Re: [CentOS] determining what depends on a rpm

2018-12-17 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS
> Am 16.12.2018 um 00:07 schrieb Gordon Messmer : > > On 12/15/18 1:05 PM, Frank Cox wrote: >> Ultimately it would be very useful to have some kind of a tool that would >> generate a report from the rpms installed on a system and tell you exactly >> what depends on what else. Among other thin

Re: [CentOS] determining what depends on a rpm

2018-12-17 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 12/17/18 3:50 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: or this one :-) rpm -ev --test PACKAGENAME will list all packages that require PACKAGENAME True.  I considered that, and then decided that I could never recommend using "rpm -e" as a test, even with the --test flag, due to the risk of oper

Re: [CentOS] determining what depends on a rpm

2018-12-17 Thread Simon Matter
> On 12/17/18 3:50 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >> >> or this one :-) >> rpm -ev --test PACKAGENAME >> will list all packages that require PACKAGENAME > > > True.  I considered that, and then decided that I could never recommend > using "rpm -e" as a test, even with the --test flag, due to th

[CentOS] qemu-kvm-common-ev-2.12.0-18.el7_6.1.1.x86_64 - lost KVM guests - qemu-kvm-ev

2018-12-17 Thread lejeczek via CentOS
hi guys, I updated to qemu-kvm-common-ev-2.12.0-18.el7_6.1.1.x86_64 (also libvirt) and my Centos 6.10 kvm guests now do not start. Funnily enough Win10 guest are fine, only Centoses cannot start, silently & without any errors. Any care to comment? many thanks, L. _

Re: [CentOS] A question about why the function "recv" return 0

2018-12-17 Thread Fred Smith
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 01:30:14PM +0800, yf chu wrote: > I am a website developer. We deploy a Nginx server on centos to provide HTTP > services. Recently, some customers of our website were complaining about that > occasionally they could not open the webpage, the web browser show that the >

Re: [CentOS] qemu-kvm-common-ev-2.12.0-18.el7_6.1.1.x86_64 - lost KVM guests - qemu-kvm-ev

2018-12-17 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 05:50:44PM +, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > I updated to qemu-kvm-common-ev-2.12.0-18.el7_6.1.1.x86_64 (also libvirt) > and my Centos 6.10 kvm guests now do not start. > > Funnily enough Win10 guest are fine, only Centoses cannot start, silently & > without any errors. >

Re: [CentOS] qemu-kvm-common-ev-2.12.0-18.el7_6.1.1.x86_64 - lost KVM guests - qemu-kvm-ev

2018-12-17 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 01:52:40PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 05:50:44PM +, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > > I updated to qemu-kvm-common-ev-2.12.0-18.el7_6.1.1.x86_64 (also libvirt) > > and my Centos 6.10 kvm guests now do not start. > > > > Funnily enough Win10

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected with Watchbog malware

2018-12-17 Thread Kaushal Shriyan
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:11 PM Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to find out how the CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected with > malware? > Currently i am referring to > http://sudhakarbellamkonda.blogspot.com/2018/11/blocking-watchbog-malwareransomware.html > to carry out the below

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected with Watchbog malware

2018-12-17 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:02:23AM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > Checking in again if anyone can pitch in for my earlier email to this > mailing list. Thanks in Advance. Wipe your system and reload it from clean backups. Change all your passwords and SSH keys. Check every other host you've eve

Re: [CentOS] determining what depends on a rpm

2018-12-17 Thread Phil Perry
On 17/12/2018 17:24, Simon Matter wrote: On 12/17/18 3:50 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: or this one :-) rpm -ev --test PACKAGENAME will list all packages that require PACKAGENAME True.  I considered that, and then decided that I could never recommend using "rpm -e" as a test, even with

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected with Watchbog malware

2018-12-17 Thread Mauricio Tavares
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 12:40 PM Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there a way to find out how the CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected with > malware? > Currently i am referring to > http://sudhakarbellamkonda.blogspot.com/2018/11/blocking-watchbog-malwareransomware.html > to carry out the below

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected with Watchbog malware

2018-12-17 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On 12/17/18 2:57 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 12:40 PM Kaushal Shriyan wrote: Hi, Is there a way to find out how the CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected with malware? Currently i am referring to http://sudhakarbellamkonda.blogspot.com/2018/11/blocking-watchbog-malwarer

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected with Watchbog malware

2018-12-17 Thread Pete Biggs
> Is there a way to find out how the CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected with > malware? > Currently i am referring to > http://sudhakarbellamkonda.blogspot.com/2018/11/blocking-watchbog-malwareransomware.html > to carry out the below steps and is done manually. > > 1)rm -fr /tmp/*timesyncc.servic

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected with Watchbog malware

2018-12-17 Thread peter.winterflood
On 17 December 2018 9:58:03 p.m. "Pete Biggs" wrote: Is there a way to find out how the CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected with malware? Currently i am referring to http://sudhakarbellamkonda.blogspot.com/2018/11/blocking-watchbog-malwareransomware.html to carry out the below steps and is do

Re: [CentOS] A question about why the function "recv" return 0

2018-12-17 Thread yf chu
I have used tcpdump to capture the data packets and found that after the ssl handshake, the client side reset the tcp connection. Is there any method to pinpoint the culprit who drops the tcp connection? At 2018-12-18 01:58:36, "Fred Smith" wrote: >On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 01:30:14PM +0800

[CentOS] Spamassassin + Postfix : delete spam mail on the server ?

2018-12-17 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Hi, My mail server is running on CentOS 7 with Postfix, Dovecot and Spamassassin. I get quite a lot of spam on a few accounts, and Spamassassin does its job fine. Spam mail is identified correctly, and it looks like there are no false positives, e. g. valid mail is never identified as spam. When