is that what you expect to find?
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0227
On 27.01.2021 08:38, Gionatan Danti wrote:
Hi all,
do you know if a fix for sudo CVE-2021-3156 is available for CentOS 6?
While CentOS 6 is now supported anymore, RedHat has it under its
payedsupport agreement (se
Hi
You can use oracle linux 6 , it is still supported (till March 2021)
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 09:38, Gionatan Danti wrote:
> Hi all,
> do you know if a fix for sudo CVE-2021-3156 is available for CentOS 6?
>
> While CentOS 6 is now supported anymore, RedHat has it under its
> payedsupport agre
> Hi
>
> You can use oracle linux 6 , it is still supported (till March 2021)
But I don't find this sudo update or the recent openssl update in their
repos? Is this for paying customers only or what?
Simon
>
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 09:38, Gionatan Danti wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> do you know if a
Il 2021-01-27 09:34 Walter H. ha scritto:
is that what you expect to find?
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0227
Yes, something similar...
Thanks.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.da...@assyoma.it - i...@assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A
I think it is just not released yet. OL6 is on support track still
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 12:33, Simon Matter wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > You can use oracle linux 6 , it is still supported (till March 2021)
>
> But I don't find this sudo update or the recent openssl update in their
> repos? Is this fo
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ.
Centos-6 compatible packages are available from the official sudo
webpage. It's a later version of sudo and I'm not sure if that will
cause problems. I've tried installing it and so-far so-good.
https://www.sudo.ws/download.html
Cheers, Christian.
On 27/01/2021 08.38, Gionatan Danti wrote:
H
Christian Anthon>
> Centos-6 compatible packages are available from the official sudo
> webpage. It's a later version of sudo and I'm not sure if that will
> cause problems. I've tried installing it and so-far so-good.
>
> https://www.sudo.ws/download.html
One minor problem - if you have sudo conf
Hi,
Is there a reason why the update is not tagged as "security"?
yum --security update sudo
...
--> sudo-1.8.23-10.el7_9.1.x86_64 from updates removed (updateinfo)
--> sudo-1.8.23-9.el7.x86_64 from @base removed (updateinfo)
No packages needed for security; 1 packages available
...
___
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:00:27AM -0800, Frank Liu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason why the update is not tagged as "security"?
>
> yum --security update sudo
> ...
> --> sudo-1.8.23-10.el7_9.1.x86_64 from updates removed (updateinfo)
> --> sudo-1.8.23-9.el7.x86_64 from @base removed (upda
I'm trying to find out how dnsmasq got on my CentOS 7 system, since I use
BIND for DNS. I'm guessing it was part of a base group that Anaconda
installs for all systems.
Red Hat has this answered on this page but the answer is only available to
subscribers. I'm guessing this kind of content wil
Here's how to find the package for a particular file:
# ls /{bin,sbin}/dns*
/bin/dnsdomainname/sbin/dnssec-coverage /sbin/dnssec-keyfromlabel
/sbin/dnssec-revoke/sbin/dnssec-verify
/sbin/dnsmasq /sbin/dnssec-dsfromkey /sbin/dnssec-keygen
/sbin/dnssec-settime
/sbin/dnssec-chec
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 15:01, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> I'm trying to find out how dnsmasq got on my CentOS 7 system, since I use
> BIND for DNS. I'm guessing it was part of a base group that Anaconda
> installs for all systems.
>
>
probably from virtualization if it is there.. but a way to check i
--On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 8:07 PM + J Martin Rushton via CentOS
wrote:
Here's how to find the package for a particular file:
That one's easy and I use this all the time:
rpm -qf full-file-name
I'm looking for how to get the yum group for a package. (I'm guessing a
package might
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 15:23, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 8:07 PM + J Martin Rushton via CentOS
> wrote:
>
> > Here's how to find the package for a particular file:
>
> That one's easy and I use this all the time:
>
> rpm -qf full-file-name
>
> I'm looking for ho
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 15:27, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 15:23, Kenneth Porter
> wrote:
>
>> --On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 8:07 PM + J Martin Rushton via
>> CentOS
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Here's how to find the package for a particular file:
>>
>> That one's easy
--On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 3:31 PM -0500 Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
or one can look for the comps file in /var/cache/yum
network-tools has dnsmasq listed as a package
repoquery says the following on my rhel box
NetworkManager-1:1.4.0-20.el7_3.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-network-0:4.5
How about using yum history to find when and why the package was installed?
yum history summary dnsmasq
yum history package-list dnsmasq
Jamie
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 20:56, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 3:31 PM -0500 Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>
> > or one can lo
--On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 11:35 PM + Jamie Burchell
wrote:
How about using yum history to find when and why the package was
installed?
yum history summary dnsmasq
yum history package-list dnsmasq
Very nice!
The oldest record of the second command:
1 | Dep-Install| dnsmasq-2
On Tue, 2021-01-19 at 17:18 +0100, Götz Reinicke wrote:
>
> Anything in the samba logs? May be SELinux/Firewall issues?
Götz,
Unfortunately, no.
The nmbd log verifies that the fileserver's samba service is the local
master browser for WORKGROUP on both eth0 and virbr0.
[2021/01/17 19:02:22.
20 matches
Mail list logo
