Re: [CentOS] Mate on Centos 7

2019-07-16 Thread H
On July 15, 2019 10:27:43 AM EDT, n...@li.nux.ro wrote: >There are loads of us, most are just happy with the current version. > > >On 2019-07-15 15:22, H wrote: >> On July 15, 2019 8:21:10 AM EDT, Jonathan Billings >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 07:27:46AM -0400, H wrote: What is the

Re: [CentOS] RHSA-2019:1150 rh-ruby24-ruby not fixed?

2019-07-16 Thread Sebastian Schubert
Hi there, it seems that this packages still not has been rebuilt yet - any plans for rebuilding or is sclo out of scope :-/ Am 25.06.19 um 09:38 schrieb Sebastian Schubert: > Hi there, > > it seems like the rh-ruby24-ruby sclo has not been rebuilt yet :-? > > https://access.redhat.com/errata/RH

[CentOS] RedHat SCL. Who maintains rh-php72?

2019-07-16 Thread rainer
Hi, I realized this still uses php 7.2.10, while 7.2.20 was released almost two weeks ago. How are these packages updated? Who does that? Any idea how to get the update in? Regards Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists

Re: [CentOS] RedHat SCL. Who maintains rh-php72?

2019-07-16 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS
Am 16.07.2019 um 11:41 schrieb rai...@ultra-secure.de: > > Hi, > > I realized this still uses php 7.2.10, while 7.2.20 was released almost two > weeks ago. > > How are these packages updated? Who does that? > > Any idea how to get the update in? > https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/upd

[CentOS] Question on screen capture from command line

2019-07-16 Thread Jerry Geis
I am trying to get the screen capture to work from command line (remotely). I am getting the wrong screen shot. This is what xrandr is giving me... xrandr --query Screen 0: minimum 8 x 8, current 1920 x 1080, maximum 32767 x 32767 DP1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) DP2 di

Re: [CentOS] Mate on Centos 7

2019-07-16 Thread isdtor
> > Can I really be the only user of Mate on Centos 7?? > > No, definitely not. I use MATE on C7, because Gnome is, how do I > say this politely..., um, horrible. Not a KDE fan either. > > Gnome-2.x wasn't broken, didn't need to be thrown away and > replaced by something completely different.

[CentOS] cron.allow.local

2019-07-16 Thread mark
It worked on C 6, but on a C 7 box, I've restarted crond, and cron.allow doesn't have what's in cron.allw.local. What am I missing, folks? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] cron.allow.local

2019-07-16 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 16:42, mark wrote: > It worked on C 6, but on a C 7 box, I've restarted crond, and cron.allow > doesn't have what's in cron.allw.local. What am I missing, folks? > > I don't know. I looked in the default CentOS 6 cronie package which would meld these together on a restart.