>
> On Sun, October 28, 2018 6:07 pm, mark wrote:
>> On 10/28/18 17:54, Zube wrote:
>>> On Sun Oct 28 10:20:31 PM, Alain péan wrote:
>>>
Le 28/10/2018 à 22:10, Albert McCann a écrit :
> Damn, this is bad enough to make one weep.
Red Hat would stay as a distinct entity inside
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 23:23, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
> 2. Does anybody still remember OS/2 which lost userbase to MS Windows for
> workgroups, but IBM still supported it for quite long period of time. And
> OS/2 was much better IMHO.
>
>
As a long-time OS/2 user, I do remember, and damn what a m
Hi,
I have a setup problem with cups on my CentOS7 laptop.
In client.conf If have set the cups server FDQN used at work
ServerName servprint.lmy.lab.fr
But when I'm at home if I do not comment this line with:
# ServerName servprint.lmy.lab.fr
cups freeze as soon as I try to print something
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Patrick Bégou wrote:
Any idea ?
I don't see that this is a bug.
In client.conf you're telling it which server to use, exclusively. You're not
adding remote printers, you're telling it which CUPS server to talk to
everytime you use CUPS clients commands. You don't even n
Hi John
thanks for your quick reply. If it is not a bug, as I was reading on the
web, it is some misunderstanding from me.
Running cups 1.4.2 (CentOS6) I was using the "BrowsePoll" directive in
cupsd.conf. So the printers were automatically known from the central
server of the lab. And home printe
Hi,
John tries to tell you:
Revert your configuration changes to the config file and use the local
web interface / lp* / GUI Print Server Configuration tool to setup all
printers at work and / or at home using these tools.
This method needs a local cups instance that works if your OS is
running (
Hi Lange,
thanks for these links. Following John reply I goes back and deeper in
looking for documentation. Using the web interface is not an option as I
have many laptops to set up and they are all automatically
(re)installable from a PXE boot + kickstart in case of trouble. So all
must be setup
Hi,
this puzzles me: On one of our developer workstations, all ports with
the exception of SSH are closed:
$ firewall-cmd --list-all
public (active)
target: default
icmp-block-inversion: no
interfaces: eno1
sources:
services: ssh dhcpv6-client
ports: 22/tcp
protocols:
masquerad
Am 29.10.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Frank Thommen:
PostgreSQL is running in a docker container:
$ docker ps
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND
CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
6f11fc41d2f0 postgres "docker-entrypo
On 10/29/18 1:55 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
To me it seems like, if they are smart, they will try to push IBM POWER
and RedHat Linux together to establish real competition in the hardware
market again (and of course don't forget to keep Fedora/CentOS alive)!
Er, RHEL has been running on Power for
On 2018-10-29, Frank Thommen wrote:
>
> PostgreSQL is running in a docker container:
>
> $ docker ps
> CONTAINER IDIMAGE COMMAND
>CREATED STATUS PORTSNAMES
> 6f11fc41d2f0postgres "docker-entr
> On 10/29/18 1:55 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
>> To me it seems like, if they are smart, they will try to push IBM POWER
>> and RedHat Linux together to establish real competition in the hardware
>> market again (and of course don't forget to keep Fedora/CentOS alive)!
>
> Er, RHEL has been running on
12 matches
Mail list logo
