Hi,
A couple of days ago, cron service stopped been running on my Centos 6.
When I try to start with "service crond start" I get this error :
"Starting /usr/sbin/crond: [-] Error 0x7a911401 in attaching to
process!"
Any ideas?
Thanks
___
CentOS mailing
Am 2019-07-25 11:12, schrieb Tarik Belaam:
Hi,
A couple of days ago, cron service stopped been running on my Centos 6.
When I try to start with "service crond start" I get this error :
"Starting /usr/sbin/crond: [-] Error 0x7a911401 in attaching to
process!"
Any ideas?
Thanks
You do not sha
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ.
Hi,
how can DNS reliability, as experienced by clients on the LAN who are
sending queries, be increased?
Would I have to set up some sort of cluster consisting of several
servers all providing DNS services which is reachable under a single
IP address known to the clients?
Just setting up sever
Am 2019-07-25 14:51, schrieb hw:
Hi,
how can DNS reliability, as experienced by clients on the LAN who are
sending queries, be increased?
Would I have to set up some sort of cluster consisting of several
servers all providing DNS services which is reachable under a single
IP address known to th
On 7/19/19 11:57 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> I was just given a Dell R720xd with 160 GB memory and 12x 900 GB drives that
> I plan to deploy as my home mail/file/backup server to replace an aging
> Supermicro server running CentOS 7. Yeah, it's gross overkill for that and I
> expect to tuck most
If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client then a master and
(possibly multiple) slave server configuration can be set up (I'm assuming ISC
DNS - their solution to redundancy/failover is master and slave servers, this
may be the way it is with all DNS). keepalived can be used f
On 7/25/19 2:53 PM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
> Am 2019-07-25 14:51, schrieb hw:
>> Hi,
>>
>> how can DNS reliability, as experienced by clients on the LAN who are
>> sending queries, be increased?
>>
>> Would I have to set up some sort of cluster consisting of several
>> servers all providing
Hello,
I want to test bachefs file system on CentOS 7.
~$ cat /etc/system-release
CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)
I'm following the bcachefs howto: https://bcachefs.org/Howto/.
Having a problem trying to complete make && make install of the bcache-tools.
After going through all the depen
Am 2019-07-25 15:41, schrieb hw:
On 7/25/19 2:53 PM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
Am 2019-07-25 14:51, schrieb hw:
Hi,
how can DNS reliability, as experienced by clients on the LAN who are
sending queries, be increased?
Would I have to set up some sort of cluster consisting of several
server
On 25/07/2019 13:51, hw wrote:
Hi,
how can DNS reliability, as experienced by clients on the LAN who are
sending queries, be increased?
Would I have to set up some sort of cluster consisting of several
servers all providing DNS services which is reachable under a single
IP address known to th
On 7/25/19 3:48 PM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
> Am 2019-07-25 15:41, schrieb hw:
>> On 7/25/19 2:53 PM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
>>> Am 2019-07-25 14:51, schrieb hw:
Hi,
how can DNS reliability, as experienced by clients on the LAN who are
sending queries, be increased?
You could try to get this slightly old rpm, save you the build troubles
(untested):
http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/repositories/home:/garloff:/storage/RHEL_7/x86_64/
Bare in mind there is no support in the stock kernel for bcachefs
(afaik), you might have better luck with the elrepo kernel-m
I'm about to do an overhaul of the DNS service at work and my plan is to
use powerdns recursor + dnsdist + keepalived.
---
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
On 2019-07-25 14:28, Leroy Tennison wrote:
If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client then a
master a
On 7/25/19 6:48 AM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
> Am 2019-07-25 15:41, schrieb hw:
>> On 7/25/19 2:53 PM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
>>> Am 2019-07-25 14:51, schrieb hw:
Hi,
how can DNS reliability, as experienced by clients on the LAN who are
sending queries, be increased?
On 7/25/19 8:14 AM, Nataraj wrote:
> On 7/25/19 6:48 AM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
>> Am 2019-07-25 15:41, schrieb hw:
>>> On 7/25/19 2:53 PM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
Am 2019-07-25 14:51, schrieb hw:
> Hi,
>
> how can DNS reliability, as experienced by clients on the LAN
On 7/25/19 3:28 PM, Leroy Tennison wrote:
> If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client
I'm ok with them, only the problem is that the clients take their timeouts
when a server is unreachable, and users panic.
> then a master and (possibly multiple) slave server configuration can
On 7/25/19 4:49 PM, Nux! wrote:
> I'm about to do an overhaul of the DNS service at work and my plan is to use
> powerdns recursor + dnsdist + keepalived.
I've more or less done the overhaul, only some sort of failover thing
is missing ... I'll check those out, thanks!
__
On 7/25/19 4:07 PM, Giles Coochey wrote:
>
> On 25/07/2019 13:51, hw wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> how can DNS reliability, as experienced by clients on the LAN who are
>> sending queries, be increased?
>>
>> Would I have to set up some sort of cluster consisting of several
>> servers all providing DNS serv
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, hw wrote:
On 7/25/19 3:28 PM, Leroy Tennison wrote:
If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client
I'm ok with them, only the problem is that the clients take their timeouts
when a server is unreachable, and users panic.
On Linux systems, you can set the ti
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:00 AM Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, hw wrote:
>
> > On 7/25/19 3:28 PM, Leroy Tennison wrote:
> >> If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client
> >
> > I'm ok with them, only the problem is that the clients take their
> timeouts
> > when a s
> Am 25.07.2019 um 19:58 schrieb Paul Heinlein :
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, hw wrote:
>
>> On 7/25/19 3:28 PM, Leroy Tennison wrote:
>>> If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client
>>
>> I'm ok with them, only the problem is that the clients take their timeouts
>> when a server i
hw wrote:
> On 7/25/19 4:07 PM, Giles Coochey wrote:
>> Sounds like you're performing maintenance on your servers
>>
>>
>> (a) too often
>> (b) during office / peak hours
>>
>
> I can't help it when the primary name server goes down because the UPS
> fails the self test and tells the server it has
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:32 AM hw wrote:
> I can't help it when the primary name server goes down because the UPS
> fails
> the self test and tells the server it has 2 minutes or so left in wich case
> the server figures it needs to shut down. I wanted better UPSs ...
>
critical infrastructur
On 7/25/19 5:14 PM, Nataraj wrote:
On 7/25/19 6:48 AM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
Am 2019-07-25 15:41, schrieb hw:
On 7/25/19 2:53 PM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
Am 2019-07-25 14:51, schrieb hw:
Hi,
how can DNS reliability, as experienced by clients on the LAN who are
sending queries,
John Pierce wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:32 AM hw wrote:
>
>> I can't help it when the primary name server goes down because the UPS
>> fails the self test and tells the server it has 2 minutes or so left in
>> wich case the server figures it needs to shut down. I wanted better
>> UPSs ...
On 7/25/19 7:58 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, hw wrote:
On 7/25/19 3:28 PM, Leroy Tennison wrote:
If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client
I'm ok with them, only the problem is that the clients take their
timeouts
when a server is unreachable, and users p
On 7/25/19 9:11 PM, mark wrote:
hw wrote:
On 7/25/19 4:07 PM, Giles Coochey wrote:
Sounds like you're performing maintenance on your servers
(a) too often
(b) during office / peak hours
I can't help it when the primary name server goes down because the UPS
fails the self test and tells t
On 7/25/19 9:39 PM, John Pierce wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:32 AM hw wrote:
I can't help it when the primary name server goes down because the UPS
fails
the self test and tells the server it has 2 minutes or so left in wich case
the server figures it needs to shut down. I wanted better
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, hw wrote:
On Linux systems, you can set the timeout in /etc/resolv.conf, e.g.,
# I think the default nameserver timeout is 5; use rotate
# option if you prefer round-robin queries rather than
# always using the first-listed first
nameserver 10.11.12.13 timeout:2 rotate
On 7/25/19 7:10 PM, Nataraj wrote:
[...]
I meant to say:
Configure all dns servers as secondary/slaves (one should be the primary
master) for your own domains. Thos means that all of your servers are
authoritative for your own domains, so they cannot fail on local dns lookups
due to Interne
On 25/07/2019 20:39, John Pierce wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:32 AM hw wrote:
I can't help it when the primary name server goes down because the UPS
fails
the self test and tells the server it has 2 minutes or so left in wich case
the server figures it needs to shut down. I wanted bett
On 25/07/2019 22:17, Giles Coochey wrote:
Separate DNS servers must be on a different subnet according to
RFC2182 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2182):
Secondary servers must be placed at both topologically and
geographically dispersed locations on the Internet, to minimise the
likeli
On 7/25/19 1:10 PM, hw wrote:
>>
>> Configure all dns servers as primary slaves (plus 1 primary master) for
>> your own domains. I have never seen problems with resolution of local
>> dns domains when the Internet was down.
>
> It seemed to have to do with the TTL for the local names being too
> s
On 7/25/19 4:31 PM, Nataraj wrote:
> It doesn't really help those clients I can not run name servers on,
> though.
Another alternative is to look at the multicast dns (mdns) protocol. I
have no experience with it, so I can't say very much, but I know it
exists. I'm pretty sure it's inplemented i
Has anyone used fastboot together with the Google Pixel 3a/3a XL phone? I
cannot get it to be recognized and wonder if the version of fastboot available
for Centos 7 may not be recent enough? It does work with older phones I have so
the setup should be correct.
_
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:45 AM Nux! wrote:
>
> You could try to get this slightly old rpm, save you the build troubles
> (untested):
> http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/repositories/home:/garloff:/storage/RHEL_7/x86_64/
Thanks I may go back to this repo if I can't get it done with more
current p
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:20 AM Chris Schanzle wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> You say (twice) all the dependencies are installed but you didn't say
> specifically what you installed. I suspect you didn't install the
> corresponding -devel packages which provide the files you need for
> compiling/link
38 matches
Mail list logo
