*>>certbot-auto is no longer available.
*>It still getting updates
>https://github.com/certbot/certbot/blob/master/certbot-auto
>>* Forbidden\n\nForbidden\nTry opening up your page in the browser to see what's going on. You
might not setup your nginx/apache properly
>http://mydomain/.well-known/a
Hallo,
msmilter doesn t start.
Has anyone a hint for me?
I used this tutorial.
/run exists and selinux is disabled.
https://www.awsmonster.com/2020/03/how-to-install-mailscanner-stable-v521.html
Thanks for a hint.
Ralf
-- Unit msmilter.service has begun starting up.
Feb 05 15:09:14 vader2 ms
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 03:13:18PM +0100, Ralf Prengel wrote:
>
> Hallo,
> msmilter doesn t start.
> Has anyone a hint for me?
> I used this tutorial.
> /run exists and selinux is disabled.
Did you read the log output? (Also mentioned in the tutorial)
It says you need to edit a file and add a lin
In article ,
Jerry Geis wrote:
> *>>certbot-auto is no longer available.
> *>It still getting updates
> >https://github.com/certbot/certbot/blob/master/certbot-auto
> >>* Forbidden\n\nForbidden\n *>Try opening up your page in the browser to see what's going on. You
> might not setup your nginx/a
On 2/5/21 7:49 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
*>>certbot-auto is no longer available.
See https://certbot.eff.org/docs/install.html#id9 "We used to have a
shell script named certbot-auto to help people install Certbot on UNIX
operating systems, however, this script is no longer supported. If you
want
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 9:44 AM Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 2/5/21 7:49 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> > *>>certbot-auto is no longer available.
>
> See https://certbot.eff.org/docs/install.html#id9 "We used to have a
> shell script named certbot-auto to help people install Certbot on UNIX
> operating systems
On 2/4/21 1:23 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On Feb 4, 2021, at 8:39 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
I posted a pretty complete rundown on the scientific linux users mailing list,
so I won't recap it all here.
Link?
Yeah, I forgot to post the link... sorry about that. Akemi beat me to
it, so I'll not rep
Le 05/02/2021 à 17:03, Lamar Owen a écrit :
> I thought long and hard about it before posting to the CentOS lists, because I
> don't want to be perceived as advocating for a particular transition path.
I found your post highly interesting, even though I chose a different path:
https://blog.microl
On 2/5/21 11:21 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Le 05/02/2021 à 17:03, Lamar Owen a écrit :
I thought long and hard about it before posting to the CentOS lists, because I
don't want to be perceived as advocating for a particular transition path.
I found your post highly interesting, even though I cho
On 2/5/21 10:00 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I thought someone would have ran into the same issue as I was
migrating to this new way of doing things getting letsencypt working
on apache.
I did run into it, just on nginx. That's why I posted the reply.
___
C
Hi,
On Thu, 4 Feb 2021, Warren Young wrote:
On Feb 4, 2021, at 8:39 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
I posted a pretty complete rundown on the scientific linux users mailing
list, so I won't recap it all here.
Link?
the transition was not any more difficult, really, than moving from CentOS 7
to Ce
Am 05.02.21 um 17:21 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs:
Le 05/02/2021 à 17:03, Lamar Owen a écrit :
I thought long and hard about it before posting to the CentOS lists, because I
don't want to be perceived as advocating for a particular transition path.
I found your post highly interesting, even though I
On 2/5/21 11:32 AM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 4 Feb 2021, Warren Young wrote:
...
1. The package names are often different, and not always differing by an
obvious translation rule. ...
Yep!! It is a pita when trying to get things running for the first time.
I started this journey
> Am 05.02.21 um 17:21 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs:
>> Le 05/02/2021 à 17:03, Lamar Owen a écrit :
>>> I thought long and hard about it before posting to the CentOS lists,
>>> because I
>>> don't want to be perceived as advocating for a particular transition
>>> path.
>>
>> I found your post highly inte
THIS IS OT comment
On 2/5/21 11:20 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 2/5/21 11:32 AM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
Maybe I'm just weird, but I don't find naming differences to be big
differences. Like I keep telling optical astronomers, radio astronomy
is just observing at another wavelength; I get a lo
Am 05.02.21 um 18:20 schrieb Lamar Owen:
On 2/5/21 11:32 AM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 4 Feb 2021, Warren Young wrote:
...
1. The package names are often different, and not always differing by an
obvious translation rule. ...
Yep!! It is a pita when trying to get things running f
Am 05.02.21 um 18:22 schrieb Simon Matter:
Am 05.02.21 um 17:21 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs:
Le 05/02/2021 à 17:03, Lamar Owen a écrit :
I thought long and hard about it before posting to the CentOS lists,
because I
don't want to be perceived as advocating for a particular transition
path.
I found
On Feb 5, 2021, at 9:03 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>> 1. The package names are often different, and not always differing by an
>> obvious translation rule. ...
>
> I consider this to be very minor in comparison to other items.
If you’re making a wholesale transition, sure, but when you’re mainta
On 2/5/21 2:03 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On Feb 5, 2021, at 9:03 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
I consider this to be very minor in comparison to other items.
If you’re making a wholesale transition, sure, but when you’re maintaining a
mix of systems and you know what you’re trying to accomplish but ca
Hi Tony,
Thanks for the suggestion https://github.com/srvrco/getssl was not aware of
that.
I got so close... It says it loaded the certificate the files are there - I
edited /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf and set the two paths to the right file.
restrated httpd - all seemed good - but when I goto my s
>
> I did the move and also looked at several source RPMs. One thing to note
> is that by default, you'll end up with packages replaced by updated
> packages from UEK repository. I've removed the UEK repo and replaced all
> packages with the corresponding base packages. That brings you very clos
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:23:37AM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
>
> Speaking for myself only, I have no problem with anyone posting Oracle
> Linux questions, answers or solutions in this mailing list. I think
> that as time goes on, OL and Rocky Linux will start to get more
> discussion and coverage h
> On Feb 5, 2021, at 7:27 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:23:37AM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
>>
>> Speaking for myself only, I have no problem with anyone posting Oracle
>> Linux questions, answers or solutions in this mailing list. I think
>> that as time goes on, OL
On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 21:53:01 -0600
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> I agree with your sentiment, John, but the fact that folks fled is due to
> CentOS (owned by RedHat, of course) doing. And they use most logical way for
> their discussion: the CentOS refugees ask their kin in quite logical place:
> CentOS
>
>>
>> I did the move and also looked at several source RPMs. One thing to note
>> is that by default, you'll end up with packages replaced by updated
>> packages from UEK repository. I've removed the UEK repo and replaced all
>> packages with the corresponding base packages. That brings you very
25 matches
Mail list logo
