
>> even like to ask for fear of offending someone, and c) no one really
>> talks abo
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> The only possible issue I saw was that after the upgrade to 5.3, it
> didn't work. Possibly I needed to wait longer for it to kick in, or
> reboot again. Akemi I think commented on that thread.
The issue about NTFS and CentOS 5.3 is that th
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> Akemi: I'm using the stock (32 bit) kernel. As I recall, after I
> upgraded from CentOS 5.2 to 5.3 and I couldn't see the NTFS partition,
> you wrote something a
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:10:58AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> If you are running CentOS-4, the last 2 kernels do not (yet) have
>> corresponding kmod-xfs. You need to wait for CentOS devs to build
>> those kmods or to su
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:07:00PM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> The one for the .22 centosplus kernel will be nice to have as well.
> Btw I have rebuild the kmod-xfs independant version for the .22 kernel
> (regular
> and
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:07:00PM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> The one for the .22 centosplus kernel will be nice to have as well.
> Btw I have rebuild the kmod-xfs independant version for the .22 kernel
> (regular
> and
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Tru Huynh wrote:
>> We can push either version in the next weeks, say June 15th?
>> to their final repositories. Does that sound good?
>
> Not quite. That version is now obsolete
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:16:42AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> Here is the updated version:
>>
>> http://centos.toracat.org/kmods/CentOS-4/xfs/SRPMS/
>>
>> Please discard the obsoleted ones (I did not bump the ve
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Tim Nelson wrote:
> Because of the sheer number of box (re)installations we do that have a CentOS
> base, I've converted our provisioning process to PXE. However, I've found
> that an alarming number of motherboards are coming with the Realtek RTL8168
> ethern
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Julian Thomas wrote:
> Centos 5.3 won't activate this. Anyone know if there is a way to get it
> going, and if so, how?
3945 is fully supported in CentOS 5.3. Have you checked the Wiki?
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless?highlight=(wireless)#head-0
501 - 600 of 1365 matches
Mail list logo
