On 15/07/2021 12:57, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 05:30, Toralf Lund wrote:
On 15/07/2021 09:37, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:03 PM Toralf Lund wrote:
Does anyone else run Microsoft Teams on CentOS 7?
I've used it for a while now, and it's generall
> On 15/07/2021 12:57, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 05:30, Toralf Lund wrote:
>>> On 15/07/2021 09:37, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:03 PM Toralf Lund
wrote:
> Does anyone else run Microsoft Teams on CentOS 7?
>
> I've used it
On 16/07/21 8:41 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
No, it looks for several different "libstdc++.so.6" versions, and the
"chrome" package provides them all. I just listed one of them to
illustrate the point.
I'm not sure that's true. You said your chrome package provides it all but
from what I see, it in
> On 16/07/21 8:41 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
>>> No, it looks for several different "libstdc++.so.6" versions, and the
>>> "chrome" package provides them all. I just listed one of them to
>>> illustrate the point.
>>
>> I'm not sure that's true. You said your chrome package provides it all
>> but
>>
On 16/07/21 10:19 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
I think you missed from a different post where the package was created
by a different 3rd-party, not google. So how else would you expect the
3rd-party package to satisfy the dependency?
I didn't say the chrome packages came from google. But, the TO ha
> On 16/07/21 10:19 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
>>> I think you missed from a different post where the package was created
>>> by a different 3rd-party, not google. So how else would you expect the
>>> 3rd-party package to satisfy the dependency?
>>
>> I didn't say the chrome packages came from google
On 16.07.21 12:39, Simon Matter wrote:
On 16/07/21 10:19 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
I think you missed from a different post where the package was created
by a different 3rd-party, not google. So how else would you expect the
3rd-party package to satisfy the dependency?
I didn't say the chrome p
> On 16.07.21 12:39, Simon Matter wrote:
>>> On 16/07/21 10:19 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
> I think you missed from a different post where the package was
> created
> by a different 3rd-party, not google. So how else would you expect
> the
> 3rd-party package to satisfy the depend
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ.
On 16.07.21 13:28, Simon Matter wrote:
On 16.07.21 12:39, Simon Matter wrote:
On 16/07/21 10:19 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
I think you missed from a different post where the package was
created
by a different 3rd-party, not google. So how else would you expect
the
3rd-party package to satisfy the
On 16/07/21 10:39 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
And I ask again, how else would you expect the package to satisfy the
dependency in chrome for the newer libstdc++?
And yet you still have not answered this question.
And that's where it breaks the rules! It "provides" something that it
doesn't really
> On 16/07/21 10:39 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
>>> And I ask again, how else would you expect the package to satisfy the
>>> dependency in chrome for the newer libstdc++?
>
> And yet you still have not answered this question.
Simple answer: you can NOT without breaking RPMs dependency system.
>
>> A
12 matches
Mail list logo
