Re: [CentOS] Centos, Samba , WIN7

On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 14:52 +0100, Timothy Kesten wrote: > Am Freitag, 14. Januar 2011, 11:27:22 schrieb John Doe: > > Search for "samba windows.7" and click on first answer... > I knew, that samba > 3.3 is necessary. > I was more interessted in where can I get a suitable version from a > centos-re

Re: [CentOS] Troubles for an non-IT beginner

On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 15:51 +0100, Parshwa Murdia wrote: > hello, > I am absolutely new, means from non-IT sector but have attraction > (developed recently) towards linux and have chosen the centos distro > for the installation as an OS in my home PC for personal use. I went > to the page: > http:/

Re: [CentOS] Let's talk about HTTPS Everywhere

On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 03:29 -0800, S Mathias wrote: > Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on: > https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere > Questions: > 1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?: > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/ No clue. > 2) Did anyone audited the "HTTPS Everyw

Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?

On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 11:05 +, John Hodrien wrote: > An account is a personal account that should not be shared. +1 Also, at least in the United States, locking a PC / workstation after 15 minutes of idle is a requirement of PCI/DSS - which your company almost certainly agreed to if you pr

Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?

On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 14:08 +0100, Giles Coochey wrote: > On 20/01/2011 13:12, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 11:05 +, John Hodrien wrote: > >> An account is a personal account that should not be shared. > > +1 > > Also, at least in t

[CentOS] Journal Aborts in VMware ESX (Filesystem Corruption)

I have several CentOS5 hosts in a VMware ESX 3.5.0 226117 environment using iSCSI storage. Recently we've begun to experience journal aborts resulting in remounted-read-only filesystems as well as other filesystem issues - I can unmount a filesystem and force a check with "fsck -f" and occasionall

Re: [CentOS] Journal Aborts in VMware ESX (Filesystem Corruption)

On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 09:40 -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Adam Tauno Williams > wrote: > > I have several CentOS5 hosts in a VMware ESX 3.5.0 226117 environment > > using iSCSI storage. Recently we've begun to experience journal aborts >

Re: [CentOS] Journal Aborts in VMware ESX (Filesystem Corruption)

more difficult [virtualized OS, virtualized storage, virtualization platform, or some interaction of all the above... ugh]. > On 13 Feb 2011, at 14:40, "Kwan Lowe" wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Adam Tauno Williams > > wrote: > >> I have several C

Re: [CentOS] Journal Aborts in VMware ESX (Filesystem Corruption)

ware.com/message/881727#881727> seems like an update that describes my issue; but even that is from 2008. Reference: VMware KB#1001778 (Note: RHEL5U1 is long since released) > On 14 Feb 2011, at 10:36, Kwan Lowe wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Adam Tauno Williams >

Re: [CentOS] Journal Aborts in VMware ESX (Filesystem Corruption)

On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 13:01 -0800, Bazooka Joe wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Adam Tauno Williams > wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 20:28 +, Keith Beeby wrote: > >> Also seeing this issue with CentOS 5.4 and 5.5 with NFS shared > >> storage, acco

Re: [CentOS] virtualization on the desktop a myth, or a reality?

On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 19:29 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > I am busy setting up some XEN servers on a SAN for high availability > and Cloud Computing, and thought it could be cool to setup > virtualization on a CentOS 5.5 Desktop, running on a Core i3 + 4GB > RAM, and use the SAN's storage to see if

Re: [CentOS] IPC Benchmark in Centos

On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 19:51 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 11/03/11 16:50, Peter Penzov wrote: > > I'm interested is there any benchmark tests for Centos. How fast is > > for example Unix domain socket and Message Queue? > I'm not aware of any scientific researches on this topic, but it mi

Re: [CentOS] CentOS server install

On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 14:41 -0800, Damien Hull wrote: > It's been a while since I've used CentOS. I'm doing a test install for > a server setup. I unchecked desktop and checked server. > What does server give me? I typically uncheck everything; then just install the packages you specifically need.

Re: [CentOS] wich filesystem to store > 250E6 small files in same or hashed dire

On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 13:10 -0700, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote: > on 13:10 Sat 12 Mar, Alain Spineux (aspin...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Hi > > I need to store about 250.000.000 files. Files are less than 4k. > > On a ext4 (fedora 14) the system crawl at 10.000.000 in the same directory. > > I tried to creat

Re: [CentOS] IPV6 - request for info

On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 08:18 +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > Greetings, > I am trying to wrap my head around on this topic. > Was wondering : Just as there is some scope for mapping ipv4 directly > into IPV6 space, Is there a MAC ID or some kind of WWID has also been > taken into consideration

Re: [CentOS] My new server

On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 19:14 -0400, Matty wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 3:55 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > > On 03/26/11 12:51 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > >> Use VLAN-trunks. > > someone using a $350 micro server as his ADSL gateway is highly unlikely > > to have layer 2 managed switches capable of

Re: [CentOS] fax software

On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 22:41 -0400, ken wrote: > It's been many years, but it seems that I have to receive a fax and > might have to send one too. Is there a way to do this on CentOS 5.5? > (Hope so.) Hylafax; has been quietly running at work, without incident, for years.

Re: [CentOS] VMware vSphere Hypervisor (free ESXi) and mdraid

On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 11:47 +0300, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > Can I combine VMWare ESXi (free version) virtualization No, ESXi is an OS. > and CentOS mdraid level 1? Any pointers how to do it? I never used VMWare > before. VMware supports NFS for VM storage. So export your MD-RAID volume to the ESX

Re: [CentOS] Centos+AD integration (uid/gid problems)

On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 18:07 +0100, n...@li.nux.ro wrote: > I need to have several EL machines in an AD env. > Joining the machines was easier than expected using authconfig, but what > happens now is that blahdomain\blahuser gets assigned a > different, random ID each time I use a different stat

Re: [CentOS] Best way to extend pv partition for LVM

On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 12:02 -0500, Jay Leafey wrote: > Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > I've replaced disks in a hardware RAID 1 with larger disks and enlarged > > the array. Now I have to find a way to tell LVM about the extra space. > > It seems there are two ways: > > 2. create another partition on the

Re: [CentOS] Forcing IPv4 DNS lookups first before IPv6

On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 09:51 -0500, Russell Jones wrote: > Hello! > I am having a strange issue with CentOS 5.4 that I cannot seem to solve. > Every DNS lookup results in records being requested first before A > records. As a result, this causes a large amount of unnecessary DNS > traffic on

Re: [CentOS] File-system Corruption

On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 11:06 +0100, James Bensley wrote: > Hi List, > We power on servers at night via IPMI and shut them down the same way > for automation. The problem I'm facing is that the servers are > shutdown in about 2 seconds. IPMI provides remote access to the power > features as we know s

Re: [CentOS] Expunge Old Email

On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 08:31 -0400, John Hinton wrote: > For those of you running mailservers on CentOS 6, what are the > suggestions for programs to expunge old email? For instance, deleting > email from a Spam folder that is 2 weeks old or older. > I see that Dovecot does have a solution, but wa

Re: [CentOS] Back up system

On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 16:43 +0300, Damas Ally wrote: > I have centos 5.7 (server). I need to configure it for backup system, that > means it have to back up or back up documents shall be posted or send to > this server from various users (clients using windows machine and ubuntu). > Can someone hel

Re: [CentOS] Samba + Openldap

On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 16:43 -0400, Al wrote: > Anyone have an update tutorial/howto for samba to authenticate to ldap? This are lots of docs. But DO NOT DO IT. A Samba 3.x DC is very very *obsolete*. The Windows world has moved on to Active Directory. If you want to do that you need Samba 4

Re: [CentOS] Samba + Openldap

On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 12:18 +0200, Giles Coochey wrote: > On Fri, October 21, 2011 12:14, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 16:43 -0400, Al wrote: > >> Anyone have an update tutorial/howto for samba to authenticate to ldap? > > This are lots of docs. &g

Re: [CentOS] Samba + Openldap

On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 07:57 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:38 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > >> Samba 4 is currently not yet in a state where it can replace existing > >> production deployments. [1] > >> [1] http://wiki.samba.org/i

Re: [CentOS] You suggestion for 'big' filesystem management Best Practice?

On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 10:34 +0200, Götz Reinicke wrote: > we plan to set up a big file storage for media files like uncompressed > movies from student film projects, dvd images etc. > It should be some sort of archive and will not bee accessed by more than > may be 5 people at the same time. > The

Re: [CentOS] Postfix mail server procedure

On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 02:58 -0600, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 09:46:51AM +0100, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > Am 09.11.2011 07:19, schrieb Leon Jacobs > > A strong NO! > Emphatically seconded. +1 Especially since CentOS 6 gives you pretty recent versions of everything. _

Re: [CentOS] Postfix mail server procedure

On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 01:10 -0500, Jonathan Vomacka wrote: > CentOS Community > I was wondering if anyone had a good resource or procedure for a step by > step in installing a mail server with Centos. There ARE documents on > google, however almost all that i've found were outdated from 2005. Doe

Re: [CentOS] Postfix mail server procedure

On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 13:23 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > >>> You don't mention a mail store [IMAP Server]? Such as Cyrus IMAP. > >>> Something for Postfix to deliver the mail too. > >> Mail store != imap server. Mail store = structure for mboxes/maildirs. > > Cyrus is sort of its own t

Re: [CentOS] Postfix mail server procedure

On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 23:13 -0700, Craig White wrote: > > > > > > been using cyrus-imapd for years - eats dovecot for lunch in terms of > > > features/performance/reliability/scaling/flexibility and just about > > > every other imaginable use for an IMAP server. > > Hmm, I must give it a try o

Re: [CentOS] Postfix mail server procedure

On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 09:47 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 21:53 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > > On Saturday, November 12, 2011 01:01 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > Cyrus is incredibly reliable, stable and fast. And the latest 2.4.x > >

Re: [CentOS] duqu

On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 13:05 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > There's an article on slashdot about the Duqu team wiping all their > intermediary c&c servers on 20 Oct. Interestingly, the report says that > they were all (?) not only linux, but CentOS. There's a suggestion of a > zero-day exploit in

Re: [CentOS] duqu

On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 16:58 -0500, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Tuesday, December 06, 2011 04:45:04 PM Johnny Hughes wrote: > 1.) Keep up to date as much as possible (and a 24 hour window is quite short, > honestly, compared to the timeframes this attack appears to have occupied); > 2.) Keep up with you

Re: [CentOS] Help to install horde

On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:46 -0500, Weplica wrote: > Hello, > I have install Horde rpm with webmin: > Instalando paquete(s) con el comando yum -y install yun grouinstall horde ... The packages are very old and lag way behind releases. Install the current versions using the PEAR method.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and LessFS

> <http://www.opendedup.org/> -- Adam Tauno Williams <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> System Administrator, OpenGroupware Developer, LPI / CNA Fingerprint 8C08 209A FBE3 C41A DD2F A270 2D17 8FA4 D95E D383 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [CentOS] MySQL/file system question

even root, can see it. Actually you can; if you look in /proc/{pid#}/fd ... -- System & Network Administrator [ LPI & NCLA ] <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> OpenGroupware Developer <http://www.opengroupware.us> Adam Tauno Williams ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] MySQL/file system question

On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 17:06 -0500, Boris Epstein wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Adam Tauno Williams > wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 16:45 -0500, Boris Epstein wrote: > > > Hello listmates, > > > I got a rather strange situation that I can'

Re: [CentOS] MySQL/file system question

tion. It is best not to dig around under engines. Use the tools and let them tell you, otherwise you will build around implementation details. -- System & Network Administrator [ LPI & NCLA ] <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> Open

[CentOS] Race Condition In PHP Session Handler

007fa177531767 in ?? () #16 0x7fa177531a7a in ?? () #17 0x7fa177531dab in ap_mpm_run () #18 0x7fa177509900 in main () -- System & Network Administrator [ LPI & NCLA ] <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> OpenGroupware Developer <http://www.opengroupware.us> A

[CentOS] Out of date debug packages [Was: Race Condition In PHP Session Handler]

the obligatory "clean metadata"]. Are debug info packages not current? Does the .6. vs. .5. matter? On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 16:51 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > php-5.3.3-3.el6_2.6.x86_64 > 2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.x86_64 > > After some testing we moved our production PHP intrane

[CentOS] Anyone recognize "www-mysql"?

p://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> OpenGroupware Developer <http://www.opengroupware.us> Adam Tauno Williams ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] postfix and spam, I am impressed

t.ly/exQSCH> > heck, I still have to patch sasl for it to > auth against crypted passwords ... maybe I should stop before I start > ranting ;) -- System & Network Administrator [ LPI & NCLA ] <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> OpenGroupware Developer <http://www.opengr

Re: [CentOS] In the press, once again

On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 09:54 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote: > On 09/24/2010 08:37 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote: > > On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoeler > > wrote: > >> Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because > >> their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger

Re: [CentOS] [Slightly OT] "Open Source Development + Tools" - Book/Resource?

; <http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=189> <http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=192> <http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=196> <http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=199> <http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=201> <http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=208> It walks through an example usage o

[CentOS] Python resource module returns just zeros

turns 0 Anyone know what condition causes this? Or is there a better / more-reliable way to check memory utilization of the current process [from python]? -- Adam Tauno Williams LPIC-1, Novell CLA <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> OpenGroupware, Cyrus IMAPd

Re: [CentOS] Colour laser printer

2550n that works very well; but is expensive to operate. ~7 cents a page. -- Adam Tauno Williams LPIC-1, Novell CLA <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> OpenGroupware, Cyrus IMAPd, Postfix, OpenLDAP, Samba ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cen

Re: [CentOS] Duplex networkprinter for Linux

On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 15:18 +0200, kim.gabriel...@get2net.dk wrote: > Hi, > does anybody know about a duplex (color) printer with linux support? Brother MFC-9840CDW [it even supports IPv6] > either with centos as print server or - preferably - as a stand alone > network printer? ___

Re: [CentOS] OT: linux desktop market share more than 1%

On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 14:05 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > You can register on this site if you use linux on your desktop, to > prove that we have at least more than 1% market share today :-) > http://www.dudalibre.com/gnulinuxcounter?lang=en Ugh. web-site polls are meaningless, pointless, wrong, an

Re: [CentOS] OT: linux desktop market share more than 1%

dv7 (HP DV-3085DX) all day five to six days a week. It is production and rock-solid. In installed openSUSE 11.2 w/GNOME and *all* the hardware *just worked*. All the applications *just worked*. OpenOffice, Evolution, Nautilus, Tomboy, Banshee, Monodevelop, F

Re: [CentOS] OT: linux desktop market share more than 1%

On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 19:21 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 10/8/10 5:55 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > On 10/8/2010 4:40 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> On 10/8/2010 5:25 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > I think the explanation is different: they tried for a few years to drum > > up support for FB on Linux,

Re: [CentOS] iptables: comprehensive tutorial for CentOS?

www.fwbuilder.org/> I know I'll never waste time building iptables rulesets by hand again. -- Adam Tauno Williams LPIC-1, Novell CLA <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> OpenGroupware, Cyrus IMAPd, Postfix, OpenLDAP, Samba ___ CentOS mail

Re: [CentOS] POP3 server

has to deal with the > issue, sees that the config is "broken" and "fixes" it. > You're much better off using a protocol which supports an immediate > delete from the server, like IMAP. Unless, of course, the issue is with > a lack of

Re: [CentOS] migrating users to openldap

On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:00 -0400, Tim Dunphy wrote: > I noticed that when I migrated my users with the migrate_passwd.pl > tool from PADL it didn't migrate the actual passwords (just the rest > of the posixAccount info). I think I need to set the EXTENDED_SCHEMA > variable and then try running th

[CentOS] OpenVPN [Was: Pptp vpn server]

On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 19:42 -0500, Jeffrey Gipson wrote: > Sorry to redirect, but have you considered OpenVPN +1. But is the OpenVPN windows client any better than recently? Does it work correctly with WIndows 7 yet? Last time I tried the Win32 client was kludgy. > If you are only connectin

Re: [CentOS] Pptp vpn server

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 13:04 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2010/11/3 mattias : > > How to setup a vpn server on centos? > > I can't find the pptpd in any repo > PopTop is possibly solution that you are looking for: > http://poptop.sourceforge.net/ , but ssl-vpn like openvpn is much > better soluti

Re: [CentOS] Pptp vpn server

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 12:49 +, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 13:04 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote: > >> 2010/11/3 mattias : > >>> How to setup a vpn server on centos? > >>> I ca

Re: [CentOS] Pptp vpn server

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 07:34 -0700, cpol...@surewest.net wrote: > Mattias wrote: > > Yes but there is no good webmin module for openvpn? > Not to pour water on your tool, but Google for "webmin exploit". > This software appears regularly on security lists I read, > but not in a good way. +1 I'd ne

Re: [CentOS] Novell sale news?

On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 12:13 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > Is anyone following the news of the Novell sale and some mysterious > 'intellectual property assets' that were transferred to a holding > company controlled by Microsoft? Oh, sheesh, here we go. Baseless speculation and the weaving on co

Re: [CentOS] Novell sale news?

e; editing complex 200+ page documents with refereces, TOCs, & indexes. I've really become a fan of OOo starting in the 3.2.x series. -- Adam Tauno Williams LPIC-1, Novell CLA <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> OpenGroupware, Cyrus IMAPd, Postfix, OpenLDAP, Samba __

[CentOS] Word Perfect [Was: Novell sale news?]

On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 22:09 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 11/22/10 9:57 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:29:12PM -0500, Michael Semcheski wrote: > >> Windows only, unfortunately. > > When did they stop publishing *nix versions? I worked > > extensively with tha

Re: [CentOS] Word Perfect [Was: Novell sale news?]

On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 11/23/2010 12:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> I have never used word processing programs for much of anything >>> serious, using vim and groff or docbook xml for most things. >> I've done lots of documents, documentation, and even some published >> a

[CentOS] LOPSA [Was: Novell sale news?]

On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 08:50 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 11/24/10 8:37 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > On 11/24/2010 02:34 PM, Toralf Lund wrote: > >>> Thats good, but how is that even remotely related to his list ? > >> It's *remotely* related in that it means someone, somewhere must have > >> s

Re: [CentOS] New list ?

On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 09:06 +1300, Spiro Harvey wrote: > I don't mean to say there aren't knowledgeable and able people here, > but I think if there was a list focused to them, then I think that > would attract more technical people who are able to help each other out > on problems higher up the f

Re: [CentOS] Any chance to get a working, current openldap srpm/rpm for centos 5.5

ction for years] and are quite current. <http://staff.telkomsa.net/packages/rhel5/openldap/i386/> <http://staff.telkomsa.net/packages/rhel5/openldap/x86_64/> -- Adam Tauno Williams LPIC-1, Novell CLA <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> Open

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

an even generate the required policies for you! It is an impressively well thought out tool and as indispensable as iptables. -- Adam Tauno Williams LPIC-1, Novell CLA <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> OpenGroupware, Cyrus IMAPd, Postfix, OpenLDAP, Samba ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] directory services and root/sudo access

On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 08:13 -0800, Iain Morris wrote: > This is perhaps a more general security question. For those of you > with a directory services installation, do you install a generic local > user with sudo access in case directory services is not available? Yes, always. > Or do you just b

[CentOS] tmpfs says "No space left on device"

I have a server where we use tmpfs as a cache for temporary files used by a web application. But occasionally this tmpfs thinks it is full when it isn't. [r...@flask-yellow tmpfs]# touch file touch: cannot touch `file': No space left on device [r...@flask-yellow tmpfs]# df -k Filesystem

Re: [CentOS] XFS or EXT3 ?

On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 14:20 +0100, Peter Kjellström wrote: > On Friday 03 December 2010 13:55:28 Keith Roberts wrote: > > There was a similar thread about which is the best FS for > > Centos. > > I'm using ext3, and wondered if XFS would be more 'data > > safe' than ext3. > 'data safe' is certainl

[CentOS] Deduplicated archives via hardlinks [Was: XFS or EXT3 ?]

On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 12:51 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/03/10 12:25 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > > Whenever anyone mentions backups, I like to plug the backuppc program > > (http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/index.html and packaged in EPEL). It > > uses compression and hardlinks all duplicate

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 13:50 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Seeing as IPV4 is near it's end of life > (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IPv4+Nearing+Final+Days.htm), > I'm curios as who know whether everyone is ready for the changeover to > IPV6? > Is anyone using it in production

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 14:13 +0100, RedShift wrote: > On 12/05/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > Seeing as IPV4 is near it's end of life > > (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3915471/IPv4+Nearing+Final+Days.htm), > > I'm curios as who know whether everyone is ready for the changeover to

Re: [CentOS] LVM change disk

On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 10:29 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/03/10 10:47 PM, muhammad panji wrote: > > Dear all, > > I have a 4,1TB Logical volume consist of four disks with size of 2TB, > > 1TB, 1TB, and 500GB. The LV currently full. I plan to change the 1Tb > > disks and 500Gb disks. I plan t

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 08:29 -0600, Todd Rinaldo wrote: > On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:27 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: > > On 05/12/10 14:21, Tom H wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, RedShift wrote: > >>> On 12/05/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > (http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 16:12 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 05/12/10 12:50, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > There are some security considerations though, related to stateless auto > configuration. Currently whichever client on a local network may start > a radvd process which will announce where the de

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 17:15 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote: > > So, spending one or two or 100s /64 subnets with public IPv6 addresses > > which is completely blocked in a firewall will serve exactly the same > > purpose as a site-local subnet. But this /64 net may get access to the > > Internet *if*

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:28 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote: > > IPv6 is not broken by design. NAT was implemented to extend the time > > until IPv4 exhaustion. A side effect was hiding the internal IPv4 > > address, which complicates a number of protocols like FTP and SIP. The > > only downside I see

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 19:26 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 12/6/10 6:27 PM, Brian Mathis wrote: > > You are enjoying a side-effect of NAT by thinking it > > is a firewall. > The other nice side-effect of NAT is that you get an effectively infinite > number > of addresses behind it without any p

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

> > 3) When I connect my IPV6 refrigerator with its automatic inventory > > system tracking every RFID-enabled carrot I use, won't I be making > > my > > shopping habits visible to all those annoying advertisers? Or, in > > other words, am I compromising my privacy? Actually, although such

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:55 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote: > David wrote: > > Folks > > I have been following the IPV6 comments. > > What concerns me with the loss of NAT are the following issues > > 3) When I connect my IPV6 refrigerator with its automatic inventory > > system tracking every RFID-e

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:11 -0500, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 05:29:09 am Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:28 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote: > > > No, the downside is that each address used will be exposed to the world. > >

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:32 -0500, Tom H wrote: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Bob McConnell wrote: > > Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > >> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:28 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote: > >>>> IPv6 is not broken by design. NAT was implemented to

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:49 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote: > > There _is_ more information leakage with ipv6, in the sense that you are > > using a real ip from an internal machine on the connection. But the > > point is that the security benefit of that is largely illusory, security > > by obscuri

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:01 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 12/7/10 9:07 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > site-local addresses are officially deprecated. > > If you want a device to only be available locally - block the traffic > > to/from that device. > So secur

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:16 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 12/7/10 9:04 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> Some people's belief that NAT is some magic sauce that makes themmore > > secure [it does not] or provides them more flexibility [it does not] > > than real addre

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 20:37 -0500, Ross Walker wrote: > On Dec 7, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Adam Tauno Williams > > wrote: > > > >> Bogus. The reason is that they haven't been pressured into adop

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 20:44 -0500, Tony Schreiner wrote: > > Does this mean I have to type in URLs like: > > http://3ffe:1900:4545:3:200:f8ff:fe21:67cf/ > > I can only image phonetically calling these off on a support call, > I'd get half way through it and the other end would tell me to "forget >

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 21:36 -0500, Ross Walker wrote: > >> I can only image phonetically calling these off on a support call, I'd > >> get half way through it and the other end would tell me to "forget it > >> I'll wait until DNS is working again". > > You aren't crippled currently when DNS doesn'

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 15:16 +, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > > I guess the reason it jars us here is because most people post properly. > Except the gmail lusers who haven't figured out how to turn off multipart > html crap. +1 Although I've found @gmail user's consider themselves

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:37 -0600, David G. Mackay wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:01 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > > Nope, ARP is gone. But it gets a replacement as a part of IPv6, instead > > of ARP being an addition to IPv4. > > > >

Re: [CentOS] Nerd rage (Was: IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?)

On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 07:46 -0800, Jerry Franz wrote: > On 12/08/2010 07:03 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > > Honestly, I had no one in mind. > > I remember in an effort to get a life outside tech, I joined a mailing > > list for something else. I hadn't realized how most people top post, > > don't tri

Re: [CentOS] IPV4 is nearly depleted, are you ready for IPV6?

On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 16:49 -0600, David G. Mackay wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:41 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:37 -0600, David G. Mackay wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:01 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > > > > Nop

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 10:11 -0500, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Thursday, December 09, 2010 12:02:44 am Robert Nichols wrote: > > On 12/07/2010 05:11 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: > > > Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > > http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/Presentations/selinux_four_things.pdf > > > I am ha

Re: [CentOS] What NAS device(s) do you use? And why?

On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 18:15 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm > referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or > home theater system. EMC AX4 SAN (iSCSI) > We've had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devi

Re: [CentOS] OT: programming language for morons (newbie friendly language in Open Source world)

On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 17:14 +0100, Sven Aluoor wrote: > Hi folks > I have more than 12 years experience with UNIX system administration, > but I am too stupid for programming. My only programming experience is > shell scripting. I tried to learn Java, but don't understand it > because it is too com

Re: [CentOS] OT: programming language for morons (newbie friendly language in Open Source world)

On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 11:53 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 17:14 +0100, Sven Aluoor wrote: > >> Hi folks > >> I have more than 12 years experience with UNIX system administration, > >> but I am too stupid

Re: [CentOS] OT: programming language for morons (newbie friendly language in Open Source world)

On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 14:49 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > On 12/13/2010 9:37 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > > On 12/13/2010 10:14 AM, Sven Aluoor wrote: > >> A friend said that C-Sharp (Mono) is very simple. Is this true? > I doubt you'll find it any less complex than Java. The two are very > similar,

Re: [CentOS] OT: programming language for morons (newbie friendly language in Open Source world)

On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 11:04 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 12/14/2010 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Yup. > > > >> yet-another-syntax for config files. But, it is somewhat hard to scale > >> and maintain because people write in different styles and things that > >> start small tend to ha

Re: [CentOS] OT: programming language for morons (newbie friendly language in Open Source world)

On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 15:33 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 12/14/2010 3:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> As to Perl.. though it still is my preferred language for getting > >> things done (mainly because I understand it that I first think out > >> problems in Perl then convert to other language

  1   2   >