On Jul 1, 2019, at 9:44 AM, mark wrote:
>
> it was on Ubuntu, but that shouldn't make a difference, I would think
Indeed not. It’s been years since the OS you were using implied a large set of
OS-specific ZFS features.
There are still differences among the implementations, but the number of t
Hallo,
I need the device eth0 for one tool using centos 7.6.
Using this tutorial
https://www.certdepot.net/rhel7-restore-old-network-interface-name/
doesn t work.
Thanks for a hint.
Ralf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.ce
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ.
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 11:56:03AM +0200, Ralf Prengel wrote:
> I need the device eth0 for one tool using centos 7.6.
> Using this tutorial
> https://www.certdepot.net/rhel7-restore-old-network-interface-name/ doesn t
> work.
This Red Hat documentation explains how the naming works:
https://acces
Does Anyone with a RedHat subscription able to give a hint as to what
the solution to the following knowledgebase article is:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2801051
I'm having a similar issue with an SFP on a Centos host, and am
searching for a way to view Optical RX/TX Power on the SFP.
This is kinda of why it makes sense to purchase at least one license.
I would start with a loop back test on both ends. Dirty ports happen.
Did you grab the most recent version of ethtool and build it?
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS On Behalf Of Giles Coochey
> Sent: Tuesday, July
Their "resolution" is: Update to RHEL 7 to get the more recent ethtool
output format.
You should be able to build a newer ethtool from source (or depending on
your NIC manufacturer, they may supply a tool with more recent features.
Solarflare, for example, provides 'sfctool', basically new ethtool
On 02/07/2019 14:35, Scott Silverman wrote:
Their "resolution" is: Update to RHEL 7 to get the more recent ethtool
output format.
You should be able to build a newer ethtool from source (or depending on
your NIC manufacturer, they may supply a tool with more recent features.
Solarflare, for ex
On 02/07/2019 14:28, Jason Pyeron wrote:
This is kinda of why it makes sense to purchase at least one license.
I would start with a loop back test on both ends. Dirty ports happen.
Did you grab the most recent version of ethtool and build it?
OK, so this is a third party product that is built
On 7/2/19 6:18 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
Does Anyone with a RedHat subscription able to give a hint as to what
the solution to the following knowledgebase article is:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2801051
You only need a Red Hat account, not subscription. I can read it after
logging in my
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:28 AM Jason Pyeron wrote:
> This is kinda of why it makes sense to purchase at least one license.
>
Red Hat does now offer free developer subscriptions which includes access
to the Red hat Customer Portal. You officially need a business or
enterprise email address, which
Might look into 70-persistent-net.rules in addition to the article below (do
your web research for that and CentOS 7), it's a file you probably have to
create (not necessarily auto-generated as some documentation says) under
/etc/udev/rules.d. There have been two known formats for that file and
Hi folks,
AFAIK CentOS uses RedHat's source RPMs for building the next CentOS
release. I am not sure about the bootstrap procedure and the infra-
structure packages, so lets put these corner cases aside.
RedHat's "regular" binary and source packages are based on open source
(GPL2, GPL3, Apache l
13 matches
Mail list logo
