Re: [CentOS] Upgrade to 5.4 with an existing XFS-filesystem

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Bernhard Gschaider > The -164 kernel is indeed from 5.4 and has xfs as a built-in kernel > module.  If you are already running this kernel, that indicates all is > well and no further action is

Re: [CentOS] kvm package difference - v36 via yum, v83 via DVD

On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Brian Schueler wrote: > Hi! > > As far as I can see there is no kvm in the base repository but > the older version 36 in CentOS-Extras. Version 83 that belongs > to 5.4 is only found on the install DVD and CD-Set. > So it's different when installing kvm later with

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4 .x86_64 and perl.i386

On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > I asked myself that same question, and when I reviewed my notes on the > install I had some packages that would only work with perl.i386 which > required me to install it.  Unfortunately, I did not document what those > packages were, a

Re: [CentOS] relatime in plus kernel

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:21:59 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Yuji > Tsuchimoto wrote: >> Dear Karanbir and all, >> >> That sounds nice. >> I'll try to make a patch for the current plus kernel. >> >> Thanks, Yuji > >

Re: [CentOS] VMware Server 2.0.1 On CentOS 5

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Max Hetrick wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: > >> That's actually pretty strange because the glibc update in 5.4 will break >> VMware >> Server 2.0.1.  Have you rebooted or restarted vmware since the update?  if >> you >> haven't, don't until you look up the fix... >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4: yum-priorities seems to be MIA

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > Hi all, > > I just installed 5.4 on a machine here... All seems running fine, > except I decided to put on the extra repositories - and as usual I > decided to install yum-priorities (as directed here: > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResou

Re: [CentOS] Interrupting Yum Update

On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Lee Perez wrote: > Hi All, > > Quick question, I just finished googling and found the thread that is > dealing with the rpmdup_remover.sh script, and thanks to everyone that > was involved in this.  I followed the following threads: > http://www.opensubscriber.com

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.4 kernels for NFS4

On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Gerhard Schneider wrote: > > Do CentOS 5.4 users still have to use the RedHat preliminary kernels > (http://people.redhat.com/jlayton/) for getting a NFSv4 safe kernel or > have the patches been incorporated into CentosPlus kernels? > > Or is kernel-2.6.18-164.3.1

Re: [CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file afterSAMBA update

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Samuel Contesse wrote: > Hi, > > I've the same problem on RHEL 5.4 after samba update. I almost tried > everything but I had to switch to -username=...,-password=... to get > CIFS mount point to work. I opened a case which has been closed > because a second system a

Re: [CentOS] relatime in plus kernel

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > A CentOS forum user (gulikoza) has a patch, tested it with the > 2.6.18-164.2.1 kernel, and offered it in this post: > > https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php? > viewmode=flat&topic_id=22924&forum=37 >

Re: [CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file afterSAMBA update

2009/11/1 José María Terry Jiménez : > Akemi Yagi escribió: >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Samuel Contesse >> wrote: >> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3960 >> >> The upstream bugzilla entries: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.co

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: >> > I have here a box which I dual-boot between CentOS 5.4 and an older >> > version of that "other OS" that I'm using to check out the ELrepo >> > version of kmod-ntfs.  After installing as per the directions on the >> > ELrepo site, I can moun

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 14:49 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> Could you show us the output returned by: >> >> uname -mr >> ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko` >> ls -l `find /lib/modules -name fuse.ko` &

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 15:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> Something is wrong here.  You are missing >> /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko that the symlinks are >> pointing to.  Are those symlinks red-blin

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: >> If ntfs-3g is working for you, I would expect the ntfs module from >> kmod-ntfs works, too. > > That's what I thought.  However, when I mount a partition created with > Windoze 2000, I can read files and directories, but not create or modify >

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 17:38 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> >> Looks like you are doing everything just fine.  Perhaps, we should >> move this conversation to the ELRepo mailing list because this is now >> all about

Re: [CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file afterSAMBA update

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532153  (RHEL5) >>> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532094  (RHEL4) > The bug has to be fixed upstream, thus the above links. Something that > wa

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Ron Loftin wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 17:38 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> >>> Looks like you are doing everything just fine.  Perhaps, we should >>> move th

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Rod Rook wrote: >> In short, the write support offered by the kernel (hence kmod-ntfs) is >> quite limited.  Alan Bartlett pointed to this section of the kernel >> Kconfig file: >> >> "The only supported operation is overwriting existing files, without >> changing

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Rod Rook wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> > I can write, rename, create folders and files under kernel >> > -2.6.18-164.2.1.el5 >> >> Using the in-kernel ntfs module (kmod-ntfs) ? > Yes. Interes

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > funny. > Rod, that wiki page ends with: > "Written and currently maintained by AkemiYagi. Comments/improvement > welcome." > I guess the Akemi you replied to had read that page :-D . > and I suspect you are actually using ntfs-3g... N

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg > wrote: >> and I suspect you are actually using ntfs-3g... Indeed, this has to be looked into. Rod, could you show us the output from: rpm -qa kmod\* and ls -l `find /lib/m

Re: [CentOS] NTFS and elrepo

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> rpm -qa kmod\* >> >> and >> >> ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko` >> (if this command gives you a list of your current directory, then >> please don

Re: [CentOS] OMG! Microsoft patents sudo! Linux and MacOS dead!

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > At Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:07:15 +0800 CentOS mailing list > wrote: >> http://blogs.computerworld.com/15082/omg_microsoft_patents_sudo_linux_and_macos_dead?source=CTWNLE_nlt_dailyam_2009-11-12 > > > Is this for real?  Blogs.computerworld.com s

Re: [CentOS] stunbdc

On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote: > >> Just to inform you this went into my gmail spam folder and now >> displays the rather unpleasant message: >> >> Warning: This message may not be from whom it claims to be. Beware of >> following any links i

Re: [CentOS] Question about the ahci kernel module: missing in the CentOS (4) Plus kernel

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > Is there some reason the ahci kernel module is *missing* from the > 2.6.9-89.0.16.plus.c4 kernel?  It is in the standard 2.6.9-89.0.16.EL > kernel. Is this due to an oversight or is there some sort of conflict? > > I wanted to add IEEE1394 su

Re: [CentOS] Question about the ahci kernel module: missing in the CentOS (4) Plus kernel

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > At Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:13:29 -0800 CentOS mailing list > wrote: >> The centosplus kernel are supposed to have all modules that are >> included in the standard kernel.  Could you please file a report at >> http://bugs.centos.org ? > > Done

Re: [CentOS] Recommended approach for adding PATA_IT8213 support via RPM

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Kurt Newman wrote: > My question is: > > Anyone know of a howto of some sort (or perhaps any instructions) for > creating a kernel module to add support for a particular device.  I need > to get support for the PATA_IT8213 hardware. > Any suggestions? Yes, try t

Re: [CentOS] system time automatically fowards in time and then comes back to normal

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, nate wrote: > ankush grover wrote: > >> Earlier this server was syncing time through ntp daemon and below is >> the ntp.conf file. Now I have set a cronjob which sync the time with > > Best not to run NTP inside a ESX VM. I've never gotten NTP to sync > inside of V

Re: [CentOS] What's wrong with yum-priorities?

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Dennis Kibbe wrote: > "The upstream maintainer of yum, Seth Vidal, had the following to say > about 'yum priorities' in September 2009: > > Gosh, I hope people do not set up yum priorities. There are so many things > about priorities that make me cringe all over.

Re: [CentOS] system time automatically fowards in time and then comes back to normal

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Clint Dilks wrote: > The OP should also reference this document > http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1006427 This is the 3rd time that KB article was quoted in this thread... :-D Akemi

Re: [CentOS] Is ext4 safe for a production server?

On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Miguel Medalha wrote: > >> For enterprise environments my favorite FS is XFS, YMMV, though. > I also thought about using xfs, but I don't like the idea of it being > dependent of an external kernel module that is always lagging behind the > current kernel version.

Re: [CentOS] Is ext4 safe for a production server?

On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Miguel Medalha wrote: >> And, as of CentOS 5.4, xfs is now enabled in the kernel, so >> no need for any external kernel module. But yes, this is available for >> x86_64 only > > ... a decision that many people have trouble at understanding! I asked Eric Sandeen of

Re: [CentOS] Building xfsprogs can't find valid UUID library

On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:43 AM, C Linus Hicks wrote: > On CentOS 5.3 x86_64, I'm trying to build > xfsprogs-2.9.4-1.el5.centos.x86_64 with -ggdb so I can use it with gdb > and examine the data structures when using xfs_db. I've installed the > src rpm as a non-root user and when I run rpmbuild -b

Re: [CentOS] Compile a kernel

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:50 AM, gilberto nunes wrote: > Hi buddies > > I attempt to compile a kernel on CentOS 5.3. > The kernel version is 2.6.31.6. > > All make procedure is running ok. > I can generate initrd image with no problem too. > But, when I try booting this kernel, I get Kernel panic:

Re: [CentOS] ntp update version

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Ron Yorston wrote: > I noticed that although I'd fetched the latest update to ntp from the > mirror it wasn't being installed. > > It seems that the version numbers have got out of step.  According to > the changelog the update that was released in August should ha

Re: [CentOS] Problem mounting CIFS shares with credential file afterSAMBA update

On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> The bug has to be fixed upstream, thus the above links. Something that >> was done in the latest update broke the use of credential file which >> was previously working fine. > > Using the patch offered in the upstream

Re: [CentOS] bnx2 losing connectivity

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:24 AM, nate wrote: > James Pearson wrote: > >> It looks like this might be the same issue as: >> >> >> >> Which seems to suggest disabling MSI - i.e. load the bnx2 module with >> "disable_msi=1" > > Wow! that looks inte

Re: [CentOS] sshfs & CentOS 5

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Has anyone installed sshfs on CentOS 5 and used it sucessfully? Yes, works nicely: http://blog.toracat.org/2008/09/hello-world/ Please note that the blog is a bit old. In step (2), dkms-fuse is no longer needed with the current CentOS kernel

Re: [CentOS] latest kernel (-164.9.1) not seen by yum

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: > I have updated my local repo and see that centos.plus has the new kernel > available. > yum update does not get it > yum clean all and another try and still it does not find it > what am I missing?? Check to see if the metadata files are also u

Re: [CentOS] i386 and x86_64 packages on an 64bit system after fresh install - why?

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote: > Hi, > > I recetly set up a brand new fres Centos 5.4 64 bit system and found a > lot of i386 packages installed along with the x86_64 packages. > > My questions: Why is this done? > > May I remove the i386 packages? (rpm -e .

Re: [CentOS] NTP update?

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Christoph Maser wrote: > Am Freitag, den 18.12.2009, 06:42 +0100 schrieb Gilbert Sebenste: >> Excellent. We're all caught up on updates now, except... >> >> I didn't see the NTP update. That's a big one, with an easy denial of >> sservice attack. Is that planning

Re: [CentOS] minimal set of packages for gnome desktop

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:49 AM, Janez Kosmrlj wrote: > Does anybody know what is the minimal set of packages, you have to install, > to make gnome desktop work. Try running a command: yum groupinfo "GNOME Desktop Environment" and see what is listed under "Mandatory Packages". That may give you

Re: [CentOS] What determines default kernel after update?

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > I have a 32-bit machine with 8 gigs RAM and was running the PAE kernel, > but after the last update noticed that grub was set to default to the > non-PAE version although both were installed.  Does anyone know how boot > default is supposed to

Re: [CentOS] What determines default kernel after update?

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Thanks - it says: > DEFAULTKERNEL=kernel > and now that I think about it, the box may have had 4 gigs of RAM when > Centos was originally installed.  What should it say so future updates > pick the PAE version? It should say kernel-PAE. Ak

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:yum?

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:03 AM, hadi motamedi wrote: > Thanks for your reply . But for unknown reasons the yum is not available on > my CentOS . > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# more /etc/redhat-release > CentOS release 5.2 (Final) > [r...@mss-1 tmp]# yum > -bash: yum: command not found > Can you please let

Re: [CentOS] via vb 8001 : vt1211 driver

On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Ben Mohilef wrote: > I could find no precompiled driver that worked. However, I found GNU-GPL code > for one that works > nicely on the Point Clark Networks' site. The instructions are for ClearOS > 5.4 which is similar to > RHEL/Centos. > > Roll your own driver

Re: [CentOS] upgrade adivce

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM, William Warren wrote: > Also will the samba version > in centos 5 natively support windows 7 clients? You would need samba3 for Windows 7 support. Try the SerNet Samba 3 Repository. Please see http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories for more detai

Re: [CentOS] DRBD error : Invalid module format

On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 1:45 PM, robert mena wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to use drbd in my centos 5.4 but I keep getting errors. > When I try modprobe -v drbd I receive > insmod /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5PAE/extra/drbd/drbd.ko > FATAL: Error inserting drbd > (/lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5PAE/extra/d

Re: [CentOS] trying to get lm_sensorts to work

On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > hi all, > > I am trying to get lm_sensors to work. > > did the yum install lm_sensors > service lm_sensors start > > sensor -s > and it says no sensors found. > > did lsmod | grep it87 and > it87                   57061  0 You may want to read

Re: [CentOS] missing module dir?

On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Michael Klinosky wrote: > I'm teaching myself about ethernet cards, and found a TLDP page. I have > CentOS 5.3. > > In this section:    http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Ethernet-HOWTO-2.html#ss2.4 > in the 'Driver as module' subsection, regarding PCI cards, it states > that t

Re: [CentOS] Update via yum fails with "needs libdbus-1.so.3, this is not available."

On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Bart van Kuik wrote: > Hi list, > > I am running CentOS release 5.2. When I did a "yum -y update", I got a > large list of packages to be updated (360 packages). Then I got the > following error: > > Total download size: 499 M > Downloading Packages: > Running rpm_c

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issue

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 06/01/10 01:32, Clint Dilks wrote: >> Yum using proxy that requires authentication and a Password that >> contains the two characters \/ fails >> > > I would strongly encourage you to open an issue report at > http://bugs.centos.org > It'

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issue

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Clint Dilks wrote: > export http_proxy=\/a...@proxy.example.com:80 > export http_proxy='\/a...@proxy.example.com:80' > export http_proxy="\/a...@proxy.example.com:80" > export http_proxy=\\\/a...@proxy.example.com:80 > I have tried reporting this as http://bugs.ce

Re: [CentOS] Lilo for CentOS 5?

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > Does there exist a version of Lilo built for x86_64 CentOS 5?  It does not > seem to be on the DVD.  *I* really, really, prefer Lilo over Grub. If you must use lilo ... the version of lilo available from: ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/syst

Re: [CentOS] Lilo for CentOS 5?

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:36:57 -0800 CentOS mailing list > wrote: >> If you must use lilo ... the version of lilo available from: >> >> ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/boot/lilo/ >> >> works just fine on CentOS-5. > > Thanks.  I'm gues

Re: [CentOS] Lilo for CentOS 5?

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Heller wrote: >> At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:36:57 -0800 CentOS mailing list >> wrote: >> Thanks.  I'm guessing that I'll have to manually update lilo.conf after >&

Re: [CentOS] Lilo for CentOS 5?

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:53 AM, wrote: >> Looks like the new kernel stanza gets added to lilo.conf >> automatically, but the default needs to be changed manually. > > That's ok, I randomly see that with grub, too. grub is supposed to set the default kernel to the newly installed one (type) as

Re: [CentOS] Serial port fun: CentOS 4.8 (32-bit) vs. CentOS 5.4 (64-bit)

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, JohnS wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:13 -0500, Ron Loftin wrote: > Also I have a problem with your post, heres why: The same for CentOS and > RHEL 5. > > uname -ra > Linux ethies 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 15 21:04:57 EST 2009 i686 > i686 i386 GNU/Linux

Re: [CentOS] what provices "replace" command?

On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > I am used to using the replace command to quickly replace strings in > file, but it's not available on some of my fresh CentOS 5.4 servers. > > "yum info replace", "yum whatprovides replace", and "yum search > replace" doesn't show me which pack

Re: [CentOS] why no centos 5.3 or 5.4 online manuals?

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >  i zipped over to centos.org to check out the 5.4 manuals, and what i > found was: > > http://www.centos.org/docs/5/ > > which stops at 5.2.  now, i don't really see this as a problem since i > can always get what i need here: > > http://

Re: [CentOS] PlanetCentOS daniel at centos dot org email address is unavailable

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Vladislav Rastrusny wrote: > I wanted to add my blog to PlanetCentOS and suddenly discovered, that > email address listed on http://planet.centos.org/ is unavailable. Can > you please tell me, who should I contact for adding my blog to > PlanetCentOS? To my knowle

Re: [CentOS] Vmware server 2.0.2 and Centos 5.4

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Tom Bishop wrote: > I know of the issue using vmware server 2.0.2 and centos 5.4, but is their > any reason not to use the .rpm install of  for centos?  I have always used > the .tar file but this time used the rpm and it appeared to install and not > crash.  I wen

Re: [CentOS] VMWare server 2

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:27 AM, wrote: > Hi All, > > > I have installed VMWare 2.0.2-203138_x64 on a CentOS 5.4 x64. > Everything appears to work fine. > I can create the virtual machine but when I power it on the whole vmware > web access is unreachable on default port 8222/8333. There is a kn

Re: [CentOS] digikam and mp3 sound on RHEL

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Kevin Kempter wrote: > I like it well enough - however I'd like to install digikam and get my system > to play mp3's.  I'm thinking I could get both of these from a centos > repository. What do you'all think? There is a known issue (and a workaround) with digika

Re: [CentOS] Problems loading drbd after upgrade

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:04 PM, robert mena wrote: > Hi, > I've upgrade the kernel to the latest version (C5) and after the update the > drbd is not being loaded at reboot time. > My previous running kernel was 2.6.18-164.el5. > I've checked the /lib/modules/ and > /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.10.1.el

Re: [CentOS] Problems loading drbd after upgrade

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:02 PM, robert mena wrote: > Hi, > Thanks. > 1) > kmod-drbd82-8.2.6-2 > drbd83-8.3.2-6.el5_3 You have drbd83 but the kernel module is for drbd82. I would uninstall kmod-drbd82 and install kmod-drbd83. However, I'm not using drbd myself. Fabian? Ralph? anyone? At any r

Re: [CentOS] Problems loading drbd after upgrade

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:02 PM, robert mena wrote: >> Hi, >> Thanks. >> 1) >> kmod-drbd82-8.2.6-2 >> drbd83-8.3.2-6.el5_3 > > You have drbd83 but the kernel module is for drbd82.  I would > uni

Re: [CentOS] netgear wg111v2

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Davy Leon wrote: > Hi folks > > I have a Centos 5.3 Box and need to know how to configure a Netgear wg111v2 > USB WLAN adapter. I already have an wireless LAN build with an AP and a > windows XP PC with another Netgear wg111v2 USB adaptor running on it.. Does the

Re: [CentOS] Auto exit lftp on bash script

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Alan Hoffmeister wrote: > Hello again! > > I have this piece od code: > > # > #lftp will make the backup > lftp -u user,password -e "mirror --reverse --delete --only-newer > --verbose /var/bkp /test_bkp" somehost.com >> $LOGFILE Try format tha

Re: [CentOS] Skype and problem with ALSA mixer driver?

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Andrew wrote: >> What version of ALSA driver are you using? Have you tried updating ALSA >> as the version within CentOS is quite old now (1.0.14rc3). >> >> Elrepo has an updated ALSA driver package here: >> >> http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-alsa >> > Thanks for that

Re: [CentOS] xterm clones on VNC problem

On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > So I'm giving up for now. The answer's probably in documentation > somewhere but  I've been going through tons of > documentation/readme/faqs/KB for work with more to digest that I just > don't have the energy to spend on something unes

Re: [CentOS] Skype and problem with ALSA mixer driver?

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 11:44 +, Andrew wrote: >> But this is disappointing because I want my PC to be completely >> functional and skype is part of that requirement - so I suppose I'm >> going to have to look around for an alternative to Cen

Re: [CentOS] VNC Questions

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Warren Michelsen wrote: >>Or use "su -" instead of "su" when switching to the root user and you >>will get root's environment, which includes /sbin on the path. > > Ah! This is something I've not run across before. Using "su -" did the trick. CentOS Wiki is (almo

Re: [CentOS] Trying to rebuild srpm from fedora....

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Tom Bishop wrote: > Thanks for the tips so I have gotten mock installed but for the life of me I > can't figure out how to install the srpm, edit the spec file and then > re-build.  I have seen an example that installs and then I can edit via mock > shell, but when

Re: [CentOS] atime, relatime query

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > I am aware that mounting filesystems with noatime option greatly > increases speed. > > I have tried to follow discussion on the pros and cons of using noatime. > > I have however not been able to mount with the option relatime in cen

Re: [CentOS] atime, relatime query

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:38 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > RHEL doesn't have a reltime enabled kernel so centos doesn't either by > default. I believe that there is a kernel in plus that is reltime > enabled but due to potentially breaking ABI compatibility with RHEL I > don't make use of it. As you

[CentOS] VMware Workstation 7.0.x and CentOS 5.4

VMware Workstation 7.0.1 Release Notes has a list of supported OS: http://www.vmware.com/support/ws7/doc/releasenotes_ws701.html According to that, RHEL 5.4 is listed as supported for both host and guest but CentOS 5.4 is only for guest. This is quite strange and, if it is true, that could be a

Re: [CentOS] Updating gfortran in CentOS 5.4?

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Jon Forrest wrote: > Although I can compile and run a simple fortran > "Hello, world" program using the version of > gfortran I built this way, trying to run a > more complex application, such as charmm (a molecular > dynamics program), fails. When I run charmm, I

Re: [CentOS] pointer to Searchable Archives for the list pls

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Simon Billis wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Can you point me in the direction of searchable archives for the list? I'm > obviously missing something. I would like to be able to search the archives > before asking my question. This wiki page may help: http://wiki.centos.o

Re: [CentOS] Create Local CentOS 5.1 repo

On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to create a local base repo from the DVD on a webserver as I am > not able to install with the x64 DVD. I have done this before I recall by > placing the DVD contents in the root of an empty webserver, but

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm still using CentOS 4.6, but have been planning an upgrade to CentOS 5 > for quite a while. One of the things that was holding me back is that the > CentOS 5.0 kernel did not have the framebuffer support enabled by d

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 16, 2008, at 19:21, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > You have another choice here if you would rather not wait for the next > > update of the centosplus kernel. The standard kernel with the

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 17, 2008, at 10:34, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > If you have your own mirror, the easiest way would be to get those > > bz32 kernels in your repo. Johnny Hughes or other CentOS devs &

Re: [CentOS] Centosplus kernel does not have framebuffer support?

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 17, 2008, at 14:02, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > > Any chance this will happen before next Wednesday? That's when I'm > > > planning to start my upgrades... > > > &g

Re: [CentOS] Edit to change startup from SMP to not so SMP

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Bob Beers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Andrew @ ATM Logic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Humm, ok but for some reason it does not start the top, or any one, it > just > > sits waiting for someone to manually hit enter on o

Re: [CentOS] howto use kvm-amd on centos 5.1

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to use kvm-amd on centos 5.1? > > I dont want to mess with XEN. I want the hardware virtualization that is on > my AMD chip. > > I played with putting 2.6.24 and centos 5.1 on my AMD laptop, got kvm-amd > and

Re: [CentOS] Not able to run kernel-xen with megasr module :/

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Tomasz Nowak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've managed to install CentOS 5.1 on S5000PAL > with fakeraid Intel Embedded Raid Technology II > Raid1 (LSI chipset) with some help of kickstart > declaration 'driverdisk --source=http://.../driver.img' > > Then I've h

Re: [CentOS] Good news for virtual EL-4.x boxes

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Currently, if you are running CentOS-4.x on a Vmware box you end up > with time skew problems. The main fix has been using a set of > recompiled kernel that has a HZ that is more fitting with what Vmware > expects

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart network settings problem

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Plant, Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have tried with the 2 network lines shown below in the kickstart file, > with and without interactive variable. Still no network configuration > screen. :-( > > # Network settings > > #network --bootproto=static --dev

Re: [CentOS] Missing update / update announcement

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bernd Bartmann wrote: > > > Also, upstream has released gnome-screensaver-2.16.1-5.el5_1.1 and > > gnome-screensaver-2.16.1-8.el5 (FasTrack channel) beginning of April. > > Neither is available yet for C5. > > > CentOS doesn'

Re: [CentOS] DKMS

On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's easy > to forget there is now a whole generation of computer users who have known > nothing but the GUI and completely missed out on DOS or CP/M, and never > owned a Spectrum/Commodore/BBC Micro etc. Wow, Ned, I never t

Re: [CentOS] kernel-vm repo

On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Clint Dilks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi People, > > I have downloaded > http://dev.centos.org/~tru/kernel-vm/5/RPMS/i386/kernel-vm-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5.i686.rpm > > but was

Re: [CentOS] howto use kvm-amd on centos 5.1

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Daniel de Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I want to put this on my desktop that is running 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5. Is > > there a way or do I just wave to use 2.6.24 or 25. > > yum install

Re: [CentOS] OFF-TOPIC: Job opportunity in Augusta Georgia

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > WAY Off topic here, but if anyone's in the Augusta, Georgia area and > wants to work as a web developer(css, html, flash, php, photoshop and > the other usual goodies), we've got a job opening. > > If you like abuse, long h

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.5 - mounting remote windows fileserver using smb or cifs

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I need to mount a windows share on a CentOS 4.5 box running stock kernel > etc - I have tried using cifs and also smbfs > > My fstab looks like > > //share/name/mount/pointsmbfs > username=user,password=passwor

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.5 - mounting remote windows fileserver using smb or cifs

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i have managed to get this working now using smbfs - there were 2 issues it > seems > > 1 - samba-client was not installed, that was an oversight on my behalf > > 2 - on the RH7.3 box the domain is not needed for the user b

Re: [CentOS] Package change logs

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:58 AM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 13:45 -0400, Matty wrote: > > Howdy, > > > > Does anyone happen to know where I can locate the changes that were > > integrated into a specific RPM update? I checked the wiki, the rpm > > quer

Re: [CentOS] "yum update" did not update kernel on one box

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Bob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 09:56 -0400, Erek Dyskant wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 08:39 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > > > This morning, I did "yum update" on my wife's box. It did not update the > > > kernel. I ran t

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Forums

2008/4/21 Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > We have CentOS Forums here: > > http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/ > > Akemi Yagi (toracat on IRC) and Fabian Arrotin (arrfab on IRC) are the > Forum Moderators. > > There are a lot of posts there that I find h

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >