On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 11:42:01PM +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I too would be interested to know what happens to CentOS 8 Stream once
> focus of RedHat moves to RHEL 9? The life cycle document says the last
> release of RHEL8 will be 8.10, that's a five year road map (since point
> releases seem to
For the record, I don't think this is a good decision because it
changes what CentOS is (its "core mission" in business-speak).
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 2:07 PM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> The future of the CentOS Project is CentOS Stream, and over the next
> year we’ll be shifting focus from CentOS Linu
"Rich Bowen" wrote:
> Meanwhile, we understand many of you are deeply invested in CentOS
> Linux 7, and we'll continue to produce that version through the
> remainder of the RHEL 7 life cycle.
You say now that you'll support CentOS 7 until the end, but you also
said you'd support CentOS 8 unt
On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 17:54 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 03:15:17PM +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > "CentOS will become the developer playground"
>
> This one is categorically not the case. Even Fedora isn't a developer
> playground. Everything landing in CentOS Stream is a
Was this decision forced, despite objection, on the CentOS board by the
RedHat Liaison?
Yes or No?
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:06 AM Rich Bowen wrote:
> The future of the CentOS Project is CentOS Stream, and over the next
> year we’ll be shifting focus from CentOS Linux, the rebuild of Red Hat
>
On 12/8/20 5:29 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 6:05 PM Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 12/8/20 3:40 PM, Jim Bourne wrote:
>>> On 08/12/2020 15:48, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I promise you, to the best of my knowledge, IBM had nothing to do with
this decision. Red Hat is a d
On 12/8/20 6:18 PM, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 17:54 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 03:15:17PM +, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
>>> "CentOS will become the developer playground"
>>
>> This one is categorically not the case. Even Fedora isn't a developer
>> playgro
On 12/8/20 6:04 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> "Rich Bowen" wrote:
>
>> Meanwhile, we understand many of you are deeply invested in CentOS
>> Linux 7, and we'll continue to produce that version through the
>> remainder of the RHEL 7 life cycle.
>
> You say now that you'll support CentOS 7 unt
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 7:32 PM Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/8/20 5:29 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 6:05 PM Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/8/20 3:40 PM, Jim Bourne wrote:
> >>> On 08/12/2020 15:48, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> I promise you, to the best of my knowledg
>
> It is not the same as Rawhide is all I am saying.
>
> It is based on the current release and it is being modified for some reason.
>
> That modification can be a bugfix from a reported bug, it can be an
> enhancement for a given package or it can be a security update.
>
> Each of these upd
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:19 PM Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 17:54 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 03:15:17PM +, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> > > "CentOS will become the developer playground"
> >
> > This one is categorically not the case. Even Fedora isn't a dev
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 6:00 PM Pete Biggs wrote:
> The problem is that we won't know if it will work. When CentOS matched
> the RHEL point releases we knew that an RPM/driver targeted for RHEL
> 8.2 has a good chance of working on CentOS 8.2 - but that versioning
> match is lost with Stream. So
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, 22:58 Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/8/20 1:04 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> >> The future of the CentOS Project is CentOS Stream, and over the next
> >> year we’ll be shifting focus from CentOS Linux, the rebuild of Red Hat
> >> Enter
+++ Rainer Duffner [2020-12-08 15:42:20]:
> If your business case resolves around being able to freeload on the work of
> others, then there’s a serious problem with the business case.
That applies to IBM/RHEL too. They aren't paying for every bit of
software that is packaged in the distribution.
On 9.12.2020 0.38, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:34:54AM -0600, Christopher Wensink wrote:
Is it possible that more regressions will get through than have before?
Well, sure, some. But let's not pretend that even RHEL is ever
regression-free. It's software, after all, and ther
On 08.12.2020 15:12, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 02:54:03PM +0100, Walter H. wrote:
Yes, then the interesting question, how can I make use of these
GeoIP-features when
doing these e.g.
nslookup 200:470:17:55::1
nslookup 222.10.10.1
nslookup www.centos.org
host w
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
